Reference data for handwriting readiness assessment – using Writing Readiness Inventory In Context (WRITIC) and fine-motor coordination test

The READme file covers explanation of the variables and gives information on the reference data study. The file: 'reference data WRITIC 9HPT Timed TIHM' presents the Dutch reference data derived from the study. <br

Reference data for handwriting readiness assessment – using Writing Readiness Inventory In Context (WRITIC) and fine-motor coordination test

The READme file covers explanation of the variables and gives information on the reference data study. The file: 'reference data WRITIC 9HPT Timed TIHM' presents the Dutch reference data derived from the study. <br

Reliability and Discriminative Validity of Wearable Sensors for the Quantification of Upper Limb Movement Disorders in Individuals with Dyskinetic Cerebral Palsy

Background—Movement patterns in dyskinetic cerebral palsy (DCP) are characterized by abnormal postures and involuntary movements. Current evaluation tools in DCP are subjective and time-consuming. Sensors could yield objective information on pathological patterns in DCP, but their reliability has not yet been evaluated. The objectives of this study were to evaluate (i) reliability and (ii) discriminative ability of sensor parameters. Methods—Inertial measurement units were placed on the arm, forearm, and hand of individuals with and without DCP while performing reach-forward, reach-and-grasp-vertical, and reach-sideways tasks. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for reliability, and Mann–Whitney U-tests for between-group differences. Results—Twenty-two extremities of individuals with DCP (mean age 16.7 y) and twenty individuals without DCP (mean age 17.2 y) were evaluated. ICC values for all sensor parameters except jerk and sample entropy ranged from 0.50 to 0.98 during reach forwards/sideways and from 0.40 to 0.95 during reach-and-grasp vertical. Jerk and maximal acceleration/angular velocity were significantly higher for the DCP group in comparison with peers. Conclusions—This study was the first to assess the reliability of sensor parameters in individuals with DCP, reporting high between- and within-session reliability for the majority of the sensor parameters. These findings suggest that pathological movements of individuals with DCP can be reliably captured using a selection of sensor parameters

Trunk movement and posture during functional activities in spastic and dyskinetic cerebral palsy – scoping review concerning measurements and insights [Protocol Scoping Review]

This review builds a framework for further research on trunk control in children and youth with dyskinetic cerebral palsy. Within this review we aim to gather insights into the characteristics of impaired trunk control in CP in general, as well as the reliability and validity of the characteristics measured by instrumented methods

Assessment of movement disorders using wearable sensors during upper limb tasks: A scoping review

Background: Studies aiming to objectively quantify movement disorders during upper limb tasks using wearable sensors have recently increased, but there is a wide variety in described measurement and analyzing methods, hampering standardization of methods in research and clinics. Therefore, the primary objective of this review was to provide an overview of sensor set-up and type, included tasks, sensor features and methods used to quantify movement disorders during upper limb tasks in multiple pathological populations. The secondary objective was to identify the most sensitive sensor features for the detection and quantification of movement disorders on the one hand and to describe the clinical application of the proposed methods on the other hand. Methods: A literature search using Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed was performed. Articles needed to meet following criteria: 1) participants were adults/children with a neurological disease, 2) (at least) one sensor was placed on the upper limb for evaluation of movement disorders during upper limb tasks, 3) comparisons between: groups with/without movement disorders, sensor features before/after intervention, or sensor features with a clinical scale for assessment of the movement disorder. 4) Outcome measures included sensor features from acceleration/angular velocity signals. Results: A total of 101 articles were included, of which 56 researched Parkinson?s Disease. Wrist(s), hand(s) and index finger(s) were the most popular sensor locations. Most frequent tasks were: finger tapping, wrist pro/supination, keeping the arms extended in front of the body and finger-to-nose. Most frequently calculated sensor features were mean, standard deviation, root-mean-square, ranges, skewness, kurtosis/entropy of acceleration and/or angular velocity, in combination with dominant frequencies/power of acceleration signals. Examples of clinical applications were automatization of a clinical scale or discrimination between a patient/control group or different patient groups. Conclusion: Current overview can support clinicians and researchers in selecting the most sensitive pathology-dependent sensor features and methodologies for detection and quantification of upper limb movement disorders and objective evaluations of treatment effects. Insights from Parkinson?s Disease studies can accelerate the development of wearable sensors protocols in the remaining pathologies, provided that there is sufficient attention for the standardisation of protocols, tasks, feasibility and data analysis methods

Attainment of personal goals in the first year of intrathecal baclofen treatment in dyskinetic cerebral palsy: a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE: To assess attainment of individual treatment goals one year after intrathecal baclofen (ITB) pump implantation in individuals with dyskinetic cerebral palsy (CP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-center prospective cohort study was conducted including 34 non-walking individuals with severe dyskinetic CP, classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) IV/V, aged 4-24 years, 12 months after pump implantation. The main outcome measure was Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). Predictors of GAS results were analyzed. Complications were registered systematically. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of individuals with dyskinetic CP fully achieved one or more treatment goals. One or more treatment goals were partially achieved in 97% of individuals. Two factors were found to be associated with attainment of goals: Dyskinesia Impairment Scale (DIS) score at baseline and the difference in pain score between baseline and follow-up. These two variables explain 30% of the variance in the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal baclofen is effective in achieving individual treatment goals in children and young adults with dyskinetic CP after nine to 12 months of ITB treatment. A positive outcome on treatment goals is, for a small part, associated with higher severity of dystonia at baseline and with improvement of pain during treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Trial Register, number NTR3642.Implications for rehabilitationIntrathecal baclofen treatment is effective in attainment of personal treatment goals, one year after pump implantation in patients with dyskinetic cerebral palsy.A positive outcome on treatment goals is, for a small part, related to higher severity of dystonia at the start and on improvement of pain during treatment

Use of the Dyskinesia Impairment Scale in non‐ambulatory dyskinetic cerebral palsy

Aim: To assess the responsiveness, concurrent validity, and feasibility of the Dyskinesia Impairment Scale (DIS) in non-ambulatory patients with dyskinetic cerebral palsy (CP). Method: The study is a secondary analysis of data collected in the IDYS trial, a randomized controlled trial on the effects of intrathecal baclofen (ITB). The DIS and Barry–Albright Dystonia Scale (BADS) were conducted at baseline and after 3 months of ITB or placebo treatment. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing the effect sizes and correlation of change after treatment between the DIS and BADS. Concurrent validity was evaluated by assessing the correlations between scales. Feasibility was evaluated for each DIS item by the number of participants who successfully accomplished the item. Results: Thirty-three non-ambulatory patients (9 females, 24 males) with dyskinetic CP (ITB-treated: n=17, mean [SD] age: 14y 1mo [4y 1mo]; placebo-treated: n=16, mean [SD] age: 14y 7mo [4y]) were included in the study. The effect sizes for BADS and DIS were similar in The ITB-treated group (−0.29 and −0.22 respectively). Changes after treatment on the DIS dystonia subscale correlated with changes on the BADS (r=0.64; p<0.001). The DIS dystonia subscale and BADS correlated at baseline and follow-up (r=0.78; p<0.001 and r=0.79; p<0.001). Not all DIS activity items could be performed in this sample of patients. Interpretation: For non-ambulatory patients with dyskinetic CP, the responsiveness of the DIS equalled the responsiveness of BADS. Concurrent validity was adequate. Feasibility for activity items was restricted in patients with severe dyskinetic CP

Use of the Dyskinesia Impairment Scale in non-ambulatory dyskinetic cerebral palsy

Aim: To assess the responsiveness, concurrent validity, and feasibility of the Dyskinesia Impairment Scale (DIS) in non-ambulatory patients with dyskinetic cerebral palsy (CP). Method: The study is a secondary analysis of data collected in the IDYS trial, a randomized controlled trial on the effects of intrathecal baclofen (ITB). The DIS and Barry–Albright Dystonia Scale (BADS) were conducted at baseline and after 3 months of ITB or placebo treatment. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing the effect sizes and correlation of change after treatment between the DIS and BADS. Concurrent validity was evaluated by assessing the correlations between scales. Feasibility was evaluated for each DIS item by the number of participants who successfully accomplished the item. Results: Thirty-three non-ambulatory patients (9 females, 24 males) with dyskinetic CP (ITB-treated: n=17, mean [SD] age: 14y 1mo [4y 1mo]; placebo-treated: n=16, mean [SD] age: 14y 7mo [4y]) were included in the study. The effect sizes for BADS and DIS were similar in The ITB-treated group (−0.29 and −0.22 respectively). Changes after treatment on the DIS dystonia subscale correlated with changes on the BADS (r=0.64; p<0.001). The DIS dystonia subscale and BADS correlated at baseline and follow-up (r=0.78; p<0.001 and r=0.79; p<0.001). Not all DIS activity items could be performed in this sample of patients. Interpretation: For non-ambulatory patients with dyskinetic CP, the responsiveness of the DIS equalled the responsiveness of BADS. Concurrent validity was adequate. Feasibility for activity items was restricted in patients with severe dyskinetic CP

Use of the Dyskinesia Impairment Scale in non-ambulatory dyskinetic cerebral palsy

AIM: To assess the responsiveness, concurrent validity, and feasibility of the Dyskinesia Impairment Scale (DIS) in non-ambulatory patients with dyskinetic cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: The study is a secondary analysis of data collected in the IDYS trial, a randomized controlled trial on the effects of intrathecal baclofen (ITB). The DIS and Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale (BADS) were conducted at baseline and after 3 months of ITB or placebo treatment. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing the effect sizes and correlation of change after treatment between the DIS and BADS. Concurrent validity was evaluated by assessing the correlations between scales. Feasibility was evaluated for each DIS item by the number of participants who successfully accomplished the item. RESULTS: Thirty-three non-ambulatory patients (9 females, 24 males) with dyskinetic CP (ITB-treated: n=17, mean [SD] age: 14y 1mo [4y 1mo]; placebo-treated: n=16, mean [SD] age: 14y 7mo [4y]) were included in the study. The effect sizes for BADS and DIS were similar in The ITB-treated group (-0.29 and -0.22 respectively). Changes after treatment on the DIS dystonia subscale correlated with changes on the BADS (r=0.64; p<0.001). The DIS dystonia subscale and BADS correlated at baseline and follow-up (r=0.78; p<0.001 and r=0.79; p<0.001). Not all DIS activity items could be performed in this sample of patients. INTERPRETATION: For non-ambulatory patients with dyskinetic CP, the responsiveness of the DIS equalled the responsiveness of BADS. Concurrent validity was adequate. Feasibility for activity items was restricted in patients with severe dyskinetic CP. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: The Dyskinesia Impairment Scale (DIS) and Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale showed similar responsiveness in non-ambulatory patients with dyskinetic cerebral palsy (CP). No floor or ceiling effect was observed for DIS in non-ambulatory participants. The concurrent validity of DIS was adequate in non-ambulatory participants. Patients with dyskinetic CP in Gross Motor Function Classification System levels IV and V could not perform all DIS activity items.status: publishe

Additional file 1: of Assessment of net knee moment-angle characteristics by instrumented hand-held dynamometry in children with spastic cerebral palsy and typically developing children

Selection of data points from raw measurement data