Clinical decision support tools: analysis of online drug information databases

BACKGROUND: Online drug information databases are used to assist in enhancing clinical decision support. However, the choice of which online database to consult, purchase or subscribe to is likely made based on subjective elements such as history of use, familiarity, or availability during professional training. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical decision support tools for drug information by systematically comparing the most commonly used online drug information databases. METHODS: Five commercially available and two freely available online drug information databases were evaluated according to scope (presence or absence of answer), completeness (the comprehensiveness of the answers), and ease of use. Additionally, a composite score integrating all three criteria was utilized. Fifteen weighted categories comprised of 158 questions were used to conduct the analysis. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square were used to summarize the evaluation components and make comparisons between databases. Scheffe's multiple comparison procedure was used to determine statistically different scope and completeness scores. The composite score was subjected to sensitivity analysis to investigate the effect of the choice of percentages for scope and completeness. RESULTS: The rankings for the databases from highest to lowest, based on composite scores were Clinical Pharmacology, Micromedex, Lexi-Comp Online, Facts & Comparisons 4.0, Epocrates Online Premium, RxList.com, and Epocrates Online Free. Differences in scope produced three statistical groupings with Group 1 (best) performers being: Clinical Pharmacology, Micromedex, Facts & Comparisons 4.0, Lexi-Comp Online, Group 2: Epocrates Premium and RxList.com and Group 3: Epocrates Free (p < 0.05). Completeness scores were similarly stratified. Collapsing the databases into two groups by access (subscription or free), showed the subscription databases performed better than the free databases in the measured criteria (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Online drug information databases, which belong to clinical decision support, vary in their ability to answer questions across a range of categories

Ability of online drug databases to assist in clinical decision-making with infectious disease therapies

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Infectious disease (ID) is a dynamic field with new guidelines being adopted at a rapid rate. Clinical decision support tools (CDSTs) have proven beneficial in selecting treatment options to improve outcomes. However, there is a dearth of information on the abilities of CDSTs, such as drug information databases. This study evaluated online drug information databases when answering infectious disease-specific queries.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Eight subscription drug information databases: American Hospital Formulary Service Drug Information (AHFS), Clinical Pharmacology (CP), Epocrates Online Premium (EOP), Facts & Comparisons 4.0 Online (FC), Lexi-Comp (LC), Lexi-Comp with AHFS (LC-AHFS), Micromedex (MM), and PEPID PDC (PPDC) and six freely accessible: DailyMed (DM), DIOne (DIO), Epocrates Online Free (EOF), Internet Drug Index (IDI), Johns Hopkins ABX Guide (JHAG), and Medscape Drug Reference (MDR) were evaluated for their scope (presence of an answer) and completeness (on a 3-point scale) in answering 147 infectious disease-specific questions. Questions were divided among five classifications: antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, antiparasitic, and vaccination/immunization. Classifications were further divided into categories (e.g., dosage, administration, emerging resistance, synergy, and spectrum of activity). Databases were ranked based on scope and completeness scores. ANOVA and Chi-square were used to determine differences between individual databases and between subscription and free databases.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Scope scores revealed three discrete tiers of database performance: Tier 1 (82-77%), Tier 2 (73-65%) and Tier 3 (56-41%) which were significantly different from each other (p < 0.05). The top tier performers: MM (82%), MDR (81%), LC-AHFS (81%), AHFS (78%), and CP (77%) answered significantly more questions compared to other databases (p < 0.05). Top databases for completeness were: MM (97%), DM (96%), IDI (95%), and MDR (95%). Subscription databases performed better than free databases in all categories (p = 0.03). Databases suffered from 37 erroneous answers for an overall error rate of 1.8%.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Drug information databases used in ID practice as CDSTs can be valuable resources. MM, MDR, LC-AHFS, AHFS, and CP were shown to be superior in their scope and completeness of information, and MM, AHFS, and MDR provided no erroneous answers. There is room for improvement in all evaluated databases.</p

Role of the pharmacist in pre-exposure chemoprophylaxis (PrEP) therapy for HIV prevention

With a global estimate of 2.5 million new infections of HIV occurring yearly, discovering novel methods to help stem the spread of the virus is critical. The use of antiretroviral chemoprophylaxis for preventing HIV after accidental or occupational exposure and in maternal to fetal transmission has become a widely accepted method to combat HIV. Based on this success, pre-exposure chemoprophylaxis (PrEP) is being explored in atrisk patient populations such as injecting drug users, female sex workers and men who have sex with men. This off-label and unmonitored use has created a need for education and intervention by pharmacists and other healthcare professionals. Pharmacists should educate themselves on PrEP and be prepared to counsel patients about their means of obtaining it (e.g. borrowing or sharing medications and ordering from disreputable Internet pharmacies). They should also be proactive about medication therapy management in these patients due to clinically important drug interactions with PrEP medications. Only one trial exploring the safety and efficacy of tenofovir as PrEP has been completed thus far. However, five ongoing trials are in various stages and two additional studies are scheduled for the near future. Unfortunately, studies in this arena have met with many challenges that have threatened to derail progress. Ethical controversy surrounding post-trial care of participants who seroconvert during studies, as well as concerns over emerging viral resistance and logistical site problems, have already halted several PrEP trials. Information about these early trials has already filtered down to affected individuals who are experimenting with this unproven therapy as an �evening before pill�. The potential for PrEP is promising; however, more extensive trials are necessary to establish its safety and efficacy. Pharmacists are well-positioned to play a key role in helping patients make choices about PrEP managing their therapy, and developing policy with an eye towards the future.Con una estimación global de 2,5 millones de nuevas infecciones de VIH cada año, es crítico descubrir nuevos métodos para ayudar a detener la extensión del virus. El uso de quimioprofilaxis antirretroviral para prevención del VIH después de una exposición accidental u ocupacional y en transmisión materno-fetal se ha convertido en un método comúnmente aceptado para combatir el VIH. Basando en este éxito, se está explorando la quimioprofilaxis pre-exposición (PrEP) en poblaciones de riesgo tales como drogadictos intravenosos, trabajadoras sexuales, y hombres que tiene sexo con hombres. Este uso no autorizado y no vigilado ha creado la necesidad de educación e intervención de farmacéuticos y otros profesionales de la salud. Los farmacéuticos deberían formarse sobre la PrEP y estar preparados para aconsejar a los pacientes sobre los medios de obtenerla (p.e. prestándose o compartiendo medicaciones y comprándola en farmacias de confianza en Internet). También deberían ser proactivos en el seguimiento de estos pacientes debido a las importantes interacciones de los medicamentos PrEP. Solo se ha completado un ensayo que exploró la seguridad y la eficacia del tenofovir como PrEP. Sin embargo, están programados 5 ensayos en marcha en diversos estadios, y dos estudios adicionales en un futuro próximo. Desafortunadamente, los estudios en este campo se han encontrado con muchos obstáculos que han amenazado interrumpir su progreso. La controversia ética sobre la atención post-ensayo de los pacientes que se seroconvierten durante el estudio, así como las preocupaciones sobre la emergente resistencia viral y los problemas logísticos, ya han interrumpido varios ensayos de PrEP. La información de estos primeros ensayos se ha filtrado e los individuos afectados que están experimentando con este tratamiento no probado como una �píldora de la tarde anterior�. El potencial de la PrEP es prometedor, sin embargo se necesitan ensayos más extensos para establecer su seguridad y eficacia. Los farmacéuticos están bien posicionaos para jugar un papel importante ayudando a los pacientes a tomar mejores decisiones sobre la PrEP, gestionando su tratamiento, y desarrollando políticas con un ojo en el futur

Associations of gender and age groups on the knowledge and use of drug information resources by American pharmacists

Objectives: To explore knowledge and use of drug information resources by pharmacists and identify patterns influenced by gender and age-group classification. Methods: A survey questionnaire was mailed nationwide to 1,000 practitioners working in community (n = 500) and hospital (n = 500) settings who answer drug information questions as part of their expected job responsibilities. Responses pertaining to drug information resource use and knowledge of different types of drug-related queries, resource media preferences, and perceived adequacy of resources maintained in the pharmacy were analyzed by gender and age group. The t statistic was used to test for significant differences of means and percentages between genders and between age groups. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize other findings. Results: Gender and age group classification influenced patterns of knowledge and use of drug information resources by pharmacists. They also affected pharmacists´ perceptions of the most common types of questions prompting them to consult a drug information reference, as well as the resources consulted. Micromedex, exclusively available in electronic format, was the most commonly consulted resource overall by pharmacists. Lexi-Comp Online was the leading choice by women, preferred over Micromedex, but was not one of the top two resources selected by men. Conclusion: This study successfully identified the influence of gender and age-group classification in assessing drug information resource knowledge and use of general and specific types of drug-related queries.Objetivos: Explorar el conocimiento y el uso de fuentes de información por farmacéuticos e identificar los patrones afectados por género y grupo etario. Métodos: Se envió un cuestionario por correo a 1000 facultativos de todo el país cuyas funciones en farmacias comunitarias (n=500) y de hospital incluían responder preguntas sobre información de medicamentos. Se analizaron por género y grupo etario las respuestas relativas al uso de fuentes de información y al conocimiento de los diferentes tipos de áreas, preferencias de fuentes e idoneidad percibida de las fuentes. Se utilizó el test t para probar las diferencias de medias y porcentajes entre géneros y grupos etarios. Se usó estadística descriptiva para caracterizar otros hallazgos. Resultados: El género y los grupos etarios afectaron los patrones de conocimiento y uso de fuentes de información sobre medicamentos por farmacéuticos. También afectaron las percepciones de los farmacéuticos sobre los tipos de preguntas más frecuentemente formuladas que les llevaban a consultar fuentes de información sobre medicamentos, así como las fuentes consultadas. Micromedex, sólo disponible en formato electrónico, fue la fuente más consultada por el conjunto de los farmacéuticos. Lexi-Comp Online fue la fuente preferida por las mujeres, seguida de Micromedex, pero no estaba entre las dos fuentes más populares entre los hombres. Conclusión: Este estudio identificó con éxito la influencia del género y del grupo etario en la evaluación de las fuentes de información sobre medicamentos y el uso en general y específico de búsquedas relativas a medicamentos

Self-reported influence of television-based direct-to-consumer advertising on patient seasonal allergy and asthma medication use: An internet survey

Background: Direct-to-consumer advertising (DDTCA) of medications, a marketing tool used by the pharmaceutical industry to increase patient awareness of products, affects both consumer behavior and, ultimately, physician prescribing practices. Billions of dollars are budgeted each year for DTCA, and its influence is far-reaching. However, little information is available about patient-initiated physician interactions in which television-bbased DTCA has played a role in consumer behavior. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the influence of television-based DTCA on treatment changes in patient-initiated medication use. Methods: A 68-item survey instrument consisting of dichotomous, multiple-choice, and open-ended questions was constructed and sent to a convenience sample of US residents during 3 consecutive months ending in February 2005. The survey, which was accessed through an Internet link provided in the e-mail, was designed to capture data about patient perceptions and behaviors regarding television-based DTCA of prescription medications used for seasonal allergy and asthma as well as demographic information. Inferential and descriptive analyses were performed. Key tests included Crosstabs analysis and normal approximation to the binomial test with the z score. Results: Surveys were sent to 2500 individuals. A total of 427 valid surveys were returned for a 17.1% response rate. Of the 402 respondents (94.1%) who stated that they had seen DTCA for seasonal allergy medication, 50 (12.4%) said they had discussed the advertised medication with their physician and 22 of those discussions (44.0%) resulted in a change in treatment. Three hundred forty-two respondents (80.1%) stated that they had viewed DTCA for prescription asthma medications, and 23 of those respondents (6.7%) said that they had discussed the brand of asthma medication viewed on television with their physician. Those discussions resulted in a change in treatment for 9 respondents (39.1%). Conclusion: Within this limited, self-reported, survey sample, patient-initiated discussions with physicians regarding television-based DTCA of allergy and asthma medications resulted in a change of treatment in 44.0% and 39.1% of respondents, respectively