Taking Blockchain Seriously

In the present techno-political moment it is clear that ignoring or dismissing the hype surrounding blockchain is unwise, and certainly for regulatory authorities and governments who must keep a grip on the technology and those promoting it, in order to ensure democratic accountability and regulatory legitimacy within the blockchain ecosystem and beyond. Blockchain is telling (and showing) us something very important about the evolution of capital and neoliberal economic reason, and the likely impact in the near future on forms and patterns of work, social organization, and, crucially, on communities and individuals who lack influence over the technologies and data that increasingly shape and control their lives. In this short essay I introduce some of the problems in the regulation of blockchain and offer counter-narratives aimed at cutting through the hype fuelling the ascendency of this most contemporary of technologies

Financing new creative enterprise through Blockchain technology: opportunities and policy implications

Blockchain technology represents an emerging source of venture capital crowdfunding for creative ventures, specifically in the music industry

Against universality: Founding cultural studies

Arguments against universality play a crucial role in cultural studies. In this dissertation I reach outside of literary studies—especially, though not at all exclusively, to contemporary analytic philosophy—to work at a well-articulated, anti-objectivist, and therefore (I argue) anti-universalist mode of analyzing and understanding the structures and contents of cultural production. The first three chapters of the dissertation survey work from a number of academic disciplines, and work between them, to set out the general arguments about universality that are of most concern and interest in the rest of the dissertation. In the fourth chapter, I discuss some commonalities and differences among some recent work on categories and categorization, especially in cognitive science and in cultural studies. In the fifth chapter, I put forth perhaps the central philosophical arguments of the dissertation: that any attempt to establish a right canon of reason or rationality for all humans, and as well for specific human groups, is not only doomed to failure, but inherently inflected with politically and culturally conservative consequences. In the sixth chapter I take seriously the challenge of cultural studies to ground such theoretical speculations in specific products of culture, in this case through a sustained reading of Toni Morrison\u27s Beloved. I discuss the dynamics between universality and difference in that work, and show how the critical reception of the work at first focused on its supposedly universal aesthetic aims, which I suggest drastically misconstrues the novel. The seventh, concluding chapter summarizes cultural-theoretical anti-universalis in and discusses its philosophical, disciplinary and theoretical consequences. In a brief epilogue I extend these consequences into an area of crucial interest across many disciplines, namely the putative barrier or dichotomy between the broad areas of human experience commonly described by the terms “nature” and “culture.

CIBERLIBERTARISMO: LOS FUNDAMENTOS EXTREMISTAS DE LA ‘LIBERTAD DIGITAL’

CIBERLIBERTARISMO: LOS FUNDAMENTOS EXTREMISTAS DE LA ‘LIBERTA

Bitcoin Will Eat Itself: More Contradictions of (Digital) Libertarianism

Bitcoin (BTC), the much in-the-news and up-for-government-discussion cryptocurrency favored by Deep Web drug markets, libertarians, anarchists and would-be assassins everywhere, has been on a tear recently, and as of yesterday has hit an all-time high (albeit briefly) of more than USD $900 mark. It’s not hard to find—in fact it’s difficult to avoid—cyberlibertarians of all..

Bitcoinsanity 1: The (Ir)relevance of Finance, or, It’s (Not) Different This Time

One of the many fascinating paradoxes about Bitcoin is that when knowledgeable economists, financial professionals and journalists write about it, because they almost always dispute its transformative power and revolutionary status, their analyses are almost uniformly greeted with shockingly abusive insults. In part this is a demonstration of the anti-democratic anti-expertise tendencies of our digita