460 research outputs found
Modeling a Sensor to Improve its Efficacy
Robots rely on sensors to provide them with information about their
surroundings. However, high-quality sensors can be extremely expensive and
cost-prohibitive. Thus many robotic systems must make due with lower-quality
sensors. Here we demonstrate via a case study how modeling a sensor can improve
its efficacy when employed within a Bayesian inferential framework. As a test
bed we employ a robotic arm that is designed to autonomously take its own
measurements using an inexpensive LEGO light sensor to estimate the position
and radius of a white circle on a black field. The light sensor integrates the
light arriving from a spatially distributed region within its field of view
weighted by its Spatial Sensitivity Function (SSF). We demonstrate that by
incorporating an accurate model of the light sensor SSF into the likelihood
function of a Bayesian inference engine, an autonomous system can make improved
inferences about its surroundings. The method presented here is data-based,
fairly general, and made with plug-and play in mind so that it could be
implemented in similar problems.Comment: 18 pages, 8 figures, submitted to the special issue of "Sensors for
Robotics
Modelling of the rolling process of titanium alloy tube billets in laboratory conditions on a RSP 14-40 rolling mill
The development of screw rolling technology for the production of hot-deformed tubes over Ă250 mm on a SVP-500 rolling mill faces a number of challenges that influence the quality of tubes, such as: the screw trace formed on the external surface of tubes and bending of tubes that makes impossible subsequent manufacturing operations. The following experimental and laboratory research was performed to solve these problems: a number of experimental tube billets with and without mandrels were rolled to various strains on a RSP 14-40 laboratory rolling mill to obtain the best ratio of wall thickness to the external diamete
A randomized phase II study of lapatinib + pazopanib versus lapatinib in patients with HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer
This multi-center Phase II study evaluated lapatinib, pazopanib, and the combination in patients with relapsed HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer. In Cohort 1, 76 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive lapatinib 1,500 mg + placebo or lapatinib 1,500 mg + pazopanib 800 mg (double-blind) once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Due to high-grade diarrhea observed with this dose combination in another study (VEG20007), Cohort 1 was closed. The protocol was amended such that an additional 88 patients (Cohort 2) were randomized in a 5:5:2 ratio to receive daily monotherapy lapatinib 1,500 mg, lapatinib 1,000 mg + pazopanib 400 mg, or monotherapy pazopanib 800 mg, respectively. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. In Cohort 1, ORR for the lapatinib (n = 38) and combination (n = 38) arms was 29 and 45 %, respectively; median PFS was 16.1 and 14.3 weeks, respectively. Grade â„3 adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in the combination arm (71 %) than in the lapatinib arm (24 %). Dose reductions and interruptions due to AEs were also more frequent in the combination arm (45 and 53 %, respectively) than in the lapatinib monotherapy arm (0 and 11 %, respectively). In Cohort 2, ORR for patients treated with lapatinib (n = 36), lapatinib + pazopanib (n = 38), and pazopanib (n = 13) was 47, 58, and 31 %, respectively; median PFS was 16.0, 16.0, and 11.4 weeks, respectively. In the lapatinib, combination, and pazopanib therapy arms, grade â„3 AEs were reported for 17, 50, and 46 % of patients, respectively, and the incidence of discontinuations due to AEs was 0, 24, and 23 %, respectively. The lapatinibâpazopanib combination was associated with a numerically higher ORR but no increase in PFS compared to lapatinib alone. The combination also had increased toxicity resulting in more dose reductions, modifications, and treatment delays. Activity with single-agent lapatinib was confirmed in this population
ĐąŃĐ”Ń ĐŒĐ”ŃĐœŃĐ” ŃŃŃŃĐșŃŃŃĐœĐŸâĐČĐ”ŃĐ”ŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœŃĐ” ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»Đž ŃĐŸŃĐŒĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ĐșĐžĐŒĐ±Đ”ŃлОŃĐŸĐČŃŃ ŃŃŃĐ±ĐŸĐș ĐŃŃĐ±ĐžĐœŃĐșĐŸĐč Đž ĐĐŸŃŃĐŸĐ±ĐžĐœŃĐșĐŸĐč (ĐŻĐșŃŃŃĐșĐ°Ń Đ°Đ»ĐŒĐ°Đ·ĐŸĐœĐŸŃĐœĐ°Ń ĐżŃĐŸĐČĐžĐœŃĐžŃ)
The Nyurbinskaya and Botuobinskaya kimberlitic pipes were in the focus of a comprehensive study aimed to investigate their structural and material positions as the main deposits in the Nakyn field (Yakutian Diamondifeâ rous Province, Russia). This paper present the study results and 3D structuralâmaterial models showing the formation of these deposits. In application to geological studies, the 3D modeling technologies allow taking into account the aniâ sotropy of material complexes comprising kimberlite pipes, as well as inconsistencies in the structural and morphoâ logical properties of oreâbearing structures. In order to discover the structural positions and features of the faultâ block structures of the deposits, tectonophysical methods were used in combination with tacheometric surveys. Based on this more comprehensive and integrated approach, the existing fault patterns were clarified in detail; elements of the internal fault structure were mapped; fault azimuths and dip angles were estimated; and thickness values were obtained. Computer processed data were used to construct 3D models showing the faultâblock structures of the Nyurbinskaya and Botuobinskaya pipes. The mineralogical, petrographic and diamondâbearing features of various kimberlite generations comprising these pipes were investigated in order to reconstruct the morphology and spatial positions of each of the selected complexes in the current crossâsection and in accordance with intrusion phases. The 3D frame models of geological bodies were constructed for all the magmatic phases, including porphyry kimberlite and eruptive and autolithic kimberlite breccia. The structuralâmaterial models for the Nyurbinskaya and Botuobinâ skaya pipes were based on a synthesis of their material and structural features discovered in the previous stages of the study. The models presented in this paper are used to discuss temporal relationships between faults in the kimâ berlitic structure and material complexes comprising the pipes. The models show that the pipes occurred in the nearâ surface structures of shear tension, which developed in the areas where the NNEâstriking fault was conjugated with the ENEâ and NEâstriking faults in the fault zone resulting from several stage of the tectonoâmagmatic activity. In this case, the kimberlite melt material was transported in discrete portions from the source through deepâseated faults, and the faults acted as channels characterized by an increased permeability. Disjunctive elements identified in this study facilitated magma movements and localization of kimberlite bodies.Đ ŃĐ°Đ±ĐŸŃĐ” ĐżŃДЎŃŃĐ°ĐČĐ»Đ”ĐœŃ ŃДзŃĐ»ŃŃĐ°ŃŃ ĐșĐŸĐŒĐżĐ»Đ”ĐșŃĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐżĐŸĐŽŃ
ĐŸĐŽĐ° Đș ОзŃŃĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ŃŃŃŃĐșŃŃŃĐœĐŸĐč Đž ĐČĐ”ŃĐ”ŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸĐč ĐżĐŸĐ·ĐžŃОО ĐșĐŸŃĐ”ĐœĐœŃŃ
ĐŒĐ”ŃŃĐŸŃĐŸĐ¶ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžĐč ĐĐ°ĐșŃĐœŃĐșĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐżĐŸĐ»Ń â ĐșĐžĐŒĐ±Đ”ŃлОŃĐŸĐČŃŃ
ŃŃŃĐ±ĐŸĐș ĐŃŃĐ±ĐžĐœŃĐșĐŸĐč Đž ĐĐŸŃŃĐŸĐ±ĐžĐœŃĐșĐŸĐč, ŃŃĐŸ ĐœĐ°ŃĐ»ĐŸ ĐŸŃŃĐ°Đ¶Đ”ĐœĐžĐ” ĐČ ŃŃĐ”Ń
ĐŒĐ”ŃĐœŃŃ
ŃŃŃŃĐșŃŃŃĐœĐŸâĐČĐ”ŃĐ”ŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœŃŃ
ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»ŃŃ
ĐžŃ
ŃĐŸŃĐŒĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ. ĐŃĐżĐŸĐ»ŃĐ·ĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐ” ĐŸĐ±ŃĐ”ĐŒĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»ĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ĐșĐ°Đș ĐŸĐŽĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ Оз ĐœĐ°ĐžĐ±ĐŸĐ»Đ”Đ” ĐżŃĐŸĐłŃĐ”ŃŃĐžĐČĐœŃŃ
ĐŒĐ”ŃĐŸĐŽĐŸĐČ ĐłĐ”ĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐżĐŸĐ·ĐœĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ĐżĐŸĐ·ĐČĐŸĐ»ĐžĐ»ĐŸ ŃŃĐ”ŃŃŃ ĐČŃŃĐŸĐșŃŃ ŃŃĐ”ĐżĐ”ĐœŃ ĐžĐ·ĐŒĐ”ĐœŃĐžĐČĐŸŃŃĐž (Đ°ĐœĐžĐ·ĐŸŃŃĐŸĐżĐžĐž) ĐČĐ”ŃĐ”ŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœŃŃ
ĐșĐŸĐŒĐżĐ»Đ”ĐșŃĐŸĐČ, ŃлагаŃŃĐžŃ
ĐșĐžĐŒĐ±Đ”ŃлОŃĐŸĐČŃĐ” ŃŃŃбĐșĐž, Đ° ŃĐ°ĐșжД ĐœĐ”ĐČŃĐŽĐ”ŃĐ¶Đ°ĐœĐœĐŸŃŃŃ ŃŃŃŃĐșŃŃŃĐœĐŸâĐŒĐŸŃŃĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐžŃ
ŃĐČĐŸĐčŃŃĐČ ŃŃĐŽĐŸĐČĐŒĐ”ŃĐ°ŃŃĐ”Đč ŃŃŃŃĐșŃŃŃŃ. Đ Đ”ŃĐ”ĐœĐžĐ” Đ·Đ°ĐŽĐ°Ń, ŃĐČŃĐ·Đ°ĐœĐœŃŃ
Ń ĐŸĐżŃĐ”ĐŽĐ”Đ»Đ”ĐœĐžĐ”ĐŒ ŃŃŃŃĐșŃŃŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐżĐŸĐ·ĐžŃОО Đž ĐŸŃĐŸĐ±Đ”ĐœĐœĐŸŃŃĐ”Đč ŃĐ°Đ·Đ»ĐŸĐŒĐœĐŸâĐ±Đ»ĐŸĐșĐŸĐČĐŸĐłĐŸ ŃŃŃĐŸĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ŃĐ°ŃŃĐŒĐ°ŃŃĐžĐČĐ°Đ”ĐŒŃŃ
ĐŒĐ”ŃŃĐŸŃĐŸĐ¶ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžĐč, ĐŸŃŃŃĐ”ŃŃĐČĐ»ŃĐ»ĐŸŃŃ ĐżŃŃĐ”ĐŒ ĐżŃĐžĐŒĐ”ĐœĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ŃĐ”ĐșŃĐŸĐœĐŸŃОзОŃĐ”ŃĐșĐžŃ
ĐŒĐ”ŃĐŸĐŽĐŸĐČ ĐČ ŃĐŸŃĐ”ŃĐ°ĐœĐžĐž Ń ĐŒĐ”ŃĐŸĐŽĐ°ĐŒĐž ŃĐ°Ń
Đ”ĐŸĐŒĐ”ŃŃĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐŸĐč ŃŃĐ”ĐŒĐșĐž. ĐĄ ĐžŃ
ĐżĐŸĐŒĐŸŃŃŃ Đ·ĐœĐ°ŃĐžŃДлŃĐœĐŸ ĐŽĐ”ŃалОзОŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœŃ ŃŃŃĐ”ŃŃĐČŃŃŃОД ŃŃ
Đ”ĐŒŃ ŃĐ°Đ·Đ»ĐŸĐŒĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ŃŃŃĐŸĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ŃŃĐ°ŃŃĐșĐŸĐČ, ĐŸŃĐșĐ°ŃŃĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœŃ ŃĐ»Đ”ĐŒĐ”ĐœŃŃ ĐČĐœŃŃŃĐ”ĐœĐœĐ”Đč ŃŃŃŃĐșŃŃŃŃ ŃĐ°Đ·Đ»ĐŸĐŒĐŸĐČ, ĐŸĐżŃĐ”ĐŽĐ”Đ»Đ”ĐœŃ Đ°Đ·ĐžĐŒŃŃŃ Đž ŃĐłĐ»Ń ĐżĐ°ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐœĐ°ŃŃŃĐ”ĐœĐžĐč, ŃŃŃĐ°ĐœĐŸĐČĐ»Đ”ĐœĐ° ĐžŃ
ĐŒĐŸŃĐœĐŸŃŃŃ. ĐĐŸ ŃДзŃĐ»ŃŃĐ°ŃĐ°ĐŒ ĐșĐŸĐŒĐżŃŃŃĐ”ŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐŸĐ±ŃĐ°Đ±ĐŸŃĐșĐž ĐŒĐ°ŃĐ”ŃĐžĐ°Đ»ĐŸĐČ ĐżĐŸŃŃŃĐŸĐ”ĐœŃ ŃŃĐ”Ń
ĐŒĐ”ŃĐœŃĐ” ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»Đž ŃĐ°Đ·Đ»ĐŸĐŒĐœĐŸâĐ±Đ»ĐŸĐșĐŸĐČĐŸĐłĐŸ ŃŃŃĐŸĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ŃŃĐ°ŃŃĐșĐŸĐČ Đ»ĐŸĐșалОзаŃОО ŃŃŃĐ±ĐŸĐș ĐŃŃĐ±ĐžĐœŃĐșĐŸĐč Đž ĐĐŸŃŃĐŸĐ±ĐžĐœŃĐșĐŸĐč. ĐŃŃĐ»Đ”ĐŽĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ĐŒĐžĐœĐ”ŃĐ°Đ»ĐŸĐłĐŸâпДŃŃĐŸĐłŃĐ°ŃĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐžŃ
ĐŸŃĐŸĐ±Đ”ĐœĐœĐŸŃŃĐ”Đč Đž ŃпДŃĐžŃĐžĐșĐž Đ°Đ»ĐŒĐ°Đ·ĐŸĐœĐŸŃĐœĐŸŃŃĐž ŃазлОŃĐœŃŃ
ĐłĐ”ĐœĐ”ŃĐ°ŃĐžĐč ĐșĐžĐŒĐ±Đ”ŃлОŃĐ°, ŃлагаŃŃĐžŃ
ŃŃŃбĐșĐž ĐŃŃĐ±ĐžĐœŃĐșŃŃ Đž ĐĐŸŃŃĐŸĐ±ĐžĐœŃĐșŃŃ, ĐżĐŸĐ·ĐČĐŸĐ»ĐžĐ»Đž ĐČĐŸŃŃŃĐ°ĐœĐŸĐČĐžŃŃ ĐŒĐŸŃŃĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžŃ Đž ĐżŃĐŸŃŃŃĐ°ĐœŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸĐ” ĐżĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐ¶Đ”ĐœĐžĐ” ĐșĐ°Đ¶ĐŽĐŸĐłĐŸ Оз ĐČŃĐŽĐ”Đ»Đ”ĐœĐœŃŃ
ĐșĐŸĐŒĐżĐ»Đ”ĐșŃĐŸĐČ ĐșĐ°Đș ĐČ ŃĐŸĐČŃĐ”ĐŒĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸĐŒ ŃŃДзД, ŃĐ°Đș Đž ĐœĐ° ŃŃапД ĐČĐœĐ”ĐŽŃĐ”ĐœĐžŃ. ĐĐ»Ń ĐČŃĐ”Ń
ĐŒĐ°ĐłĐŒĐ°ŃĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐžŃ
ŃĐ°Đ· (ĐżĐŸŃŃĐžŃĐŸĐČŃĐč ĐșĐžĐŒĐ±Đ”ŃлОŃ, ŃŃŃĐżŃĐžĐČĐœĐ°Ń ĐșĐžĐŒĐ±Đ”ŃлОŃĐŸĐČĐ°Ń Đ±ŃĐ”ĐșŃĐžŃ Đž Đ°ĐČŃĐŸĐ»ĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°Ń ĐșĐžĐŒĐ±Đ”ŃлОŃĐŸĐČĐ°Ń Đ±ŃĐ”ĐșŃĐžŃ) ŃĐŸĐ·ĐŽĐ°ĐœŃ ĐŸĐ±ŃĐ”ĐŒĐœŃĐ” ĐșĐ°ŃĐșĐ°ŃĐœŃĐ” ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»Đž ĐžŃ
ĐłĐ”ĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐžŃ
ŃДл. Đ Đ°Đ·ŃĐ°Đ±ĐŸŃĐșĐ° ŃŃŃŃĐșŃŃŃĐœĐŸâĐČĐ”ŃĐ”ŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœŃŃ
ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»Đ”Đč ĐŽĐ»Ń ŃŃŃĐ±ĐŸĐș ĐŃŃĐ±ĐžĐœŃĐșĐŸĐč Đž ĐĐŸŃŃĐŸĐ±ĐžĐœŃĐșĐŸĐč ĐŸŃŃŃĐ”ŃŃĐČĐ»ŃлаŃŃ ĐżŃŃĐ”ĐŒ ŃĐžĐœŃДзОŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐœŃŃ
ĐŸ ĐČĐ”ŃĐ”ŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœŃŃ
Đž ŃŃŃŃĐșŃŃŃĐœŃŃ
ĐŸŃĐŸĐ±Đ”ĐœĐœĐŸŃŃŃŃ
ĐŒĐ”ŃŃĐŸŃĐŸĐ¶ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžĐč, ĐżĐŸĐ»ŃŃĐ”ĐœĐœŃŃ
ĐČ Ń
ĐŸĐŽĐ” ĐżŃДЎŃĐŽŃŃĐžŃ
ŃŃĐ°ĐżĐŸĐČ ĐžŃŃĐ»Đ”ĐŽĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ. Đ ŃĐ°ĐŒĐșĐ°Ń
ĐżŃДЎŃŃĐ°ĐČĐ»ŃĐ”ĐŒŃŃ
ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»Đ”Đč ĐČĐŸ ĐČŃĐ”ĐŒĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸĐč ĐżĐŸŃĐ»Đ”ĐŽĐŸĐČĐ°ŃДлŃĐœĐŸŃŃĐž ŃĐ°ŃŃĐŒĐŸŃŃĐ”ĐœŃ ĐżŃĐŸŃĐ”ŃŃŃ ĐČĐ·Đ°ĐžĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”ĐčŃŃĐČĐžŃ ŃĐ°Đ·ŃŃĐČĐœŃŃ
ĐœĐ°ŃŃŃĐ”ĐœĐžĐč, ŃĐŸŃĐŒĐžŃŃŃŃĐžŃ
ĐșĐžĐŒĐ±Đ”ŃлОŃĐŸĐČĐŒĐ”ŃĐ°ŃŃŃŃ ŃŃŃŃĐșŃŃŃŃ, Đž ĐČĐ”ŃĐ”ŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœŃŃ
ĐșĐŸĐŒĐżĐ»Đ”ĐșŃĐŸĐČ, ŃлагаŃŃĐžŃ
ŃŃŃбĐșĐž. ĐĄĐŸĐłĐ»Đ°ŃĐœĐŸ ĐżĐŸĐ»ŃŃĐ”ĐœĐœŃĐŒ ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»ŃĐŒ, ŃĐŸŃĐŒĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐ” ŃŃŃĐ±ĐŸĐș ĐżŃĐŸĐžŃŃ
ĐŸĐŽĐžĐ»ĐŸ ĐČ ĐżŃĐžĐżĐŸĐČĐ”ŃŃ
ĐœĐŸŃŃĐœŃŃ
ŃŃŃŃĐșŃŃŃĐ°Ń
ĐżŃĐžŃĐŽĐČĐžĐłĐŸĐČĐŸĐłĐŸ ŃĐ°ŃŃŃĐ¶Đ”ĐœĐžŃ, ĐŸĐ±ŃĐ°Đ·ĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐœŃŃ
ĐœĐ° ŃŃĐ°ŃŃĐșĐ°Ń
ŃĐŸĐżŃŃĐ¶Đ”ĐœĐžŃ ŃĐ°Đ·Đ»ĐŸĐŒĐ° ŃĐ”ĐČĐ”ŃâŃĐ”ĐČĐ”ŃĐŸâĐČĐŸŃŃĐŸŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐŸŃĐžĐ”ĐœŃĐžŃĐŸĐČĐșĐž Ń ŃĐ°ŃŃĐœŃĐŒĐž ĐŽĐžŃĐ»ĐŸĐșĐ°ŃĐžŃĐŒĐž Đ·ĐŸĐœŃ ŃĐ°Đ·ŃŃĐČĐœŃŃ
ĐœĐ°ŃŃŃĐ”ĐœĐžĐč ĐČĐŸŃŃĐŸĐșâŃĐ”ĐČĐ”ŃĐŸâĐČĐŸŃŃĐŸŃĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ Đž ŃĐ”ĐČĐ”ŃĐŸâĐ·Đ°ĐżĐ°ĐŽĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐœĐ°ĐżŃĐ°ĐČĐ»Đ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐČ ŃДзŃĐ»ŃŃĐ°ŃĐ” ĐœĐ”ŃĐșĐŸĐ»ŃĐșĐžŃ
ŃŃĐ°ĐżĐŸĐČ ŃĐ”ĐșŃĐŸĐœĐŸĐŒĐ°ĐłĐŒĐ°ŃĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐŸĐč Đ°ĐșŃĐžĐČОзаŃОО. ĐŃĐž ŃŃĐŸĐŒ ĐŽĐŸŃŃĐ°ĐČĐșĐ° ĐŽĐžŃĐșŃĐ”ŃĐœŃŃ
ĐżĐŸŃŃĐžĐč ĐșĐžĐŒĐ±Đ”ŃлОŃĐŸĐČĐŸĐłĐŸ ŃĐ°ŃплаĐČĐ° ĐŸŃ ĐžŃŃĐŸŃĐœĐžĐșĐ° ĐżŃĐŸĐžŃŃ
ĐŸĐŽĐžĐ»Đ° ĐżĐŸ глŃĐ±ĐžĐœĐœŃĐŒ ŃĐ°Đ·Đ»ĐŸĐŒĐ°ĐŒ, ĐČŃŃŃŃпаŃŃĐžĐŒ ĐČ ĐșĐ°ŃĐ”ŃŃĐČĐ” ĐșĐ°ĐœĐ°Đ»ĐŸĐČ ĐżĐŸĐČŃŃĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸĐč ĐżŃĐŸĐœĐžŃĐ°Đ”ĐŒĐŸŃŃĐž. Đ ŃĐŸĐČĐŸĐșŃĐżĐœĐŸŃŃĐž ĐČŃĐŽĐ”Đ»Đ”ĐœĐœŃĐ” ЎОзŃŃĐœĐșŃĐžĐČĐœŃĐ” ŃĐ»Đ”ĐŒĐ”ĐœŃŃ ĐżŃДЎŃŃĐ°ĐČĐ»ŃŃŃ ŃĐŸĐ±ĐŸĐč ŃŃŃŃĐșŃŃŃŃ, Đ±Đ»Đ°ĐłĐŸĐżŃĐžŃŃĐœŃĐ” ĐŽĐ»Ń ĐżĐ”ŃĐ”ĐŒĐ”ŃĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐŒĐ°ĐłĐŒŃ Đž Đ»ĐŸĐșалОзаŃОО ĐșĐžĐŒĐ±Đ”ŃлОŃĐŸĐČŃŃ
ŃДл
PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS OF SURVIVAL AND DISEASE COURSE IN WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER: RESULTS AND PROSPECTS OF THE STUDY
The article presents the results of a study of psychological factors of survival and the course of the disease in women with breast cancer. As a result of a longitudinal study, data were obtained on the relationship of psychological indicators with various variants of the course of the disease, as well as on the dynamics of personal and subjective characteristics with different outcomes of the disease. The authors have outlined further prospects for a longitudinal study on a sample of women with breast cancer with a fiveyear survival rate.Đ ŃŃĐ°ŃŃĐ” ĐżŃĐžĐČĐŸĐŽŃŃŃŃ ŃДзŃĐ»ŃŃĐ°ŃŃ ĐžŃŃĐ»Đ”ĐŽĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ĐżŃĐžŃ
ĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐžŃ
ŃĐ°ĐșŃĐŸŃĐŸĐČ ĐČŃжОĐČĐ°Đ”ĐŒĐŸŃŃĐž Đž ŃĐ”ŃĐ”ĐœĐžŃ Đ±ĐŸĐ»Đ”Đ·ĐœĐž Ń Đ¶Đ”ĐœŃĐžĐœ Ń ŃĐ°ĐșĐŸĐŒ ĐŒĐŸĐ»ĐŸŃĐœĐŸĐč жДлДзŃ. Đ ŃДзŃĐ»ŃŃĐ°ŃĐ” Đ»ĐŸĐœĐłĐžŃŃĐŽĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐžŃŃĐ»Đ”ĐŽĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ĐżĐŸĐ»ŃŃĐ”ĐœŃ ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐœŃĐ” ĐŸ ŃĐČŃĐ·Đž ĐżŃĐžŃ
ĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐžŃ
ĐżĐŸĐșĐ°Đ·Đ°ŃДлДĐč Ń ŃазлОŃĐœŃĐŒĐž ĐČĐ°ŃĐžĐ°ĐœŃĐ°ĐŒĐž ŃĐ”ŃĐ”ĐœĐžŃ Đ±ĐŸĐ»Đ”Đ·ĐœĐž, Đ° ŃĐ°ĐșжД ĐŸ ĐŽĐžĐœĐ°ĐŒĐžĐșĐ” лОŃĐœĐŸŃŃĐœŃŃ
Đž ŃŃбŃĐ”ĐșŃĐœŃŃ
Ń
Đ°ŃĐ°ĐșŃĐ”ŃĐžŃŃĐžĐș ĐżŃĐž ŃазлОŃĐœŃŃ
ĐžŃŃ
ĐŸĐŽĐ°Ń
Đ±ĐŸĐ»Đ”Đ·ĐœĐž. ĐĐČŃĐŸŃĐ°ĐŒĐž ĐŸĐ±ĐŸĐ·ĐœĐ°ŃĐ”ĐœŃ ĐŽĐ°Đ»ŃĐœĐ”ĐčŃОД пДŃŃпДĐșŃĐžĐČŃ Đ»ĐŸĐœĐłĐžŃŃĐŽĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐžŃŃĐ»Đ”ĐŽĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ĐœĐ° ĐČŃĐ±ĐŸŃĐșĐ” Đ¶Đ”ĐœŃĐžĐœ Ń ŃĐ°ĐșĐŸĐŒ ĐŒĐŸĐ»ĐŸŃĐœĐŸĐč Đ¶Đ”Đ»Đ”Đ·Ń ĐżŃĐž ĐżŃŃОлДŃĐœĐ”Đč ĐČŃжОĐČĐ°Đ”ĐŒĐŸŃŃĐž.ĐŃŃĐ»Đ”ĐŽĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐ” ĐČŃĐżĐŸĐ»ĐœĐ”ĐœĐŸ Đ·Đ° ŃŃĐ”Ń ĐłŃĐ°ĐœŃĐ° Đ ĐŸŃŃĐžĐčŃĐșĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐœĐ°ŃŃĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ŃĐŸĐœĐŽĐ° (ĐżŃĐŸĐ”ĐșŃ â 19-18-00426)
ХйРУĐйУРĐĐ-ĐĐĐ©ĐĐĄĐąĐĐĐĐĐĐŻ ĐĐĐĐĐĐŹ ĐĄĐąĐĐĐĐĐĐĐĐĐŻ ĐĐĐĐĐĐ ĐĐĐąĐĐĐРйРУĐĐĐ ĐПРĐĐĐĐĄĐĐĐŻ (ĐĄĐ ĐĐĐĐ-ĐĐĐ Đ„ĐĐĐĄĐĐĐ Đ ĐĐĐĐ ĐŻĐУйХĐĐĐ ĐĐĐĐĐĐĐĐĐĄĐĐĐ ĐĐ ĐĐĐĐĐŠĐĐ)
The paper presents the results of comprehensive study of the primary diamond deposit of the Nyurbinskaya pipe in the Yakutian diamondiferous province. It is established, that the pipe is confined to the fault junction of four directions and is composed of the kimberlite of four phases. Analysis of different faults and tectonic fracturing allowed to reconstruct the tectonic stress fields acting at the stage of the kimberlite body formation and to determine their occurrence sequence in time. The data obtained about regularities of the Nyurbinskaya pipe compositional structure and results of geologo-structural studies are combined in a single structural-compositional model of the deposit formation. Peculiarities of the fault network operation during the deposit formation stage are confirmed by experimental results using polarization-optical method. The model allowed to formulate the basic structural characteristics of the prospecting works object within which the formation of kimberlite body type of the Nyurbinskaya pipe is possible and to determine the elements of the fault network which are promising for the kimberlite pipes discovery.Đ ŃŃĐ°ŃŃĐ” ĐżŃДЎŃŃĐ°ĐČĐ»Đ”ĐœŃ ŃДзŃĐ»ŃŃĐ°ŃŃ ĐșĐŸĐŒĐżĐ»Đ”ĐșŃĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ОзŃŃĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐșĐŸŃĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐŒĐ”ŃŃĐŸŃĐŸĐ¶ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžŃ Đ°Đ»ĐŒĐ°Đ·ĐŸĐČ ŃŃŃбĐșĐ° ĐŃŃĐ±ĐžĐœŃĐșĐ°Ń. ĐŁŃŃĐ°ĐœĐŸĐČĐ»Đ”ĐœĐŸ, ŃŃĐŸ ŃŃŃбĐșĐ° ĐżŃĐžŃŃĐŸŃĐ”ĐœĐ° Đș ŃĐ·Đ»Ń ŃĐ°Đ·Đ»ĐŸĐŒĐŸĐČ ŃĐ”ŃŃŃĐ”Ń
ĐœĐ°ĐżŃĐ°ĐČĐ»Đ”ĐœĐžĐč Đž ŃĐ»ĐŸĐ¶Đ”ĐœĐ°Â ĐșĐžĐŒĐ±Đ”ŃлОŃĐ°ĐŒĐž ŃĐ”ŃŃŃĐ”Ń
ŃĐ°Đ·. ĐĐœĐ°Đ»ĐžĐ· ŃĐ°Đ·ĐœĐŸŃĐ°ĐœĐłĐŸĐČŃŃ
ŃĐ°Đ·ŃŃĐČĐœŃŃ
ĐœĐ°ŃŃŃĐ”ĐœĐžĐč Đž ŃĐ”ĐșŃĐŸĐœĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐŸĐč ŃŃĐ”ŃĐžĐœĐŸĐČĐ°ŃĐŸŃŃĐž ĐżĐŸĐ·ĐČĐŸĐ»ĐžĐ» ĐČĐŸŃŃŃĐ°ĐœĐŸĐČĐžŃŃ ĐżĐŸĐ»Ń ŃĐ”ĐșŃĐŸĐœĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐžŃ
ĐœĐ°ĐżŃŃĐ¶Đ”ĐœĐžĐč, ĐŽĐ”ĐčŃŃĐČĐŸĐČĐ°ĐČŃОД ĐœĐ° ŃŃапД ŃĐŸŃĐŒĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ĐșĐžĐŒĐ±Đ”ŃлОŃĐŸĐČĐŸĐłĐŸ ŃДла Đž ĐŸĐżŃДЎДлОŃŃ ĐżĐŸŃĐ»Đ”ĐŽĐŸĐČĐ°ŃДлŃĐœĐŸŃŃŃ ĐžŃ
ĐżŃĐŸŃĐČĐ»Đ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐČĐŸ ĐČŃĐ”ĐŒĐ”ĐœĐž. ĐĐŸĐ»ŃŃĐ”ĐœĐœŃĐ” ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐœŃĐ” ĐŸ Đ·Đ°ĐșĐŸĐœĐŸĐŒĐ”ŃĐœĐŸŃŃŃŃ
ĐČĐ”ŃĐ”ŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ŃŃŃĐŸĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ŃŃŃбĐșĐž ĐŃŃĐ±ĐžĐœŃĐșĐŸĐč Đž ŃДзŃĐ»ŃŃĐ°ŃŃ ĐłĐ”ĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐŸ-ŃŃŃŃĐșŃŃŃĐœŃŃ
ĐžŃŃĐ»Đ”ĐŽĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐč ĐŸĐ±ŃĐ”ĐŽĐžĐœĐ”ĐœŃ ĐČ ŃĐ°ĐŒĐșĐ°Ń
Đ”ĐŽĐžĐœĐŸĐč ŃŃŃŃĐșŃŃŃĐœĐŸ-ĐČĐ”ŃĐ”ŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸĐč ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»Đž ŃĐŸŃĐŒĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ĐŒĐ”ŃŃĐŸŃĐŸĐ¶ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžŃ. ĐŃĐŸĐ±Đ”ĐœĐœĐŸŃŃĐž ŃŃĐœĐșŃĐžĐŸĐœĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ŃĐ°Đ·ŃŃĐČĐœĐŸĐč ŃĐ”ŃĐž ĐœĐ° ŃŃапД ŃĐŸŃĐŒĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ĐŒĐ”ŃŃĐŸŃĐŸĐ¶ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐżĐŸĐŽŃĐČĐ”ŃĐ¶ĐŽĐ”ĐœŃ ŃДзŃĐ»ŃŃĐ°ŃĐ°ĐŒĐž ŃĐșŃпДŃĐžĐŒĐ”ĐœŃĐŸĐČ Ń ĐžŃĐżĐŸĐ»ŃĐ·ĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐ”ĐŒ ĐżĐŸĐ»ŃŃОзаŃĐžĐŸĐœĐœĐŸ-ĐŸĐżŃĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐŒĐ”ŃĐŸĐŽĐ°. ĐĐŸĐ»ŃŃĐ”ĐœĐœĐ°Ń ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»Ń ĐżĐŸĐ·ĐČĐŸĐ»ĐžĐ»Đ° ŃŃĐŸŃĐŒŃлОŃĐŸĐČĐ°ŃŃ ĐżŃĐžĐ·ĐœĐ°ĐșĐž, ĐŸĐżŃДЎДлŃŃŃОД ĐŸŃĐœĐŸĐČĐœŃĐ” ŃŃŃŃĐșŃŃŃĐœŃĐ” Ń
Đ°ŃĐ°ĐșŃĐ”ŃĐžŃŃĐžĐșĐž ĐŸĐ±ŃĐ”ĐșŃĐ° ĐżĐŸĐžŃĐșĐŸĐČŃŃ
ŃĐ°Đ±ĐŸŃ, ĐČ ĐżŃДЎДлаŃ
ĐșĐŸŃĐŸŃĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐČĐŸĐ·ĐŒĐŸĐ¶ĐœĐŸ ŃĐŸŃĐŒĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐ” ĐșĐžĐŒĐ±Đ”ŃлОŃĐŸĐČŃŃ
ŃДл ŃОпа ŃŃŃбĐșĐž ĐŃŃĐ±ĐžĐœŃĐșĐŸĐč, Đž ĐœĐ° ĐžŃ
ĐŸŃĐœĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐž ĐČŃЎДлОŃŃ ŃĐ” ŃĐ»Đ”ĐŒĐ”ĐœŃŃ ŃĐ°Đ·Đ»ĐŸĐŒĐœĐŸĐč ŃĐ”ŃĐž (ŃĐ°Đ·Đ»ĐŸĐŒĐœŃĐ” ŃĐ·Đ»Ń), ĐșĐŸŃĐŸŃŃĐ” ŃĐČĐ»ŃŃŃŃŃ ĐżĐ”ŃŃпДĐșŃĐžĐČĐœŃĐŒĐž ĐŽĐ»Ń ĐŸĐ±ĐœĐ°ŃŃĐ¶Đ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐșĐžĐŒĐ±Đ”ŃлОŃĐŸĐČŃŃ
ŃŃŃĐ±ĐŸĐș
Multijet production in neutral current deep inelastic scattering at HERA and determination of α_{s}
Multijet production rates in neutral current deep inelastic scattering have been measured in the range of exchanged boson virtualities 10 5 GeV and â1 < η_{LAB}^{jet} < 2.5. Next-to-leading-order QCD calculations describe the data well. The value of the strong coupling constant α_{s} (M_{z}), determined from the ratio of the trijet to dijet cross sections, is α_{s} (M_{z}) = 0.1179 ± 0.0013 (stat.)_{-0.0046}^{+0.0028}(exp.)_{-0.0046}^{+0.0028}(th.)
An NLO QCD analysis of inclusive cross-section and jet-production data from the ZEUS experiment
The ZEUS inclusive differential cross-section data from HERA, for charged and
neutral current processes taken with e+ and e- beams, together with
differential cross-section data on inclusive jet production in e+ p scattering
and dijet production in \gamma p scattering, have been used in a new NLO QCD
analysis to extract the parton distribution functions of the proton. The input
of jet data constrains the gluon and allows an accurate extraction of
\alpha_s(M_Z) at NLO;
\alpha_s(M_Z) = 0.1183 \pm 0.0028(exp.) \pm 0.0008(model)
An additional uncertainty from the choice of scales is estimated as \pm
0.005. This is the first extraction of \alpha_s(M_Z) from HERA data alone.Comment: 37 pages, 14 figures, to be submitted to EPJC. PDFs available at
http://durpdg.dur.ac.uk/hepdata in LHAPDFv
High-E_T dijet photoproduction at HERA
The cross section for high-E_T dijet production in photoproduction has been
measured with the ZEUS detector at HERA using an integrated luminosity of 81.8
pb-1. The events were required to have a virtuality of the incoming photon,
Q^2, of less than 1 GeV^2 and a photon-proton centre-of-mass energy in the
range 142 < W < 293 GeV. Events were selected if at least two jets satisfied
the transverse-energy requirements of E_T(jet1) > 20 GeV and E_T(jet2) > 15 GeV
and pseudorapidity requirements of -1 < eta(jet1,2) < 3, with at least one of
the jets satisfying -1 < eta(jet) < 2.5. The measurements show sensitivity to
the parton distributions in the photon and proton and effects beyond
next-to-leading order in QCD. Hence these data can be used to constrain further
the parton densities in the proton and photon.Comment: 36 pages, 13 figures, 20 tables, including minor revisions from
referees. Accepted by Phys. Rev.
Measurement of event shapes in deep inelastic scattering at HERA
Inclusive event-shape variables have been measured in the current region of
the Breit frame for neutral current deep inelastic ep scattering using an
integrated luminosity of 45.0 pb^-1 collected with the ZEUS detector at HERA.
The variables studied included thrust, jet broadening and invariant jet mass.
The kinematic range covered was 10 < Q^2 < 20,480 GeV^2 and 6.10^-4 < x < 0.6,
where Q^2 is the virtuality of the exchanged boson and x is the Bjorken
variable. The Q dependence of the shape variables has been used in conjunction
with NLO perturbative calculations and the Dokshitzer-Webber non-perturbative
corrections (`power corrections') to investigate the validity of this approach.Comment: 7+25 pages, 6 figure
- âŠ