The increasing lifespan variation gradient by area-level deprivation: A decomposition analysis of Scotland 1981–2011

Life expectancy inequalities are an established indicator of health inequalities. More recent attention has been given to lifespan variation, which measures the amount of heterogeneity in age at death across all individuals in a population. International studies have documented diverging socioeconomic trends in lifespan variation using individual level measures of income, education and occupation. Despite using different socioeconomic indicators and different indices of lifespan variation, studies reached the same conclusion: the most deprived experience the lowest life expectancy and highest lifespan variation, a double burden of mortality inequality. A finding of even greater concern is that relative differences in lifespan variation between socioeconomic group were growing at a faster rate than life expectancy differences. The magnitude of lifespan variation inequalities by area-level deprivation has received limited attention. Area-level measures of deprivation are actively used by governments for allocating resources to tackle health inequalities. Establishing if the same lifespan variation inequalities emerge for area-level deprivation will help to better inform governments about which dimension of mortality inequality should be targeted. We measure lifespan variation trends (1981–2011) stratified by an area-level measure of socioeconomic deprivation that is applicable to the entire population of Scotland, the country with the highest level of variation and one of the longest, sustained stagnating trends in Western Europe. We measure the gradient in variation using the slope and relative indices of inequality. The deprivation, age and cause specific components driving the increasing gradient are identified by decomposing the change in the slope index between 1981 and 2011. Our results support the finding that the most advantaged are dying within an ever narrower age range while the most deprived are facing greater and increasing uncertainty. The least deprived group show an increasing advantage, over the national average, in terms of deaths from circulatory disease and external causes

Cognitive map formation supported by auditory, haptic, and multimodal information in persons with blindness

For efficient navigation, the brain needs to adequately represent the environment in a cognitive map. In this review, we sought to give an overview of literature about cognitive map formation based on non-visual modalities in persons with blindness (PWBs) and sighted persons. The review is focused on the auditory and haptic modalities, including research that combines multiple modalities and real-world navigation. Furthermore, we addressed implications of route and survey representations. Taking together, PWBs as well as sighted persons can build up cognitive maps based on non-visual modalities, although the accuracy sometime somewhat differs between PWBs and sighted persons. We provide some speculations on how to deploy information from different modalities to support cognitive map formation. Furthermore, PWBs and sighted persons seem to be able to construct route as well as survey representations. PWBs can experience difficulties building up a survey representation, but this is not always the case, and research suggests that they can acquire this ability with sufficient spatial information or training. We discuss possible explanations of these inconsistencies

Scaling Propensity of Water

The commonly used Saturation Index calculated at 10°C (SI10) is not suitable for practical situations. New parameters have been developed for simple and rapid analysis of calcium carbonate precipitation (scaling) phenomena which occur during the heating of drinking water: TPCC90 (Theoretically Precipitable Calcium Carbonate at 90°C) SI90 (Saturation Index at 90°C) NI (Nucleation Index) PPCC (Practically Precipitable Calcium Carbonate) Both TPCC90 and SI90 describe the hydrodynamic driven force for the scaling reaction. The nucleation index indicates at what rate calcium carbonate precipitation is accelerated by nuclei present in the water. Finally, the PPCC is a measurement under practical conditions, determining the rate of scaling. The suitability of these parameters for predicting scaling was assessed and detailed results are presented in this publication

Low-dose glucocorticoid treatment affects multiple aspects of intermediary metabolism in healthy humans: a randomised controlled trial

AIM/HYPOTHESIS: To assess whether low-dose glucocorticoid treatment induces adverse metabolic effects, as is evident for high glucocorticoid doses. METHODS: In a randomised placebo-controlled double-blind (participants and the investigators who performed the studies and assessed the outcomes were blinded) dose-response intervention study, 32 healthy men (age 22 +/- 3 years; BMI 22.4 +/- 1.7 kg/m(2)) were allocated to prednisolone 7.5 mg once daily (n = 12), prednisolone 30 mg once daily (n = 12), or placebo (n = 8) for 2 weeks using block randomisation. Main outcome measures were glucose, lipid and protein metabolism, measured by stable isotopes, before and at 2 weeks of treatment, in the fasted state and during a two-step hyperinsulinaemic clamp conducted in the Clinical Research Unit of the Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands RESULTS: Prednisolone, compared with placebo, dose dependently and significantly increased fasting plasma glucose levels, whereas only prednisolone 30 mg increased fasting insulin levels (29 +/- 15 pmol/l). Prednisolone 7.5 mg and prednisolone 30 mg decreased the ability of insulin to suppress endogenous glucose production (by 17 +/- 6% and 46 +/- 7%, respectively, vs placebo). Peripheral glucose uptake was not reduced by prednisolone 7.5 mg, but was decreased by prednisolone 30 mg by 34 +/- 6% (p < 0.0001). Compared with placebo, prednisolone treatment tended to decrease lipolysis in the fasted state (p = 0.062), but both prednisolone 7.5 mg and prednisolone 30 mg decreased insulin-mediated suppression of lipolysis by 11 +/- 5% and 34 +/- 6%, respectively. Finally, prednisolone treatment increased whole-body proteolysis during hyperinsulinaemia, which tended to be driven by prednisolone 30 mg (5 +/- 2%; p = 0.06). No side effects were reported by the study participants. All participants completed the study and were analysed. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Not only at high doses but also at low doses, glucocorticoid therapy impaired intermediary metabolism by interfering with the metabolic actions of insulin on liver and adipose tissue. These data indicate that even low-dose glucocorticoids may impair glucose tolerance when administered chronically. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN83991850

Acute renal effects of the GLP-1 receptor agonist exenatide in overweight type 2 diabetes patients: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Aims/hypothesis: This study aimed to investigate the acute renal effects of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) exenatide in type 2 diabetes patients. Methods: We included overweight (BMI 25–40 kg/m2) men and postmenopausal women, aged 35–75 years with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 48–75 mmol/mol; 6.5–9.0%) and estimated GFR ≥ 60 ml min−1 1.73 m−2. Exenatide or placebo (NaCl solution, 154 mmol/l) was administrated intravenously in an acute, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at the Diabetes Center VU University Medical Center (VUMC). GFR (primary endpoint) and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) were determined by inulin and para-aminohippurate clearance, respectively, based on timed urine sampling. Filtration fraction (FF) and effective renal vascular resistance (ERVR) were calculated, and glomerular hydrostatic pressure (PGLO) and vascular resistance of the afferent (RA) and efferent (RE) renal arteriole were estimated. Tubular function was assessed by absolute and fractional excretion of sodium (FENa), potassium (FEK) and urea (FEU), in addition to urine osmolality, pH and free water clearance. Renal damage markers, BP and plasma glucose were also determined. Results: Of the 57 patients randomised by computer, 52 were included in the final analyses. Exenatide (n = 24) did not affect GFR (mean difference +2 ± 3 ml min−1 1.73 m−2, p = 0.489), ERPF, FF, ERVR or PGLO, compared with placebo (n = 28). Exenatide increased RA (p < 0.05), but did not change RE. Exenatide increased FENa, FEK, urine osmolality and pH, while FEU, urinary flow and free water clearance were decreased (all p < 0.05). Osmolar clearance and renal damage makers were not affected. Diastolic BP and mean arterial pressure increased by 3 ± 1 and 6 ± 2 mmHg, respectively, whereas plasma glucose decreased by 1.4 ± 0.1 mmol/l (all p < 0.05). Conclusions/interpretation: Exenatide infusion does not acutely affect renal haemodynamics in overweight type 2 diabetes patients at normal filtration levels. Furthermore, acute GLP-1RA administration increases proximal sodium excretion in these patients. Trial registration: ClincialTrials.gov NCT01744236 Funding: The research leading to these results has been funded from: (1) the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement number 282521 – the SAFEGUARD project; and (2) the Dutch Kidney Foundation, under grant agreement IP12.87

Twelve week liraglutide or sitagliptin does not affect hepatic fat in type 2 diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1-based therapies have been suggested to improve hepatic steatosis. We assessed the effects of the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide and the dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor sitagliptin on hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In this 12 week, parallel, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, performed at the VU University Medical Center between July 2013 and August 2015, 52 overweight patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin and/or sulphonylurea agent ([mean ± SD] age 62.7 ± 6.9 years, HbA1c 7.3 ± 0.7% or 56 ± 1 mmol/mol) were allocated to once daily liraglutide 1.8 mg (n = 17), sitagliptin 100 mg (n = 18) or matching placebos (n = 17) by computer generated numbers. Both participants and researchers were blinded to group assignment. Hepatic fat content was measured using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS). Hepatic fibrosis was estimated using three validated formulae. RESULTS: One patient dropped out in the sitagliptin group owing to dizziness, but no serious adverse events occurred. At week 12, no between-group differences in hepatic steatosis were found. Liraglutide reduced steatosis by 10% (20.9 ± 3.4% to 18.8 ± 3.3%), sitagliptin reduced steatosis by 12.1% (23.9 ± 3.0% to 21.0 ± 2.7%) and placebo lessened it by 9.5% (18.7 ± 2.7% to 16.9 ± 2.7%). Neither drug affected hepatic fibrosis scores compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Twelve-week liraglutide or sitagliptin treatment does not reduce hepatic steatosis or fibrosis in type 2 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01744236 FUNDING : Funded by the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 282521 - the SAFEGUARD project

Exenatide twice-daily does not affect renal function or albuminuria compared to titrated insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus : A post-hoc analysis of a 52-week randomised trial

Aims: To compare the effects of long-term treatment with the GLP-1RA exenatide twicedaily versus titrated insulin glargine (iGlar) on renal function and albuminuria in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients. Methods: We post-hoc evaluated renal outcome-data of 54 overweight T2DM patients (mean +/- SD age 60 +/- 8 years, HbA1c 7.5 +/- 0.9%, eGFR 86 +/- 16 mL/min/1.73m(2), median [IQR] urinary albumin-to-creatinine-ratio (UACR) 0.75 [0.44-1.29] mg/mmol) randomised to exenatide 10 mg twice-daily or titrated iGlar on-top-of metformin for 52-weeks. Renal efficacy endpoints were change in creatinine clearance (CrCl) and albuminuria (urinary albuminexcretion [UAE] and UACR) based on 24-h urines, collected at baseline and Week-52. eGFR and exploratory endpoints were collected throughout the intervention-period, and after a 4-week wash-out. Results: HbA1c-reductions were similar with exenatide (mean +/- SEM -0.80 +/- 0.10%) and iGlar (-0.79 +/- 0.14%; treatment-difference 0.02%; 95% CI - 0.31 to 0.42%). Change from baseline to Week-52 in CrCl, UAE or UACR did not statistically differ; only iGlar reduced albuminuria (P <0.05; within-group). eGFR decreased from baseline to Week-4 with exenatide (-3.9 +/- 2.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P = 0.069) and iGlar (-2.7 +/- 1.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P = 0.034), without treatment-differences in ensuing trajectory. Exenatide versus iGlar reduced bodyweight (-5.4 kg; 2.9-7.9; P <0.001), but did not affect blood pressure, lipids or plasma uric acid. Conclusions: Among T2DM patients without overt nephropathy, one-year treatment with exenatide twice-daily does not affect renal function-decline or onset/progression of albuminuria compared to titrated iGlar. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Peer reviewe