The Role of Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is the therapy of choice for patients with severe aortic stenosis who have prohibitive or high surgical risk. However, the benefit of TAVR is attenuated by the occurrence of major disabling stroke which is associated with increased mortality and early-reduced quality of life. Despite advances in TAVR technology, stroke remains a serious complication that is associated with significant negative outcomes. The majority of these occur in the acute phase following TAVR where cerebral embolic events are frequent. Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPD) have been developed to minimize the risk of peri-procedural ischemic stroke during TAVR. CEPD have the potential to reduce intraprocedural burden of new silent ischemic injury. In this review we outline the etiology and incidence of stroke in TAVR population, and systematically review current evidence for cerebral embolic protection devices

Antiinflammatory Therapy with Canakinumab for Atherosclerotic Disease

Background: Experimental and clinical data suggest that reducing inflammation without affecting lipid levels may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Yet, the inflammatory hypothesis of atherothrombosis has remained unproved. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of canakinumab, a therapeutic monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-1β, involving 10,061 patients with previous myocardial infarction and a high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level of 2 mg or more per liter. The trial compared three doses of canakinumab (50 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg, administered subcutaneously every 3 months) with placebo. The primary efficacy end point was nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. RESULTS: At 48 months, the median reduction from baseline in the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level was 26 percentage points greater in the group that received the 50-mg dose of canakinumab, 37 percentage points greater in the 150-mg group, and 41 percentage points greater in the 300-mg group than in the placebo group. Canakinumab did not reduce lipid levels from baseline. At a median follow-up of 3.7 years, the incidence rate for the primary end point was 4.50 events per 100 person-years in the placebo group, 4.11 events per 100 person-years in the 50-mg group, 3.86 events per 100 person-years in the 150-mg group, and 3.90 events per 100 person-years in the 300-mg group. The hazard ratios as compared with placebo were as follows: in the 50-mg group, 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.07; P = 0.30); in the 150-mg group, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.98; P = 0.021); and in the 300-mg group, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.99; P = 0.031). The 150-mg dose, but not the other doses, met the prespecified multiplicity-adjusted threshold for statistical significance for the primary end point and the secondary end point that additionally included hospitalization for unstable angina that led to urgent revascularization (hazard ratio vs. placebo, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.95; P = 0.005). Canakinumab was associated with a higher incidence of fatal infection than was placebo. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio for all canakinumab doses vs. placebo, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.06; P = 0.31). Conclusions: Antiinflammatory therapy targeting the interleukin-1β innate immunity pathway with canakinumab at a dose of 150 mg every 3 months led to a significantly lower rate of recurrent cardiovascular events than placebo, independent of lipid-level lowering. (Funded by Novartis; CANTOS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01327846.

Phase II trial of sorafenib in combination with 5-fluorouracil infusion in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Purpose: Sorafenib improves overall survival and time to progression of advanced hepatocellular (aHCC) patients such as demonstrated in 2 phase III trials. However, aHCC patients' outcome is still poor despite these results. In order to improve the efficacy of systemic treatment for aHCC, we evaluated the combination of sorafenib plus 5-fluorouacil infusion in a phase II trial. Methods: Patients with aHCC not eligible for loco-regional therapies, Child-Pugh A-B, ECOG-PS 0-1, and without history of anti-cancer systemic treatment were enrolled. Treatment schedule was: sorafenib 400 mg/bid continuously and continuum infusion of 5-fluorouracil 200 mg/sqm/daily day 1-14 every 3 weeks. Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled: ECOG-PS 0-1: 29-10, Child-Pugh A-B: 36-3. Grade 3/4 (%) toxicities included: diarrhea 5.1/0, mucositis 20.5/2.6, hand foot skin reaction 20.5/0, skin rash 10.5/0, hypertension 10.3/0, hyperbilirubinemia 5.1/2.6, glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase increase 10.3/0, glutamic-pyruvic transaminase increase 7.7/0, cardiac toxicity (one heart failure, two atrial fibrillation cases) 7.7/0, and bleeding (melena) in 2.6/0. One partial response was observed. Stable disease was obtained in 46.2% of patients with a median duration of 16.2 months. Median time to progression was 8 months (CI 95% = 5.7-10.4), and median overall survival was 13.7 months (CI 95% = 9.5-17.9). Conclusions: The results show an encouraging disease control rate, time to progression, and overall survival. The combination of sorafenib and 5-fluorouracil was feasible, and the side effects were manageable for patients carefully selected for liver function and performance status

A phase II (PhII) trial of sorafenib (S) in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) continuous infusion (c.i.) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Preliminary data.

Background: S, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that targets Raf-kinase and receptor tyrosine kinases, improved overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) versus placebo in a randomized phase III study in HCC (SHARP study). The safety of S in association with infusional and bolus 5FU regimens was established in a previous PhI study, with no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between S and 5FU. The present trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of S with infusional 5FU in HCC pts. Methods: Patients with advanced HCC (not eligible to surgical or locoregional therapies), age≥18 years, Child-Pugh Class A or B, ECOG PS 0-1, without prior systemic treatment for HCC and adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function, were eligible for the study. The primary endpoint is the Disease Control Rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included response rate, TTP, OS and safety. According to a two-step Simon's model 46 pts were to be accrued. Pts were treated with oral S 400 mg bid continuously and c.i. 5FU 200 mg/sqm/day day 1-14 every 3 weeks. Tumour response was assessed according to RECIST criteria every 9 weeks. Results: Between October 2006 and October 2008 38 pts were enrolled: M-F: 32-6, median age (range): 68(47-83) years, ECOG-PS 0-1: 28-10, Child-Pugh A-B: 35-3, extrahepatic spread: 14 pts, macroscopic vascular invasion: 6 pts. Grade 3/4 (%) toxicities (NCI CTC v 3.0 criteria) included diarrhoea 5/0, stomatitis 21/3, hand foot syndrome 21/0, skin rash 11/0, hypertension 11/0; hyperbilirubinemia 5/3, AST 11/0, ALT 8/0, cardiac toxicity (one cardiac failure, one atrial fibrillation) 5/0 and bleeding (melena) in 3/0. One partial response was observed. Stable disease was obtained in 45% of pts with a median duration of 9.6 months (range 5-18+). Median TTP was 7.6 months (CI 95%=5.3-9.9) and median OS 12.2 months (CI 95%=4.45-19.8). Conclusions: Preliminary results of this PhII study show encouraging disease control rate, TTP and OS in pts with advanced HCC. The S+5FU association is feasible, well tolerated and AEs were predictable and manageable