Day100 Score predicts moderate-severe cGVHD, transplant mortality, and survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation

: The aim of this study was to develop a predictive score for moderate-severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) on day +100 after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We studied 1292 patients allografted between 1990 and 2016, alive on day +100 after transplant, without cGvHD, and with full biochemistry laboratory values available. Patients were randomly assigned to a training and a validation cohort (ratio 1:1). In the training cohort, a multivariate analysis identified four independent predictors of moderate-severe cGvHD: gammaglutamyltransferase 6575 UI/l, creatinine 651 mg/dl, cholinesterase 644576 UI/l and albumin 644 g/dl. A score of 1 was assigned to each variable, producing a low (0-1), intermediate (2-3) and high (4) score. The cumulative incidence (CI) of moderate-severe cGvHD was 12%, 20% and 52% (p<0.0001) in the training cohort, and 13%, 24% and 33% (p=0.002) in the validation cohort. The 5 year CI of transplant related mortality (TRM) was 5%, 14%, 27%(p<0.0001) and 5%, 16%, 31%(p<0.0001), respectively. The 5 year survival was 64%, 57%, 54%(p=0.009) and 70%, 59%, 42%(p=0.0008) in the two cohorts respectively . In conclusion, Day100 score predicts cGvHD, TRM and survival, and, if validated in a separate group of patients, could be considered for trials of pre-emptive therapy

phase ii study of sequential infusion of donor lymphocyte infusion and cytokine induced killer cells for patients relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Abstract Seventy-four patients who relapsed after allogeneic stem cell transplantation were enrolled in a phase IIA study and treated with the sequential infusion of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) followed by cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells. Seventy-three patients were available for the intention to treat analysis. At least 1 infusion of CIK cells was given to 59 patients, whereas 43 patients received the complete cell therapy planned (58%). Overall, 12 patients (16%) developed acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) of grades I to II in 7 cases and grades III to IV in 5). In 8 of 12 cases, aGVHD developed during DLI treatment, leading to interruption of the cellular program in 3 patients, whereas in the remaining 5 cases aGVHD was controlled by steroids treatment, thus allowing the subsequent planned administration of CIK cells. Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was observed in 11 patients (15%). A complete response was observed in 19 (26%), partial response in 3 (4%), stable disease in 8 (11%), early death in 2 (3%), and disease progression in 41 (56%). At 1 and 3 years, rates of progression-free survival were 31% and 29%, whereas rates of overall survival were 51% and 40%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, the type of relapse, the presence of cGVHD, and a short

Clinical significance of chromatin-spliceosome acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Northern Italy Leukemia Group (NILG) randomized trial 02/06

Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) after myelodysplastic or myeloproliferative disorders is a high-risk category currently identified by clinical history or specific morphological and cytogenetic abnormalities. However, in the absence of these features, uncertainties remain to identify the secondary nature of some cases otherwise defined as de novo AML. To test whether a chromatin-spliceosome (CS) mutational signature might better inform the definition of the de novo AML group, we analyzed a prospective cohort of 413 newly diagnosed AML patients enrolled into a randomized clinical trial (NILG AML 02/06) and provided with accurate cytogenetic and molecular characterization. Among clinically defined de novo AML, 17.6% carried CS mutations (CS-AML) and showed clinical characteristics closer to sAML (older age, lower white blood cell counts and higher rate of multilineage dysplasia). Outcomes in this group were adverse, more similar to those of sAML as compared to de novo AML (overall survival, 30% in CS-AML and 17% in sAML vs 61% in de novo AML, P<0.0001; disease free survival, 26% in CS-AML and 22% in sAML vs 54% of de novo AML, P<0.001) and independently confirmed by multivariable analysis. Allogeneic transplant in first complete remission improved survival in both sAML and CS-AML patients. In conclusion, these findings highlight the clinical significance of identifying CS-AML for improved prognostic prediction and potential therapeutic implications. (NILG AML 02/06: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00495287)

Busulfan or Treosulfan Conditioning Platform for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients Aged >60 Y With Acute Myeloid Leukemia/Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Subanalysis of the GITMO AlloEld Study

Background. The conditioning regimens with different alkylators at different doses can influence the outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), but conclusive data are missing. Methods. With the aim to analyze real-life allogeneic SCTs performed in Italy between 2006 and 2017 in elderly patients (aged >60 y) with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome, we collected 780 first transplants data. For analysis purposes, patients were grouped according to the type of alkylator included in the conditioning (busulfan [BU]-based; n = 618; 79%; treosulfan [TREO]-based; n=162; 21%). Results. No significant differences were observed in nonrelapse mortality, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival, although in the TREO-based group, we observed a greater proportion of elderly patients (P < 0.001); more active diseases at the time of SCT (P < 0.001); a higher prevalence of patients with either hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index ≥3 (P < 0.001) or a good Karnofsky performance status (P = 0.025); increased use of peripheral blood stem cells as graft sources (P < 0.001); and greater use of reduced intensity conditioning regimens (P = 0.013) and of haploidentical donors (P < 0.001). Moreover, the 2-y cumulative incidence of relapse with myeloablative doses of BU was significantly lower than that registered with reduced intensity conditioning (21% versus 31%; P = 0.0003). This was not observed in the TREO-based group. Conclusions. Despite a higher number of risk factors in the TREO group, no significant differences were observed in nonrelapse mortality, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival according to the type of alkylator, suggesting that TREO has no advantage over BU in terms of efficacy and toxicity in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome