7 research outputs found

    Send reprint requests to: METABOLISM OF CARBAMAZEPINE AND ITS EPOXIDE METABOLITE IN HUMAN AND RAT LIVER IN VITRO GUNNEL TYBRING, CHRISTER

    No full text
    ABSTRACT: The epoxidation of carbamazepine (CBZ) and the hydration of the primary epoxide metabolite was studied in microsomes isolated from ten human livers. To study the epoxide hydrolase activity a high-performance liquid-chromatographic method was developed for the analysis of dlhydro-CBZ-trans-diol. There was a pronounced variation between the specimens in the activity of both enzymes

    Mapping cortical brain asymmetry in 17,141 healthy individuals worldwide via the ENIGMA Consortium

    No full text

    Reproducibility in the absence of selective reporting: An illustration from large‐scale brain asymmetry research

    Get PDF
    The problem of poor reproducibility of scientific findings has received much attention over recent years, in a variety of fields including psychology and neuroscience. The problem has been partly attributed to publication bias and unwanted practices such as p-hacking. Low statistical power in individual studies is also understood to be an important factor. In a recent multisite collaborative study, we mapped brain anatomical left-right asymmetries for regional measures of surface area and cortical thickness, in 99 MRI datasets from around the world, for a total of over 17,000 participants. In the present study, we revisited these hemispheric effects from the perspective of reproducibility. Within each dataset, we considered that an effect had been reproduced when it matched the meta-analytic effect from the 98 other datasets, in terms of effect direction and significance threshold. In this sense, the results within each dataset were viewed as coming from separate studies in an "ideal publishing environment," that is, free from selective reporting and p hacking. We found an average reproducibility rate of 63.2% (SD = 22.9%, min = 22.2%, max = 97.0%). As expected, reproducibility was higher for larger effects and in larger datasets. Reproducibility was not obviously related to the age of participants, scanner field strength, FreeSurfer software version, cortical regional measurement reliability, or regional size. These findings constitute an empirical illustration of reproducibility in the absence of publication bias or p hacking, when assessing realistic biological effects in heterogeneous neuroscience data, and given typically-used sample sizes
    corecore