PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK KASUS TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA

Corruption is considered a great crime and requires special handling. In handling corruption, special handling is needed by using the proof reversed or reversal of the burden of proof but in a balanced manner. The purpose of this study is to explain the reverse evidence of corruption from a human rights perspective. This research uses the empirical normative legal research method, namely the combination of normative legal provisions (laws) with practical elements (legal events in society/social elements). The study results state that the theory of reverse proof of corruption cases based on a human rights perspective does not violate the principles and respect for the rights of the defendants in the general principles of criminal law

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Perzinahan Menurut KUHP dan Hukum Adat Baduy

Adultery is a problem that often occurs in Indonesia, adultery itself is an act that often occurs in society due to a lack of awareness and norms. Adultery in the Criminal Code is regulated in Article 411 which is a complaint offense, without a complaint from the party who feels aggrieved cannot be criminalized. The purpose of this research is to find out the criminal responsibility for adultery according to the Criminal Code and Baduy Customary Law, and to find out the comparison of punishments for adultery according to the Criminal Code and Baduy Customary Law, this study uses an empirical normative approach. by using primary data sources, namely data obtained directly from the source, secondary data obtained from existing sources such as journals, books and laws while tertiary data obtained from websites and others related to writing this thesis. As for the research results obtained by the author that criminal liability for adultery according to the Criminal Code is regulated in article 411 with a maximum imprisonment of 1 year in prison or a maximum fine of category II of IDR 10,000,000.00 (ten million rupiah). Meanwhile, according to the Baduy tribe, adultery is a disgrace that embarrasses all parties, both the victim, the perpetrator and the Baduy community. So that both married and unmarried people still commit adultery. The punishment is to be sent to prison for 40 days, perform a self-purification ceremony (ngabokoran) and then get married

Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik di Media Sosial

When a criminal case is resolved in court, the public expects legal certainty and justice regarding the resolution of the case, namely the Judge's Decision. In the Criminal Procedure Code, only the term "free decision" is recognized, without the qualification "pure freedom" or "impure freedom". However, in the development of world criminal justice practice, the "free decision" (vrijspraak) decided by this judge developed and the terms "pure freedom" and "pure non-free" were known. Knowing the problem of acquittals in criminal cases, this focuses on defamation through social media. This research is normative juridical research used to examine the application of law in society, whether it is in accordance with applicable regulations. The research approach used is a qualitative descriptive approach. The data analysis used is a qualitative data analysis technique. The research method uses qualitative methods. The data obtained from the research results will be analyzed descriptively, describing and using the data which will then be analyzed qualitatively. So that we obtain the legal basis for free decision making, the obstacles faced, how to overcome obstacles and so on. The research results show that there is an understanding of "freedom" in people who do not understand the law (men on the street). Meanwhile, for understanding criminal law there is a difference between vrijspraak and "free from all legal demands". Efforts that can be taken to handle the acquittal are to file a cassation with the Supreme Court by first proving that the acquittal is not a genuine acquittal

ANALISI PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK KASUS TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAM

Tindak pidana korupsi dianggap sebagai kejahatan yang luar biasa (extraordinary crime) dan memerlukan penanganan yang luar biasa pula. Dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi diperlukan penanganan yang khusus dengan menggunakan teori pembuktian terbalik atau pembalikan beban pembuktian namun secara berimbang. Hal tersebut agar terhindar dari potensi melanggar prinsip HAM dan penghargaan hak-hak terdakwa. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif empiris yaitu penggabungan dari ketentuan hukum normatif (undang-undang) dengan unsur-unsur empiris (peristiwa hukum di masyarakat atau unsur sosial)

KEDUDUKAN HUKUM ISLAM DALAM PELAKSANAAN WARIS DI INDONESIA

Ketentuan tentang Hukum Waris di Indonesia diatur dalam Hukum Waris Islam, Hukum Waris Adat, dan Hukum Waris Belanda (Hukum Waris KUHPerdata). Dalam hal wilayah di Indonesia dan keberagaman budaya, agama, dan adat istiadat dalam sistem kekerabatan di tiap daerah mempengaruhi keberlakuan Hukum Waris di Indonesia. Namun seringkali permasalahan timbul antara Hukum yang berlaku dalam agama dengan keberlakuan adat daerah setempat. Penelitian dilakukan dengan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Empiris, dimana Hukum bertindak sebagai Norma (Perundang-undangan) dengan memperhatikan kenyataan sosial. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa Hukum Kewarisan Islam dilaksanakan dengan mendalilkan dasar pada Al Quran dan Hadits yang termaktub dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Berlaku bagi penganut agama Islam dan melingkupi juga Masyarakat Adat yang menundukkan diri pada hukum agama

Effectiveness of Law Enforcement on Online Gambling Promotion Among Influencers

The sophistication of information technology makes online gambling increasingly developing. This also gives rise to the rampant promotion and advertising of online gambling, The important role of influencers is often associated with the increase in online gambling among the public. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of law enforcement against the promotion of online gambling by influencers in Indonesia, focusing on existing regulations, challenges in their implementation, and their impact on society. The research method used in this writing is that this research is designed with a normative juridical method. This research was carried out by researching library materials (secondary data) or library legal research.  The results of the study show that despite the law enforcement efforts carried out, their effectiveness is still limited and requires a more comprehensive approach, including inter-agency cooperation and public education about the risks of online gambling. The recommendations include the need for clearer and more specific regulatory revisions and strengthening the capacity of law enforcement agencies to face challenges in this digital era. This research is expected to contribute to the development of more effective legal policies in tackling the promotion of online gambling by influencers in Indonesia

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WAKAF DI DESA KUBANG PUJI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan penyelesaian sengketa wakaf di Desa Kubang Puji Pontang dalam perspektif hukum positif di Indonesia. Lokasi penelitian ini terletak di desa Kubang Puji Kecamatan Pontang Kabupaten Serang. Metodologi yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif deskriptif, dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Metode pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini dilakukan dengan wawancara dan studi dokumen. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan Sengketa tanah wakaf di Desa Kubang Puji berupa gugatan ahli waris akibat tanah yang telah diwakafkan oleh wakif tidak dikelola dengan baik oleh nazhir, sehingga tanah tersebut menjadi tempat pembuangan sampah dan sedikit demi sedikit menyempit tergerus bangunan rumah warga sekitar, sengketa lain terkait dengan relokasi sekolah yang berdiri di atas lahan wakaf, pro kontra terjadi antara pengurus Yayasan dan DKM Masjid. Kedua sengketa tersebut diselesaikan dengan jalan musyawarah untuk mencapai mufakat dengan menghadirkan pihak yang bersengketa dan tokoh masyarakat. Dalam perspektif hukum positif yang berlaku di Indonesia, penyelesaian sengketa wakaf yang dilakukan di Desa Kubang Puji mengikuti metode Non Ligitasi, artinya penyelesaian sengketa wakaf dilakukan di luar pengadilan, dengan jalan musyawarah untuk mencapai mufakat sesuai dengan Pasal 1 angka 10 UU No. 30 Tahun 1999 dan Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 41 Tahun 2014 tentang wakaf

Restorative Justice Bagi Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan dalam Perspektif Pidana Islam

The settlement of criminal cases by using the punishment method for the perpetrators (retributive) is not effective enaough and it is not become deterrent for the perpetrators but they more expert in doing criminal acts, moreover the perpetrators are children under the age that they are unstable in psychiatric and very easy to imitate the negative behavior gained in jail. Many methods of punishment offered by experts to change conventional punishment methods one of them is using the Restorative Justice, the  concept of punishment is by involving the victim's family efforts not only focus on giving suffering to the perpetrator but also healing the injuries suffered by the victim and the victim's family. This study focuses on the concept of Restorative Justice for children involved in criminal acts of murder in Islamic criminal studies, and find the differences in the application of Restorative Justice in the provision of a positive legal system in Indonesia with Islamic criminal law

TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN BEBAS DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DI MEDIA SOSIAL (Studi Putusan Pengadilan No.853/Pid.Sus /2022/PN.Srg)

Ketika ada penyelesaian suatu perkara pidana di pengadilan, maka masyarakat mengharapkan kepastian hukum dan keadilan atas penyelesaian perkara tersebut dalam bentuk Putusan Hakim. Putusan tersebut merupakan hasil akhir pemeriksaan suatu perkara pidana di pengadilan. KUHAP, hanya mengenal istilah “keputusan bebas”, tanpa adanya kualifikasi “bebas murni” atau “bebas tidak murni”. Namun dalam perkembangan praktik peradilan pidana dunia, “keputusan bebas” (vrijspraak) yang diputus oleh Hakim ini berkembang dan dikenal dengan istilah “bebas murni” dan “murni tidak bebas”. mengetahui permasalahan seputar putusan bebas dalam perkara pidana dalam hal ini terfokus pada perkara pencemaran nama baik melalui media sosial. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif yang digunakan untuk mengkaji penerapan hukum dalam masyarakat, apakah sudah sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan yang berlaku. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah teknik analisis data kualitatif. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif. Data yang diperoleh dari hasil penelitian akan dianalisis secara deskriptif, mendeskripsikan dan menggunakan data yang kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. kualitatif, sehingga diperoleh gambaran yang jelas mengenai dasar hukum pengambilan keputusan secara bebas, kendala yang dihadapi, cara mengatasi hambatan tersebut, dan lain sebagainya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya pengertian “bebas” pada masyarakat yang tidak memahami hukum (man on the street). dianggap mencakup "meskipun ada semua klaim" selain sepenuhnya gratis (vrijspraak). Sedangkan bagi yang memahami ilmu hukum pidana ada perbedaan antara vrijspraak dengan “bebas dari segala tuntutan hukum”. Upaya yang dapat dilakukan dalam menangani putusan bebas tersebut adalah: mengajukan kasasi ke Mahkamah Agung dengan terlebih dahulu membuktikan bahwa putusan bebas tersebut bukanlah pembebasan murni.Abstract when there is a settlement of a criminal case in court, the community expects legal certainty and justice for the settlement of the case in the form of a Judge's Decision. The decision is final result of examining a criminal case in court. KUHAP, only recognizes the term "free decision", without any qualifications of "purely free" or "impurely free". However, in the development of world criminal justice practices, the "free decision" (vrijspraak) decided by this Judge developed and became known as "purely free" and "purely not free". find out the problems surrounding acquittal in criminal cases, in this case focused on defamation cases through social media. This research is a juridical research normative used to examine the application of law in society, whether it is in accordance with applicable provisions regulations. The research approach used is a qualitative descriptive approach. The data analysis used is a qualitative data analysis technique. The research method uses a qualitative method. The data obtained from the research results will be analyzed descriptively, describing and using data which is then analyzed qualitatively. qualitative, so that a clear picture is obtained regarding the legal basis for making decisions freely, the obstacles faced, how to overcome these obstacles, and so on. The results of the research show the definition of "free" in a society that does not understand the law (man on the street). deemed to cover "despite all claims" in addition to being completely free (vrijspraak). Whereas for those who understand the science of criminal law there is a difference between vrijspraak and "free from all lawsuits". Efforts that can be made in dealing with the acquittal are: filing an appeal to the Supreme Court by first proving that the acquittal is not pure acquittal.