14 research outputs found
Efecto sobre la mortalidad de la ampliación a los festivos y fines de semana del proyecto "UCI sin paredes". Estudio before-after.
Objetivo: Estudiar si la ampliación, a festivos y fines de semana, del protocolo de detección
proactiva precoz de gravedad en el hospital y actuación de intensivistas en planta convencional
y urgencias (actividad «UCI sin paredes») se asocia a una reducción en la mortalidad de los
pacientes ingresados en UCI en esos días.
Diseno: ˜ Estudio cuasiexperimental before---after.
Ámbito: Hospital de nivel 2 con 210 camas en funcionamiento y UCI polivalente con 8 camas.
Pacientes o participantes: En el grupo control, donde no se realiza la actividad «UCI sin
paredes» los fines de semana ni festivos, se incluyeron los pacientes ingresados en la UCI esos
días del 1 de enero de 2010 al 30 de abril de 2013. En el grupo intervención se amplió la actividad
«UCI sin paredes» a los fines de semana y festivos y se incluyeron los pacientes ingresados esos
días del 1 de mayo de 2013 al 31 de octubre de 2014. Se excluyeron los pacientes procedentes
de quirófano tras una cirugía programada.
Variables de interés: Se analizaron las variables demográficas (edad, sexo), la procedencia
(urgencias, planta de hospitalización, quirófano), el tipo de paciente (médico, quirúrgico),
el motivo de ingreso, las comorbilidades y el SAPS 3 como puntuación de gravedad al ingreso,
estancia en UCI y hospitalaria, además de la mortalidad en la UCI y en el hospital.
Resultados: Se incluyeron en el grupo control 389 pacientes, y 161 en el grupo intervención.
No se encontraron diferencias entre ambos grupos, salvo en la comorbilidad cardiovascular (un
49% en el grupo control frente a un 33% en el grupo intervención; p < 0,001), en la gravedad
al ingreso medida mediante el SAPS 3 (mediana de 52 [percentiles 25---75: 42---63] en el grupo
control frente a 48 [percentiles 25---75: 40---56] en el grupo intervención; p = 0,008) y en la
mortalidad en UCI, que fue de un 11% en el grupo control (IC 95% 8 a 14) frente al 3% (IC 95%
1 a 7) en el grupo intervención (p = 0,003). En el análisis multivariable, los 2 únicos factores
asociados con la mortalidad en UCI fueron: SAPS 3 (OR 1,08; IC 95% 1,06---1,11) y el pertenecer
al grupo intervención (OR 0,33; IC 95% 0,12---0,89).
Conclusiones: La ampliación de la actividad «UCI sin paredes» a los fines de semana y festivos
conlleva un descenso en la mortalidad en la UCI.Objective: To determine whether extension to holidays and weekends of the protocol for
the early proactive detection of severity in hospital (‘‘ICU without walls’’ project) results in
decreased mortality among patients admitted to the ICU during those days.
Design: A quasi-experimental before---after study was carried out.
Setting: A level 2 hospital with 210 beds and a polyvalent ICU with 8 beds.
Patients or participants: The control group involved no ‘‘ICU without walls’’ activity on holidays
or weekends and included those patients admitted to the ICU on those days between 1
January 2010 and 30 April 2013. The intervention group in turn extended the ‘‘ICU without
walls’’ activity to holidays and weekends, and included those patients admitted on those days
between 1 May 2013 and 31 October 2014. Patients arriving from the operating room after
scheduled surgery were excluded.
Variables of interest: An analysis was made of the demographic variables (age, gender), origin
(emergency room, hospital ward, operating room), type of patient (medical, surgical), reason
for admission, comorbidities and SAPS 3 score as a measure of severity upon admission, stay in
the ICU and in hospital, and mortality in the ICU and in hospital.
Results: A total of 389 and 161 patients were included in the control group and intervention
group, respectively. There were no differences between the 2 groups except as regards cardiovascular comorbidity (49% in the control group versus 33% in the intervention group;
P < .001), severity upon admission (median SAPS 3 score 52 [percentiles 25---75: 42---63) in the
control group versus 48 [percentiles 25---75: 40---56] in the intervention group; P = .008) and mortality
in the ICU (11% in the control group [95% CI 8---14] versus 3% [95% CI 1---7] in the intervention
group; P = .003). In the multivariate analysis, the only 2 factors associated to mortality in the
ICU were the SAPS 3 score (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.06---1.11) and inclusion in the intervention group
(OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.12---0.89).
Conclusions: Extension of the ‘‘ICU without walls’’ activity to holidays and weekends results in
a decrease in mortality in the ICU.pre-print424 K
The impact of frailty on ICU and 30-day mortality and the level of care in very elderly patients (≥ 80 years)
Purpose: Very old critical ill patients are a rapid expanding group in the ICU. Indications for admission, triage criteria and level of care are frequently discussed for such patients. However, most relevant outcome studies in this group frequently find an increased mortality and a reduced quality of life in survivors. The main objective was to study the impact of frailty compared with other variables with regards to short-term outcome in the very old ICU population. Methods: A transnational prospective cohort study from October 2016 to May 2017 with 30 days follow-up was set up by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. In total 311 ICUs from 21 European countries participated. The ICUs included the first consecutive 20 very old (≥ 80 years) patients admitted to the ICU within a 3-month inclusion period. Frailty, SOFA score and therapeutic procedures were registered, in addition to limitations of care. For measurement of frailty the Clinical Frailty Scale was used at ICU admission. The main outcomes were ICU and 30-day mortality and survival at 30 days. Results: A total of 5021 patients with a median age of 84 years (IQR 81–86 years) were included in the final analysis, 2404 (47.9%) were women. Admission was classified as acute in 4215 (83.9%) of the patients. Overall ICU and 30-day mortality rates were 22.1% and 32.6%. During ICU stay 23.8% of the patients did not receive specific ICU procedures: ventilation, vasoactive drugs or renal replacement therapy. Frailty (values ≥ 5) was found in 43.1% and was independently related to 30-day survival (HR 1.54; 95% CI 1.38–1.73) for frail versus non-frail. Conclusions: Among very old patients (≥ 80 years) admitted to the ICU, the consecutive classes in Clinical Frailty Scale were inversely associated with short-term survival. The scale had a very low number of missing data. These findings provide support to add frailty to the clinical assessment in this patient group. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03134807)
Weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care units across 50 countries (WEAN SAFE): a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study
International audienceBackground: Current management practices and outcomes in weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation are poorly understood. We aimed to describe the epidemiology, management, timings, risk for failure, and outcomes of weaning in patients requiring at least 2 days of invasive mechanical ventilation. Methods: WEAN SAFE was an international, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study done in 481 intensive care units in 50 countries. Eligible participants were older than 16 years, admitted to a participating intensive care unit, and receiving mechanical ventilation for 2 calendar days or longer. We defined weaning initiation as the first attempt to separate a patient from the ventilator, successful weaning as no reintubation or death within 7 days of extubation, and weaning eligibility criteria based on positive end-expiratory pressure, fractional concentration of oxygen in inspired air, and vasopressors. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients successfully weaned at 90 days. Key secondary outcomes included weaning duration, timing of weaning events, factors associated with weaning delay and weaning failure, and hospital outcomes. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03255109. Findings: Between Oct 4, 2017, and June 25, 2018, 10 232 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 5869 were enrolled. 4523 (77·1%) patients underwent at least one separation attempt and 3817 (65·0%) patients were successfully weaned from ventilation at day 90. 237 (4·0%) patients were transferred before any separation attempt, 153 (2·6%) were transferred after at least one separation attempt and not successfully weaned, and 1662 (28·3%) died while invasively ventilated. The median time from fulfilling weaning eligibility criteria to first separation attempt was 1 day (IQR 0–4), and 1013 (22·4%) patients had a delay in initiating first separation of 5 or more days. Of the 4523 (77·1%) patients with separation attempts, 2927 (64·7%) had a short wean (≤1 day), 457 (10·1%) had intermediate weaning (2–6 days), 433 (9·6%) required prolonged weaning (≥7 days), and 706 (15·6%) had weaning failure. Higher sedation scores were independently associated with delayed initiation of weaning. Delayed initiation of weaning and higher sedation scores were independently associated with weaning failure. 1742 (31·8%) of 5479 patients died in the intensive care unit and 2095 (38·3%) of 5465 patients died in hospital. Interpretation: In critically ill patients receiving at least 2 days of invasive mechanical ventilation, only 65% were weaned at 90 days. A better understanding of factors that delay the weaning process, such as delays in weaning initiation or excessive sedation levels, might improve weaning success rates. Funding: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, European Respiratory Society
Sepsis at ICU admission does not decrease 30-day survival in very old patients: a post-hoc analysis of the VIP1 multinational cohort study
Background: The number of intensive care patients aged ≥ 80 years (Very old Intensive Care Patients; VIPs) is growing. VIPs have high mortality and morbidity and the benefits of ICU admission are frequently questioned. Sepsis incidence has risen in recent years and identification of outcomes is of considerable public importance. We aimed to determine whether VIPs admitted for sepsis had different outcomes than those admitted for other acute reasons and identify potential prognostic factors for 30-day survival.
Results: This prospective study included VIPs with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores ≥ 2 acutely admitted to 307 ICUs in 21 European countries. Of 3869 acutely admitted VIPs, 493 (12.7%) [53.8% male, median age 83 (81-86) years] were admitted for sepsis. Sepsis was defined according to clinical criteria; suspected or demonstrated focus of infection and SOFA score ≥ 2 points. Compared to VIPs admitted for other acute reasons, VIPs admitted for sepsis were younger, had a higher SOFA score (9 vs. 7, p < 0.0001), required more vasoactive drugs [82.2% vs. 55.1%, p < 0.0001] and renal replacement therapies [17.4% vs. 9.9%; p < 0.0001], and had more life-sustaining treatment limitations [37.3% vs. 32.1%; p = 0.02]. Frailty was similar in both groups. Unadjusted 30-day survival was not significantly different between the two groups. After adjustment for age, gender, frailty, and SOFA score, sepsis had no impact on 30-day survival [HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.86-1.15), p = 0.917]. Inverse-probability weight (IPW)-adjusted survival curves for the first 30 days after ICU admission were similar for acute septic and non-septic patients [HR: 1.00 (95% CI 0.87-1.17), p = 0.95]. A matched-pair analysis in which patients with sepsis were matched with two control patients of the same gender with the same age, SOFA score, and level of frailty was also performed. A Cox proportional hazard regression model stratified on the matched pairs showed that 30-day survival was similar in both groups [57.2% (95% CI 52.7-60.7) vs. 57.1% (95% CI 53.7-60.1), p = 0.85].
Conclusions: After adjusting for organ dysfunction, sepsis at admission was not independently associated with decreased 30-day survival in this multinational study of 3869 VIPs. Age, frailty, and SOFA score were independently associated with survival