37 research outputs found
Contextual layers of service experience in professional business services
Abstract
Purpose: This study provides us with new knowledge in the form of conceptual framework of the contextual layers of service experience within professional business services. This study aims to answer the following questions: What kinds of contextual layers can be identified influencing service experience? How specific characteristics of professional service context may influence customer experience at these different layers?
Design/methodology/approach: The framework is based on extensive literature review considering research in the fields of service and relationship perspectives, likewise professional services.
Findings: The framework is based on extensive literature review in the fields of service and relationship perspectives, likewise professional services.
Originality/value: Only a limited number of studies seem to address the highly topical context of professional/knowledge-intensive business services and relationships. The authors tie the discussion concerning different contextual layers of service experience to this specific operating context with the aim of identifying their importance and influence in service experience. Related to this context, this study highlights the importance of understanding role of individuals in service experience, rarely emphasized in B2B dyadic setting. The framework also contributes to current discussion regarding service experience and âzooms inâ to the context and its detailed levels
Quality of work and quality of life of service sector workers. Cross-national variations in eight European countries
Quality of Work and Quality of Life of Service Sector Workers. Cross-National Variations in Eight European Countries
Quality of Work and Quality of Life of Service Sector Workers. Cross-National Variations in Eight European Countries
Quality of Work and Quality of Life of Service Sector Workers. Cross-National Variations in Eight European Countries
Absorptive capacity and network orchestration in innovation communities â promoting service innovation
The transfer of organisational practices: a diachronic perspective
Extensive research has been undertaken on the transfer of organizational practices by multinational firms (e.g. Morgan, Kristensen and Whitley 2001; Ferner, Quintanilla, and SĂĄnchez-Runde 2006). However, little investigation has assessed the role that time plays in this process. The commonplace theoretical assumption is that as their overseas subsidiaries become more embedded in the local environment they increasingly take on the practices that prevail locally (Rosenzweig and Nohria 1994; Farley, Hoenig and Yang 2004). There have, though, been few longitudinal studies that would allow the veracity of this assumption or its implications to be assessed; most studies provide one-off, synchronic âsnapshotsâ of organizations. Drawing upon research conducted at a UK-owned retail firm in China between 1999 and 2005, this paper provides a diachronic perspective that can trace emergent trends. Data are derived from mixed methods: 140 interviews with expatriate managers and local staff from all levels of the hierarchy, a three month period of ethnographic research and a total of 305 survey questionnaires. Comparison between findings from the more recent research and those based upon the earlier research suggests that time does play a role in affecting transplanted organizational practices. We report that in some respects the organizational practices of the firm in question increasingly took on more of the âcolourâ of those that prevailed in the host environment. However, convergence with local practices was far from total, some practices bear increasing resemblance to the firm's parent country operation. We also caution that it is difficult to disentangle the isomorphic influence of the passage of time from factors such as the rapid withdrawal of expatriate managers from the operational level and the impact of the firm's rapid expansion across China. Moreover, we suggest that the localâglobal dichotomy, upon which much of the convergenceâdivergence debate rests, is perhaps increasingly problematic