54 research outputs found

    Granitic groundwater colloids sampling and characterisation: the strategy for artefact elimination

    Get PDF
    Colloids were separated by submicro-filtration of granitic groundwater samples collected at-line under in-situ thermodynamic conditions after down-hole groundwater sampling and transfer at the well head. The methodology avoids the generation of artefacts produced by pH changes due to CO2 exchange, yielding potential carbonate precipitation, or by O2 contamination yielding oxidized insoluble phases. The enhanced pressure and the anoxic conditions are also maintained through the filtering procedure. This procedure was carried out after a period of regular sampling of groundwater pumped to the ground surface and continuous on-line long-term measurements (weeks, months) of chemical and physical parameters in the unbroken sample water both at the ground surface and at depth down-hole. Colloid samples were characterized on the submicro-filtration membrane by scanning electron microscopy. Under deep granite groundwater conditions, natural colloids occur sparsely. The colloid concentration was determined C col ∼1 and ∼50μg L−1 for sizes ranging from 50 to 200nm or n col ∼ 3.9 × 109 and 47 × 109 L−1 for sizes larger than 50nm for KFM11A, Forsmark, and KLX17A, Laxemar, Oskarshamn, respectively, Sweden. These colloids are expected to be clay particles with an average size smaller than 200nm for the Na-Ca-Cl and Na-Cl groundwaters (pH 7.6 and 8.00, ionic strength ∼10−1 and ∼10−2 mol L−1, respectively, for KFM11A and KLX17A), the colloid concentrations were comparable with values previously reported in the literatur

    Pretreatment serum albumin as a predictor of cancer survival: A systematic review of the epidemiological literature

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There are several methods of assessing nutritional status in cancer of which serum albumin is one of the most commonly used. In recent years, the role of malnutrition as a predictor of survival in cancer has received considerable attention. As a result, it is reasonable to investigate whether serum albumin has utility as a prognostic indicator of cancer survival in cancer. This review summarizes all available epidemiological literature on the association between pretreatment serum albumin levels and survival in different types of cancer.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A systematic search of the literature using the MEDLINE database (January 1995 through June 2010) to identify epidemiologic studies on the relationship between serum albumin and cancer survival. To be included in the review, a study must have: been published in English, reported on data collected in humans with any type of cancer, had serum albumin as <it>one of the </it>or <it>only </it>predicting factor, had survival as one of the outcome measures (primary or secondary) and had any of the following study designs (case-control, cohort, cross-sectional, case-series prospective, retrospective, nested case-control, ecologic, clinical trial, meta-analysis).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of the 29 studies reviewed on cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, all except three found higher serum albumin levels to be associated with better survival in multivariate analysis. Of the 10 studies reviewed on lung cancer, all excepting one found higher serum albumin levels to be associated with better survival. In 6 studies reviewed on female cancers and multiple cancers each, lower levels of serum albumin were associated with poor survival. Finally, in all 8 studies reviewed on patients with other cancer sites, lower levels of serum albumin were associated with poor survival.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Pretreatment serum albumin levels provide useful prognostic significance in cancer. Accordingly, serum albumin level could be used in clinical trials to better define the baseline risk in cancer patients. A critical gap for demonstrating causality, however, is the absence of clinical trials demonstrating that raising albumin levels by means of intravenous infusion or by hyperalimentation decreases the excess risk of mortality in cancer.</p

    Granitic groundwater colloids sampling and characterisation: the strategy for artefact elimination

    No full text
    Colloids were separated by submicro-filtration of granitic groundwater samples collected at-line under in-situ thermodynamic conditions after down-hole groundwater sampling and transfer at the well head. The methodology avoids the generation of artefacts produced by pH changes due to CO2 exchange, yielding potential carbonate precipitation, or by O2 contamination yielding oxidized insoluble phases. The enhanced pressure and the anoxic conditions are also maintained through the filtering procedure. This procedure was carried out after a period of regular sampling of groundwater pumped to the ground surface and continuous on-line long-term measurements (weeks, months) of chemical and physical parameters in the unbroken sample water both at the ground surface and at depth down-hole. Colloid samples were characterized on the submicro-filtration membrane by scanning electron microscopy. Under deep granite groundwater conditions, natural colloids occur sparsely. The colloid concentration was determined C col ∼1 and ∼50 μg L−1 for sizes ranging from 50 to 200 nm or n col ∼ 3.9 × 109 and 47 × 109 L−1 for sizes larger than 50 nm for KFM11A, Forsmark, and KLX17A, Laxemar, Oskarshamn, respectively, Sweden. These colloids are expected to be clay particles with an average size smaller than 200 nm for the Na-Ca-Cl and Na-Cl groundwaters (pH 7.6 and 8.00, ionic strength ∼10−1 and ∼10−2 mol L−1, respectively, for KFM11A and KLX17A), the colloid concentrations were comparable with values previously reported in the literature
    corecore