602 research outputs found
Conflict resolution in Libya
This paper examines the role of key conflict elements such as solidarity among disagreeing groups and partisan foreign intervention in the complexification of the Libyan conflict. Incorporating evidentiary events along with a comparative application of different conflict theories (ripeness theory, instrumentalism, primordialism, protracted social conflict and constructivism), this paper argues that ideational factors top merely material factors in the Libyan conflict and no permanent solution can be achieved without changing people 's socially constructed identities and world view
EpĂłxidos y aziridinas de ciclohexano relacionados estructuralmente con la galactosa como inhibidores selectivos de galactosidasas
La presente invenciĂłn se refiere a una familia de epĂłxidos y aziridinas derivadas de ciclohexano que poseen una similitud estructural con la galactosa y presentan propiedades como inhibidores de galactosidasas. AdemĂĄs la presente invenciĂłn tambiĂ©n se refiere al uso de estos compuestos como herramienta biotecnolĂłgica, como reactivo de biologĂa molecular, asĂ como, para la preparaciĂłn de un medicamento para el tratamiento de enfermedades asociadas a la glicosilaciĂłn de lĂpidos y proteĂnas.Peer reviewedConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientĂficas (España)A1 Solicitud de patente con informe sobre el estado de la tĂ©cnic
La variole du dromadaire chez le jeune au Maroc. Isolement et identification du virus. Mise au point du vaccin et application Ă la prophylaxie
La variole cameline est une pathologie majeure de l'espĂšce. Le virus (Orthopoxvirus cameli) a pu ĂȘtre isolĂ© au Maroc. La souche isolĂ©e aprĂšs huit passages sur cellules Vero a Ă©tĂ© dĂ©nommĂ©e T8. Un vaccin inactivĂ© a pu ĂȘtre mis au point et Ă©valuĂ© par le test de sĂ©roneutralisation et par la dĂ©termination de l'index de protection aprĂšs l'Ă©preuve virulente. Ce vaccin a Ă©tĂ© utilisĂ© dans les campagnes de vaccination au Maroc Ă partir de 1993. Chaque annĂ©e, 15 000 jeunes dromadaires sont immunisĂ©s. Son innocuitĂ© est totale et son efficacitĂ© reconnue. (RĂ©sumĂ© d'auteur
From Student Questions to Student Profiles in a Blended Learning Environment
International audienceThe analysis of student questions can be used to improve the learning experience for both students and teachers. We investigated questions (N = 6457) asked before the class by first-year medicine/pharmacy students on an online platform, used by professors to prepare for Q&A sessions. Our long-term objectives are to help professors in categorizing those questions, and to provide students with feedback on the quality of their questions. To do so, we developed a coding scheme and then used it for automatic annotation of the whole corpus. We identified student characteristics from the typology of questions they asked using the k-means algorithm over four courses. Students were clustered based on question dimensions only. Then, we characterized the clusters by attributes not used for clustering, such as student grade, attendance, and number and popularity of questions asked. Two similar clusters always appeared (lower than average students with popular questions, and higher than average students with unpopular questions). We replicated these analyses on the same courses across different years to show the possibility of predicting student profiles online. This work shows the usefulness and validity of our coding scheme and the relevance of this approach to identify different student profiles. Notes for Practice âą Questions provide important insights into students' level of knowledge, but coding schemes are lacking to study this phenomenon. âą After providing a bottom-up coding scheme of student questions in a blended environment, we analyzed the relationship between the questions asked and the student profiles. âą Profiling students based on their questions over a year allows us to predict the profiles of future students to help the teacher understand who asks what. âą These results provide both a coding scheme that can be reused in various contexts involving questions, and a methodology that can be replicated in any context where students ask many questions, in particular to help the teacher in prioritizing them according to their own criteria. âą Teachers need to focus on the nature of questions asked by their students, because they can reveal information about their profile (attendance, activity, etc.)
Ăvaluation de la sĂ©curitĂ© des hĂ©parines de bas poids molĂ©culaire en hĂ©modialyse au QuĂ©bec : une Ă©tude de cohorte rĂ©trospective
Le nombre de personnes avec insuffisance rĂ©nale terminale et de patients nĂ©cessitant un traitement dâhĂ©modialyse chronique est en constante augmentation Ă travers le monde. LâhĂ©modialyse nĂ©cessite une anticoagulation appropriĂ©e afin de rĂ©duire la formation de caillots sanguins dans le circuit extracorporel. LâhĂ©parine non fractionnĂ©e (HNF) est la forme dâanticoagulant la plus rĂ©pandue pour cette indication au Canada. Cependant, lâhĂ©parine de bas poids molĂ©culaire (HBPM) a Ă©tĂ© rĂ©cemment introduite comme alternative Ă lâHNF. Lâutilisation de lâHBPM est plus simple que lâHNF puisquâelle nĂ©cessite moins dâinjections et de monitoring, offrant au personnel infirmier en hĂ©modialyse plus de temps pour dâautres soins. Parmi les patients sans insuffisance rĂ©nale chronique (IRC), la sĂ©curitĂ© de lâHBPM a Ă©tĂ© longuement Ă©valuĂ©e et est maintenant le traitement de choix pour de nombreuses applications cliniques. Bien que lâHBPM soit utilisĂ©e dans plusieurs unitĂ©s dâhĂ©modialyse, la probabilitĂ© dâaccumulation et dâaugmentation du risque de saignement reste une source dâinquiĂ©tude chez les patients en IRC. Quelques petites Ă©tudes ont Ă©valuĂ© la sĂ©curitĂ© des HBPM en hĂ©modialyse mais leurs conclusions restent controversĂ©es. Le but de cette Ă©tude Ă©tait dâĂ©valuer la sĂ©curitĂ© comparative de lâHBPM pour lâanticoagulation en hĂ©modialyse. Nous avons tout dâabord effectuĂ© une revue systĂ©matique et mĂ©ta-analyse afin dâĂ©valuer la sĂ©curitĂ© des HBPM en hĂ©modialyse chronique comparativement Ă lâHNF. Ensuite, nous avons menĂ© une Ă©tude de cohorte rĂ©trospective multicentrique auprĂšs de patients incidents et prĂ©valents en hĂ©modialyse chronique au QuĂ©bec entre 2007 et 2013 dont les objectifs spĂ©cifiques Ă©taient de comparer lâHBPM Ă lâHNF et le risque de saignements majeurs et mineurs, le risque de fracture ostĂ©oporotique et le risque dâinfection. Les donnĂ©es ont Ă©tĂ© extraites des bases de donnĂ©es de la RAMQ et de Med-Ăcho. Lâexposition Ă lâhĂ©parine a Ă©tĂ© collectĂ©e auprĂšs de 21 unitĂ©s dâhĂ©modialyse au QuĂ©bec. Le risque de chaque issue dâintĂ©rĂȘt a Ă©tĂ© estimĂ© en utilisant un modĂšle de rĂ©gression de COX ou un modĂšle temps dĂ©pendant de rĂ©gression de COX, selon le plus appropriĂ©, en ajustant pour de multiples variables. Comparativement Ă lâHNF, lâHBPM nâa pas montrĂ© de diffĂ©rence de risque pour les saignements et les fractures ostĂ©oporotiques. Une diminution du risque dâinfection a Ă©tĂ© observĂ©e chez les patients recevant lâHBPM comparĂ© Ă lâHNF en hĂ©modialyse chronique.The proportion of patients with end-stage renal disease and patients receiving hemodialysis treatments chronically is constantly increasing worldwide. The hemodialysis procedure requires an appropriate anticoagulation to avoid blood clots in the extracorporeal circuit. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the most commonly used anticoagulant for this indication in Canada. However, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has recently been introduced as an alternative to UFH. The use of LMWH is more convenient than UFH since it requires fewer injections and monitoring, allowing time to dialysis nurses to perform other care. Among patients without chronic kidney disease (CKD), safety of LMWH was extensively evaluated and LMWH is now a first-choice agent in various clinical settings. While LMWH is now used by an increasing number of hemodialysis units, concerns remain due to drug accumulation and increase risk of bleeding reported with LMWH use among CKD patients. Only a few small studies evaluated safety of LMWH in the hemodialysis setting, and their conclusions remain controversial. The overall aim of this study is to evaluate the comparative safety of LMWH when used for hemodialysis anticoagulation. We first conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to evaluate the safety of LMWH in chronic hemodialysis compared to UFH. We then conducted an observational retrospective multicentre study among a cohort of all incident and prevalent chronic hemodialysis patients in QuĂ©bec between 2007 and 2013 which specific aims are to compare between LMWH and UFH the risk of major and minor bleeding; to evaluate the risk of osteoporotic fractures; and to evaluate the risk of infection. The data was extracted from existing databases (RAMQ-RĂ©gie de lâassurance maladie du QuĂ©bec, Med-Echo-Maintenance et exploitation des donnĂ©es pour lâĂ©tude de la clientĂšle hospitaliĂšre. The information on exposure to heparin type was collected from 21 hemodialysis units in QuĂ©bec. We estimated the risk for each outcome of interest using a COX proportional model or a time-dependent COX proportional model where appropriate, adjusting for multiple covariates. Compared to UFH, LMWH showed no risk difference for bleeding and osteoporotic fracture. A decreased risk of infection was observed for patients receiving LMWH compared to UFH in chronic hemodialysis
Towards Improving Studentsâ Forum Posts Categorization in MOOCs and Impact on Performance Prediction
International audienceGoing beyond mere forum posts categorization is key to understand why some students struggle and eventually fail in MOOCs. We propose here an extension of a coding scheme and present the design of the associated automatic annotation tools to tag studentsâ questions in their forum posts. Working of four sessions of the same MOOC, we cluster studentsâ questions and show how the obtained clusters are consistent across all sessions and can be sometimes correlated with studentsâ success in the MOOC. Moreover, it helps us better understand the nature of questions asked by successful vs. unsuccessful students
- âŠ