15 research outputs found

    Contribution of actin filaments and microtubules to cell elongation and alignment depends on the grating depth of microgratings

    Get PDF
    Additional file 1: Figure S1. (A) A phase contrast image of TCPS surface. Bar, 100 μm. (B) An imageshowing FN-lines (1 μm line and spacing) obtained by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) (Dimension 3100with a Nanoscope III controller, Digital Instruments) using silicon cantilevers (spring constant; 50 Nm-1)(RTESP, Veeco Probes) in contact mode. (C-E) SEM (Scanning electron microscopy) (6010 LV, JEOL)images showing the cross section of three different microgratings; 1 μm gratings with 0.35 um depth (C) and1 μm depth (D) and 2 μm gratings with 2 μm depth (E). Figure S2. (A) Fluorescence image of a RPE-1 cell stably expressing GFP/centrin cell on 1 μm gratings (1 μm deep). Bar, 30 μm. A yellow arrow indicates the direction of cell elongation. (B) Average cell aspect ratio (R) of cells on 1 μm gratings (0.35 or 1 μm deep) and 2 μm gratings with/without CD treatment. n: number of cells. ***P < 0.001. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and a Bonferroni post hoc test. Error bar denotes the standard deviation of the mean. Figure S3. Alignment of actin and vinculin to the different substrates (Flat TCPS surface, FN-lines, and 1 μm gratings (0.35 or 1μm deep)). The alignment angle was measured as an angle difference of actin or vinculin orientation to the long axis of a cell on flat PDMS surface or the long axis of the FN-line or each micrograting. #: the number of cells. Error bar denotes the standard deviation of the mean. Figure S4. Merged image of MTs (Green fluorescence) and pattern (phase contrast) of cells on 1 μm grating (1 μm deep) in the presenceof CD at 1 μM

    An Antinuclear Antibody-Negative Patient With Lupus Nephritis

    Get PDF
    Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a typical autoimmune disease that's characterized by various autoantibodies to nuclear and cytoplasmic antigens. The presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in serum is generally considered a decisive diagnostic sign of SLE. However, a small subset of SLE patients who had the typical clinical features of SLE was reported to show persistently negative ANA tests. Our report describes a 16-yr-old female who presented with the clinical manifestations of SLE such as malar rash, photosensitivity, arthritis, lymphopenia, pericarditis and proteinuria. The serum autoantibodies were all negative and renal biopsy showed that the histopathological changes of immune complex mediated the focal segmental necrotizing glomerulonephritis with crescent formation. She was treated with monthly pulse cyclophosphamide along with corticosteroids. During the 2-yr follow-up period, the proteinuria was markedly decreased and all of the ANA and anti-double stranded DNA antibody tests were negative. This case suggests that ANA may not be required in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis
    corecore