Razvoj banke koštanog tkiva u Sveučilišnoj kliničkoj bolnici Mostar

Bone tissue banks are necessary for collection, production, testing, packaging, storage and delivery of bone transplants. Bone tissue bank is a link between the donor and the recipient by which the donation becomes a medium of health improvement for both the donor and the recipient. At the Department of Orthopedics, Mostar University Clinical Hospital, about 200 total hip replacements are performed per year. Most patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery (90%) have been diagnosed with osteoarthritis, and they are suitable donors, having in mind their age and comorbidities. In the same Department, around 50 procedures that require bone transplants are performed per year. A team of highly competent surgeons are working on an intensive process of adaptation oriented to quality improvement and intensification of the activity, both with the goal of meeting the standards of excellence in orthopedic surgery. The presence of a bone tissue bank has a favorable impact on the quality of health care owing to bone transplant availability, as well as on the scientific role of a highly specialized institution that examines the properties of bone tissue.Banke koštanog tkiva su odgovorne za skupljanje, proizvodnju, ispitivanje, pakiranje, skladištenje i isporuku koštanih transplantata. Banka koštanog tkiva premosnica je od donora k primatelju prilikom koje se donacija pretače u sredstvo za poboljšanje zdravstvenog stanja kako primatelja tako i davatelja. Na Klinici za ortopediju Sveučilišne kliničke bolnice Mostar na godinu se ugradi oko 200 totalnih proteza kuka. Većini bolesnika kojima se ugrađuje totalna proteza kuka (90%) identificirana je dijagnoza osteoartritisa te su pogodni davatelji, s tim da se u obzir uzimaju komorbiditeti i životna dob. Na godinu se na Klinici izvodi oko 50 različitih operacija za koje trebaju koštani presatci. Tim visoko kompetentnih kirurga bavi se intenzivnim procesom adaptacije koji je orijentiran poboljšanju kvalitete i jačanju aktivnosti s ciljem zadovoljenja standarda izvrsnosti u ortopedskoj kirurgiji. Prisutnost ovakve koštane banke učinkovito utječe na kvalitetu skrbi kako zbog brže dostupnosti implantata tako i zbog znanstvene uloge visoko specificirane ustanove koja bazično istražuje svojstva koštanog tkiva

Konflikten i Georgien:förhandling som konflikthantering eller som problemlösning?

The aim of this essay is to examine which of the two approaches within the field of conflicts that best explains the conflict between Georgia and Russia using negotiations, dialogue and conciliation. According to the first approach negotiations are used to handle a conflict, according to the second approach negotiations are used to solve a problem.  The focus will be on how the two states acted and how the dialogue from the European Union as a conciliator was brought before the war escalated in 2008. The EU is today an important actor within the international politics and has established close relations to the two states. The conflict goes back in history and is still not solved.   In the fields of international studies, there is a realistic view that claims the international politics to be shaped by suspicions between states as main actors. War is never far away, what is claimed to be solved through diplomacy. Within this field there are two approaches that explain conflicts. In order to conduct the survey I have chosen to use the qualitative analytic method and apply it on statements and reports from the three actors. The result is that neither of the both approaches gives a good explanation of the conflict, while they both have gaps and the actors did not always act as they were supposed to