63 research outputs found

    Augustan Conquest of the Balkans in the Light of Triumphal Monuments

    Get PDF
    The article offers an interpretation of inscriptions from the Sebasteion of Aphrodisias in Caria that represent Roman victories in the Balkans during the reign of Augustus. Six inscriptions from sc. αΌ”ΞΈΞ½Ξ· series commemorate Danubian-Balkan tribes: Japodes Andizetes, Pirustae, Dardani, Dacians, Bessi. These monuments provide not only early epigraphic attestations of single tribes but seem to illuminate, to some extent, the rΓ΄le that pacification of the Danubian-Balkan regions played in Augustan propagandic imagery

    Greek, Latin and Palaeo-Balkan Languages in Contact

    Get PDF
    Focusing on the area of Danubian provinces of Roman Empire, this paper aims at touching upon linguistic diversity and language change in north-western Balkans in Roman epoch. Using epigraphic evidence, it will address the questions of the impact of the spread of Greek and Latin in this area, which led to a gradual extinction of the native, Palaeo-Balkan languages. In Antiquity, linguistic situation in this area was extremely complex: a great variety of languages came into close mutual contact and in contact with Greek and Latin, which became dominant. These Palaeo-Balkan languages are relict languages, and they are known almost exclusively through the onomastics recorded in Latin and Greek inscriptions and through rare glosses, i.e. by the time they came to be documented, their speakers were already Romanized or Hellenized. Most of the documents that record native onomastics are at the same time testaments of Romanization/Hellenization; however, these inscriptions bear witness that the native population preserved the memory of their ethnic and linguistic background

    The Thracian Hero on the Danube New Interpretation of an Inscription from Diana

    Get PDF
    The paper looks at some aspects of the Thracian Hero cult on the Danube frontier of Upper Moesia inspired by a reinterpretation of a Latin votive inscription from Diana, which, as the paper proposes, was dedicated to Deo Totovitioni. Based on epigraphic analogies, the paper puts forth the view that it was a dedication to the Thracian Hero, since it is in the context of this particular cult that the epithet Totovitio has been attested in various variants (Toto-viti- / Toto-bisi- / Toto-ithi-)

    ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄Π°Ρ‡ΠΊΠ° боТанства ΠΈ Π΅Ρ‚Π½ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ ΡƒΠ΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³Π΅. Епиграфски ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈ ΠΈΠ· Π“ΠΎΡ€ΡšΠ΅ МСзијС

    Get PDF
    The article aims at exploring the epigraphic evidence for socialreligious associations of foreigners in the Roman province of Upper Moesia. The members of these associations were united by a common background and often by professional interests, and gathered around an ancestral cult.Π£ Ρ€Π°Π΄Ρƒ сС ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ€ΠΈΡˆΠ΅ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎ Спиграфских свСдочанства ΠΎ страним ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π°Ρ‡ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΊΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠ° који ΡƒΠΊΠ°Π·ΡƒΡ˜Ρƒ Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ˜Π°ΡšΠ΅ Π΅Ρ‚Π½ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΡ… колСгија Ρƒ Ρ€ΠΈΠΌΡΠΊΠΎΡ˜ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜ΠΈ Π“ΠΎΡ€ΡšΠΎΡ˜ МСзији. Π§Π»Π°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Ρ‚ΠΈΡ… ΡƒΠ΄Ρ€ΡƒΠΆΠ΅ΡšΠ° ΠΌΠΈΠ³Ρ€Π°Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π·ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎ јС Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡ€Π΅ΠΊΠ»ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΊΡƒΠ»Ρ‚, Π° Π½Π΅Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠΎ ΠΈ иста ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π΅ΡΠΈΡ˜Π° ΠΈ пословни интСрСси

    The Roman Roads Between Upper Moesia and Thrace: Archaeological and Epigraphic Evidence

    Get PDF
    The paper focuses on a little-known Roman vicinal communication that connected the River Timok region in Upper Moesia with the Roman town of Pautalia in the province of Thrace. In Roman times the most important feature of both of these two regions was mining activity. This road that connected two mining centres was most likely to have been used for the transport of ore. Although it is not mentioned in the extant Roman itineraries, it was certainly an important compendium between two Roman centres and was marked by milestones. This paper also reconsider

    New and revised inscriptions from Dalmatia. Municipium Malvesiatium and municipium Splonistarum

    Get PDF
    This paper provides new epigraphic evidence from the Roman province of Dalmatia, more precisely from its easternmost parts, which belong today to Serbia. The present edition is based on our autopsy performed during 2015–2016 within the framework of the digitization project carried out by the Institute for Balkan Studies of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts

    Из СпиграфскС Π±Π°ΡˆΡ‚ΠΈΠ½Π΅ Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ Π”ΠΎΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ˜Π΅ ЈСдан натпис посвСћСн Neptuno periculorum Absolutori

    Get PDF
    A new votive inscription from the territory of Doclea has recently been published. The reading of the text needs revision, and consequently, reinterpretation. The inscription should be read as follows: Neptuno Χ€ sacrum pΧ€ericuloruΧ€m AbsoluΧ€tori PetroΧ€5nius AspeΧ€r v(otum) s(olvit) Χ€ l(ibens) a(nimo). Neptune’s attribute periculorum Absolutor appears here for the first time. The noun Β«AbsolutorΒ», i.e. Β«he who absolves, liberator Β», attested late in the narrative sources e.g. Cassiod. Var . XI, praef. 3, should be close to the Jupiter’s epithets Liberator or Servator. The dedication could be connected with a successful ending of a journey, possibly after being exposed to maritime perils: the dedicator may well be a person engaged in trade and businesses that involve transmarine voyage. His name - Petronius Asper - implies the connection with the large group of Italian settlers in Dalmatia, whose presence is attested in the province all through the Principate. Such relations are illustrated in the light of other Dalmatian examples

    Civitates peregrinae in Illyricum in the times of the Principate based on the evidence of Pliny the Elder's Naturalis historia and epigraphic sources

    Get PDF
    Π”ΠΈΡΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° јС посвСћСна ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡƒΡ‡Π°Π²Π°ΡšΡƒ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π³Ρ€ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ… Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ†Π° (civitates peregrinae) Π½Π°Ρ‚Π»Ρƒ Π˜Π»ΠΈΡ€ΠΈΠΊΠ°, односно римских ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π”Π°Π»ΠΌΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ ΠΈ ПанонијС којС су Π½Π°ΡΡ‚Π°Π»Π΅ΡšΠ΅Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌ 9. Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡƒΡΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π²Ρ™Π°ΡšΠ° римских ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°, Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ›Π΅ΡΡ‚Π°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈΡˆΡ‚Π²ΠΎ јС ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ Ρƒ Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ†Π΅ Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π°Π½Π΅ Π½Π° плСмСнском ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΠΏΡƒ. ВСплСмСнскС Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ†Π΅ су ΡƒΠ³Π»Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΏΠ°Π΄Π°Π»Π΅ ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ˜ΠΈ civitates stipendiariae,односно tributariae, Π° Π½Π°Π·ΠΈΠ² peregrinae односи сС Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΈ статус ΡšΠΈΡ…ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅, која јС вСћински Π±ΠΈΠ»Π° Ρƒ статусу ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π³Ρ€ΠΈΠ½Π° (Ρƒ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ³Π»Π΅Π΄Ρƒ, странци ΡƒΠ ΠΈΠΌΡΠΊΠΎΡ˜ Π΄Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Π²ΠΈ). На простору ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° којС су ΠΎΠ±ΡƒΡ…Π²Π°Ρ›Π΅Π½Π΅ Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΎΠΌ Π·Π°Π±Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΎ Ρ˜Π΅ΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ˜Π°ΡšΠ΅ ΠΎΠΊΠΎ пСдСсСт ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π³Ρ€ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ… Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ†Π° Ρƒ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΠΏΠ°Ρ‚Π°. Π“Π»Π°Π²Π½ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡšΠΈΡ…ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ познавањС су Спиграфски спомСници ΠΈ вишС ΠΏΠΎΠ³Π»Π°Π²Ρ™Π° ΙΙΙ књигС Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Naturalis historia Плинија Π‘Ρ‚Π°Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜Π΅Π³. ΠŸΠΎΡ€Π΅Π΄ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³Π°, ΡƒΠΏΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±Ρ™Π΅Π½ΠΈ су ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈ oΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°, сачувани ΠΊΠΎΠ΄ Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΈΡ… Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΡ… писаца (Апијан, КасијС Π”ΠΈΠΎΠ½, Π‘Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΠ½,ΠŸΡ‚ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Ρ˜, Π’Π΅Π»Π΅Ρ˜ ΠŸΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΡƒΠ» ΠΈ Π΄Ρ€.). Π£ Π΄Π΅Π»Ρƒ Naturalis historia сачувани су списковипСрСгриних Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ†Π° који ΠΏΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Ρƒ ΠΈΠ· Π·Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈΡ… Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° (formulae provinciarum) спочСтка Ξ™ Π²Π΅ΠΊΠ°, Π·Π±ΠΎΠ³ Ρ‡Π΅Π³Π° сС ΡΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ˜Ρƒ ΠΏΠΎΡƒΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌ. Натписи свСдочС ΠΎ Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ Π΄Π° јС Π²Π΅Ρ›ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π³Ρ€ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ… Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ†Π° којС ПлинијС Π±Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΆΠΈ Ρƒ својим списковима ΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ˜Π°Π»Π° још касноу ΙΙ, Π° Ρƒ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π²ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈ Ρƒ III Π²Π΅ΠΊΡƒ. Π Π°Π΄ Π±ΠΈ Ρ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±Π°Π»ΠΎ Π΄Π° ΠΏΡ€ΡƒΠΆΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΎΠΊΡ€ΡƒΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρƒ слику оадминистративним Ρ€Π΅ΡˆΠ΅ΡšΠΈΠΌΠ° Ρƒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜ΠΈ, Ρ€ΠΈΠΌΡΠΊΠΎΡ˜ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ†ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΌΠ° Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ›Π΅ΠΌΡΡ‚Π°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈΡˆΡ‚Π²Ρƒ, њСговој ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜ΠΈ Ρƒ Римску Π΄Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Π²Ρƒ ΠΈ ΠΎ процСсу Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅. Π¦ΠΈΡ™Ρ˜Π΅ Π΄Π° сС просторно ΠΈ врСмСнски ΠΎΠ΄Ρ€Π΅Π΄Π΅ свС ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π³Ρ€ΠΈΠ½Π΅ административнС Ρ˜Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ†Π΅ напростору ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π”Π°Π»ΠΌΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ ΠΈ ПанонијС (Π“ΠΎΡ€ΡšΠ΅ ΠΈ Π”ΠΎΡšΠ΅), ΠΎ Ρ‡ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ˜Π°ΡšΡƒ ΡƒΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ Ι‒ΙΙΙ Π²Π΅ΠΊΠ° ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΎ свСдочанства. ПосСбна паТња посвСћСна јС ΠΏΠΈΡ‚Π°ΡšΠΈΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½ΡƒΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚Π°, Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π½ΡΡ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ ΠΈ ΡƒΡ€Π±Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ плСмСнских Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ†Π°. АнализомСпиграфског ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»Π° ΡƒΡ‚Π²Ρ€Ρ’Π΅Π½ΠΎ јС Π΄Π° настанак Π³Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π° Π½Π° плСмСнским Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ˜Π°ΠΌΠ°Π²Ρ€Π»ΠΎ чСсто нијС ΠΌΠΎΡ€Π°ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈ ΡƒΠΊΠΈΠ΄Π°ΡšΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π³Ρ€ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ… Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ†Π°, Π²Π΅Ρ› Π΄Π° суcivitates ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Π»Π΅Π»Π½ΠΎ наставилС Π΄Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ˜Π΅, Π²Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚Π½ΠΎ ΡƒΠΌΠ°ΡšΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ… Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π°. НовиСпиграфски ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π», Π½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎ онај који сС Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ ПанонијС, отварапростор Π·Π° Π½ΠΎΠ²Π° ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ°, ΠΈ Π·Π°Ρ…Ρ‚Π΅Π²Π° Π΄Π° сС Ρ‚Π΅ΠΌΠ° прСиспита.The dissertation is dedicated to studying peregrine communities (civitates peregrinae) inIllyricum, that is the Roman provinces of Dalmatia and Pannonia which were created by thedivision of Illyricum in 9 A.D. In the establishment of the Roman provinces the localpopulation was organized into communities based on tribal affiliation. These tribalcommunities predominantly belonged to the category of civitates stipendiariae, that istributariae, while the designation peregrinae refers to the legal status of their populations,chiefly holding the status of peregrini (from a legal stance, foreigners within the Romanstate). Within the provinces explored in this dissertation, about fifty peregrine communitiesare known to have existed during the Principate. The main sources for these communitiesare epigraphic monuments and several chapters from the third book of Pliny the Elder’sNaturalis Historia. This text preserved the lists of peregrine communities and, since thelists originate from official documents (formulae provinciarum) from the early first century,they are deemed reliable. The inscriptions attest that the majority of peregrine communitiesPliny cited in his lists existed late into the second, and in some cases even in the thirdcentury. Apart from these, information about the tribes preserved in other Classical authorswas used (Appian, Cassius Dio, Strabo, Ptolemy, Velleius Paterculus etc.). This study aimsto offer a comprehensive overview of the administrative solutions in the province, Romanpolicies towards the indigenous population, its integration into the Roman state, and theprocess of Romanization. The goal is to temporally and spatially establish all the peregrineadministrative units in the provinces of Dalmatia and Pannonia (Upper and Lower), theexistence of which in the first and second century A.D. is well attested. Special attention isdedicated to questions of continuity, transformation, and urbanization of these tribalcommunities. By an analysis of the epigraphic material it was determined that the birth oftowns within tribal territories frequently did not result in an inevitable abolition ofperegrine communities but that the civitates continued to exist separately, most likelydiminished. New epigraphic material, particularly the material in reference to the provinceof Pannonia, opens new avenues for research and requires a re-examination of the subject

    Civitates peregrinae in Illyricum in the times of the pincipate based on the evidence of Piny the Elder's Naturalis historia and epigraphic sources

    Get PDF
    Π”ΠΈΡΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° јС посвСћСна ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡƒΡ‡Π°Π²Π°ΡšΡƒ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π³Ρ€ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ… Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ†Π° (civitates peregrinae) Π½Π° Ρ‚Π»Ρƒ Π˜Π»ΠΈΡ€ΠΈΠΊΠ°, односно римских ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π”Π°Π»ΠΌΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ ΠΈ ПанонијС којС су насталС њСговом ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌ 9. Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡƒΡΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π²Ρ™Π°ΡšΠ° римских ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°, Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ›Π΅ ΡΡ‚Π°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈΡˆΡ‚Π²ΠΎ јС ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ Ρƒ Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ†Π΅ Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π°Π½Π΅ Π½Π° плСмСнском ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΠΏΡƒ. Π’Π΅ плСмСнскС Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ†Π΅ су ΡƒΠ³Π»Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΏΠ°Π΄Π°Π»Π΅ ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ˜ΠΈ civitates stipendiariae, односно tributariae, Π° Π½Π°Π·ΠΈΠ² peregrinae односи сС Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΈ статус ΡšΠΈΡ…ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅, која јС вСћински Π±ΠΈΠ»Π° Ρƒ статусу ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π³Ρ€ΠΈΠ½Π° (Ρƒ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ³Π»Π΅Π΄Ρƒ, странци Ρƒ Римској Π΄Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Π²ΠΈ). На простору ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° којС су ΠΎΠ±ΡƒΡ…Π²Π°Ρ›Π΅Π½Π΅ Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΎΠΌ Π·Π°Π±Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΎ јС ΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ˜Π°ΡšΠ΅ ΠΎΠΊΠΎ пСдСсСт ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π³Ρ€ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ… Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ†Π° Ρƒ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΠΏΠ°Ρ‚Π°. Π“Π»Π°Π²Π½ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΡ€ΠΈ Π·Π° ΡšΠΈΡ…ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ познавањС су Спиграфски спомСници ΠΈ вишС ΠΏΠΎΠ³Π»Π°Π²Ρ™Π° ΙΙΙ књигС Π΄Π΅Π»Π° Naturalis historia Плинија Π‘Ρ‚Π°Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜Π΅Π³. ΠŸΠΎΡ€Π΅Π΄ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³Π°, ΡƒΠΏΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±Ρ™Π΅Π½ΠΈ су ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈ o ΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°, сачувани ΠΊΠΎΠ΄ Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΈΡ… Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΡ… писаца (Апијан, КасијС Π”ΠΈΠΎΠ½, Π‘Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΠ½, ΠŸΡ‚ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Ρ˜, Π’Π΅Π»Π΅Ρ˜ ΠŸΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΡƒΠ» ΠΈ Π΄Ρ€.). Π£ Π΄Π΅Π»Ρƒ Naturalis historia сачувани су спискови ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π³Ρ€ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ… Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ†Π° који ΠΏΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Ρƒ ΠΈΠ· Π·Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈΡ… Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° (formulae provinciarum) с ΠΏΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ° Ξ™ Π²Π΅ΠΊΠ°, Π·Π±ΠΎΠ³ Ρ‡Π΅Π³Π° сС ΡΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ˜Ρƒ ΠΏΠΎΡƒΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌ. Натписи свСдочС ΠΎ Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ Π΄Π° јС Π²Π΅Ρ›ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π³Ρ€ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ… Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ†Π° којС ПлинијС Π±Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΆΠΈ Ρƒ својим списковима ΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ˜Π°Π»Π° још касно Ρƒ ΙΙ, Π° Ρƒ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π²ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈ Ρƒ III Π²Π΅ΠΊΡƒ. Π Π°Π΄ Π±ΠΈ Ρ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±Π°Π»ΠΎ Π΄Π° ΠΏΡ€ΡƒΠΆΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΎΠΊΡ€ΡƒΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρƒ слику ΠΎ административним Ρ€Π΅ΡˆΠ΅ΡšΠΈΠΌΠ° Ρƒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜ΠΈ, Ρ€ΠΈΠΌΡΠΊΠΎΡ˜ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ†ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΌΠ° Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ›Π΅ΠΌ ΡΡ‚Π°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈΡˆΡ‚Π²Ρƒ, њСговој ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜ΠΈ Ρƒ Римску Π΄Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Π²Ρƒ ΠΈ ΠΎ процСсу Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅. Π¦ΠΈΡ™ јС Π΄Π° сС просторно ΠΈ врСмСнски ΠΎΠ΄Ρ€Π΅Π΄Π΅ свС ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π³Ρ€ΠΈΠ½Π΅ административнС Ρ˜Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ†Π΅ Π½Π° простору ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π”Π°Π»ΠΌΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ ΠΈ ПанонијС (Π“ΠΎΡ€ΡšΠ΅ ΠΈ Π”ΠΎΡšΠ΅), ΠΎ Ρ‡ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ˜Π°ΡšΡƒ Ρƒ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ Ι‒ΙΙΙ Π²Π΅ΠΊΠ° ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΎ свСдочанства. ПосСбна паТња посвСћСна јС ΠΏΠΈΡ‚Π°ΡšΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½ΡƒΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚Π°, Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π½ΡΡ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ ΠΈ ΡƒΡ€Π±Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ плСмСнских Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ†Π°. Анализом Спиграфског ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»Π° ΡƒΡ‚Π²Ρ€Ρ’Π΅Π½ΠΎ јС Π΄Π° настанак Π³Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π° Π½Π° плСмСнским Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ˜Π°ΠΌΠ° Π²Ρ€Π»ΠΎ чСсто нијС ΠΌΠΎΡ€Π°ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈ ΡƒΠΊΠΈΠ΄Π°ΡšΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π³Ρ€ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ… Π·Π°Ρ˜Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ†Π°, Π²Π΅Ρ› Π΄Π° су civitates ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Π»Π΅Π»Π½ΠΎ наставилС Π΄Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ˜Π΅, Π²Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚Π½ΠΎ ΡƒΠΌΠ°ΡšΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ… Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π°. Нови Спиграфски ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π», Π½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎ онај који сС Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ ПанонијС, ΠΎΡ‚Π²Π°Ρ€Π° простор Π·Π° Π½ΠΎΠ²Π° ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ°, ΠΈ Π·Π°Ρ…Ρ‚Π΅Π²Π° Π΄Π° сС Ρ‚Π΅ΠΌΠ° прСиспита.The dissertation is dedicated to studying peregrine communities (civitates peregrinae) in Illyricum, that is the Roman provinces of Dalmatia and Pannonia which were created by the division of Illyricum in 9 A.D. In the establishment of the Roman provinces the local population was organized into communities based on tribal affiliation. These tribal communities predominantly belonged to the category of civitates stipendiariae, that is tributariae, while the designation peregrinae refers to the legal status of their populations, chiefly holding the status of peregrini (from a legal stance, foreigners within the Roman state). Within the provinces explored in this dissertation, about fifty peregrine communities are known to have existed during the Principate. The main sources for these communities are epigraphic monuments and several chapters from the third book of Pliny the Elder’s Naturalis Historia. This text preserved the lists of peregrine communities and, since the lists originate from official documents (formulae provinciarum) from the early first century, they are deemed reliable. The inscriptions attest that the majority of peregrine communities Pliny cited in his lists existed late into the second, and in some cases even in the third century. Apart from these, information about the tribes preserved in other Classical authors was used (Appian, Cassius Dio, Strabo, Ptolemy, Velleius Paterculus etc.). This study aims to offer a comprehensive overview of the administrative solutions in the province, Roman policies towards the indigenous population, its integration into the Roman state, and the process of Romanization. The goal is to temporally and spatially establish all the peregrine administrative units in the provinces of Dalmatia and Pannonia (Upper and Lower), the existence of which in the first and second century A.D. is well attested. Special attention is dedicated to questions of continuity, transformation, and urbanization of these tribal communities. By an analysis of the epigraphic material it was determined that the birth of towns within tribal territories frequently did not result in an inevitable abolition of peregrine communities but that the civitates continued to exist separately, most likely diminished. New epigraphic material, particularly the material in reference to the province of Pannonia, opens new avenues for research and requires a re-examination of the subject
    • …
    corecore