4 research outputs found

    Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in infective endocarditis and implantable cardiac electronic device infection: A cross-sectional study.

    Get PDF
    Early diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) is based on the yielding of blood cultures and echocardiographic findings. However, they have limitations and sometimes the diagnosis is inconclusive, particularly in patients with prosthetic valves (PV) and implantable cardiac electronic devices (ICED). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with suspected IE an ICED infection. METHODS: A prospective study with 80 consecutive patients with suspected IE and ICED infection (65 men and 15 women with a mean age of 68卤13 years old) between June 2013 and May 2015 was performed in our hospital. The inclusion criteria was clinically suspected IE and ICED infection at the following locations: native valve (NV) (n = 21), PV (n = 29) or ICED (n = 30) [(automatic implantable defibrillator (n = 11) or pacemaker (n = 19)]. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT with a myocardial uptake suppression protocol with unfractionated heparin was performed in all patients. The final diagnosis of infection was established by the IE study Group according to the clinical, echocardiographic and microbiological findings. RESULTS: A final diagnosis of infection was confirmed in 31 patients: NV (n = 6), PV (n = 12) and ICED (n = 13). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for 18F-FDG PET/CT was 82%, 96%, 94% and 87%, respectively. 18F-FDG PET/CT was false negative in all cases with infected NV. 18F-FDG PET/CT was able to reclassify 63/70 (90%) patients initially classified as possible IE by modified Duke criteria. In 18/70 cases 18F-FDG PET/CT changed possible to definite IE (26%) and in 45/70 cases changed possible to rejected IE (64%). Additionally, 18F-FDG PET/CT identified 8 cases of septic embolism and 3 colorectal cancer in patients with final diagnosis of IE. CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/CT proved to be a useful diagnostic tool in suspected IE and ICED infection and should be included in the diagnostic algorithm for early diagnosis. 18F-FDG PET/CT is not useful in the diagnosis of IE in NV, but should be also considered in the initial assessment of this complex scenario to rule out extracardiac complications and possible neoplasms

    Utilidad de la PET/TC con 18F-Fluorodesoxiglucosa en la detecci贸n de infecciones cardiovasculares y embolias s茅pticas hemat贸genas

    Get PDF
    [spa] Las infecciones cardiovasculares (ICV) son entidades de dif铆cil manejo que presentan un alto riesgo de mortalidad y de complicaciones severas. Dentro de estas complicaciones, el diagn贸stico temprano de posibles embolias s茅pticas hemat贸genas (ESH) es un reto en la pr谩ctica cl铆nica diaria y resulta crucial para el correcto manejo de estos pacientes, principalmente aquellas con cl铆nica silente como es el caso de las espondilodiscitis. Los hemocultivos y los hallazgos del ecocardiograma contin煤an siendo los pilares en la sospecha y en el diagn贸stico inicial. Sin embargo, el rendimiento de las pruebas diagn贸sticas actuales no es 贸ptimo, persistiendo un alto porcentaje de pacientes sin un diagn贸stico de confirmaci贸n. Las dificultades radican en la interpretaci贸n de los estudios microbiol贸gicos y ecocardiogr谩ficos, principalmente en los pacientes portadores de v谩lvulas prot茅sicas (VP) y dispositivos de electroestimulaci贸n cardiaca (DEC). Publicamos estudios prospectivos observacionales de dos grupos de pacientes: En el primer art铆culo se estudiaron 80 pacientes consecutivos con sospecha de endocarditis infecciosa (EI) y/o infecci贸n de DEC (EI-DEC). Se les realiz贸 PET/TC con inhibici贸n mioc谩rdica, de acuerdo a las siguientes indicaciones: sospecha de EI sobre v谩lvulas nativas (VN) (n:21), EI-VP (n:29) o infecci贸n de DEC (n= 30). El diagn贸stico final de infecci贸n se estableci贸 en 31/80 pacientes: EI-VN (n:6), EI-VP (n:12), EI-DEC (n:8) e infecci贸n de DEC (n= 5). Los valores de sensibilidad, especificidad, VPP y VPN de la PET/TC fueron 82%, 96%, 94% y 87%, si se excluyeran las VN estos valores fueran 96%, 94%, 93% y 97%, respectivamente. La PET/TC identific贸 8 casos de embolismos s茅pticos en los pacientes con infecci贸n (4 embolias pulmonares, 2 espl茅nicas y 2 vertebrales) y 3 casos de c谩ncer colo-rectal en estadios iniciales . La PET/TC fue capaz de reclasificar 63/70 casos (90%) inicialmente clasificados como posibles EI por los criterios de Duke modificados. En el segundo art铆culo se estudiaron a 26 pacientes con sospecha cl铆nica de espondilodiscitis. Se realizaron estudios PET/TC y RM de columna a todos los pacientes, y se compararon sus resultados. El diagn贸stico de espondilodiscitis se confirmo en 18/26 pacientes. Los valores de sensibilidad, especificidad, VPP, y VPN para la PET/TC fueron de 83%, 88%, 94% y 70 %. La RM obtuvo valores del 94%, 38%, 77% y 75%, respectivamente. Se encontraron diferencias estad铆sticamente significativas en lo valores de media del SUVmax entre los pacientes infectados y no infectados (6,52 y 3,67, respectivamente; p= 0,0013). La combinaci贸n de la PET/TC y la RM identific贸 correctamente la infecci贸n en el 100% de los pacientes con espondilodiscitis. La baja especificidad de la RM en el estudio (38%), se debi贸 al numero de falsos positivos (5/8), dado principalmente a la dificultad que presenta la RM de diferenciar infecci贸n en aquellos pacientes con antecedentes de fracturas vertebrales previas y enfermedades degenerativas severas de la columna. De acuerdo a la experiencia y a los resultados de nuestras series, consideramos que la PET/TC debe incluirse en el algoritmo diagn贸stico de EI, tanto en la sospecha de infecci贸n de las VP como de los DEC, reduciendo la tasa de pacientes mal diagnosticados. Tambi茅n consideramos que la t茅cnica debe ser de elecci贸n en la detecci贸n de complicaciones sist茅micas, tales como ESH y neoplasias insospechadas, influenciando de forma sustancial el manejo y el pron贸stico de los pacientes. Pese a que la t茅cnica no demuestra ser 煤til en el diagn贸stico de EI-VN, en este grupo de pacientes mejora significativamente la detecci贸n del origen de la infecci贸n. Los resultados de nuestra serie indican que la PET/TC es una t茅cnica complementaria a la RM en el diagn贸stico de espondilodiscitis infecciosa.[eng] Cardiovascular infections are devastating diseases with high risk of mortality. Moreover, early diagnosis and detection of posible complications such as hematogenous septic embolism (HSE) remain a challenge in clinical practice. Diagnosis is based on the yielding of blood cultures and echocardiographic findings. However, they have limitations and sometimes the diagnosis is inconclusive, particularly in patients with prosthetic valves (PV) and implantable cardiac electronic devices (ICED) We conducted propective studies on two groups of patients: In the first article we included 80 patients with suspected native valve (NV) infective endocarditis (IE) (n:21), PV-IE (n:29), and ICED-related infection (n:30). For the total group, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 82%, 96%, 94%, and 87%, respectively, were reported. In the subgroup of patients with intracardiac prosthetic material, these numbers were 96%, 94%, 93%, and 97%, respectively. PET/CT was able to reclassify 90% of the patients initially classified as possible IE according to the modified Duke criteria (63/70). Aditionally, PET/CT identified 26% of (HSE) and 10% of malignant foci. In the second article we included 26 patients with suspicion of spondylodiscitis. Whole- body PET/CT and an MRI scan of the spine were performed in all patients. Spondylodiscitis was confirmed in 18/26 patients. The sensitivity, specificity,PPV and NPV were 83 %, 88 %, 94 % and 70 % for PET/CT, and 94 %, 38 %, 77 % and 75 % for MRI, respectively. The combination of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI detected the infection in 100 % of the patients. According to our results, we consider that PET/CT should be included in the diagnostic workup of patients suspected of having IE or ICED-related infection. Aditionally, PET/CT must be of choice in the detection of HSE, mainly in spondylodiscitis

    Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in infective endocarditis and implantable cardiac electronic device infection: A cross-sectional study.

    No full text
    Early diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) is based on the yielding of blood cultures and echocardiographic findings. However, they have limitations and sometimes the diagnosis is inconclusive, particularly in patients with prosthetic valves (PV) and implantable cardiac electronic devices (ICED). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with suspected IE an ICED infection. METHODS: A prospective study with 80 consecutive patients with suspected IE and ICED infection (65 men and 15 women with a mean age of 68卤13 years old) between June 2013 and May 2015 was performed in our hospital. The inclusion criteria was clinically suspected IE and ICED infection at the following locations: native valve (NV) (n = 21), PV (n = 29) or ICED (n = 30) [(automatic implantable defibrillator (n = 11) or pacemaker (n = 19)]. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT with a myocardial uptake suppression protocol with unfractionated heparin was performed in all patients. The final diagnosis of infection was established by the IE study Group according to the clinical, echocardiographic and microbiological findings. RESULTS: A final diagnosis of infection was confirmed in 31 patients: NV (n = 6), PV (n = 12) and ICED (n = 13). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for 18F-FDG PET/CT was 82%, 96%, 94% and 87%, respectively. 18F-FDG PET/CT was false negative in all cases with infected NV. 18F-FDG PET/CT was able to reclassify 63/70 (90%) patients initially classified as possible IE by modified Duke criteria. In 18/70 cases 18F-FDG PET/CT changed possible to definite IE (26%) and in 45/70 cases changed possible to rejected IE (64%). Additionally, 18F-FDG PET/CT identified 8 cases of septic embolism and 3 colorectal cancer in patients with final diagnosis of IE. CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/CT proved to be a useful diagnostic tool in suspected IE and ICED infection and should be included in the diagnostic algorithm for early diagnosis. 18F-FDG PET/CT is not useful in the diagnosis of IE in NV, but should be also considered in the initial assessment of this complex scenario to rule out extracardiac complications and possible neoplasms

    Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in infective endocarditis and implantable cardiac electronic device infection: A cross-sectional study.

    No full text
    Early diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) is based on the yielding of blood cultures and echocardiographic findings. However, they have limitations and sometimes the diagnosis is inconclusive, particularly in patients with prosthetic valves (PV) and implantable cardiac electronic devices (ICED). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with suspected IE an ICED infection. METHODS: A prospective study with 80 consecutive patients with suspected IE and ICED infection (65 men and 15 women with a mean age of 68卤13 years old) between June 2013 and May 2015 was performed in our hospital. The inclusion criteria was clinically suspected IE and ICED infection at the following locations: native valve (NV) (n = 21), PV (n = 29) or ICED (n = 30) [(automatic implantable defibrillator (n = 11) or pacemaker (n = 19)]. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT with a myocardial uptake suppression protocol with unfractionated heparin was performed in all patients. The final diagnosis of infection was established by the IE study Group according to the clinical, echocardiographic and microbiological findings. RESULTS: A final diagnosis of infection was confirmed in 31 patients: NV (n = 6), PV (n = 12) and ICED (n = 13). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for 18F-FDG PET/CT was 82%, 96%, 94% and 87%, respectively. 18F-FDG PET/CT was false negative in all cases with infected NV. 18F-FDG PET/CT was able to reclassify 63/70 (90%) patients initially classified as possible IE by modified Duke criteria. In 18/70 cases 18F-FDG PET/CT changed possible to definite IE (26%) and in 45/70 cases changed possible to rejected IE (64%). Additionally, 18F-FDG PET/CT identified 8 cases of septic embolism and 3 colorectal cancer in patients with final diagnosis of IE. CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/CT proved to be a useful diagnostic tool in suspected IE and ICED infection and should be included in the diagnostic algorithm for early diagnosis. 18F-FDG PET/CT is not useful in the diagnosis of IE in NV, but should be also considered in the initial assessment of this complex scenario to rule out extracardiac complications and possible neoplasms
    corecore