5 research outputs found

    Risk factors and management of intraprocedural rupture during coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: role of balloon guiding catheter

    Get PDF
    IntroductionIntraprocedural rupture (IPR) is a serious complication of endovascular coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). Although outcomes after IPR are poor, methods to prevent subsequent neurological deterioration have not yet been investigated. We evaluated the risk factors and management strategies for IPR, particularly the role of balloon guiding catheters (BGCs) in rapid hemostasis.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all UIA cases treated with coil embolization at three institutions between 2003 and 2021, focusing on preoperative radiological data, operative details, and outcomes.ResultsIn total, 2,172 aneurysms were treated in 2026 patients. Of these, 19 aneurysms in 19 patients (0.8%) ruptured during the procedure. Multivariate analysis revealed that aneurysms with a bleb (OR: 3.03, 95% CI: 1.21 to 7.57, p = 0.017), small neck size (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.85, p = 0.007), and aneurysms in the posterior communicating artery (PcomA) (OR: 4.92, 95% CI: 1.19 to 20.18, p = 0.027) and anterior communicating artery (AcomA) (OR: 12.08, 95% CI: 2.99 to 48.79, p < 0.001) compared with the internal carotid artery without PcomA were significantly associated with IPR. The incidence of IPR was similar between the non-BGC and BGC groups (0.9% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.822); however, leveraging BGC was significantly associated with lower morbidity and mortality rates after IPR (0% vs. 44%, p = 0.033).DiscussionThe incidence of IPR was relatively low. A bleb, small aneurysm neck, and location on PcomA and AcomA are independent risk factors for IPR. The use of BGC may prevent fatal clinical deterioration and achieve better clinical outcomes in patients with IPR

    Abstract Number ‐ 57: Investigation on Hemodynamic Force Related to Thin‐walled Regions in Intracranial Aneurysm by Using CFD

    No full text
    Introduction Although thin‐walled regions (TWRs) in an intracranial aneurysm have a risk of rupture due to contact with surgical instruments, imaging modalities cannot accurately evaluate the thickness of aneurysm walls. The surgical operation will be able to perform safely by identifying the location of TWRs before the treatment. In previous studies, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been used to investigate the relationship between hemodynamics and TWRs. However, a quantitative method has not been employed to evaluate the location of TWRs. This study aims to clarify the relationship between hemodynamics and TWRs by comparing the results of CFD analysis with quantitatively defined TWRs. Methods We identified 70 aneurysms (MCA: 48, ACA: 20, ICA: 2) treated with craniotomy and clipping. CFD analysis was conducted to evaluate the pressure difference (PD), wall shear stress (WSS), and wall shear stress divergence (WSSD) on the aneurysm wall. High regions were defined as the regions with values above the 90th percentile for each parameter, and Low regions were defined as the regions with values below the 10th percentile for each parameter. In this study, 4 regions (HighPD, HighWSS, LowWSS, and HighWSSD) and 6 regions obtained by combining two of these regions were defined as regions of interest (RoI). Because TWRs generally indicate intense red, the comprehensive red value (cR value) was defined by using the RGB color model to evaluate the intensity of redness. The cR value was calculated for each pixel of the intraoperative images, and TWRs were defined using the cR value. Comparing the results of CFD analysis and identified TWRs, the percentage of the area of TWRs in RoI was calculated as the occupancy ratio. Results Table 1 shows the mean occupancy ratio for each defined RoI. The mean occupancy ratio in RoI by a single parameter is higher in the order of HighPD, HighWSSD, HighWSS, and LowWSS regions. In HighPD regions, which show the highest occupancy ratio, the impingement flow to the aneurysm wall is considered to make the aneurysm wall thinner. In HighWSSD regions, the aneurysm wall seems to have thinned due to the tensile force along the wall surface caused by blood flow. The mean occupancy ratio of RoI obtained by the combination of two regions is lower than that of HighPD regions. However, in some cases, TWRs that could not be identified by HighPD regions can be detected by HighPD or HighWSSD regions. Conclusions The mean occupancy ratio for RoI was higher in the order of HighPD, HighWSSD, HighWSS, and LowWSS regions. Therefore, it was suggested that these hemodynamic parameters are related to TWRs. Furthermore, in some cases, TWRs that the RoI of a single parameter could not identify can be detected using RoI obtained by the combination of two parameters
    corecore