5 research outputs found

    Disease correlates and clinical relevance of hereditary α-tryptasemia in patients with systemic mastocytosis

    No full text
    Background: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) encompasses a heterogeneous group of clonal disorders characterized by abnormal expansion of mast cells (MCs). Beyond KIT and other genes recurrently mutated in myeloid neoplasms, several genetic variants have been described as predisposing to the development of the disease and influencing its clinical phenotype. Increased copy number variants of the TPSAB1 gene were identified as a cause of nonclonal elevated tryptasemia and defined as hereditary α-tryptasemia (HαT). Moreover, HαT is enriched in patients with SM, where it can affect the incidence of mediator-related symptoms. Objective: In a multicenter data set of 444 patients with MC disorders, we aimed to investigate the clinical correlates of germline TPSAB1 copy number gains. Methods: Droplet digital PCR was performed in all cases to ascertain the presence of HαT. Clinical history along with blood values and bone marrow examination were analyzed. Results: We confirmed a higher incidence of HαT+ cases (n = 59, 13.3%) in patients diagnosed with mastocytosis with respect to the general population (approximately 5%). HαT+ patients were characterized by a lower MC-associated disease burden and higher levels of tryptase. Several disease variables were coherent with this pattern, from bone marrow MC infiltration to MC-related histopathologic traits, which also accounted for a significantly higher incidence of clonal MC activation syndrome in HαT+ (10.2%) compared to HαT- (3.4%, P = .029) patients. We also confirmed that HαT+ carriers had a significantly higher frequency of anaphylaxis, without relevant differences for other clinical manifestations. Conclusion: These findings on a large patient series support and extend previous data, and suggest that knowledge of HαT status may be useful for personalized management of patients with SM

    A Survey on Clinical and Biological Characteristic and Therapy Management of an Italian Series of 455 Adult Patients with Systemic Mastocytosis on Behalf of Italian Registry of Mastocytosis

    No full text
    Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by proliferation and hyperactivation of clonal mast cells. Clinical manifestations are heterogeneous and encompass cutaneous lesions, gastrointestinal alterations, osteoporosis, anaphylaxis and involvement of bone marrow and other organs due to neoplastic mast cells (MC) infiltration. As consequence, diagnosis may be difficult and patients (pts) are often evaluated by different specialists before the disease is recognized. To date, only few studies (Lim 2009, Escribano 2009, Cohen 2014) described relatively large series of pts with SM. We performed a multicentre retrospective study to evaluate clinical and biological features and therapeutic management in a large series of pts from 10 Italian centres experienced in management of SM and organized in multidisciplinary groups of specialists. We collected 455 pts diagnosed with SM according to WHO criteria. Additionally 26 pts with mastocytosis in the skin (MIS) evaluated with BM examination did not fulfil criteria for SM, leading to diagnosis of Cutaneous Mastocytosis (CM); however 2/26 pts with CM had both cKITD816V mutation and CD2/CD25 expression on MC in BM, additional 3 showed either cKITD816V or CD2/CD25. Moreover, we found 22 pts without MIS but with features of monoclonal mast cell activation syndrome. Of the 455 pts with WHO-SM (male 56%), 252 (55%) had MIS: median age at MIS diagnosis (dg) was 37 years (y) (range 0-79), while at SM dg it was 46.5 (range 18-82). Time from onset of MIS to dg of SM was 9 y (range 0-43). In 18/252 pts (7%) MIS occurred before age of 18 y (median 9, range 0-17) and persisted over childhood. Median age at dg of SM without MIS (203/455 pts, 45%) was older: 54 y, range 19-79 (p<0.0001). First manifestations of SM were MIS in 46.5% of pts, anaphylaxis in 47.8%, mediator related symptoms in 6.4%, osteoporosis/bone lesions in 5.2%, organomegaly in 3.4%, hematologic alterations in 0.4%. Anaphylaxis was observed in 76/252 (30.1%) pts with MIS, of which 23 had tryptase <20 mcg/L. BM multifocal infiltrates of MC were present in 61.6% of pts, while in 38.4% dg was performed only by using minor criteria. cKIT D816V mutation was detected in BM of 394/432 analysed pts (91.2%). Three D816V-negative pts had different cKIT mutations: M541L, D816H and K546K. In peripheral blood cKIT D816V was evaluated in 165 pts and found in 49.7%. CD2 and/or CD25 expressing MC were found in 99% of pts of the 426 evaluated. Mean tryptase value at dg was 75.9±263 mcg/L. SM subtypes were indolent SM (ISM) 402/455 (88.4%), of which 140 isolated bone marrow mastocytosis (BMM) (34.5% of ISM) and 34 smoldering SM (SSM) (8.4% of ISM), aggressive SM (ASM) 32/455 (7%), SM associated with hematological non mast cell disorders (SM-AHNMD) 20/455 (4.4%), mast cell leukemia (MCL) 1/455 (0.2%). In SM-AHNMD the associated hematologic disease was chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (6/20, 30%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma and refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (3/20 each, 15%), essential thrombocythemia and not otherwise characterized myeloproliferative neoplasm (2/20 each, 10%), myelodysplastic syndrome, myelofibrosis, multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (1/20 each, 5%). Median follow up was 23 months (mo), range 2-289. At last follow up, 27/455 pts died (5.9%). 52% of pts had ASM, 18.5% SM-AHNMD, 14.7% SSM, 7.4% ISM and 3.7% each MCL and BMM. Causes of death were disease progression in 21/27 pts (77.8%), other solid neoplasms in 3/27 (11.1%), arterial thrombosis in 2/27 (9.5%), cerebral haemorrhage in 1/27 (3.7%). Disease progression consisted in evolution to AML in 6 pts with ASM, 1 pts with SSM and 1 pts with SM-AHNMD; median time to progression to AML was 30 mo (range 13-149); 2 pts developed other AHNMD: chronic myeloid leukemia and myelofibrosis. 178/455 pts (39%) were treated with anti MC mediators therapies. Of the 60/455 (13%) treated with cytostatic therapy 47% had ASM, 12% SM-AHNMD, 2% MCL, 35% ISM of which 38% were SSM. The ISM cohort was treated mainly due to severe osteoporosis with vertebral fractures not C-findings or disease evolution. First line therapy was interferon (28.3%), hydroxyurea (20%), midostaurine (18.3%), imatinib (13.3%), cladribin (8.3%), dasatinib (6.7%) and masitinib (5%). This is one of the largest series reporting pts with SM that may provide useful information for clinical management of pts with this probably underestimated “rare” disease

    A Survey on Clinical and Biological Characteristic and Therapy Management of an Italian Series of 455 Adult Patients with Systemic Mastocytosis on Behalf of Italian Registry of Mastocytosis

    No full text
    Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by proliferation and hyperactivation of clonal mast cells. Clinical manifestations are heterogeneous and encompass cutaneous lesions, gastrointestinal alterations, osteoporosis, anaphylaxis and involvement of bone marrow and other organs due to neoplastic mast cells (MC) infiltration. As consequence, diagnosis may be difficult and patients (pts) are often evaluated by different specialists before the disease is recognized. To date, only few studies (Lim 2009, Escribano 2009, Cohen 2014) described relatively large series of pts with SM. We performed a multicentre retrospective study to evaluate clinical and biological features and therapeutic management in a large series of pts from 10 Italian centres experienced in management of SM and organized in multidisciplinary groups of specialists. We collected 455 pts diagnosed with SM according to WHO criteria. Additionally 26 pts with mastocytosis in the skin (MIS) evaluated with BM examination did not fulfil criteria for SM, leading to diagnosis of Cutaneous Mastocytosis (CM); however 2/26 pts with CM had both cKITD816V mutation and CD2/CD25 expression on MC in BM, additional 3 showed either cKITD816V or CD2/CD25. Moreover, we found 22 pts without MIS but with features of monoclonal mast cell activation syndrome. Of the 455 pts with WHO-SM (male 56%), 252 (55%) had MIS: median age at MIS diagnosis (dg) was 37 years (y) (range 0-79), while at SM dg it was 46.5 (range 18-82). Time from onset of MIS to dg of SM was 9 y (range 0-43). In 18/252 pts (7%) MIS occurred before age of 18 y (median 9, range 0-17) and persisted over childhood. Median age at dg of SM without MIS (203/455 pts, 45%) was older: 54 y, range 19-79 (p<0.0001). First manifestations of SM were MIS in 46.5% of pts, anaphylaxis in 47.8%, mediator related symptoms in 6.4%, osteoporosis/bone lesions in 5.2%, organomegaly in 3.4%, hematologic alterations in 0.4%. Anaphylaxis was observed in 76/252 (30.1%) pts with MIS, of which 23 had tryptase <20 mcg/L. BM multifocal infiltrates of MC were present in 61.6% of pts, while in 38.4% dg was performed only by using minor criteria. cKIT D816V mutation was detected in BM of 394/432 analysed pts (91.2%). Three D816V-negative pts had different cKIT mutations: M541L, D816H and K546K. In peripheral blood cKIT D816V was evaluated in 165 pts and found in 49.7%. CD2 and/or CD25 expressing MC were found in 99% of pts of the 426 evaluated. Mean tryptase value at dg was 75.9±263 mcg/L. SM subtypes were indolent SM (ISM) 402/455 (88.4%), of which 140 isolated bone marrow mastocytosis (BMM) (34.5% of ISM) and 34 smoldering SM (SSM) (8.4% of ISM), aggressive SM (ASM) 32/455 (7%), SM associated with hematological non mast cell disorders (SM-AHNMD) 20/455 (4.4%), mast cell leukemia (MCL) 1/455 (0.2%). In SM-AHNMD the associated hematologic disease was chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (6/20, 30%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma and refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (3/20 each, 15%), essential thrombocythemia and not otherwise characterized myeloproliferative neoplasm (2/20 each, 10%), myelodysplastic syndrome, myelofibrosis, multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (1/20 each, 5%). Median follow up was 23 months (mo), range 2-289. At last follow up, 27/455 pts died (5.9%). 52% of pts had ASM, 18.5% SM-AHNMD, 14.7% SSM, 7.4% ISM and 3.7% each MCL and BMM. Causes of death were disease progression in 21/27 pts (77.8%), other solid neoplasms in 3/27 (11.1%), arterial thrombosis in 2/27 (9.5%), cerebral haemorrhage in 1/27 (3.7%). Disease progression consisted in evolution to AML in 6 pts with ASM, 1 pts with SSM and 1 pts with SM-AHNMD; median time to progression to AML was 30 mo (range 13-149); 2 pts developed other AHNMD: chronic myeloid leukemia and myelofibrosis. 178/455 pts (39%) were treated with anti MC mediators therapies. Of the 60/455 (13%) treated with cytostatic therapy 47% had ASM, 12% SM-AHNMD, 2% MCL, 35% ISM of which 38% were SSM. The ISM cohort was treated mainly due to severe osteoporosis with vertebral fractures not C-findings or disease evolution. First line therapy was interferon (28.3%), hydroxyurea (20%), midostaurine (18.3%), imatinib (13.3%), cladribin (8.3%), dasatinib (6.7%) and masitinib (5%). This is one of the largest series reporting pts with SM that may provide useful information for clinical management of pts with this probably underestimated “rare” disease

    Clinical presentation and management practice of systemic mastocytosis. A survey on 460 Italian patients

    No full text
    none33noPieri, Lisa; Bonadonna, Patrizia; Elena, Chiara; Papayannidis, Cristina; Grifoni, Federica Irene; Rondoni, Michela; Girlanda, Stefania; Mauro, Marina; Magliacane, Diomira; Elli, Elena Maria; Iorno, Maria Loredana; Almerigogna, Fabio; Scarfì, Federica; Salerno, Roberto; Fanelli, Tiziana; Gesullo, Francesca; Corbizi Fattori, Giuditta; Bonifacio, Massimiliano; Perbellini, Omar; Artuso, Anna; Soverini, Simona; De Benedittis, Caterina; Muratori, Simona; Pravettoni, Valerio; Cova, Vittoria; Cortellini, Gabriele; Ciceri, Fabio; Cortelezzi, Agostino; Martinelli, Giovanni; Triggiani, Massimo; Merante, Serena; Vannucchi, Alessandro Maria; Zanotti, RobertaPieri, Lisa; Bonadonna, Patrizia; Elena, Chiara; Papayannidis, Cristina; Grifoni, Federica Irene; Rondoni, Michela; Girlanda, Stefania; Mauro, Marina; Magliacane, Diomira; Elli, Elena Maria; Iorno, Maria Loredana; Almerigogna, Fabio; Scarfì, Federica; Salerno, Roberto; Fanelli, Tiziana; Gesullo, Francesca; Corbizi Fattori, Giuditta; Bonifacio, Massimiliano; Perbellini, Omar; Artuso, Anna; Soverini, Simona; De Benedittis, Caterina; Muratori, Simona; Pravettoni, Valerio; Cova, Vittoria; Cortellini, Gabriele; Ciceri, Fabio; Cortelezzi, Agostino; Martinelli, Giovanni; Triggiani, Massimo; Merante, Serena; Vannucchi, Alessandro Maria; Zanotti, Robert

    A survey of clinical features of allergic rhinitis in adults

    Get PDF
    Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) has high prevalence and substantial socio-economic burden.Material/Methods: The study included 35 Italian Centers recruiting an overall number of 3383 adult patients with rhinitis (48% males, 52% females, mean age 29.1, range 18-45 years). For each patient, the attending physician had to fill in a standardized questionnaire, covering, in particular, some issues such as the ARIA classification of allergic rhinitis (AR), the results of skin prick test (SPT), the kind of treatment, the response to treatment, and the satisfaction with treatment.Results: Out of the 3383 patients with rhinitis, 2788 (82.4%) had AR: 311 (11.5%) had a mild intermittent, 229 (8.8%) a mild persistent, 636 (23.5%) a moderate-severe intermittent, and 1518 (56.1%) a moderate-severe persistent form. The most frequently used drugs were oral antihistamines (77.1%) and topical corticosteroids (60.8%). The response to treatment was judged as excellent in 12.2%, good in 41.3%, fair in 31.2%, poor in 14.5%, and very bad in 0.8% of subjects. The rate of treatment dissatisfaction was significantly higher in patients with moderate-to-severe AR than in patients with mild AR (p<0.0001). Indication to allergen immunotherapy (AIT) was significantly more frequent (p<0.01) in patients with severe AR than with mild AR.Conclusions: These findings confirm the appropriateness of ARIA guidelines in classifying the AR patients and the association of severe symptoms with unsuccessful drug treatment. The optimal targeting of patients to be treated with AIT needs to be reassessed
    corecore