Recurrent melanocytic nevi and melanomas in dermoscopy: results of a multicenter study of the International Dermoscopy Society

IMPORTANCE Differentiating recurrent nevi from recurrent melanoma is challenging. OBJECTIVE To determine dermoscopic features to differentiate recurrent nevi from melanomas. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective observational study of 15 pigmented lesion clinics from 12 countries; 98 recurrent nevi (61.3%) and 62 recurrent melanomas (38.8%) were collected from January to December 2011. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Scoring the dermoscopic features, patterns, and colors in correlation with the histopathologic findings. RESULTS In univariate analysis, radial lines, symmetry, and centrifugal growth pattern were significantly more common dermoscopically in recurrent nevi; in contrast, circles, especially if on the head and neck area, eccentric hyperpigmentation at the periphery, a chaotic and noncontinuous growth pattern, and pigmentation beyond the scar's edge were significantly more common in recurrent melanomas. Patients with recurrent melanomas were significantly older than patients with recurrent nevi (mean [SD] age, 63.1 [17.5] years vs 30.2 [12.4] years) (P<.001), and there was a significantly longer time interval between the first procedure and the second treatment (median time interval, 25 vs 8 months) (P<.001). In a multivariate analysis, pigmentation beyond the scar's edge (P=.002), age (P<.001), and anatomic site (P=.002) were significantly and independently associated with the diagnosis of recurrent melanoma in dermoscopy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Dermoscopically, pigmentation beyond the scar's edge is the strongest clue for melanoma. Dermoscopy is helpful in evaluating recurrent lesions, but final interpretation requires taking into account the patient age, anatomic site, time to recurrence, growth pattern, and, if available, the histopathologic findings of the first excision

Man against machine reloaded : performance of a market-approved convolutional neural network in classifying a broad spectrum of skin lesions in comparison with 96 dermatologists working under less artificial conditions

Copyright © 2019 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Background: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) efficiently differentiate skin lesions by image analysis. Studies comparing a market-approved CNN in a broad range of diagnoses to dermatologists working under less artificial conditions are lacking. Materials and methods: One hundred cases of pigmented/non-pigmented skin cancers and benign lesions were used for a two-level reader study in 96 dermatologists (level I: dermoscopy only; level II: clinical close-up images, dermoscopy, and textual information). Additionally, dermoscopic images were classified by a CNN approved for the European market as a medical device (Moleanalyzer Pro, FotoFinder Systems, Bad Birnbach, Germany). Primary endpoints were the sensitivity and specificity of the CNN's dichotomous classification in comparison with the dermatologists’ management decisions. Secondary endpoints included the dermatologists’ diagnostic decisions, their performance according to their level of experience, and the CNN's area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Results: The CNN revealed a sensitivity, specificity, and ROC AUC with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 95.0% (95% CI 83.5% to 98.6%), 76.7% (95% CI 64.6% to 85.6%), and 0.918 (95% CI 0.866–0.970), respectively. In level I, the dermatologists’ management decisions showed a mean sensitivity and specificity of 89.0% (95% CI 87.4% to 90.6%) and 80.7% (95% CI 78.8% to 82.6%). With level II information, the sensitivity significantly improved to 94.1% (95% CI 93.1% to 95.1%; P < 0.001), while the specificity remained unchanged at 80.4% (95% CI 78.4% to 82.4%; P = 0.97). When fixing the CNN's specificity at the mean specificity of the dermatologists’ management decision in level II (80.4%), the CNN's sensitivity was almost equal to that of human raters, at 95% (95% CI 83.5% to 98.6%) versus 94.1% (95% CI 93.1% to 95.1%); P = 0.1. In contrast, dermatologists were outperformed by the CNN in their level I management decisions and level I and II diagnostic decisions. More experienced dermatologists frequently surpassed the CNN's performance. Conclusions: Under less artificial conditions and in a broader spectrum of diagnoses, the CNN and most dermatologists performed on the same level. Dermatologists are trained to integrate information from a range of sources rendering comparative studies that are solely based on one single case image inadequate.publishersversionPeer reviewe

Isothiazolinone derivatives and allergic contact dermatitis: a review and update

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) from isothiazolinones has frequently been described in the literature. Following an epidemic of sensitization to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) in the 1980s, and more recently to MI, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety of the European Commission banned their use in leave-on products, while restricting that in rinse-off cosmetics. Despite a decreasing prevalence of ACD from MCI/MI and MI, cases caused by occupational exposure and non-cosmetic isothiazolinone sources are on the rise. Moreover, sensitization to newer and lesser known isothiazolinones has been reported. This paper reviews the epidemiology of contact allergy to different isothiazolinones, clinical presentation of isothiazolinone-induced ACD, most relevant sensitization sources and potential cross-reactions between isothiazolinone derivatives. It also provides an update on recent legislative measures.status: publishe

Skin signs in the diagnosis of thallium poisoning.

A 45-year-old man developed a painful and rapidly progressive sensory-motor polyneuropathy associated with confusion and convulsions. This resulted in hypoventilation and led to respiratory failure and coma. A rapid and diffuse alopecia occurred after 3 weeks in the intensive care unit. Examination of hair roots under polarized light detected dystrophic anagen hairs with dark bands caused by empty spaces in the disorganized cortex. These dark zones were originally reported in patients with thallium poisoning and a toxicological investigation confirmed thallium exposure. The classical systemic symptoms and the various dermatological signs are reviewed, and the origins of contamination and physiopathology discussed

What's the point of the children's sensory peculiarities in PDD assessment.

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Evaluation of primary care physicians' competence in selective skin tumour triage after short versus long dermoscopy training: a randomized non-inferiority trial

Background: Although primary care physicians (PCPs) play a key role in skin cancer screening, their skills in detecting malignant tumours is suboptimal. Objectives: To determine whether a short dermoscopy e-learning course (4 h) in skin tumour diagnosis for PCPs is non-inferior to a long course (12 h) in selective triage of skin lesions. Secondly, to evaluate whether regular refresher training sessions are necessary to maintain the PCPs' skills in the medium term. Methods: A randomized 2 × 2 factorial non-inferiority trial was conducted online over an 8-month period among 233 PCPs including 126 certified general practitioners, 94 PCPs in training, and 13 occupational physicians, all without prior advanced dermoscopy training. Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive short training and mandatory refreshers (n = 58), short training and optional refreshers (n = 59), long training and mandatory refreshers (n = 58), or long training and optional refreshers (n = 58). PCPs' skills were evaluated before training (T0), immediately after training (T1) to test the non-inferiority, and after 5 months (T2) to evaluate the impact of the refreshers. The primary endpoint was the difference in the change of score after short and long training. The non-inferiority margin was set at −28%. Results: Among the 233 randomized participants, 216 (93%) completed T1 and 197 (84.5%) completed T2. For short versus long training, the primary endpoint was 1.392 (95% CI: 0.138; 2.645) in the per-protocol population (p &lt; 0.001) and 1.016 (95% CI: −0.224; 2.256) in the modified intention-to-treat population (p &lt; 0.001). After training, the type of refresher showed no impact on the score (p = 0.840). However, PCPs who completed all refreshers showed the best mean overall score at T2 (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: These findings confirm that short dermoscopy e-learning is non-inferior in training PCPs to triage skin lesions compared to long training. After training, regular refreshers are important to maintain the PCPs' acquired skills over time

Evaluation of primary care physicians' competence in selective skin tumour triage after short versus long dermoscopy training: a randomized non‐inferiority trial

Background: Although primary care physicians (PCPs) play a key role in skin cancer screening, their skills in detecting malignant tumours is suboptimal. Objectives: To determine whether a short dermoscopy e‐learning course (4 h) in skin tumour diagnosis for PCPs is non‐inferior to a long course (12 h) in selective triage of skin lesions. Secondly, to evaluate whether regular refresher training sessions are necessary to maintain the PCPs' skills in the medium term.MethodsA randomized 2 × 2 factorial non‐inferiority trial was conducted online over an 8‐month period among 233 PCPs including 126 certified general practitioners, 94 PCPs in training, and 13 occupational physicians, all without prior advanced dermoscopy training. Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive short training and mandatory refreshers (n = 58), short training and optional refreshers (n = 59), long training and mandatory refreshers (n = 58), or long training and optional refreshers (n = 58). PCPs' skills were evaluated before training (T0), immediately after training (T1) to test the non‐inferiority, and after 5 months (T2) to evaluate the impact of the refreshers. The primary endpoint was the difference in the change of score after short and long training. The non‐inferiority margin was set at −28%. Results: Among the 233 randomized participants, 216 (93%) completed T1 and 197 (84.5%) completed T2. For short versus long training, the primary endpoint was 1.392 (95% CI: 0.138; 2.645) in the per‐protocol population (p < 0.001) and 1.016 (95% CI: −0.224; 2.256) in the modified intention‐to‐treat population (p < 0.001). After training, the type of refresher showed no impact on the score (p = 0.840). However, PCPs who completed all refreshers showed the best mean overall score at T2 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: These findings confirm that short dermoscopy e‐learning is non‐inferior in training PCPs to triage skin lesions compared to long training. After training, regular refreshers are important to maintain the PCPs' acquired skills over time