Synthetic skull bone defects for automatic patient-specific craniofacial implant design

Patient-specific craniofacial implants are used to repair skull bone defects after trauma or surgery. Currently, cranial implants are designed and produced by third-party suppliers, which is usually time-consuming and expensive. Recent advances in additive manufacturing made the in-hospital or in-operation-room fabrication of personalized implants feasible. However, the implants are still manufactured by external companies. To facilitate an optimized workflow, fast and automatic implant manufacturing is highly desirable. Data-driven approaches, such as deep learning, show currently great potential towards automatic implant design. However, a considerable amount of data is needed to train such algorithms, which is, especially in the medical domain, often a bottleneck. Therefore, we present CT-imaging data of the craniofacial complex from 24 patients, in which we injected various artificial cranial defects, resulting in 240 data pairs and 240 corresponding implants. Based on this work, automatic implant design and manufacturing processes can be trained. Additionally, the data of this work build a solid base for researchers to work on automatic cranial implant designs. Image Acquisition Matrix Size center dot Image Slice Thickness center dot craniofacial regionimaging technique center dot computed tomography Sample Characteristic - Organism Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13265225This investigation was approved by the internal review board (IRB) of the Medical University of Graz, Austria (IRB: EK-30-340 ex 17/18). This work was supported by CAMed (COMET K-Project 871132), which is funded by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology (BMVIT) and the Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs (BMDW) and the Styrian Business Promotion Agency (SFG). Furthermore, the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) KLI 678-B31: "enFaced: Virtual and Augmented Reality Training and Navigation Module for 3D-Printed Facial Defect Reconstructions" and the TU Graz LEAD Project "Mechanics, Modeling and Simulation of Aortic Dissection". Privatdozent Dr. Dr. Jan Egger was supported as Visiting Professor by the Overseas Visiting Scholars Program from the Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU) in China. Finally, we thank Professor Hannes Deutschmann, MD, from the Department of Radiology - Division of Neuroradiology, Vascular and Interventional Neuroradiology of the Medical University of Graz, for having kindly provided us with the source CT datasets used in this work

Imaging practice in low-grade gliomas among European specialized centers and proposal for a minimum core of imaging

Objective: Imaging studies in diffuse low-grade gliomas (DLGG) vary across centers. In order to establish a minimal core of imaging necessary for further investigations and clinical trials in the field of DLGG, we aimed to establish the status quo within specialized European centers. Methods: An online survey composed of 46 items was sent out to members of the European Low-Grade Glioma Network, the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies, the German Society of Neurosurgery and the Austrian Society of Neurosurgery. Results: A total of 128 fully completed surveys were received and analyzed. Most centers (n=96, 75%) were academic and half of the centers (n=64, 50%) adhered to a dedicated treatment program for DLGG. There were national differences regarding the sequences enclosed in MRI imaging and use of PET, however most included T1 (without and with contrast, 100%), T2 (100%) and TIRM or FLAIR (20, 98%). DWI is performed by 80% of centers and 61% of centers regularly performed PWI.ConclusionA minimal core of imaging composed of T1 (w/wo contrast), T2, TIRM/FLAIR, PWI and DWI could be identified. All morphologic images should be obtained in a slice thickness of 3mm. No common standard could be obtained regarding advanced MRI protocols and PET. Importance of the study: We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because we were able to determine similarities in numerous aspects of LGG imaging. Using the proposed minimal core of imaging in clinical routine will facilitate future cooperative studies

Imaging practice in low-grade gliomas among European specialized centers and proposal for a minimum core of imaging.

OBJECTIVE: Imaging studies in diffuse low-grade gliomas (DLGG) vary across centers. In order to establish a minimal core of imaging necessary for further investigations and clinical trials in the field of DLGG, we aimed to establish the status quo within specialized European centers. METHODS: An online survey composed of 46 items was sent out to members of the European Low-Grade Glioma Network, the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies, the German Society of Neurosurgery and the Austrian Society of Neurosurgery. RESULTS: A total of 128 fully completed surveys were received and analyzed. Most centers (n = 96, 75%) were academic and half of the centers (n = 64, 50%) adhered to a dedicated treatment program for DLGG. There were national differences regarding the sequences enclosed in MRI imaging and use of PET, however most included T1 (without and with contrast, 100%), T2 (100%) and TIRM or FLAIR (20, 98%). DWI is performed by 80% of centers and 61% of centers regularly performed PWI. CONCLUSION: A minimal core of imaging composed of T1 (w/wo contrast), T2, TIRM/FLAIR, PWI and DWI could be identified. All morphologic images should be obtained in a slice thickness of ≤ 3 mm. No common standard could be obtained regarding advanced MRI protocols and PET. IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY: We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because we were able to determine similarities in numerous aspects of LGG imaging. Using the proposed "minimal core of imaging" in clinical routine will facilitate future cooperative studies

Interactive reconstructions of cranial 3D implants under MeVisLab as an alternative to commercial planning software.

In this publication, the interactive planning and reconstruction of cranial 3D Implants under the medical prototyping platform MeVisLab as alternative to commercial planning software is introduced. In doing so, a MeVisLab prototype consisting of a customized data-flow network and an own C++ module was set up. As a result, the Computer-Aided Design (CAD) software prototype guides a user through the whole workflow to generate an implant. Therefore, the workflow begins with loading and mirroring the patients head for an initial curvature of the implant. Then, the user can perform an additional Laplacian smoothing, followed by a Delaunay triangulation. The result is an aesthetic looking and well-fitting 3D implant, which can be stored in a CAD file format, e.g. STereoLithography (STL), for 3D printing. The 3D printed implant can finally be used for an in-depth pre-surgical evaluation or even as a real implant for the patient. In a nutshell, our research and development shows that a customized MeVisLab software prototype can be used as an alternative to complex commercial planning software, which may also not be available in every clinic. Finally, not to conform ourselves directly to available commercial software and look for other options that might improve the workflow

Result of the preparation steps with the original skull in white and the mirrored skull in green.

<p>Both skulls are cut with a plane, to have a view on the inner as well the outer surface.</p

Overall flowchart of the smoothing algorithm, which is based on an own C++ MeVisLab module.

<p>Blue boxes represent object types, green diamonds are test expression and orange boxes belong to processing steps.</p

Result of evaluation questionnaire.

<p>Q1-Q11 according questions and T for the used time in minutes. Rated with a six-point Likert scale with increasing accordance from one to six.</p

The overall workflow pipeline separated in three main parts: Dataset preparation, marker setting and final adjustments.

<p>The overall workflow pipeline separated in three main parts: Dataset preparation, marker setting and final adjustments.</p

Side by side comparison of an unsmoothed (left) and smoothed (right) implant (green) for a clinical case with a large cranial defect on the left side.

<p>The improvement of the implant surface is indicated by red arrows and the bottom images show the inner view.</p