Multipurpose silicon photonics signal processor core

[EN] Integrated photonics changes the scaling laws of information and communication systems offering architectural choices that combine photonics with electronics to optimize performance, power, footprint, and cost. Application-specific photonic integrated circuits, where particular circuits/chips are designed to optimally perform particular functionalities, require a considerable number of design and fabrication iterations leading to long development times. A different approach inspired by electronic Field Programmable Gate Arrays is the programmable photonic processor, where a common hardware implemented by a two-dimensional photonic waveguide mesh realizes different functionalities through programming. Here, we report the demonstration of such reconfigurable waveguide mesh in silicon. We demonstrate over 20 different functionalities with a simple seven hexagonal cell structure, which can be applied to different fields including communications, chemical and biomedical sensing, signal processing, multiprocessor networks, and quantum information systems. Our work is an important step toward this paradigm.J.C. acknowledges funding from the ERC Advanced Grant ERC-ADG-2016-741415 UMWP-Chip, I.G. acknowledges the funding through the Spanish MINECO Ramon y Cajal program. D.P. acknowledges financial support from the UPV through the FPI predoctoral funding scheme. D.J.T. acknowledges funding from the Royal Society for his University Research Fellowship.Pérez-López, D.; Gasulla Mestre, I.; Crudgington, L.; Thomson, DJ.; Khokhar, AZ.; Li, K.; Cao, W.... (2017). Multipurpose silicon photonics signal processor core. Nature Communications. 8(1925):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00714-1S1981925Doerr, C. R. & Okamoto, K. Advances in silica planar lightwave circuits. J. Lightw. Technol. 24, 4763–4789 (2006).Coldren, L. A. et al. High performance InP-based photonic ICs—A tutorial. J. Lightw. Technol 29, 554–570 (2011).Soref, R. The past, present, and future of silicon photonics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 12, 1678–1687 (2006).Bogaerts, W. Design challenges in silicon photonics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 20, 8202008 (2014).Bogaerts, W. et al. Nanophotonic waveguides in silicon-on-insulator fabricated with CMOS technology. J. Lightw. Technol. 23, 401–412 (2005).Smit, M. K. et al. An introduction to InP-based generic integration technology. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 29, 083001 (2014).Leinse, A. et al. TriPleX waveguide platform: low-loss technology over a wide wavelength range. Proc. SPIE 8767, 87670E (2013).Kish, F. et al. From visible light-emitting diodes to large-scale III–V photonic integrated circuits. Proc. IEEE 101, 2255–2270 (2013).Heck, M. J. R. et al. Hybrid silicon photonic integrated circuit technology. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 19, 6100117 (2013).Sacher, W. et al. Multilayer silicon nitride-on-silicon integrated photonic platforms and devices. J. Lightw. Technol. 33, 901–910 (2015).Asghari, M. Silicon photonics: A low cost integration platform for datacom and telecom applications. In OFC/NFOEC 2008 – 2008 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference 1–10 (San Diego, USA, 2008).Melati, D. et al. Integrated all-optical MIMO demultiplexer for mode- and wavelength-division-multiplexed transmission. Opt. Lett. 42, 342–345 (2017).Waterhouse, R. & Novak, D. Realizing 5G: microwave photonics for 5G mobile wireless systems. IEEE Microw. Mag. 16, 84–92 (2015).Marpaung, D. et al. Integrated microwave photonics. Laser Photon. Rev. 7, 506–538 (2013).Iezekiel, S., Burla, M., Klamkin, J., Marpaung, D. & Capmany, J. RF engineering meets optoelectronics: Progress in integrated microwave photonics. IEEE Microw. Mag. 16, 28–45 (2015).Technology focus on microwave photonics. Nat. Photon. 5, 723 (2011).Ghelfi, P. et al. A fully photonics-based coherent radar system. Nature 507, 341–345 (2014).Heideman, R. G. TriPleX™-based integrated optical ring resonators for lab-ona-chip-and environmental detection. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 18, 1583–1596 (2012).Estevez, M. C., Alvarez, M. & Lechuga, L. Integrated optical devices for lab-on-a-chip biosensing applications. Laser Photon. Rev. 6, 463–487 (2012).Almeida, V. R., Barrios, C. A., Panepucci, R. & Lipson, M. All-optical control of light on a silicon chip. Nature 431, 1081–1084 (2004).Norberg, E. J., Guzzon, R. S., Parker, J. S., Johansson, L. A. & Coldren, L. A. Programmable photonic microwave filters monolithically integrated in InP/InGaAsP. J. Lightw. Technol. 29, 1611–1619 (2011).Wang, J. et al. Reconfigurable radio-frequency arbitrary waveforms synthesized in a silicon photonic chip. Nat. Commun. 6, 5957 (2015).Hill, M. T. et al. A fast low power optical memory based on coupled micro-ring lasers. Nature 432, 206–209 (2004).Slavík, R. et al. Photonic temporal integrator for all-optical computing. Opt. Express 16, 18202–18214 (2008).Sun, C. et al. A monolithically-integrated chip-to-chip optical link in bulk CMOS. IEEE J. Solid-State Circ. 50, 828–844 (2015).Sun, C. et al. Single-chip microprocessor that communicates directly using light. Nature 528, 534–538 (2015).Assefa, S. et al. in Optical Fibre Communication Conference OMM6, https://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.cfm?uri=OFC-2011-OMM6 (Optical Society of America, 2011).Peruzzo, A. et al. Multimode quantum interference of photons in multiport integrated devices. Nat. Commun. 2, 224 (2011).Bonneau, D. et al. Quantum interference and manipulation of entanglement in silicon wire waveguide quantum circuits. N. J. Phys. 14, 045003 (2012).Metcalf, B. J. et al. Multiphoton quantum interference in a multiport integrated photonic device. Nat. Commun. 4, 1356 (2013).Muñoz, P. et al. in 16th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), 1–4 (Graz, 2014).Ribeiro, A. et al. Demonstration of a 4×4-port universal linear circuit. Optica 3, 1348–1357 (2016).Liu, W. et al. A fully reconfigurable photonic integrated signal processor. Nat. Photon 10, 190–195 (2016).Graydon, O. Birth of the programmable optical chip. Nat. Photon 10, 1 (2016).Pérez, D., Gasulla, I. & Capmany, J. Software-defined reconfigurable microwave photonics processor. Opt. Express 23, 14640–14654 (2015).Miller, D. A. B. Self-configuring universal linear optical component. Photon. Res. 1, 1–15 (2013).Miller, D. A. B. Self-aligning universal beam coupler. Opt. Express 21, 6360–6370 (2013).Clements, W. R. et al. Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers. Optica 3, 1460–1465 (2016).Zhuang, L., Roeloffzen, C. G. H., Hoekman, M., Boller, K.-J. & Lowery, A. J. Programmable photonic signal processor chip for radiofrequency applications. Optica 2, 854–859 (2015).Capmany, J., Gasulla, I. & Pérez, D. Microwave photonics: The programmable processor. Nat. Photon. 10, 6–8 (2016).Pérez, D., Gasulla., Capmany, J. & Soref, R. A. Reconfigurable lattice mesh designs for programmable photonic processors. Opt. Express 24, 12093–12106 (2016).Madsen, C. K. & Zhao, J. H. Optical Filter Design and Analysis: A Signal Processing Approach. 1st edn. (Wiley, 1999).Jinguji, K. Synthesis of coherent two-port lattice-form optical delay-line circuit. J. Lightw. Technol. 13, 73–82 (1995).Jinguji, K. Synthesis of coherent two-port Optical delay-line circuit with ring waveguides. J. Lightw. Technol. 14, 1882–1898 (1996).Madsen, C. K. General IIR optical filter design for WDM applications using all-pass filters. J. Lightw. Technol. 18, 860–868 (2000).Burla, M. et al. On-chip CMOS compatible reconfigurable optical delay line with separate carrier tuning for microwave photonic signal processing. Opt. Express 19, 21475–21484 (2011).Yariv, A. et al. Coupled resonator optical waveguides: a proposal and analysis. Opt. Lett. 24, 711–713 (1999).Hebner, J. E. et al. Distributed and localized feedback in microresonator sequences for linear and nonlinear optics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 21, 1665–1673 (2004).Fandiño, J. S. et al. A monolithic integrated photonic microwave filter. Nat. Photon. 11, 124–129 (2017).Miller, D. A. B. All linear optical devices are mode converters. Opt. Express 20, 23985–23993 (2012).Reck, M. et al. Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 58–61 (1994).Carolan, J. et al. Universal linear optics. Science 349, 711 (2015).Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. 1st edn. (Cambridge University Press, 2001).Miller, D. A. B. Perfect optics with imperfect components. Optica 2, 747–750 (2015).Grillanda, S. et al. Non-invasive monitoring and control in silicon photonics using CMOS integrated electronics. Optica 1, 129–136 (2014)

A three-experiment examination of iliotibial band strain characteristics during different conditions using musculoskeletal simulation.

PURPOSE: Iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS) is a common chronic pathology mediated via excessive Iliotibial band (ITB) strain. The purpose using a three-experiment approach is to provide insight into the differences in strain between different athletic movements, the incidence of ITBS in females, the efficacy of different prophylactic modalities for ITBS and also the kinematic parameters associated with ITB strain. METHODS: Experiment 1 examined male and female athletes performing run, 45° cut and one-legged hop movements, experiment 2 observed males and females, whilst running in five different orthotic conditions and experiment 3 examined males and females riding a cycle ergometer at 70, 80 and 90RPM whilst in prophylactic knee brace and no-brace conditions. In each experiment, kinematics were obtained using a motion capture system and ITB strain was measured using a musculoskeletal simulation approach. RESULTS: In experiment 1 ITB strain was greater in the run (male=3.87% & female=4.37%; P<0.001) and cut (male=3.12% & female=4.06%; P<0.001) movements compared to hop (male=0.87% & female=1.54%). Experiment 2 showed that females exhibited increased ITB strain (male=6.34% & female=8.91%; P<0.05) and ITB strain velocity (male=57.17%/s & female=77.41%/s; P<0.05) and also in females that ITB strain velocity was greater (P≤0.01) in lateral (80.22%/s) and no-orthotic (83.01%/s) conditions compared to medial (72.58%/s) and off the shelf orthoses (74.52%/s). The regression analyses across movements showed that ITB strain was predicted by sagittal and coronal plane mechanics at the hip (R2=0.15-0.30; P<0.05) and sagittal, coronal and transverse plane kinematics at the knee joint (R2=0.15-0.22; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Further insight is provided into differences in ITB strain across functional athletic movements, the increased incidence of ITBS in females and the parameters linked most strongly with ITB strain during different movements is provided; whilst also highlighting the prophylactic efficacy of medial and off the shelf orthoses in female runners

Enhancement of Vaccinia Virus Based Oncolysis with Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDI) dampen cellular innate immune response by decreasing interferon production and have been shown to increase the growth of vesicular stomatitis virus and HSV. As attenuated tumour-selective oncolytic vaccinia viruses (VV) are already undergoing clinical evaluation, the goal of this study is to determine whether HDI can also enhance the potency of these poxviruses in infection-resistant cancer cell lines. Multiple HDIs were tested and Trichostatin A (TSA) was found to potently enhance the spread and replication of a tumour selective vaccinia virus in several infection-resistant cancer cell lines. TSA significantly decreased the number of lung metastases in a syngeneic B16F10LacZ lung metastasis model yet did not increase the replication of vaccinia in normal tissues. The combination of TSA and VV increased survival of mice harbouring human HCT116 colon tumour xenografts as compared to mice treated with either agent alone. We conclude that TSA can selectively and effectively enhance the replication and spread of oncolytic vaccinia virus in cancer cells

Blocking FcRn in humans reduces circulating IgG levels and inhibits IgG immune complex-mediated immune responses.

The neonatal crystallizable fragment receptor (FcRn) functions as an intracellular protection receptor for immunoglobulin G (IgG). Recently, several clinical studies have reported the lowering of circulating monomeric IgG levels through FcRn blockade for the potential treatment of autoimmune diseases. Many autoimmune diseases, however, are derived from the effects of IgG immune complexes (ICs). We generated, characterized, and assessed the effects of SYNT001, a FcRn-blocking monoclonal antibody, in mice, nonhuman primates (NHPs), and humans. SYNT001 decreased all IgG subtypes and IgG ICs in the circulation of humans, as we show in a first-in-human phase 1, single ascending dose study. In addition, IgG IC induction of inflammatory pathways was dependent on FcRn and inhibited by SYNT001. These studies expand the role of FcRn in humans by showing that it controls not only IgG protection from catabolism but also inflammatory pathways associated with IgG ICs involved in a variety of autoimmune diseases