Rapid detection of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci: impact on decision-making and costs.

International audienceBACKGROUND: According to French national recommendations, the detection of a patient colonized with glycopeptide-resistant enterococci (GRE) leads to interruption of new admissions and transfer of contact patients (CPs) to another unit or healthcare facility, with weekly screening of CPs. FINDINGS: We evaluated the medical and economic impact of a pragmatic adaptation of national guidelines associated with a real-time PCR (RTP) (Cepheid XpertTM vanA/vanB) as part of the strategy for controlling GRE spread in two medical wards. Screening was previously performed using chromogenic selective medium (CSM). Turn around time (TAT), costs of tests and cost of missed patient days were prospectively collected. In February 2012, the identification of GRE in one patient in the diabetology ward led to the screening of 31 CPs using CSM; one secondary case was identified in a CP already transferred to the Nephrology ward. Awaiting the results of SCM (median TAT, 70.5 h), 41 potential patient days were missed, due to interruption of admissions. The overall cost (screening tests + missing patient.days) was estimated at 14, 302.20 [euro sign]. The secondary case led to screening of 22 CPs in the Nephrology ward using RTP. Because of a short median TAT of 4.6 h, we did not interrupt admissions and patients' transfers. Among 22 CPs, 19 (86%) were negative for vanA, 2 were positive for vanB and 3 had invalid results needing CSM. The overall cost of the strategy was estimated at 870.40 [euro sign] (cost of screening tests only), without missing patient days. CONCLUSION: The rapid PCR test for vanA-positive GRE detection both allowed rapid decision about the best infection control strategy and prevented loss of income due to discontinuation of patient transfers and admissions

Ebola: should we consider influenza vaccination?

International audienc

Multicenter study on recent portal venous system thrombosis associated with cytomegalovirus disease.

International audienceBackground & AimsRecent non-malignant non-cirrhotic portal venous system thrombosis (PVT) is a rare condition. Among risk factors for PVT, cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is usually listed based on a small number of reported cases. The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics and outcomes of PVT associated with CMV disease.MethodsWe conducted a French multicenter retrospective study comparing patients with recent PVT and CMV disease (“CMV positive”; n = 23) to patients with recent PVT for whom CMV testing was negative (“CMV negative”; n = 53) or unavailable (“CMV unknown”; n = 297).ResultsCompared to patients from the “CMV negative” and “CMV unknown” groups, patients from the “CMV positive” group were younger, more frequently had fever, and had higher heart rate, lymphocyte count and serum ALT levels (p ≤0.01 for all). The prevalence of immunosuppression did not differ between the 3 groups (4%, 4% and 6%, respectively). Extension of PVT was similar between the 3 groups. Thirteen out of 23 “CMV positive” patients had another risk factor for thrombosis. Besides CMV disease, the number of risk factors for thrombosis was similar between the 3 groups. Heterozygosity for the prothrombin G20210A gene variant was more frequent in “CMV positive” patients (22%) than in the “CMV negative” (4%, p = 0.01) and “CMV unknown” (8%, p = 0.03) groups. Recanalization rate was not influenced by CMV status.ConclusionsIn patients with recent PVT, features of mononucleosis syndrome should raise suspicion of CMV disease. CMV disease does not influence thrombosis extension nor recanalization. More than half of “CMV positive” patients have another risk factor for thrombosis, with a particular link to the prothrombin G20210A gene variant.Lay summaryPatients with cytomegalovirus (CMV)-associated portal venous system thrombosis have similar thrombosis extension and evolution as patients without CMV disease. However, patients with CMV-associated portal venous system thrombosis more frequently have the prothrombin G20210A gene variant, suggesting that these entities act synergistically to promote thrombosis