The effect of distractions in the operating room during endourological procedures

Contains fulltext : 98421.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)BACKGROUND: Professionals working in the operating room (OR) are subject to various distractions that can be detrimental to their task performance and the quality of their work. This study aimed to quantify the frequency, nature, and effect on performance of (potentially) distracting events occurring during endourological procedures and additionally explored urologists' and residents' perspectives on experienced ill effects due to distracting factors. METHODS: First, observational data were collected prospectively during endourological procedures in one OR of a teaching hospital. A seven-point ordinal scale was used to measure the level of observed interference with the main task of the surgical team. Second, semistructured interviews were conducted with eight urologists and seven urology residents in two hospitals to obtain their perspectives on the impact of distracting factors. RESULTS: Seventy-eight procedures were observed. A median of 20 distracting events occurred per procedure, which corresponds to an overall rate of one distracting event every 1.8 min. Equipment problems and procedure-related and medically irrelevant communication were the most frequently observed causes of interruptions and identified as the most distracting factors in the interviews. Occurrence of distracting factors in difficult situations requiring high levels of concentration was perceived by all interviewees as disturbing and negatively impacting performance. The majority of interviewees (13/15) thought distracting factors impacted more strongly on residents' compared to urologists' performance due to their different levels of experience. CONCLUSION: Distracting events occur frequently in the OR. Equipment problems and communication, the latter both procedure-related and medically irrelevant, have the largest impact on the sterile team and regularly interrupt procedures. Distracting stimuli can influence performance negatively and should therefore be minimized. Further research is required to determine the direct effect of distraction on patient safety

Troponin T Measurements by High-Sensitivity vs Conventional Assays for Risk Stratification in Acute Dyspnea

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponin T measured by a high-sensitivity assay (hs-cTnT) recently proved to be of prognostic value in several populations. The hs-cTnT assay may also improve risk stratification in acute dyspnea. METHODS: We prospectively studied the prognostic value of hs-cTnT in 678 consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department with acute dyspnea. On the basis of conventional cardiac troponin T assay (cTnT) and hs-cTnT assay measurements, patients were divided into 3 categories: (1) neither assay increased (cTnT <0.03 mu g/L, hs-cTnT <0.016 mu g/L), (2) only hs-cTnT increased <0.016 mu g/L (cTnT <0.03 mu g/L), and (3) both assays increased (cTnT <0.03 mu g/L, hs-cTnT <0.016 mu g/L). Moreover, the prognostic value of hs-cTnT was investigated if cTnT was not detectable ( <0.01). RESULTS: One hundred seventy-two patients were in the lowest, 282 patients in the middle, and 223 patients in the highest troponin category. Patients in the second and third categories had significantly higher mortality compared to those in the first category (90-day mortality rate 2%, 10%, and 26% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, P <0.001; 1-year mortality rate 9%, 21%, and 39%, P <0.001). Importantly, in patients with undetectable cTnT (n = 347, 51%), increased hs-cTnT indicated worse outcome [ 90-day mortality, odds ratio 4.26 (95% CI 1.19-15.21); 1-year mortality, hazard ratio 2.27 (1.19-4.36), P = 0.013], whereas N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was not predictive of short-term outcome. CONCLUSIONS: hs-cTnT is associated with mortality in patients presenting with acute dyspnea. hs-cTnT concentrations provide additional prognostic information to cTnT and NT-proBNP testing in patients with cTnT concentrations below the detection limit. In particular, the hs-cTnT cutoff of 0.016 mu g/L enables identification of low-risk patients. (C) 2011 American Association for Clinical Chemistr