25 research outputs found
Correction: Pulsed moxifloxacin for the prevention of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbations contribute to the morbidity and mortality associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This proof-of-concept study evaluates whether intermittent pulsed moxifloxacin treatment could reduce the frequency of these exacerbations. METHODS: Stable patients with COPD were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to receive moxifloxacin 400 mg PO once daily (N = 573) or placebo (N = 584) once a day for 5 days. Treatment was repeated every 8 weeks for a total of six courses. Patients were repeatedly assessed clinically and microbiologically during the 48-week treatment period, and for a further 24 weeks' follow-up. RESULTS: At 48 weeks the odds ratio (OR) for suffering an exacerbation favoured moxifloxacin: per-protocol (PP) population (N = 738, OR 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.565-0.994, p = 0.046), intent-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 1149, OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.645-1.008, p = 0.059), and a post-hoc analysis of per-protocol (PP) patients with purulent/mucopurulent sputum production at baseline (N = 323, OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36-0.84, p = 0.006).There were no significant differences between moxifloxacin and placebo in any pre-specified efficacy subgroup analyses or in hospitalization rates, mortality rates, lung function or changes in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores. There was, however, a significant difference in favour of moxifloxacin in the SGRQ symptom domain (ITT: -8.2 vs -3.8, p = 0.009; PP: -8.8 vs -4.4, p = 0.006). Moxifloxacin treatment was not associated with consistent changes in moxifloxacin susceptibility. There were more treatment-emergent, drug related adverse events with moxifloxacin vs placebo (p < 0.001) largely due to gastrointestinal events (4.7% vs 0.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent pulsed therapy with moxifloxacin reduced the odds of exacerbation by 20% in the ITT population, by 25% among the PP population and by 45% in PP patients with purulent/mucopurulent sputum at baseline. There were no unexpected adverse events and there was no evidence of resistance development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00473460 (ClincalTrials.gov)
Comparison of Sequential Intravenous/Oral Ciprofloxacin Plus Metronidazole with Intravenous Ceftriaxone Plus Metronidazole for Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infetions.
Please help us populate SUNScholar with the post print version of this article. It can be e-mailed to: [email protected]
Drug-induced acute malaria
The case of an elderly woman with asymptomatic P. malariae infection
that acutely reactivated after 45 y of latency following treatment with
chlorambucil and methylprednisolone is reported. Only 1 similar case
with methotrexate-induced acute malaria has been reported in the English
literature thus far
DIFFERENCES IN ADHERENCE TO BUCCAL EPITHELIAL-CELLS, IN PHAGOCYTOSIS AND IN KILLING BY NEUTROPHILS BETWEEN HUMAN AND NONHUMAN STRAINS OF CANDIDA-ALBICANS
The adherence of strains of Candida albicans to buccal epithelial cells
as well as the phagocytosis of these organisms by human
polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMNL) was studied. The strains of C.
albicans were obtained from patients’ urine, from bird faeces and from
soil. The strains of C. albicans obtained front patients and the
environment displayed greater adhering ability (23.8 +/- 6.4 and 27.5
+/- 5.2 respectively) than the avian strains (14.4 +/- 2.2) (P <0.01).
Strains obtained from the environment were resistant to phagocytosis
(81.6 +/- 0.2 organisms ingested per 200 PMNL) and killing (8.4 +/-
2.6%) by PMNL as compared to human and avian strains (P <0.01). These
observations indicate that environmental strains of C. albicans may be
more virulent for human beings
Intravenous itraconazole followed by oral itraconazole in the treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with hematologic malignancies, chronic granulomatous disease, or AIDS
The pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of intravenous (iv) itraconazole (2 days at 400 mg/day, 12 days at 200 mg/day), followed by 12 weeks of oral capsules (400 mg/day) were studied in 31 immunocompromised patients with pulmonary invasive aspergillosis. All patients received iv itraconazole (median duration, 14 days), and 26 then received oral itraconazole (median duration, 78.5 days). After receiving iv itraconazole, concentrations increased rapidly, with trough plasma levels greater than or equal to 250 ng/mL in 91% of patients and in all patients by day 7. Concentrations greater than or equal to 500 ng/mL were observed in 64% of patients by day 2. Mean trough concentrations after 2 and 14 days were 670 and 850 ng/mL, respectively. Therapeutic levels were maintained after switching to oral capsules. A complete or partial response was seen at the last on-treatment assessment in 15 (48%) of 31 patients, with 6 (19%) showing stable disease. Itraconazole was well tolerated, with no unexpected effects. Overall iv/oral itraconazole was safe and effective in invasive aspergillosis
Comparative Effects of Ciprofloxacin and Ceftazidime on Cytokine Production in Patients with Severe Sepsis Caused by Gram-Negative Bacteria
In the present study the effect of ciprofloxacin versus ceftazidime on concentrations of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the sera of patients with severe sepsis was evaluated. The study included 58 previously healthy patients suffering from severe sepsis caused by gram-negative bacteria, treated with either ciprofloxacin or ceftazidime after thorough clinical and microbiological evaluation and followed up for clinical outcome. Levels of the proinflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1b (IL-1b), IL-6, and IL-8 and of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, as well as of IL-1 receptor antagonist and soluble TNF receptors I and II, in serum were measured at baseline and 24 and 48 h after the first antimicrobial dose. Mean SAPS-II scores, development of septic shock, and mortality rates were similar in the two groups (43.2 ± 9.2, 21.4%, and 14.3% in the ceftazidime group versus 49.8 ± 11.3, 20%, and 13.3% in the ciprofloxacin group). Serum TNF-α and IL-6 levels at 24 and 48 h were significantly lower in the ciprofloxacin group, while the IL-10/TNF-α ratio was significantly higher, than those for the ceftazidime group. Among patients with high baseline TNF-α levels, there were significant increases in the IL-10/TNF-α ratio at both 24 and 48 h over that at admission for the ciprofloxacin group, while no differences were noted in the ceftazidime group. These results indicate that ciprofloxacin may have an immunomodulatory effect on septic patients by attenuating the proinflammatory response, while there is no evidence that differences in the cytokines measured have any impact on the final outcome
Cephradine Penetration into Cerebrospinal Fluid and Effects of Its Administration into the Cerebral Ventricles of Cats
A RANDOMIZED, MULTINATIONAL STUDY WITH SEQUENTIAL THERAPY COMPARING CIPROFLOXACIN TWICE-DAILY AND OFLOXACIN ONCE-DAILY
In a multinational, open, randomised, controlled clinical study, 474 hospitalised patients with moderate or severe infections were treated with sequential regimens of ofloxacin or ciprofloxacin, Ofloxacin 400 mg once daily or ciprofloxacin 200 mg twice daily were given intravenously for at least 3 days followed by oral treatment,vith ofloxacin 400 mg once daily or ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily. Overall cure rates of 86.8% (85.7%) in the ofloxacin group and 89.6% (89.5%) in the ciprofloxacin group were achieved in the intention-to-treat analysis (per protocol analysis). The overall bacteriological response rate (ofloxacin 89.5%, ciprofloxacin 89.0%) was comparable to the clinical cure rate. Both drugs were well tolerated and adverse events were rarely observed. It is concluded that ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin can be used successfully in the treatment of hospitalised patients with aerobic gram-positive and gram negative infections. Ofloxacin has the advantage of a once-daily regimen, compared to the twice-daily regimen with ciprofloxacin