The serological prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia is similar to that in the general population

Patients with hematological malignancies are at an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19) and adverse outcome. However, a low mortality rate has been reported in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Preclinical evidence suggests that tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may have a protective role against severe COVID-19

Ruxolitinib in cytopenic myelofibrosis: Response, toxicity, drug discontinuation, and outcome

Background: Patients with cytopenic myelofibrosis (MF) have more limited therapeutic options and poorer prognoses compared with patients with the myeloproliferative phenotype. Aims and methods: Prognostic correlates of cytopenic phenotype were explored in 886 ruxolitinib-treated patients with primary/secondary MF (PMF/SMF) included in the RUX-MF retrospective study. Cytopenia was defined as: leukocyte count <4 × 109 /L and/or hemoglobin <11/<10 g/dL (males/females) and/or platelets <100 × 109 /L. Results: Overall, 407 (45.9%) patients had a cytopenic MF, including 249 (52.4%) with PMF. In multivariable analysis, high molecular risk mutations (p = .04), intermediate 2/high Dynamic International Prognostic Score System (p < .001) and intermediate 2/high Myelofibrosis Secondary to Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia Prognostic Model (p < .001) remained associated with cytopenic MF in the overall cohort, PMF, and SMF, respectively. Patients with cytopenia received lower average ruxolitinib at the starting (25.2 mg/day vs. 30.2 mg/day, p < .001) and overall doses (23.6 mg/day vs. 26.8 mg/day, p < .001) and achieved lower rates of spleen (26.5% vs. 34.1%, p = .04) and symptom (59.8% vs. 68.8%, p = .008) responses at 6 months compared with patients with the proliferative phenotype. Patients with cytopenia also had higher rates of thrombocytopenia at 3 months (31.1% vs. 18.8%, p < .001) but lower rates of anemia (65.6% vs. 57.7%, p = .02 at 3 months and 56.6% vs. 23.9% at 6 months, p < .001). After competing risk analysis, the cumulative incidence of ruxolitinib discontinuation at 5 years was 57% and 38% in patients with cytopenia and the proliferative phenotype (p < .001), whereas cumulative incidence of leukemic transformation was similar (p = .06). In Cox regression analysis adjusted for Dynamic International Prognostic Score System score, survival was significantly shorter in patients with cytopenia (p < .001). Conclusions: Cytopenic MF has a lower probability of therapeutic success with ruxolitinib as monotherapy and worse outcome. These patients should be considered for alternative therapeutic strategies

Additional chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia-positive clone: Adverse prognostic influence on frontline imatinib therapy: A GIMEMA Working Party on CML analysis

Additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) in Philadelphia-positive cells have been reported in ∼5% of patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). Few studies addressing the prognostic significance of baselineACAs in patients treated with imatinib have been published previously. The European LeukemiaNet recommendations suggest that the presence of ACAs at diagnosis is a "warning" for patients in early CP, but there is not much information about their outcome after therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. To investigate the role of ACAs in early CP CML patients treated with imatinib mesylate, we performed an analysis in a large series of 559 patients enrolled in 3 prospective trials of the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto Working Party on CML: 378 patients were evaluable and ACAs occurred in 21 patients (5.6%). The overall cytogenetic and molecular response rates were significantly lower and the time to response was significantly longer in patients with ACAs. The long-term outcome of patients with ACAs was inferior, but the differences were not significant. The prognostic significance of each specific cytogenetic abnormality was not assessable. Therefore, we confirm thatACAs constitute an adverse prognostic factor in CML patients treated with imatinib as frontline therapy. This study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00514488 and NCT00510926. © 2012 by The American Society of Hematology

3-YEARS and Beyond Study Completion Results of the Otpkima Randomized Clinical Trial in Elderly CML Patients

The goal of Treatment Free Remission (TFR) is achievable in no more than 25-30% of patients with Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs). Thus, for the great majority of patients, particularly for the elderly, the options are to continue TKI therapy life-long or to enter an intermittent TKI administration, as previously published ( Russo D et al, Blood 2013; Russo et al Blood Adv 2015). The probability of major molecular response (MMR or MR3.0) maintenance while on intermittent 1 month on/1 month off TKI at 1 year is 80%, as reported recently in the first interime analysis of the Italian prospective randomized OPTkIMA trial (Malagola M et al, Cancer Med 2021). This is the second interim report of OPTkIMA trial, in which elderly patients with Ph+ CML in sustained (≥ 2 years) confirmed major molecular response (MMR or MR3.0) or deep molecular response (MR4.0 or deeper) were randomly assigned to receive a FIXED intermittent schedule (1 month on/1 month off) vs a PROGRESSIVE intermittent schedule (1 month on/1 month off for the 1 st year, 1 month on/2 months off for the 2 nd year, 1 month on/3 months off for the 3 rd year). After the 3 rd year, clinicians were free to decide if maintain the intermittent schedule, discontinue TKI or resume TKI daily ( Malagola M et al, Cancer Med 2021). At last follow up, 203 patients are evaluable after randomization (104 FIXED vs 99 PROGRESSIVE). At 3 rd year (end of study protocol), by intention to treat, 28/104 (27%) and 45/99 (45%) patients discontinued OPTkIMA because of MR3.0 loss in the FIXED vs PROGRESSIVE arm, respectively (p=0.005). The percentages of patients who discontinued OPTkIMA because of MR3.0 loss at 1 st, 2 nd and 3 rd year in the FIXED vs PROGRESSIVE arm were: 24% in both arms (p=0.97), 1% vs 22% (p=0.001) and 3% vs 15% (p=0.01), respectively (Figure 1). The probability of survival without MR3.0 loss at 1, 2 and 3 years in the FIXED vs PROGRESSIVE arm were: 81%, 69% and 66% vs 81%, 59% and 53%, respectively (Figure 2; p=0.13). None of the patients who lost MR3.0 progressed to accelerated or blastic phase (AP/BP) and all of the patients regained the MR3.0 after continuous TKI resumption within 9 months. At the end of the 3 rd year from randomization, 61/104 (59%) and 36/99 (36%) patients were in MR3.0 or deeper response in the FIXED vs PROGRESSIVE arm, respectively (p=0.001). For these patients, comparing the two arms, Clinicians' choice was to maintain the ongoing intermittent schedule in 46% vs 28% of the cases (p=0.01), discontinue TKI with the goal of TFR in 36% vs 58% (p=0.03), and resume the TKI continuously in 18% vs 14% of the patients (p=0.59). The results of the OPTkIMA trial clearly confirm that a policy of intermittent TKI administration in elderly patients with Ph+ CML in MR3.0 or deeper response is safe, as no progression to AP/BP was observed. Furthermore, the great majority of protocol discontinuation for MR3.0 loss were recorded in the 1 st year (one month on and one month off in both arms). Then the cumulative incidence of patients who lost MR3.0 beyond the 1 st year was significantly higher in the PROGRESSIVE arm with a trend towards a higher probability of survival without MR3.0 loss in the FIXED arm (Figure 1). Finally, at the end of the study protocol (3 rd year), patients in MR3.0 or deeper response after a FIXED intermittent schedule were more likely addressed to maintain the same program, whereas patients included in the PROGRESSIVE arm were more frequently discontinued with the goal of TFR. This last observation represents a “real-life” CML management by Clinicians. It suggests that after a PROGRESSIVE intermittent therapy, patients were considered at high probability to safely maintain the TFR

Chronic myeloid leukemia: A prospective comparison of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromosome banding analysis for the definition of complete cytogenetic response: A study of the GIMEMACMLWP

In chronic myeloid leukemia, different methods are available to monitor the response to therapy: chromosome banding analysis (CBA), interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (I-FISH), and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-Q-PCR). The GIMEMA CML WP (Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Adulto Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Working Party) has performed a prospective study to compare CBA and I-FISH for the definition of complete cytogenetic response (CCgR). Samples (n = 664) were evaluated simultaneously by CBA and I-FISH. Of 537 cases in CCgR, the number of positive nuclei by I-FISH was less than 1% in 444 cases (82.7%). Of 451 cases with less than 1% positive nuclei by I-FISH, 444 (98.4%) were classified as CCgR by CBA. The major molecular response rate was significantly greater in cases with I-FISH less than 1% than in those with I-FISH 1% to 5% (66.8% vs 51.6%, P < .001) and in cases with CCgR and I-FISH less than 1% than in cases with CCgR and I-FISH 1% to 5% (66.1% vs 49.4%, P = .004). I-FISH is more sensitive than CBA and can be used to monitor CCgR. With appropriate probes, the cutoff value of I-FISH may be established at 1%. These trials are registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00514488 and NCT00510926

Chronic myeloid leukemia: A prospective comparison of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromosome banding analysis for the definition of complete cytogenetic response: A study of the GIMEMACMLWP

In chronic myeloid leukemia, different methods are available to monitor the response to therapy: chromosome banding analysis (CBA), interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (I-FISH), and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-Q-PCR). The GIMEMA CML WP (Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Adulto Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Working Party) has performed a prospective study to compare CBA and I-FISH for the definition of complete cytogenetic response (CCgR). Samples (n = 664) were evaluated simultaneously by CBA and I-FISH. Of 537 cases in CCgR, the number of positive nuclei by I-FISH was less than 1% in 444 cases (82.7%). Of 451 cases with less than 1% positive nuclei by I-FISH, 444 (98.4%) were classified as CCgR by CBA. The major molecular response rate was significantly greater in cases with I-FISH less than 1% than in those with I-FISH 1% to 5% (66.8% vs 51.6%, P < .001) and in cases with CCgR and I-FISH less than 1% than in cases with CCgR and I-FISH 1% to 5% (66.1% vs 49.4%, P = .004). I-FISH is more sensitive than CBA and can be used to monitor CCgR. With appropriate probes, the cutoff value of I-FISH may be established at 1%. These trials are registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00514488 and NCT00510926

Deferasirox in the management of iron overload in patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib: The multicentre retrospective RUX‐IOL study

Deferasirox (DFX) is used for the management of iron overload (IOL) in many haematological malignancies including myelofibrosis (MF). The ‘RUX-IOL’ study retrospectively collected 69 MF patients treated with ruxolitinib (RUX) and DFX for IOL to assess: safety, efficacy in term of iron chelation response (ICR) and erythroid response (ER), and impact on overall survival of the combination therapy. The RUX–DFX therapy was administered for a median time of 12.4 months (interquartile range 3.1–71.2). During treatment, 36 (52.2%) and 34 (49.3%) patients required RUX and DFX dose reductions, while eight (11.6%) and nine (13.1%) patients discontinued due to RUX- or DFX-related adverse events; no unexpected toxicity was reported. ICR and ER were achieved by 33 (47.8%) and 32 patients (46.4%) respectively. Thirteen (18.9%) patients became transfusion-independent. Median time to ICR and ER was 6.2 and 2 months respectively. Patients achieving an ER were more likely to obtain an ICR also (p = 0.04). In multivariable analysis, the absence of leukocytosis at baseline (p = 0.02) and achievement of an ICR at any time (p = 0.02) predicted improved survival. In many MF patients, the RUX–DFX combination provided ICR and ER responses that correlated with improved outcome in the absence of unexpected toxicities. This strategy deserves further clinical investigation