276 research outputs found
Clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) interaction: separate intake and a non-omeprazole PPI the solution?
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Dual therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel increases the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Therefore, co-therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is recommended by most guidelines. However, there are warnings against combining PPIs with clopidogrel because of their interactions with cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 2C19 (<it>CYP2C19</it>).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The effects of the combined or separate intake of 20 mg of omeprazole and 75 mg of clopidogrel on the clopidogrel-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation were measured in four healthy subjects whose <it>CYP2C19 </it>exon sequences were determined. The effects of co-therapy with 10 mg of rabeprazole were also examined.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Two subjects showed the wild-type <it>CYP2C19 </it>sequence. The concurrent intake of omeprazole had no effect on clopidogrel-induced platelet inhibition in these subjects. Two subjects were heterozygous for the *2 allele, with predicted reduced <it>CYP2C19 </it>activity. One of them was a clopidogrel non-responder. In the second heterozygous subject, omeprazole co-therapy reduced the clopidogrel anti-platelet effect when taken simultaneously or separately. However, the simultaneous intake of rabeprazole did not reduce the clopidogrel effect.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The clopidogrel-PPI interaction does not seem to be a PPI class effect. Rabeprazole did not affect the clopidogrel effect in a subject with a clear omeprazole-clopidogrel interaction. The separate intake of PPI and clopidogrel may not be sufficient to prevent their interaction.</p
XLMR in MRX families 29, 32, 33 and 38 results from the dup24 mutation in the ARX (Aristaless related homeobox) gene
BACKGROUND: X-linked mental retardation (XLMR) is the leading cause of mental retardation in males. Mutations in the ARX gene in Xp22.1 have been found in numerous families with both nonsyndromic and syndromic XLMR. The most frequent mutation in this gene is a 24 bp duplication in exon 2. Based on this fact, a panel of XLMR families linked to Xp22 was tested for this particular ARX mutation. METHODS: Genomic DNA from XLMR families linked to Xp22.1 was amplified for exon 2 in ARX using a Cy5 labeled primer pair. The resulting amplicons were sized using the ALFexpress automated sequencer. RESULTS: A panel of 11 families with X-linked mental retardation was screened for the ARX 24dup mutation. Four nonsyndromic XLMR families – MRX29, MRX32, MRX33 and MRX38 – were found to have this particular gene mutation. CONCLUSION: We have identified 4 additional XLMR families with the ARX dup24 mutation from a panel of 11 XLMR families linked to Xp22.1. This finding makes the ARX dup24 mutation the most common mutation in nonsyndromic XLMR families linked to Xp22.1. As this mutation can be readily tested for using an automated sequencer, screening should be considered for any male with nonsyndromic MR of unknown etiology
Highly sensitive liquid biopsy Duplex sequencing complements tissue biopsy to enhance detection of clinically relevant genetic variants
BackgroundLiquid biopsy (LB) is a promising complement to tissue biopsy for detection of clinically relevant genetic variants in cancer and mosaic diseases. A combined workflow to enable parallel tissue and LB analysis is required to maximize diagnostic yield for patients.MethodsWe developed and validated a cost-efficient combined next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflow for both tissue and LB samples, and applied Duplex sequencing technology for highly accurate detection of low frequency variants in plasma. Clinically relevant cutoffs for variant reporting and quantification were established.ResultsWe investigated assay performance characteristics for very low amounts of clinically relevant variants. In plasma, the assay achieved 100% sensitivity and 92.3% positive predictive value (PPV) for single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and 91.7% sensitivity and 100% PPV for insertions and deletions (InDel) in clinically relevant hotspots with 0.5-5% variant allele frequencies (VAFs). We further established a cutoff for reporting variants (i.e. Limit of Blank, LOB) at 0.25% VAF and a cutoff for quantification (i.e. Limit of Quantification, LOQ) at 5% VAF in plasma for accurate clinical interpretation of analysis results. With our LB approach, we were able to identify the molecular cause of a clinically confirmed asymmetric overgrowth syndrome in a 10-year old child that would have remained undetected with tissue analysis as well as other molecular diagnostic approaches.ConclusionOur flexible and cost-efficient workflow allows analysis of both tissue and LB samples and provides clinically relevant cutoffs for variant reporting and precise quantification. Complementing tissue analysis by LB is likely to increase diagnostic yield for patients with molecular diseases
Low-level APC mutational mosaicism is the underlying cause in a substantial fraction of unexplained colorectal adenomatous polyposis cases
BACKGROUND: In 30-50% of patients with colorectal adenomatous polyposis, no germline mutation in the known genes APC, causing familial adenomatous polyposis, MUTYH, causing MUTYH-associated polyposis, or POLE or POLD1, causing polymerase-proofreading-associated polyposis can be identified, although a hereditary aetiology is likely. This study aimed to explore the impact of APC mutational mosaicism in unexplained polyposis. METHODS: To comprehensively screen for somatic low-level APC mosaicism, high-coverage next-generation sequencing of the APC gene was performed using DNA from leucocytes and a total of 53 colorectal tumours from 20 unrelated patients with unexplained sporadic adenomatous polyposis. APC mosaicism was assumed if the same loss-of-function APC mutation was present in ≥2 anatomically separated colorectal adenomas/carcinomas per patient. All mutations were validated using diverse methods. RESULTS: In 25% (5/20) of patients, somatic mosaicism of a pathogenic APC mutation was identified as underlying cause of the disease. In 2/5 cases, the mosaic level in leucocyte DNA was slightly below the sensitivity threshold of Sanger sequencing; while in 3/5 cases, the allelic fraction was either very low (0.1-1%) or no mutations were detectable. The majority of mosaic mutations were located outside the somatic mutation cluster region of the gene. CONCLUSIONS: The present data indicate a high prevalence of pathogenic mosaic APC mutations below the detection thresholds of routine diagnostics in adenomatous polyposis, even if high-coverage sequencing of leucocyte DNA alone is taken into account. This has important implications for both routine work-up and strategies to identify new causative genes in this patient group
Role of germline aberrations affecting CTNNA1, MAP3K6 and MYD88 in gastric cancer susceptibility
Background In approximately 10% of all gastric cancer (GC) cases, a heritable cause is suspected. A subset of these cases have a causative germline CDH1 mutation; however, in most cases the cause remains unknown. Our objective was to assess to what extent these remaining cases may be explained by germline mutations in the novel candidate GC predisposing genes CTNNA1, MAP3K6 or MYD88. Methods We sequenced a large cohort of unexplained young and/or familial patients with GC (n=286) without a CDH1germline mutation for germline variants affecting CTNNA1, MAP3K6 and MYD88 using a targeted next-generation sequencing approach based on single-molecule molecular inversion probes. Results Predicted deleterious germline variants were not encountered in MYD88, but recurrently observed in CTNNA1 (n=2) and MAP3K6 (n=3) in our cohort of patients with GC. In contrast to deleterious variants in CTNNA1, deleterious variants in MAP3K6 also occur frequently in the general population. Conclusions Based on our results MAP3K6 should no longer be considered a GC predisposition gene, whereas deleterious CTNNA1 variants are confirmed as an infrequent cause of GC susceptibility. Biallelic MYD88 germline mutations are at most a very rare cause of GC susceptibility as no additional cases were identified.This study was funded by KWF Kankerbestrijding (grant number KUN2013-5876, RSvdP)
Current Account Imbalances in the Euro Area: Catching Up or Competitiveness?
In the debate on global imbalances, the euro area countries did not receive much attention so far. While the current account is on balance for the entire area, divergences between individual member states have increased since the introduction of the common currency. In this paper, the imbalances are traced back to catching up and competitiveness factors using paneleconometric techniques. In line with the intertemporal approach to the current account, low income countries tend to run deficits, while rich countries realize surpluses. However, the effect diminishes, if early years are dropped from the sample. The competitiveness channel is more robust and shows the expected sign, i.e. a real appreciation leads to external deficits. To restore competitiveness, a reduction of unit labour costs is on the agenda. Since a deterioration of competitiveness is not a feasible strategy for the surplus countries, an asymmetric response across countries is required in order to reduce the imbalances.In der Diskussion über globale Ungleichgewichte spielen die Länder der Eurozone bisher nicht die zentrale Rolle. Während die Leistungsbilanz für die gesamte Währungsunion ausgeglichen ist, sind die Ungleichgewichte zwischen den Mitgliedsländern erheblich und haben sich seit der Einführung der gemeinsamen Währung erhöht. In diesem Papier werden die Ungleichgewichte auf ökonomische Aufholprozesse und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit zurückgeführt. Dabei kommen panelökonometrische Methoden zum Einsatz. Bei Wohlfahrtunterschieden sollten Länder mit niedrigen Einkommen Defiziten, reichen Länder hingegen Überschüsse realisieren. Dieser Effekt nimmt jedoch im Zeitablauf ab. Eeine Erklärung über die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit ist robuster und zeigt die erwarteten VorZeichen, d.h. eine reale Aufwertung führt zu externen Defizite. Zur Wiederherstellung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit steht eine Reduzierung der Lohnstückkosten steht auf der Tagesordnung. Da eine Verschlechterung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit keine geeignete Strategie für die Überschussländer ist, scheint eine asymmetrische Reaktion in den einzelnen Ländern erforderlich zu sein, um die Ungleichgewichte in der Währungsunion zu verringern
Role of germline aberrations affecting CTNNA1, MAP3K6 and MYD88 in gastric cancer susceptibility
Background: In approximately 10% of all gastric cancer (GC) cases, a heritable cause is suspected. A subset of these cases have a causative germline CDH1 mutation; however, in most cases the cause remains unknown. Our objective was to assess to what extent these remaining cases may be explained by germline mutations in the novel candidate GC predisposing genes CTNNA1, MAP3K6 or MYD88. Methods: We sequenced a large cohort of unexplained young and/or familial patients with GC (n=286) without a CDH1germline mutation for germline variants affecting CTNNA1, MAP3K6 and MYD88 using a targeted next-generation sequencing approach based on single-molecule molecular inversion probes. Results: Predicted deleterious germline variants were not encountered in MYD88, but recurrently observed in CTNNA1 (n=2) and MAP3K6 (n=3) in our cohort of patients with GC. In contrast to deleterious variants in CTNNA1, deleterious variants in MAP3K6 also occur frequently in the general population. Conclusions: Based on our results MAP3K6 should no longer be considered a GC predisposition gene, whereas deleterious CTNNA1 variants are confirmed as an infrequent cause of GC susceptibility. Biallelic MYD88 germline mutations are at most a very rare cause of GC susceptibility as no additional cases were identified
- …