La generatividad a través de la cultura. Una revisión sistemática

This systematic review aims to resolve the controversy that exists in the relationship between generativity and culture, in order to clarify the approach of generative study from a cultural perspective in future empirical research. The articles included in the review, published between 1990 and 2019, should be peer-reviewed scientific articles with explicit content about both terms. In the search, five databases were used combining multidisciplinary repositories with specialized databases, obtaining a total of thirty articles eligible for this review (n = 30). The analysis of the articles is divided into four categories that provide information about different dimensions of the relationship between both concepts: the limits of cultural generativity, cross-cultural comparisons of the structure of generativity, effects and cultural interpretations of generativity, and cultural evi­dences of its application and potential usefulness. In conclusion, the most psycho­logical aspects that structure generativity are common interculturally, however, the motives, conception and interpretation of generative behavior seem to vary in­tensely from one type of culture to another.Esta revisión sistemática pretende resolver la controversia que existe en la relación entre generatividad y cultura, para así clarificar el modo de estudio generativo desde una perspectiva cultural en futuras investigaciones empí-ricas. Los artículos incluidos en la revisión, publicados entre 1990 y 2019, debían ser artículos científicos revisados por pares con contenido explícito acerca de am-bos términos. En la búsqueda se utilizaron cinco bases de datos combinando repo-sitorios multidisciplinares con bases especializadas, obteniendo un total de treinta artículos elegibles para esta revisión (n = 30). El análisis de los artículos se articu-la en cuatro categorías que aportan información acerca de diferentes dimensiones de la relación entre ambos conceptos: los límites de la generatividad cultural, com-paraciones transculturales de la estructura de la generatividad, efectos e interpre-taciones culturales de la generatividad y evidencias culturales de su aplicación y utilidad potencial. En conclusión, los aspectos más psicológicos que estructuran la generatividad son comunes interculturalmente, sin embargo, los motivos, la con-cepción y la interpretación del comportamiento generativo parecen variar intensa-mente de un tipo de cultura a otra.This systematic review aims to resolve the controversy that exists in the relationship between generativity and culture, in order to clarify the approach of generative study from a cultural perspective in future empirical research. The articles included in the review, published between 1990 and 2019, should be peer-reviewed scientific articles with explicit content about both terms. In the search, five databases were used combining multidisciplinary repositories with specialized databases, obtaining a total of thirty articles eligible for this review (n = 30). The analysis of the articles is divided into four categories that provide information about different dimensions of the relationship between both concepts: the limits of cultural generativity, cross-cultural comparisons of the structure of generativity, effects and cultural interpretations of generativity, and cultural evi­dences of its application and potential usefulness. In conclusion, the most psycho­logical aspects that structure generativity are common interculturally, however, the motives, conception and interpretation of generative behavior seem to vary in­tensely from one type of culture to another

Adult Attachment Questionnaire: evidence of validity in a sample of IPVAW offenders

IntroductionAdult attachment can be understood as a cognitive and emotional system concerning oneself and others, based on previous attachment experiences throughout life. This system automatically affects relationships with others. Because of its importance in the interpersonal domain, it has been studied on numerous occasions in research on intimate partner violence. The aim of this study was to obtain evidence of validity of the Adult Attachment Questionnaire (AAQ) in a sample of 331 men convicted of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW).MethodsThe AAQ assesses adult attachment style in four dimensions that, together, yield four attachment categories. A psychometric analysis was performed, including reliability analysis and confirmatory factor analysis of the items, which ratified the factorial structure of the questionnaire. For a correct fit of the model, it was necessary to eliminate 4 of the items from the original scale.ResultsA latent profile analysis was also carried out, which identified four attachment styles: secure, preoccupied/anxious, avoidant/dismissing and fearful. Reliability indices were adequate. In general, the attachment profiles obtained ranges and means similar to those found in the general population study. The distribution of attachment styles was not equal: 50.57% of the participants presented secure attachment, 4.57% avoidant/dismissing attachment, 36.9% preoccupied/anxious, and 8.57% fearful.DiscussionIn conclusion, a valid and reliable instrument was determined based on the original AAQ scale to measure attachment in men convicted of IPVAW

Co-construcción del conocimiento en GrupoLab

En este proyecto pretende dar respuesta a la necesidad de crear sinergias académicas entre alumnado, personal docente e investigador y usuarios de proyectos, cuyo punto en común es el interés en la investigación social y el trabajo social, en concreto en la intervención con grupos. Asimismo, da respuesta a la necesidad del alumnado de crear espacios de aprendizaje donde desarrollar propuestas que favorezcan el impulso de la carrera universitaria y donde se pueda colaborar de forma horizontal con otras personas de forma que se potencie la creatividad y la iniciativa

El podcast como herramienta docente desde una perspectiva participativa

Depto. de Trabajo Social y Servicios SocialesFac. de Trabajo SocialFALSEsubmitte

IPVAW male perpetrators convicted in Spain: a typology and characterization based on latent class analysis

Introduction: Men who assault their partners present deficits in the social skills necessary for adequate interpersonal interaction. Not all of them have the same difficulties, thus they do not constitute a homogeneous group. Various studies have proposed different typologies of abusers based on their sociodemographic characteristics, criminal history, intensity and extent of violent or psychopathological traits. The majority of these investigations have been conducted in community samples, prompting the question of their validity in samples of men convicted of gender violence. The aim of this study was to establish a typology of men convicted in Spain for a gender violences crimes. Methodology: A total of 365 men participated and were subdivided into three classes of abusers based on their childhood, family experiences with violence, criminal history, sexist attitudes and attitudes toward violence, intensity and type of violence, psychopathological state and attachment style. Results: Coinciding with the results found in other research, 30% of the participants were classified as generally violent. They engaged in severe forms of physical, psychological and sexual violence and were more likely to do so than the rest. Additionally, they are more likely to present psychopathological problems and an antisocial character. Twenty-one percent were classified as dysphoric/borderline. They are characterized by minor forms of psychological violence, borderline or depressive symptomatology and an anxious attachment style. The remaining 49% were classified as familial or normalized abusers. This group exhibits moderate attitudes toward violence and sexism, resulting in less psychological and physical aggression. They do not present psychopathological problems and are likely to present a secure attachment style. Discussion: It is argued that determining the psychological characteristics of each type of abuser would contribute to improving and adapting intervention protocols in Spain, leading to a significant improvement in the current issue of abuse.The 2020 call for Industrial Doctorates in the Community of Madrid (IND2020/SOC-17490)3.8 Q1 JCR 20220.8 Q2 SJR 2023No data IDR 2022UE