7 research outputs found

    Analisis Strategi Pengembangan Kota Pintar (Smart City) di Kota Bandung

    Get PDF
    This phenomenon occurs such as congestion, cleanliness, lack of transportation services, and lack of service are the causes of problems. This study aims to determine the Smart City Development Strategy (Smart City) in the city of Bandung. This study uses a quantitative approach in the form of numbers. The type of data used is using primary data in the form of a questionnaire. Research using the number of respondents as many as 97 people. Statistical tests and data processing were carried out using Partial Least Square (SmartPLS 4). The research findings show that: (1) Smart Branding has no effect on the development strategy; (2) Smart Economy has no effect on the Development Strategy; (3) Smart Living has no effect on the Development Strategy; (4) Smart Society influences Development Strategy; (5) Smart Environment influences Development Strategy; (6) Smart Governance has no effect on the Development Strategy; (7) Smart Branding has no effect on the Development Strategy through Smart Governance; (8) Smart Economy has no effect on the Development Strategy through Smart Governance; (9) Smart Living has no effect on the Development Strategy through Smart Governance; (10) Smart Society has no effect on the Development Strategy through Smart Governance; (11) Smart Environment has no effect on Development Strategy through Smart Governance. With an improved Smart Society and Smart Environment, the Development Strategy in the City of Bandung will also be easy to realize which aims for the growth of the City of Bandung

    Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

    Get PDF
    Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

    Correction to: Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study (Intensive Care Medicine, (2021), 47, 2, (160-169), 10.1007/s00134-020-06234-9)

    No full text
    The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The members of the ESICM Trials Group Collaborators were not shown in the article but only in the ESM. The full list of collaborators is shown below. The original article has been corrected
    corecore