Characteristics of pncA mutations in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Taiwan

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Pyrazinamide (PZA) is an important first-line drug in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDRTB) treatment. However, the unreliable results obtained from traditional susceptibility testing limits its usefulness in clinical settings. The detection of <it>pncA </it>gene mutations is a potential surrogate of PZA susceptibility testing, especially in MDRTB isolates. The impact of genotypes of <it>M. tuberculosis </it>in <it>pncA </it>gene mutations also remains to be clarified.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>MDRTB isolates were collected from six hospitals in Taiwan from January 2007 to December 2009. <it>pncA </it>gene sequencing, pyrazinamidase activity testing, and spoligotyping were performed on all of the isolates. PZA susceptibility was determined by the BACTEC MGIT 960 PZA method. The sensitivity and specificity of <it>pncA </it>gene analysis were estimated based on the results of PZA susceptibility testing.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 66 MDRTB isolates, including 37 Beijing and 29 non-Beijing strains, were included for analysis. Among these isolates, 36 (54.5%) were PZA-resistant and 30 (45.5%) were PZA-susceptible. The PZA-resistant isolates were more likely to have concomitant resistance to ethambutol and streptomycin. Thirty-seven mutation types out of 30 isolates were identified in the <it>pncA </it>gene, and most of them were point mutations. The sensitivities of <it>pncA </it>gene sequencing for PZA susceptibility in overall isolates, Beijing and non-Beijing strains were 80.6%, 76.2%, and 86.7% respectively, and the specificities were 96.7%, 93.8%, and 100% respectively.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>More than half of the MDRTB isolates in this study are PZA-resistant. Analysis of <it>pncA </it>gene mutations helped to identify PZA-susceptible MDRTB isolates, especially in non-Beijing strains.</p

Resistência primária e adquirida à pirazinamida em pacientes com tuberculose pulmonar atendidos em um hospital de referência no Recife Primary and acquired pyrazinamide resistance in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis treated at a referral hospital in the city of Recife, Brazil

OBJETIVO: Verificar a resistência primária e adquirida à pirazinamida em cepas de Mycobacterium tuberculosis provenientes de amostras de escarro de pacientes com tuberculose pulmonar. MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo e descritivo realizado no período entre abril e novembro de 2011 em um hospital de referência para o tratamento de tuberculose em Recife (PE). Culturas, testes de sensibilidade a fármacos e testes da pirazinamidase foram realizados em um laboratório particular na mesma cidade. RESULTADOS: Dos 71 pacientes incluídos no estudo, 37 eram virgens de tratamento e 34 eram casos de retratamento. Desses, 0 (0,0%) e 14 (41,2%), respectivamente, apresentaram cepas resistentes à pirazinamida. Desses 14 isolados, 10 (90,9%) apresentaram resultados negativos no teste da pirazinamidase. Dos 60 isolados que apresentaram resultados positivos para o teste da pirazinamidase, 56 (93,3%) eram sensíveis à pirazinamida. CONCLUSÕES: A elevada frequência de cepas resistentes à pirazinamida em pacientes em retratamento da tuberculose destaca a necessidade da realização de testes de sensibilidade à pirazinamida antes de se escolher um novo esquema de tratamento.<br>OBJECTIVE: To determine primary and acquired resistance to pyrazinamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated in sputum samples from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. METHODS: This was a prospective, descriptive study conducted between April and November of 2011 at a referral hospital for tuberculosis in the city of Recife, Brazil. Cultures, drug sensitivity tests, and tests of pyrazinamidase activity were conducted in a private laboratory in Recife. RESULTS: Of the 71 patients included in the study, 37 were treatment-naïve and 34 represented cases of retreatment. Pyrazinamide-resistant strains were isolated in 14 (41.2%) of the 34 patients who had previously been treated for tuberculosis and in none of the 37 treatment-naïve patients. Of the 14 isolates, 10 (90.9%) tested negative for pyrazinamidase activity. A total of 60 isolates tested positive for pyrazinamidase activity. Of those, 56 (93.3%) were found to be sensitive to pyrazinamide. CONCLUSIONS: The high frequency of pyrazinamide-resistant strains (41.2%) in patients previously treated for tuberculosis highlights the need for drug susceptibility testing prior to the adoption of a new treatment regimen

‘Z S

Indispensable for shortening treatment of drug-susceptible tuberculosis (TB), pyrazinamide (PZA, Z) is also essential in the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB. While resistance to PZA in MDR-TB is associated with poor treatment outcome, bacillary susceptibility to PZA along with the use of fluoroquinolone (FQ) and second-line injectable drugs (SLIDs) may predict improved treatment success in MDR-TB. Despite a high prevalence of PZA resistance among MDR-TB patients (10%–85%), PZA susceptibility testing is seldom performed because of technical challenges. To improve treatment of MDR-TB, we propose to: (i) classify MDR-TB into PZA-susceptible MDR-TB (Z(S)-MDR-TB) and PZA-resistant MDR-TB (Z(R)-MDR-TB); (ii) use molecular tests such as DNA sequencing (pncA, gyrA, rrs, etc.) to rapidly identify Z(S)-MDR-TB versus Z(R)-MDR-TB and susceptibility profile for FQ and SLID; (iii) refrain from using PZA in Z(R)-MDR-TB; and (iv) explore the feasibility of shortening the treatment duration of Z(S)-MDR-TB with a regimen comprising PZA plus at least two bactericidal agents especially new agents like TMC207 or PA-824 or delamanid which the bacilli are susceptible to, with one or two other agents. These measures may potentially shorten therapy, save costs, and reduce side effects of MDR-TB treatment