22 research outputs found

    An Investigation Of Brain Normalization And Lesion Compensation Techniques Applied To Stroke

    Get PDF
    One of the most ubiquitous steps in neuroimaging is the normalization of brain images. The process of normalization attempts to match any given brain to a standardized template image (e.g. the MNI 152 image). However, clinical images such as those from stroke participants present many challenges when we attempt to warp them to the space of template images, which are typically representative of neurologically healthy individuals. Many software packages exist to facilitate normalization of brain images, but most have limited options available to compensate for brain injury, which is often disruptive to these algorithms. Of the injury compensation methods that do exist, they are varied across software packages. The current study aimed to assess the contemporary methods available in state of the software commonly used across the field. Specifically, we assessed SPM12’s new tissue filling procedure on masked clinical images, and LINDA, a fully automated lesion segmentation algorithm combined with ANTs normalization. Across normalization methods, we compared each software package’s default injury compensation strategy to the nonstandard enantiomorphic lesion healing procedure. We created an artificial dataset of more than 10,000 images representing stroke related injury, and assessed each normalization method (SPM’s unified segmentation, DARTEL, ANTs) on multiple performance metrics. Overall, we found that the optimal injury compensation strategy for clinical images varied by the normalization method used, and the metric it was evaluated on. Finally, we present evidence of each vi normalization method and brain injury compensation technique’s effect on predicting behavior deficits from brain injury using support vector regression. Our results show that prediction accuracy (and error) can be affected by the normalization technique used

    tDCS induced GABA change is associated with the simulated electric field in M1, an effect mediated by grey matter volume in the MRS voxel

    Get PDF
    Background and objective Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has wide ranging applications in neuro-behavioural and physiological research, and in neurological rehabilitation. However, it is currently limited by substantial inter-subject variability in responses, which may be explained, at least in part, by anatomical differences that lead to variability in the electric field (E-field) induced in the cortex. Here, we tested whether the variability in the E-field in the stimulated cortex during anodal tDCS, estimated using computational simulations, explains the variability in tDCS induced changes in GABA, a neurophysiological marker of stimulation effect. Methods Data from five previously conducted MRS studies were combined. The anode was placed over the left primary motor cortex (M1, 3 studies, N = 24) or right temporal cortex (2 studies, N = 32), with the cathode over the contralateral supraorbital ridge. Single voxel spectroscopy was performed in a 2x2x2cm voxel under the anode in all cases. MRS data were acquired before and either during or after 1 mA tDCS using either a sLASER sequence (7T) or a MEGA-PRESS sequence (3T). sLASER MRS data were analysed using LCModel, and MEGA-PRESS using FID-A and Gannet. E-fields were simulated in a finite element model of the head, based on individual structural MR images, using SimNIBS. Separate linear mixed effects models were run for each E-field variable (mean and 95th percentile; magnitude, and components normal and tangential to grey matter surface, within the MRS voxel). The model included effects of time (pre or post tDCS), E-field, grey matter volume in the MRS voxel, and a 3-way interaction between time, E-field and grey matter volume. Additionally, we ran a permutation analysis using PALM to determine whether E-field anywhere in the brain, not just in the MRS voxel, correlated with GABA change. Results In M1, higher mean E-field magnitude was associated with greater anodal tDCS-induced decreases in GABA (t(24) = 3.24, p = 0.003). Further, the association between mean E-field magnitude and GABA change was moderated by the grey matter volume in the MRS voxel (t(24) = −3.55, p = 0.002). These relationships were consistent across all E-field variables except the mean of the normal component. No significant relationship was found between tDCS-induced GABA decrease and E-field in the temporal voxel. No significant clusters were found in the whole brain analysis. Conclusions Our data suggest that the electric field induced by tDCS within the brain is variable, and is significantly related to anodal tDCS-induced decrease in GABA, a key neurophysiological marker of stimulation. These findings strongly support individualised dosing of tDCS, at least in M1. Further studies examining E-fields in relation to other outcome measures, including behaviour, will help determine the optimal E-fields required for any desired effects

    Association between tDCS induced GABA change and estimated electric field in the cortex

    Get PDF
    Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has wide ranging applications in neuro- behavioural and physiological research, and in neurological rehabilitation. However, it is currently limited by inter-subject variability in responses, which may be explained, at least in part, by anatomical differences that lead to variability in the actual electric field in the cortex. Our aim was to examine whether the variability in electric fields, estimated using computational simulations, explains the variability in tDCS induced GABA changes measured using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Data from five studies (total N = 56 complete cases) were combined. The anode and cathode were placed over the left M1 (3 studies, N = 24) or right temporal cortex (2 studies, N = 32), and contralateral supraorbital ridge respectively. GABA to total Creatine ratios were measured and estimated, before and after tDCS application. sLASER MRS data were analysed using LCModel, and MEGA-PRESS using FID-A and Gannet. The electric fields were simulated in a finite element model of the head, based on individual MPRAGE images, using SimNIBS. Twelve linear mixed effects models were run, one for each E-field variable (mean and 95th percentile of magnitude, normal and tangential components), and separately for the M1 and temporal data. We found that in M1, E-field in the MRS voxel is related to the GABA drop, adding to the accumulating evidence that supports individualised dosing of tDCS. We also found an interaction with grey matter volume within the MRS voxel, emphasising the need to appropriately choose and evaluate any outcome measures which we expect to be related to E-field. While we did not find a similar association in the temporal region, given the challenges of modelling the E-field in this region and possible homeostatic metaplastic effects, such an association cannot be ruled out

    tDCS induced GABA change is associated with the simulated electric field in M1, an effect mediated by grey matter volume in the MRS voxel

    Get PDF
    Background and objectiveTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has wide ranging applications in neuro-behavioural and physiological research, and in neurological rehabilitation. However, it is currently limited by substantial inter-subject variability in responses, which may be explained, at least in part, by anatomical differences that lead to variability in the electric field (E-field) induced in the cortex. Here, we tested whether the variability in the E-field in the stimulated cortex during anodal tDCS, estimated using computational simulations, explains the variability in tDCS induced changes in GABA, a neurophysiological marker of stimulation effect. MethdsData from five previously conducted MRS studies were combined. The anode was placed over the left primary motor cortex (M1, 3 studies, N = 24) or right temporal cortex (2 studies, N = 32), with the cathode over the contralateral supraorbital ridge. Single voxel spectroscopy was performed in a 2x2x2cm voxel under the anode in all cases. MRS data were acquired before and either during or after 1 mA tDCS using either a sLASER sequence (7T) or a MEGA-PRESS sequence (3T). sLASER MRS data were analysed using LCModel, and MEGA-PRESS using FID-A and Gannet. E-fields were simulated in a finite element model of the head, based on individual structural MR images, using SimNIBS. Separate linear mixed effects models were run for each E-field variable (mean and 95th percentile; magnitude, and components normal and tangential to grey matter surface, within the MRS voxel). The model included effects of time (pre or post tDCS), E-field, grey matter volume in the MRS voxel, and a 3-way interaction between time, E-field and grey matter volume. Additionally, we ran a permutation analysis using PALM to determine whether E-field anywhere in the brain, not just in the MRS voxel, correlated with GABA change. ResultsIn M1, higher mean E-field magnitude was associated with greater anodal tDCS-induced decreases in GABA (t(24) = 3.24, p = 0.003). Further, the association between mean E-field magnitude and GABA change was moderated by the grey matter volume in the MRS voxel (t(24) = -3.55, p = 0.002). These relationships were consistent across all E-field variables except the mean of the normal component. No significant relationship was found between tDCS-induced GABA decrease and E-field in the temporal voxel. No significant clusters were found in the whole brain analysis. ConclusionsOur data suggest that the electric field induced by tDCS within the brain is variable, and is significantly related to anodal tDCS-induced decrease in GABA, a key neurophysiological marker of stimulation. These findings strongly support individualised dosing of tDCS, at least in M1. Further studies examining E-fields in relation to other outcome measures, including behaviour, will help determine the optimal E-fields required for any desired effects

    Regression of Dimension 1 on features from the First set experiment.

    No full text
    <p>Note. Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.40, F (8, 61) = 6.66.</p><p>*P<0.05, CI  =  Confidence interval for α = 0.05, SE = Standard error.</p><p>Regression of Dimension 1 on features from the First set experiment.</p

    Feature weights for the LD classification algorithm in predicting high- vs. low- perceived naturalness of the images.

    No full text
    <p>A high absolute value of the weight indicates that that feature is important for classification. A positive weight indicates that that increasing this feature would lead to increased perceived naturalness; a negative weight indicates that increasing this feature would lead to a decrease in perceived naturalness. Error bars reflect 2 standard deviations from the mean.</p

    Comparison of two images in their color diversity properties.

    No full text
    <p>a) SDHue  = 0.11, SDSat = 0.22, SDbright = 0.21 b) SDHue = 0.19, SDSat = 0.26, SDbright = 0.26.</p
    corecore