Intestinal PTGS2 mRNA Levels, PTGS2 Gene Polymorphisms, and Colorectal Carcinogenesis

<div><p>Background & Aims</p><p>Inflammation is a major risk factor for development of colorectal cancer (CRC). Prostaglandin synthase cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) encoded by the <i>PTGS2</i> gene is the rate limiting enzyme in prostaglandin synthesis and therefore plays a distinct role as regulator of inflammation.</p><p>Methods</p><p><i>PTGS2</i> mRNA levels were determined in intestinal tissues from 85 intestinal adenoma cases, 115 CRC cases, and 17 healthy controls. The functional <i>PTGS2</i> polymorphisms A-1195G (rs689466), G-765C (rs20417), T8473C (rs5275) were assessed in 200 CRC cases, 991 adenoma cases and 399 controls from the Norwegian KAM cohort.</p><p>Results</p><p><i>PTGS2</i> mRNA levels were higher in mild/moderate adenoma tissue compared to morphologically normal tissue from the same individual (P<0.0001) and (P<0.035) and compared to mucosa from healthy individuals (P<0.0039) and (P<0.0027), respectively. In CRC patients, <i>PTGS2</i> mRNA levels were 8–9 times higher both in morphologically normal tissue and in cancer tissue, compared to healthy individuals (P<0.0001). <i>PTGS2</i> A-1195G variant allele carriers were at reduced risk of CRC (odds ratio (OR) = 0.52, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.28–0.99, P = 0.047). Homozygous carriers of the haplotype encompassing the A-1195G and G-765C wild type alleles and the T8473C variant allele <i>(PTGS2</i> AGC) were at increased risk of CRC as compared to homozygous carriers of the <i>PTGS2</i> AGT (<u>A</u>-1195G, <u>G</u>-765C, <u>T</u>8473C) haplotype (OR = 5.37, 95% CI: 1.40–20.5, P = 0.014). No association between the investigated polymorphisms and <i>PTGS2</i> mRNA levels could be detected.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>High intestinal <i>PTGS2</i> mRNA level is an early event in colorectal cancer development as it occurs already in mild/moderate dysplasia. <i>PTGS2</i> polymorphisms that have been associated with altered <i>PTGS2</i> mRNA levels/COX-2 activity in some studies, although not the present study, were associated with colorectal cancer risk. Thus, both <i>PTGS2</i> polymorphisms and <i>PTGS2</i> mRNA levels may provide information regarding CRC risk.</p></div

Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers

Background: Reported prevalence, penetrance and expression of deleterious mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2, may reflect differences in the clinical criteria used to select families for DNA testing. The authors have previously reported that clinical criteria are not sensitive enough to identify MMR mutation carriers among incident colorectal cancer cases. Objective: To describe the sensitivity of the criteria when applied to families with a demonstrated MMR mutation. Methods: Families with an aggregation of colorectal cancers were examined for deleterious MMR mutations according to the Mallorca guidelines. All families with a detected MMR mutation as of November 2009 were reclassified according to the Amsterdam and Bethesda criteria. Results: Sixty-nine different DNA variants were identified in a total of 129 families. The original Amsterdam clinical criteria were met by 38%, 12%, 78% and 25% of families with mutations in MSH2, MSH6, MLH1 and PMS2, respectively. Corresponding numbers for the revised Amsterdam criteria were 62%, 48%, 87% and 38%. Similarly, each of the four clinical Bethesda criteria had low sensitivity for identifying MSH6 or PMS2 mutations. Conclusion: Amsterdam criteria and each of the Bethesda criteria were inadequate for identifying MSH6 mutation-carrying kindreds. MSH6 mutations may be more common than currently assumed, and the penetrance/expression of MSH6 mutations, as derived from families meeting current clinical criteria, may be misleading. To increase detection rate of MMR mutation carriers, all cancers in the Lynch syndrome tumour spectrum should be subjected to immunohistochemical analysis and/or analysis for microsatellite instability

Expression of NDRG2 is down-regulated in high-risk adenomas and colorectal carcinoma

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>It has recently been shown that <it>NDRG2 </it>mRNA is down-regulated or undetectable in several human cancers and cancer cell-lines. Although the function of NDRG2 is unknown, high <it>NDRG2 </it>expression correlates with improved prognosis in high-grade gliomas. The aim of this study has been to examine <it>NDRG2 </it>mRNA expression in colon cancer. By examining affected and normal tissue from individuals with colorectal adenomas and carcinomas, as well as in healthy individuals, we aim to determine whether and at which stages <it>NDRG2 </it>down-regulation occurs during colonic carcinogenesis.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using quantitative RT-PCR, we have determined the mRNA levels for <it>NDRG2 </it>in low-risk (n = 15) and high-risk adenomas (n = 57), colorectal carcinomas (n = 50) and corresponding normal tissue, as well as control tissue from healthy individuals (n = 15). <it>NDRG2 </it>levels were normalised to <it>β-actin</it>.</p> <p>Results</p> <p><it>NDRG2 </it>mRNA levels were lower in colorectal carcinomas compared to normal tissue from the control group (p < 0.001). When comparing adenomas/carcinomas with adjacent normal tissue from the same individual, <it>NDRG2 </it>expression levels were significantly reduced in both high-risk adenoma (p < 0.001) and in colorectal carcinoma (p < 0.001). There was a trend for <it>NDRG2 </it>levels to decrease with increasing Dukes' stage (p < 0.05).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results demonstrate that expression of <it>NDRG2 </it>is down-regulated at a late stage during colorectal carcinogensis. Future studies are needed to address whether <it>NDRG2 </it>down-regulation is a cause or consequence of the progression of colorectal adenomas to carcinoma.</p

Polymorphisms of the XRCC1, XRCC3 and XPD genes and risk of colorectal adenoma and carcinoma, in a Norwegian cohort: a case control study

BACKGROUND: Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes may influence individual variation in DNA repair capacity, which may be associated with risk of developing cancer. For colorectal cancer the importance of mutations in mismatch repair genes has been extensively documented. Less is known about other DNA repair pathways in colorectal carcinogenesis. In this study we have focused on the XRCC1, XRCC3 and XPD genes, involved in base excision repair, homologous recombinational repair and nucleotide excision repair, respectively. METHODS: We used a case-control study design (157 carcinomas, 983 adenomas and 399 controls) to test the association between five polymorphisms in these DNA repair genes (XRCC1 Arg(194)Trp, Arg(280)His, Arg(399)Gln, XRCC3 Thr(241)Met and XPD Lys(751)Gln), and risk of colorectal adenomas and carcinomas in a Norwegian cohort. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated by binary logistic regression model adjusting for age, gender, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption. RESULTS: The XRCC1 280His allele was associated with an increased risk of adenomas (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.19–4.46). The XRCC1 399Gln allele was associated with a reduction of risk of high-risk adenomas (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41–0.96). Carriers of the variant XPD 751Gln allele had an increased risk of low-risk adenomas (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.03–1.89), while no association was found with risk of carcinomas. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest an increased risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia in individuals with the XRCC1 Arg(280)His polymorphism and a reduced risk associated with the XRCC1 Arg(399)Gln polymorphism. Interestingly, individuals with the XPD Lys(751)Gln polymorphism had an increased risk of low-risk adenomas. This may suggest a role in regression of adenomas

Generation and Characterisation of Novel Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Xenograft Models and Corresponding Primary Cell Lines

<div><p>Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is one of the most lethal cancer types, currently lacking efficient treatment. The heterogeneous nature of these tumours are poorly represented by the classical pancreatic cell lines, which have been through strong clonal selection <i>in vitro</i>, and are often derived from metastases. Here, we describe the establishment of novel pancreatic adenocarcinoma models, xenografts and corresponding <i>in vitro</i> cell lines, from primary pancreatic tumours. The morphology, differentiation grade and gene expression pattern of the xenografts resemble the original tumours well. The cell lines were analysed for colony forming capacity, tumourigenicity and expression of known cancer cell surface markers and cancer stem-like characteristics. These primary cell models will be valuable tools for biological and preclinical studies for this devastating disease.</p></div

Characterisation of tumour mutation status and xenograft tumours.

1<p>: p53 staining is scored as hot spots where 5 = 30–60% and 6 = 60–100%, and the staining intensity is given in brackets (1 = weak, 2 = medium and 3 = strong).</p>2<p>: S100A4 is scored as % positive cells where 1 = 1–4%, 2 = 5–9%, 3 = 10–14%, 4 = 15–49%, 5≥50%, and the staining intensities is given in brackets (1 = weak, 2 = medium and 3 = strong).</p>3<p>: Time in weeks required for the implanted patient material to reach 10 mm.</p>4<p>:Time in weeks required for the xenograft passage to reach 10 mm for F3 and forward.</p

Cell surface expression of known cancer and stem cell markers.

<p>Shown here is the average % positive cells out of single, live cells, n = at least 3, n.d = not done.</p><p>Cells were analysed in the following passage spans: PpaC1 p1–p10, PpaC2 p3–p14, PpaC6 p5–p9 and PpaC8 p4–p20.</p

<i>In vivo</i> tumourigenicity.

<p>Shown is the number of tumours growing/the number of injected sites in NSG mice for each cell lines, harvested at the following passages: PpaC1 p6, PpaC2 p12, PpaC6 p6, PpaC8 p13.</p

Morphology of the cell lines.

<p>A: Phase contrast pictures of the generated cell lines at the following passages: PpaC1 p2, PpaC2 p4, PpaC6 p8 and PpaC8 p10, at 10× magnification. B: Disseminating cell clusters in cultures with cobblestone growth pattern. The regular smooth colony border is indicated with a white arrow and the protruding group of cells with a black arrow. 20× magnification. Picture is from p4.</p