7 research outputs found
Drug Susceptibility Patterns in MDR-TB Patients:Challenges for Future Regimen Design. A Cross-Sectional Study
Globally, there is substantial concern regarding the challenges of treating complex drug resistance patterns in multidrug resistant tuberculosis cases. Utilising data from three different settings (Estonia, Latvia, Romania) we sought to contrast drug susceptibility profiles for multidrug resistant tuberculosis cases, highlight the difficulties in designing universal regimen, and inform future regimen selection. Demographic and microbiological surveillance data for multidrug resistant tuberculosis cases from 2004-13 were analysed. High levels of additional resistance to currently recommended second line drugs were seen in all settings, with extensive variability between countries. Accurate drug susceptibility testing and drug susceptibility testing data are vital to inform the development of comprehensive, flexible, multidrug resistant tuberculosis guidance
Decreased Time to Treatment Initiation for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients after Use of Xpert MTB/RIF Test, Latvia
Few studies have examined whether the Xpert MTB/RIF test improves time to treatment initiation for persons with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB). We determined the impact of this test in Latvia, where it was introduced in 2010. After descriptive analyses of pulmonary MDR TB patients in Latvia during 2009–2012, time to treatment initiation was calculated, and univariate and multivariable accelerated failure time models were constructed. Univariate results showed strong evidence of an association between having rifampin-resistant TB detected by Xpert MTB/RIF and reduced time to treatment initiation versus the test not being used. A multivariable model stratifying by previous TB showed similar results. Our finding that in Latvia, time to treatment initiation was decreased for MDR TB cases that were rifampin-resistant TB by XpertMTB/RIF has implications for the use of this test in other settings with a high burden of MDR TB in which rifampin resistance is highly predictive of MDR TB
Drug susceptibility testing results for multidrug resistant tuberculosis patients in Estonia, Latvia and Romania in 2013.
<p><sup>a</sup>Denominator 28</p><p><sup>b</sup>denominators (new cases, retreatment cases) ethambutol 97, 255; amikacin 66, 154; capreomycin 70, 164; kanamycin 87, 234; ofloxacin 69, 152; cycloserine 28, 105; PAS 60, 151</p><p><sup>c</sup>denominator 48</p><p><sup>d</sup>denominator 49</p><p><sup>e</sup>denominator 19 new, 12 retreatment</p><p><sup>f</sup>ethionamide DST undertaken in Latvia and Romania (denominators for new Romanian cases 89, retreatment cases 220)</p><p><sup>g</sup>denominator 21 new, 14 retreatment. DST- drug susceptibility testing; PAS- p-aminosalicylic acid.</p><p>Drug susceptibility testing results for multidrug resistant tuberculosis patients in Estonia, Latvia and Romania in 2013.</p
Integration of drug safety monitoring in tuberculosis treatment programmes: country experiences.
New drugs and shorter treatments for drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) have become available in recent years and active pharmacovigilance (PV) is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) at least during the early phases of implementation, with active drug safety monitoring and management (aDSM) proposed for this. We conducted a literature review of papers reporting on aDSM. Up to 18 April, 2019, results have only been published from one national aDSM programme. Because aDSM is being introduced in many low- and middle-income countries, we also report experiences in introducing it into DR-TB treatment programmes, targeting the reporting of a restricted set of adverse events (AEs) as per WHO-recommended aDSM principles for the period 2014–2017. Early beneficial effects of active PV for TB patients include increased awareness about the occurrence, detection and management of AEs during TB treatment, and the increase of spontaneous reporting in some countries. However, because PV capacity is low in most countries and collaboration between national TB programmes and national PV centres remains weak, parallel and coordinated co-development of the capacities of both TB programmes and PV centres is needed