Automodification de l'énolase par le 2-phosphoglycérate et son rôle potentiel

CAEN-BU Sciences et STAPS (141182103) / SudocSudocFranceF

Inhibition of Cell Surface Export of Group A Streptococcal Anchorless Surface Dehydrogenase Affects Bacterial Adherence and Antiphagocytic Properties

Surface dehydrogenase (SDH) is an anchorless, multifunctional protein displayed on the surfaces of group A Streptococcus (GAS) organisms. SDH is encoded by a single gene, sdh (gap or plr) that is essential for bacterial survival. Hence, the resulting nonfeasibility of creating a knockout mutant is a major limiting factor in studying its role in GAS pathogenesis. An insertion mutagenesis strategy was devised in which a nucleotide sequence encoding a hydrophobic tail of 12 amino acids ((337)IVLVGLVMLLLS(348)) was added at the 3′ end of the sdh gene, successfully creating a viable mutant strain (M1-SDH(HBtail)). In this mutant strain, the SDH(HBtail) protein was not secreted in the medium but was retained in the cytoplasm and to some extent trapped within the cell wall. Hence, SDH(HBtail) was not displayed on the GAS surface. The mutant strain, M1-SDH(HBtail), grew at the same rate as the wild-type strain. The SDH(HBtail) protein displayed the same GAPDH activity as the wild-type SDH protein. Although the whole-cell extracts of the wild-type and mutant strains showed similar GAPDH activities, cell wall extracts of the mutant strain showed 5.5-fold less GAPDH activity than the wild-type strain. The mutant strain, M1-SDH(HBtail), bound significantly less human plasminogen, adhered poorly to human pharyngeal cells, and lost its innate antiphagocytic activity. These results indicate that the prevention of the cell surface export of SDH affects the virulence properties of GAS. The anchorless SDH protein, thus, is an important virulence factor

Omnipresent Maxwell's demons orchestrate information management in living cells

International audienceThe development of synthetic biology calls for accurate understanding of the critical functions that allow construction and operation of a living cell. Besides coding for ubiquitous structures, minimal genomes encode a wealth of functions that dissipate energy in an unanticipated way. Analysis of these functions shows that they are meant to manage information under conditions when discrimination of substrates in a noisy background is preferred over a simple recognition process. We show here that many of these functions, including transporters and the ribo-some construction machinery, behave as would behave a material implementation of the information-managing agent theorized by Maxwell almost 150 years ago and commonly known as Maxwell's demon (MxD). A core gene set encoding these functions belongs to the minimal genome required to allow the construction of an autonomous cell. These MxDs allow the cell to perform computations in an energy-efficient way that is vastly better than our contemporary computers

Omnipresent Maxwell's demons orchestrate information management in living cells

© 2019 The Authors.The development of synthetic biology calls for accurate understanding of the critical functions that allow construction and operation of a living cell. Besides coding for ubiquitous structures, minimal genomes encode a wealth of functions that dissipate energy in an unanticipated way. Analysis of these functions shows that they are meant to manage information under conditions when discrimination of substrates in a noisy background is preferred over a simple recognition process. We show here that many of these functions, including transporters and the ribosome construction machinery, behave as would behave a material implementation of the information‐managing agent theorized by Maxwell almost 150 years ago and commonly known as Maxwell's demon (MxD). A core gene set encoding these functions belongs to the minimal genome required to allow the construction of an autonomous cell. These MxDs allow the cell to perform computations in an energy‐efficient way that is vastly better than our contemporary computers.This work was supported by the Fondation Fourmentin-Guilbert support of the Stanislas Noria network

ABC-F proteins in mRNA translation and antibiotic resistance

International audienceThe ATP binding cassette protein superfamily comprises ATPase enzymes which are, for the most part, involved in transmembrane transport. Within this superfamily however, some protein families have other functions unrelated to transport. One example is the ABC-F family, which comprises an extremely diverse set of cytoplasmic proteins. All of the proteins in the ABC-F family characterized to date act on the ribosome and are translation factors. Their common function is ATP-dependent modulation of the stereochemistry of the peptidyl transferase center (PTC) in the ribosome coupled to changes in its global conformation and P-site tRNA binding geometry. In this review, we give an overview of the function, structure, and theories for the mechanisms-of-action of microbial proteins in the ABC-F family, including those involved in mediating resistance to ribosome-binding antibiotics

ABC systems: structural and functional variations on a common theme

International audienc

The new strategies to overcome challenges in protein production in bacteria

International audienc

The phosphotransferase system of Lactobacillus casei: regulation of carbon metabolism and connection to cold shock response.

Genome sequencing of two different Lactobacillus casei strains (ATCC334 and BL23) is presently going on and preliminary data revealed that this lactic acid bacterium possesses numerous carbohydrate transport systems probably reflecting its capacity to proliferate under varying environmental conditions. Many carbohydrate transporters belong to the phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS), but all different kinds of non-PTS transporters are present as well and their substrates are known in a few cases. In L. casei regulation of carbohydrate transport and carbon metabolism is mainly achieved by PTS proteins. Carbon catabolite repression (CCR) is mediated via several mechanisms, including the major P-Ser-HPr/catabolite control protein A (CcpA)-dependent mechanism. Catabolite response elements, the target sites for the P-Ser-HPr/CcpA complex, precede numerous genes and operons. PTS regulation domain-containing antiterminators and transcription activators are also present in both L. casei strains. Their activity is usually controlled by two PTS-mediated phosphorylation reactions exerting antagonistic effects on the transcription regulators: P~EIIB-dependent phosphorylation regulates induction of the corresponding genes and P~His-HPr-mediated phosphorylation plays a role in CCR. Carbohydrate transport of L. casei is also regulated via inducer exclusion and inducer expulsion. The presence of glucose, fructose, etc. leads to inhibition of the transport or metabolism of less favorable carbon sources (inducer exclusion) or to the export of accumulated non-metabolizable carbon sources (inducer expulsion). While P-Ser-HPr is essential for inducer exclusion of maltose, it is not necessary for the expulsion of accumulated thio-methyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside. Surprisingly, recent evidence suggests that the PTS of L. casei also plays a role in cold shock response

HPr kinase/phosphorylase, a Walker motif A-containing bifunctional sensor enzyme controlling catabolite repression in Gram-positive bacteria

International audienceCarbon catabolite repression (CCR) in Gram-positive bacteria is regulated by the bifunctional enzyme HPr kinase/phosphorylase (HprK/P). This enzyme catalyses the ATP- as well as the pyrophosphate-dependent phosphorylation of Ser-46 in HPr, a phosphocarrier protein of a sugar transport and phosphorylation system. HprK/P also catalyses the pyrophosphate-producing, inorganic phosphate-dependent dephosphorylation (phosphorolysis) of seryl-phosphorylated HPr (P-Ser-HPr). P-Ser-HPr functions as catabolite co-repressor by interacting with the LacI/GalR-type repressor, catabolite control protein A (CcpA), and allowing it to bind to operator sites preceding catabolite-regulated transcription units. HprK/P thus indirectly controls the expression of about 10% of the genes of Gram-positive bacteria. The two antagonistic activities of HprK/P are regulated by intracellular metabolites, which change their concentration in response to the absence or presence of rapidly metabolisable carbon sources (glucose, fructose, etc.) in the growth medium. Biochemical and structural studies revealed that HprK/P exhibits no similarity to eukaryotic protein kinases and that it contains a Walker motif A (or P-loop) as nucleotide binding site. Interestingly, HprK/P has a structural fold resembling that in kinases phosphorylating certain low molecular weight substrates such as nucleosides, nucleotides or oxaloacetate. The structures of the complexes of HprK/P with HPr and P-Ser-HPr have also been determined, which allowed proposing a detailed mechanism for the kinase and phosphorylase functions of HprK/P

The Lactobacillus casei ptsHI47T Mutation Causes Overexpression of a LevR-Regulated but RpoN-Independent Operon Encoding a Mannose Class Phosphotransferase System

A proteome analysis of Lactobacillus casei mutants that are affected in carbon catabolite repression revealed that a 15-kDa protein was strongly overproduced in a ptsHI47T mutant. This protein was identified as EIIA of a mannose class phosphotransferase system (PTS). A 7.1-kb DNA fragment containing the EIIA-encoding open reading frame and five other genes was sequenced. The first gene encodes a protein resembling the RpoN (σ(54))-dependent Bacillus subtilis transcription activator LevR. The following pentacistronic operon is oriented in the opposite direction and encodes four proteins with strong similarity to the proteins of the B. subtilis Lev-PTS and one protein of unknown function. The genes present on the 7.1-kb DNA fragment were therefore called levR and levABCDX. The levABCDX operon was induced by fructose and mannose. No “−12, −24” promoter typical of RpoN-dependent genes precedes the L. casei lev operon, and its expression was therefore RpoN independent but required LevR. Phosphorylation of LevR by P∼His-HPr stimulates its activity, while phosphorylation by P∼EIIB(Lev) inhibits it. Disruption of the EIIB(Lev)-encoding levB gene therefore led to strong constitutive expression of the lev operon, which was weaker in a strain carrying a ptsI mutation preventing phosphorylation by both P∼EIIB(Lev) and P∼His-HPr. Expression of the L. casei lev operon is also subject to P-Ser-HPr-mediated catabolite repression. The observed slow phosphoenolpyruvate- and ATP-dependent phosphorylation of HPrI47T as well as the slow phosphoryl group transfer from the mutant P∼His-HPr to EIIA(Lev) are assumed to be responsible for the elevated expression of the lev operon in the ptsHI47T mutant