301,444 research outputs found

    JJ-pairing interaction, number of states, and nine-jj sum rules of four identical particles

    Full text link
    In this paper we study JJ-pairing Hamiltonian and find that the sum of eigenvalues of spin II states equals sum of norm matrix elements within the pair basis for four identical particles such as four fermions in a single-jj shell or four bosons with spin ll. We relate number of states to sum rules of nine-jj coefficients. We obtained sum rules for nine-jj coefficients and and summing over (1) even JJ and KK, (2) even JJ and odd KK, (3) odd JJ and odd KK, and (4) both even and odd J,KJ,K, where jj is a half integer and ll is an integer.Comment: 6 pages, no figure, updated version, to be published. Physical Review C, in pres

    Formation mechanisms and phase stability of solid-state grown cspbi3 perovskites

    Get PDF
    CsPbI3 inorganic perovskite is synthesized by a solvent-free, solid-state reaction, and its structural and optical properties can be deeply investigated using a multi-technique approach. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Raman measurements, optical absorption, steady-time and time-resolved luminescence, as well as High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM) imaging, were exploited to understand phase evolution as a function of synthesis time length. Nanoparticles with multiple, well-defined crystalline domains of different crystalline phases were observed, usually surrounded by a thin, amorphous/out-of-axis shell. By increasing the synthesis time length, in addition to the pure α phase, which was rapidly converted into the δ phase at room temperature, a secondary phase, Cs4PbI6, was observed, together with the 715 nm-emitting γ phase

    Two-point correlation function with pion in QCD sum rules

    Get PDF
    Within the framework of the conventional QCD sum rules, we study the pion two-point correlation function, id4xeiqx<0TJN(x)JˉN(0)π(p)>i\int d^4x e^{iq\cdot x} < 0| T J_N(x) {\bar J}_N(0)|\pi(p)>, beyond the soft-pion limit. We construct sum rules from the three distinct Dirac structures, i \gamma_5 \notp, i \gamma_5, \gamma_5 \sigma_{\mu \nu} {q^\mu p^\nu} and study the reliability of each sum rule. The sum rule from the third structure is found to be insensitive to the continuum threshold, SπS_\pi, and contains relatively small contribution from the undetermined single pole which we denote as bb. The sum rule from the iγ5i \gamma_5 structure is very different even though it contains similar contributions from SπS_\pi and bb as the ones coming from the γ5σμνqμpν\gamma_5 \sigma_{\mu \nu} {q^\mu p^\nu} structure. On the other hand, the sum rule from the i \gamma_5 \notp structure has strong dependence on both SπS_\pi and bb, which is clearly in constrast with the sum rule for γ5σμνqμpν\gamma_5 \sigma_{\mu \nu} {q^\mu p^\nu}. We identify the source of the sensitivity for each of the sum rules by making specific models for higher resonance contributions and discuss the implication.Comment: slightly revised. version accepted for publication in Physical Review

    Negative and Nonlinear Response in an Exactly Solved Dynamical Model of Particle Transport

    Full text link
    We consider a simple model of particle transport on the line defined by a dynamical map F satisfying F(x+1) = 1 + F(x) for all x in R and F(x) = ax + b for |x| < 0.5. Its two parameters a (`slope') and b (`bias') are respectively symmetric and antisymmetric under reflection x -> R(x) = -x. Restricting ourselves to the chaotic regime |a| > 1 and therein mainly to the part a>1 we study not only the `diffusion coefficient' D(a,b), but also the `current' J(a,b). An important tool for such a study are the exact expressions for J and D as obtained recently by one of the authors. These expressions allow for a quite efficient numerical implementation, which is important, because the functions encountered typically have a fractal character. The main results are presented in several plots of these functions J(a,b) and D(a,b) and in an over-all `chart' displaying, in the parameter plane, all possibly relevant information on the system including, e.g., the dynamical phase diagram as well as invariants such as the values of topological invariants (kneading numbers) which, according to the formulas, determine the singularity structure of J and D. Our most significant findings are: 1) `Nonlinear Response': The parameter dependence of these transport properties is, throughout the `ergodic' part of the parameter plane (i.e. outside the infinitely many Arnol'd tongues) fractally nonlinear. 2) `Negative Response': Inside certain regions with an apparently fractal boundary the current J and the bias b have opposite signs.Comment: corrected typos and minor reformulations; 28 pages (revtex) with 7 figures (postscript); accepted for publication in JS

    Chebyshev Series Expansion of Inverse Polynomials

    Get PDF
    An inverse polynomial has a Chebyshev series expansion 1/\sum(j=0..k)b_j*T_j(x)=\sum'(n=0..oo) a_n*T_n(x) if the polynomial has no roots in [-1,1]. If the inverse polynomial is decomposed into partial fractions, the a_n are linear combinations of simple functions of the polynomial roots. If the first k of the coefficients a_n are known, the others become linear combinations of these with expansion coefficients derived recursively from the b_j's. On a closely related theme, finding a polynomial with minimum relative error towards a given f(x) is approximately equivalent to finding the b_j in f(x)/sum_(j=0..k)b_j*T_j(x)=1+sum_(n=k+1..oo) a_n*T_n(x), and may be handled with a Newton method providing the Chebyshev expansion of f(x) is known.Comment: LaTeX2e, 24 pages, 1 PostScript figure. More references. Corrected typos in (1.1), (3.4), (4.2), (A.5), (E.8) and (E.11

    Number of states for nucleons in a single-jj shell

    Full text link
    In this paper we obtain number of states with a given spin II and a given isospin TT for systems with three and four nucleons in a single-jj orbit, by using sum rules of six-jj and nine-jj symbols obtained in earlier works.Comment: to be published in Physical Review

    Power laws of complex systems from Extreme physical information

    Full text link
    Many complex systems obey allometric, or power, laws y=Yx^{a}. Here y is the measured value of some system attribute a, Y is a constant, and x is a stochastic variable. Remarkably, for many living systems the exponent a is limited to values +or- n/4, n=0,1,2... Here x is the mass of a randomly selected creature in the population. These quarter-power laws hold for many attributes, such as pulse rate (n=-1). Allometry has, in the past, been theoretically justified on a case-by-case basis. An ultimate goal is to find a common cause for allometry of all types and for both living and nonliving systems. The principle I - J = extrem. of Extreme physical information (EPI) is found to provide such a cause. It describes the flow of Fisher information J => I from an attribute value a on the cell level to its exterior observation y. Data y are formed via a system channel function y = f(x,a), with f(x,a) to be found. Extremizing the difference I - J through variation of f(x,a) results in a general allometric law f(x,a)= y = Yx^{a}. Darwinian evolution is presumed to cause a second extremization of I - J, now with respect to the choice of a. The solution is a=+or-n/4, n=0,1,2..., defining the particular powers of biological allometry. Under special circumstances, the model predicts that such biological systems are controlled by but two distinct intracellular information sources. These sources are conjectured to be cellular DNA and cellular transmembrane ion gradient
    corecore