43 research outputs found

    Microbiome dataset from a marine recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) for salmon post-smolt production in Norway

    Get PDF
    A marine aquaculture recycling system (RAS) for the production of post-smolt was monitored for microbial community structures during the first year of operation. Sample material was obtained monthly from the biofilter biofilm carriers, the production water (tank 3), the fish skin (tank 3) and the tank 3 wall biofilm. Additional samples were taken during outbreaks of fish skin wounds, washing of the plant, UV filtration of the inlet water and from various wall biofilms. Samples for depth profiles from all fish tanks were also collected. The sampling tools were a ladle for capturing biofilter biofilm carriers, toothbrushes for wall biofilm capture, filters for capture of water microbes and scalpels for skin tissue slicing. The sampling times were indicated by the production cycle number (cycle 2-5) and the week number within the cycle (W). Prior to bacterial community analysis, the stored samples were exposed to cell lysis and extraction of environmental DNA by commercial kits. All samples were subjected for PCR amplification of 16S rDNA sequences for library formations and prepared for Ion Torrent technology, which sequences 250 bp fragments. A total of 1.1 million reads were obtained from the 100 RAS samples analysed. The process from Ion Torren analysis to library involved bioinformatics steps with sorting, filtering, adjustment and taxonomic identification, and the final output was shown in a table as operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and relative abundance at different sampling sites and sampling time points. Of a total of 450 taxonomically assigned OTUs, 45% were classified at genus level. The 16S library raw data are deposited in the Mendeley data repository and cited in this Data in Brief article co-submitted with the article “Microbial colonization and stability in a marine post-smolt RAS inoculated with a commercial starter culture.” [1]. So far, the raw data are referenced in four more publications in progress. These cover microbial shifts and enrichments between sampling times, sulfur cycling, “in vivo biofilm” and identification of relatives of fish pathogens in RAS. All library sequences are available in GenBank with accession numbers MN890148-MN891672.publishedVersio

    Antibacterial treatment of lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus) experimentally challenged with Vibrio anguillarum, atypical Aeromonas salmonicida and Pasteurella atlantica

    Get PDF
    Lumpfish is a novel farmed species used as cleaner fish for the removal of lice from farmed salmon. As often with new, farmed species, there are challenges with bacterial infections. The frequency of prescription of antibiotic agents to lumpfish is increasing, despite the lack of knowledge about appropriate doses, duration of treatment and application protocols for the various antibacterial agents. In the current study, we have tested the effect of medicated feed with florfenicol (FFC), oxolinic acid (OA) and flumequine (FLU) on lumpfish experimentally challenged with Vibrio anguillarum, atypical Aeromonas salmonicida and Pasteurella atlantica. We found that all three antibacterial agents efficiently treated lumpfish with vibriosis using 10 and 20 mg kg−1 day−1 of FFC, 25 mg kg−1 day−1 of OA and 25 mg kg−1 day−1 FLU, whereas only FFC (20 mg kg−1 day−1) had good effect on lumpfish with pasteurellosis. None of the antibacterial agents were efficient to treat lumpfish with atypical furunculosis. FFC 20 mg kg−1 day−1 showed promising results in the beginning of the experiment, but the mortality increased rapidly 14 days post-medication. Efficient treatment is important for the welfare of lumpfish and for reducing the risk of development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. To our knowledge, this is the first study to establish protocols for antibacterial treatment of lumpfish.publishedVersio

    Phaeobacter gallaeciensis Reduces Vibrio anguillarum in Cultures of Microalgae and Rotifers, and Prevents Vibriosis in Cod Larvae

    Get PDF
    Phaeobacter gallaeciensis can antagonize fish-pathogenic bacteria in vitro, and the purpose of this study was to evaluate the organism as a probiont for marine fish larvae and their feed cultures. An in vivo mechanism of action of the antagonistic probiotic bacterium is suggested using a non-antagonistic mutant. P. gallaeciensis was readily established in axenic cultures of the two microalgae Tetraselmis suecica and Nannochloropsis oculata, and of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. P. gallaeciensis reached densities of 107 cfu/ml and did not adversely affect growth of algae or rotifers. Vibrio anguillarum was significantly reduced by wild-type P. gallaeciensis, when introduced into these cultures. A P. gallaeciensis mutant that did not produce the antibacterial compound tropodithietic acid (TDA) did not reduce V. anguillarum numbers, suggesting that production of the antibacterial compound is important for the antagonistic properties of P. gallaeciensis. The ability of P. gallaeciensis to protect fish larvae from vibriosis was determined in a bath challenge experiment using a multidish system with 1 larva per well. Unchallenged larvae reached 40% accumulated mortality which increased to 100% when infected with V. anguillarum. P. gallaeciensis reduced the mortality of challenged cod larvae (Gadus morhua) to 10%, significantly below the levels of both the challenged and the unchallenged larvae. The TDA mutant reduced mortality of the cod larvae in some of the replicates, although to a much lesser extent than the wild type. It is concluded that P. gallaeciensis is a promising probiont in marine larviculture and that TDA production likely contributes to its probiotic effect

    Antibiotic uptake by cultured Atlantic cod leucocytes and effect on intracellular Francisella noatunensis subsp. noatunensis replication

    Get PDF
    The granuloma disease caused by Francisella noatunensis subsp. noatunensis in farmed Atlantic cod has not been successfully treated by use of antibacterials, even when antibacterial resistance testing indicates a sufficient effect. The reason for this treatment failure may be the intracellular existence of the bacteria within immune cells, mainly macrophages. To investigate the effect of antibacterials on intracellular Francisella replication, we established a protocol for the detection of drugs within Atlantic cod immune cells using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). When the uptake and intracellular concentrations of oxolinic acid and flumequine were analysed in isolated adherent head kidney leucocytes (HKLs) by HPLC, we found that uptake was rapid and the intracellular concentrations reflected the extracellular exposure concentrations. To investigate the effect of the antibacterial compounds on intracellular bacterial replication, adherent HKLs experimentally infected with the bacteria were analysed using flow cytometry and intracellular labelling of bacteria by specific antibodies. We found that flumequine did not inhibit intracellular bacterial replication. Unexpectedly, the results indicated that the intracellularly effiacy of the drug was reduced. The HPLC method used proved to be highly applicable for accurate determination of intracellular drug concentrations. When combined with sensitive and specific flow cytometry analyses for identification and measurement of intracellular bacterial replication, we suggest that this approach can be very valuable for the design of antibacterial treatments of intracellular pathogens

    Oligonucleotids used as primers in qRT-PCR.

    No full text
    <p>Oligonucleotids used as primers in qRT-PCR.</p

    The C4B6<sup>−</sup> cells are negative for lymphocyte-, neutrophil and monocyte/macrophage markers, but express CD83 and MHC class II.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Flow cytometry analyses of the unbound fraction after MACS show the C4B6<sup>−</sup> cells' reactivity with MAb C4B6 (anti-leukocytes), C7G7 and G2H3 (B-cells), E3D9 (neutrophils) and the polyclonal anti-human CD3 antiserum (T- and IgM<sup>+</sup> cells). Representative histograms are shown. Grey filled curves are negative controls. Positive cells are shown as red dots. The markers represent positive cells. The antibodies reactivity against PBL prior to MACS is shown in the lowest panels. (B) A silver stained SDS- polyacrylamide gel, left panel, and an immunoblot using polyclonal IgM serum developed with ECL, right panel. Lane 1, molecular mass markers; lane 2, PBL; lane 3, unbound fraction after MACS (C4B6<sup>−</sup> cells); lane 4, bound fraction after MACS (C4B6<sup>+</sup> cells); lane 5, salmon IgM. The 66 KDa band (*) in lane 3 and 4 is most likely BSA present in the MACS buffer. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of the C4B6<sup>−</sup> cells. Gene expression of the following genes; IgM (B-cell marker), CD3, CD8 and TCRα (T-cell markers), MCSF-R (monocyte/macrophage marker), CD86 (involved in antigen presentation), CD83 (DC marker), MHC class II (APC), GATA-1 and G6F (thrombocyte/erythrocyte markers) is presented as mean normalized expression (MNE) using EF1α as reference gene (n = 4). The average of triplicates from four fish with standard error is shown. Note different scale in the inserted histogram.</p
    corecore