Public administration in an age of austerity:the future of the discipline

Reflecting changes in the nature of governance, some have questioned whether Public Administration is now an historical anachronism. While a legitimate debate exists between sceptics and optimists, this special issue demonstrates grounds for optimism by indicating the continuing diversity and adaptability of the field of Public Administration. In this introduction, we first sketch the variety of intellectual traditions which comprise the field of modern Public Administration. We then consider institutional challenges facing the subject given considerable pressures towards disciplinary fragmentation, and ideological challenges arising from a new distrust of public provision in the UK. Despite these challenges, Public Administration continues to provide a framework to analyse the practice of government and governance, governing institutions and traditions, and their wider sociological context. It can also directly inform policy reform - even if this endeavour can have its own pitfalls and pratfalls for the 'engaged' academic. We further suggest that, rather than lacking theoretical rigour, new approaches are developing that recognise the structural and political nature of the determinants of public administration. Finally, we highlight the richness of modern comparative work in Public Administration. Researchers can usefully look beyond the Atlantic relationship for theoretical enhancement and also consider more seriously the recursive and complex nature of international pressures on public administration

"Liberalizing" the English National Health Service: background and risks to healthcare entitlement

Resumo: A recente reforma do Serviço Nacional de Saúde (NHS) inglês por meio do Health and Social Care Act de 2012 introduziu mudanças importantes na organização, gestão e prestação de serviços públicos de saúde na Inglaterra. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar as reformas do NHS no contexto histórico de predomínio de teorias neoliberais desde 1980 e discutir o processo de "liberalização" do NHS. São identificados e analisados três momentos: (i) gradativa substituição ideológica e teórica (1979-1990) - transição da lógica profissional e sanitária para uma lógica gerencial/comercial; (ii) burocracia e mercado incipiente (1991-2004) - estruturação de burocracia voltada à administração do mercado interno e expansão de medidas pró-mercado; e (iii) abertura ao mercado, fragmentação e descontinuidade de serviços (2005-2012) - fragilização do modelo de saúde territorial e consolidação da saúde como um mercado aberto a prestadores públicos e privados. Esse processo gradual e constante de liberalização vem levando ao fechamento de serviços e à restrição do acesso, comprometendo a integralidade, a equidade e o direito universal à saúde no NHS

Towards Neo-Bismarckian Health Care States?: Comparing Health Insurance Reforms in Bismarckian Welfare Systems

Germany, France and the Netherlands all have specific ‘Bismarckian’ health insurance systems,which encounter different and specific problems (and solutions) from those of national healthsystems. Following a relatively similar trajectory, the three systems have gone through importantchanges: they now combine universalization through the state and marketization based on regulatedcompetition; they associate more state control (directly or through agencies) and more competitionand market mechanisms. Competition between insurers has gained importance in Germanyand the Netherlands and the state is reinforcing its controlling capacities in France and Germany.Up to now, continental health insurance systems have remained, however, Bismarckian (they arestill mainly financed by social contribution, managed by health insurance funds, they deliver publicand private health care, and freedom is still higher than in national health systems), but a new‘regulatory health care state’ is emerging. Those changes are embedded in the existing institutionssince the aim of the reforms is more to change the logic of institutions than to change theinstitutions themselves. Hence, structural changes occur without revolution in the system