9 research outputs found
Humanitární katastrofa v Sýrii :pomoc člověka v tísni
Organizace Člověk v tísni od roku 2012 pomáhá lidem zasaženým válečným konfliktem v Sýrii. Pomoc je zaměřena na práci lékařů a vybavení nemocnic, na vzdělávání dětí syrských uprchlíků a zajišťování vody, potravin, oblečení a přístřešků pro nejohroženější rodiny.3
Effect of Short-and Long-Term High-Fat Feeding on Autophagy Flux and Lysosomal Activity in Rat Liver
Summary Autophagy-lysosomal pathway is a cellular mechanism ensuring degradation of various macromolecules like proteins or triacylglycerols (TAG). Its disruption is related to many pathological states, including liver steatosis. We compared the effect of short-and long-established steatosis on the intensity of autophagy-lysosomal pathway in rat liver. The experiments were carried out on 3-month old Wistar rats fed standard (SD) or highfat diet for 2 (HF-2) or 10 (HF-10) weeks. HF diet administered animals accumulated an increased amount of TAG in the liver (HF-2→HF-10). Autophagy flux was up-regulated in HF-2 group but nearly inhibited after 10 weeks of HF administration. The expression of autophagy related genes was up-regulated in HF-2 but normal in HF-10. In contrast, total activities of two lysosomal enzymes, lysosomal lipase (LAL) and acid phosphatase, were unaffected in HF-2 but significantly increased in HF-10 groups. mRNA expression of lysosomal enzymes was not affected by the diet. We conclude that in a state of metabolic unbalance (steatosis), autophagy machinery and lysosomal enzymes expression are regulated independently. The accumulation of TAG in the liver is associated with the increase of total LAL activity and protein expression. In contrast, the autophagy response is bi-phasic and after rapid increase it is significantly diminished. This may represent an adaptive mechanism that counteracts the excessive degradation of substrate, i.e. TAG, and eliminate over-production of potentially hazardous lipiddegradation intermediates
Stability constants of the Li+, Na+, H3O+, NH4 +, Ag+, and K+ complexes of the cone conformer of tetraethyl p-tert-butyltetrathiacalix[4]arene tetraacetate in nitrobenzene saturated with water
The evolution and ecology of multiple antipredator defences
Prey seldom rely on a single type of antipredator defence, often using multiple defences to avoid predation. In many cases, selection in different contexts may favour the evolution of multiple defences in a prey. However, a prey may use multiple defences to protect itself during a single predator encounter. Such "defence portfolios" that defend prey against a single instance of predation are distributed across and within successive stages of the predation sequence (encounter, detection, identification, approach (attack), subjugation and consumption). We contend that at present, our understanding of defence portfolio evolution is incomplete, and seen from the fragmentary perspective of specific sensory systems (e.g., visual) or specific types of defences (especially aposematism). In this review, we aim to build a comprehensive framework for conceptualizing the evolution of multiple prey defences, beginning with hypotheses for the evolution of multiple defences in general, and defence portfolios in particular. We then examine idealized models of resource trade-offs and functional interactions between traits, along with evidence supporting them. We find that defence portfolios are constrained by resource allocation to other aspects of life history, as well as functional incompatibilities between different defences. We also find that selection is likely to favour combinations of defences that have synergistic effects on predator behaviour and prey survival. Next, we examine specific aspects of prey ecology, genetics and development, and predator cognition that modify the predictions of current hypotheses or introduce competing hypotheses. We outline schema for gathering data on the distribution of prey defences across species and geography, determining how multiple defences are produced, and testing the proximate mechanisms by which multiple prey defences impact predator behaviour. Adopting these approaches will strengthen our understanding of multiple defensive strategies