61 research outputs found
QUALICOPC, a multi-country study evaluating quality, costs and equity in primary care
Contains fulltext :
96249.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The QUALICOPC (Quality and Costs of Primary Care in Europe) study aims to evaluate the performance of primary care systems in Europe in terms of quality, equity and costs. The study will provide an answer to the question what strong primary care systems entail and which effects primary care systems have on the performance of health care systems. QUALICOPC is funded by the European Commission under the "Seventh Framework Programme". In this article the background and design of the QUALICOPC study is described. METHODS/DESIGN: QUALICOPC started in 2010 and will run until 2013. Data will be collected in 31 European countries (27 EU countries, Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey) and in Australia, Israel and New Zealand. This study uses a three level approach of data collection: the system, practice and patient. Surveys will be held among general practitioners (GPs) and their patients, providing evidence at the process and outcome level of primary care. These surveys aim to gain insight in the professional behaviour of GPs and the expectations and actions of their patients. An important aspect of this study is that each patient's questionnaire can be linked to their own GP's questionnaire. To gather data at the structure or national level, the study will use existing data sources such as the System of Health Accounts and the Primary Health Care Activity Monitor Europe (PHAMEU) database. Analyses of the data will be performed using multilevel models. DISCUSSION: By its design, in which different data sources are combined for comprehensive analyses, QUALICOPC will advance the state of the art in primary care research and contribute to the discussion on the merit of strengthening primary care systems and to evidence based health policy development
Do list size and remuneration affect GPs' decisions about how they provide consultations?
Background: Doctors' professional behaviour is influenced by the way they are paid. When GPs are paid per
item, i.e., on a fee-for-service basis (FFS), there is a clear relationship between workload and income: more work
means more money. In the case of capitation based payment, workload is not directly linked to income since the
fees per patient are fixed. In this study list size was considered as an indicator for workload and we investigated
how list size and remuneration affect GP decisions about how they provide consultations. The main objectives of
this study were to investigate a) how list size is related to consultation length, waiting time to get an appointment,
and the likelihood that GPs conduct home visits and b) to what extent the relationships between list size and
these three variables are affected by remuneration.
Methods: List size was used because this is an important determinant of objective workload. List size was
corrected for number of older patients and patients who lived in deprived areas. We focussed on three
dependent variables that we expected to be related to remuneration and list size: consultation length; waiting
time to get an appointment; and home visits. Data were derived from the second Dutch National Survey of
General Practice (DNSGP-2), carried out between 2000 and 2002. The data were collected using electronic
medical records, videotaped consultations and postal surveys. Multilevel regression analyses were performed to
assess the hypothesized relationships.
Results: Our results indicate that list size is negatively related to consultation length, especially among GPs with
relatively large lists. A correlation between list size and waiting time to get an appointment, and a correlation
between list size and the likelihood of a home visit were only found for GPs with small practices. These
correlations are modified by the proportion of patients for whom GPs receive capitation fees. Waiting times to
get an appointment tend to become shorter with increasing patient lists when there is a larger capitation
percentage. The likelihood that GPs will conduct home visit rises with increasing patient lists when the capitation
percentage is small.
Conclusion: Remuneration appears to affect GPs' decisions about how they provide consultations, especially
among GPs with relatively small patient lists. This role is, however, small compared to other factors such as
patient characteristics.
Multimorbidity and comorbidity in the Dutch population - data from general practices
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Multimorbidity is increasingly recognized as a major public health challenge of modern societies. However, knowledge about the size of the population suffering from multimorbidity and the type of multimorbidity is scarce. The objective of this study was to present an overview of the prevalence of multimorbidity and comorbidity of chronic diseases in the Dutch population and to explore disease clustering and common comorbidities.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used 7 years data (2002–2008) of a large Dutch representative network of general practices (212,902 patients). Multimorbidity was defined as having two or more out of 29 chronic diseases. The prevalence of multimorbidity was calculated for the total population and by sex and age group. For 10 prevalent diseases among patients of 55 years and older (N = 52,014) logistic regressions analyses were used to study disease clustering and descriptive analyses to explore common comorbid diseases.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Multimorbidity of chronic diseases was found among 13% of the Dutch population and in 37% of those older than 55 years. Among patients over 55 years with a specific chronic disease more than two-thirds also had one or more other chronic diseases. Most disease pairs occurred more frequently than would be expected if diseases had been independent. Comorbidity was not limited to specific combinations of diseases; about 70% of those with a disease had one or more extra chronic diseases recorded which were not included in the top five of most common diseases.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Multimorbidity is common at all ages though increasing with age, with over two-thirds of those with chronic diseases and aged 55 years and older being recorded with multimorbidity. Comorbidity encompassed many different combinations of chronic diseases. Given the ageing population, multimorbidity and its consequences should be taken into account in the organization of care in order to avoid fragmented care, in medical research and healthcare policy.</p
- …