Más allá de la pesca: empalamiento de una tortuga cabezona por el pez espada

Sea turtles are susceptible to a wide range of impacts. In Brazil, the loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1758) is the main sea turtle species caught incidentally by longline fishing fleets that target the blue shark Prionace glauca (Linnaeus, 1758) and swordfish Xiphias gladius (Linnaeus, 1758). The latter is well known for its predation strategy, which consists of using the rostrum to injure and catch prey. In this study, we recorded for the first time the impalement of a juvenile loggerhead sea turtle by a swordfish during a fishing operation of a Brazilian longline vessel in 2018. Two videos of this interaction were recorded by the shipmaster around 260 km from the Brazilian coast. The sea turtle was incidentally caught with a hook and subsequently attacked by the swordfish. The rostrum initially pierced the anterior left shoulder of the turtle and passed through the body, exiting from the right posterior carapace. Given the position of the attack, considerable internal damage was most certainly done to the turtle. Although the turtle was hauled aboard to remove the hook and then returned to the sea alive, it probably died due to the extent of the injuries caused by the rostrum having passed through the center of the body. Since both swordfish and turtle are pelagic and these interactions are poorly recorded, such encounters may be relatively common. Therefore, this type of information should be included in the data collection protocols of fishery monitoring programs to better understand and scale the bill-stab phenomenon, not only for sea turtles but also in relation to other groups of fauna.Las tortugas marinas son susceptibles a una amplia gama de impactos. En Brasil, la tortuga cabezona Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1758) es la principal especie de tortuga marina capturada incidentalmente por las flotas pesqueras de palangre que tienen como objetivo la tintorera Prionace glauca (Linnaeus, 1758) y el pez espada Xiphias gladius (Linnaeus, 1758). Este último, es muy conocido por su estrategia de depredación, que consiste en utilizar el rostro para herir y atrapar presas. En este estudio, se registró por primera vez el empalamiento de un juvenil de tortuga cabezona por un pez espada en 2018 durante una operación de pesca de un palangrero brasileño. El capitán del barco grabó dos videos de esta interacción a unos 260 km de la costa brasileña. La tortuga marina fue atrapada incidentalmente con un anzuelo y posteriormente atacada por el pez espada. El rostro perforó inicialmente el hombro izquierdo anterior de la tortuga y atravesó el cuerpo, saliendo por la parte posterior derecha del caparazón. Dada la posición del ataque, la tortuga sufrió un daño interno considerable. Aunque la tortuga fue subida a bordo para quitarle el anzuelo y luego fue devuelta viva al mar, probablemente murió debido a la extensión de las heridas causadas por el paso del rostro a través del centro del cuerpo. Dado que tanto el pez espada como la tortuga son pelágicos y estas interacciones no se registran acabadamente, estos encuentros pueden ser relativamente comunes. Por lo tanto, este tipo de información debe incluirse en los protocolos de recopilación de datos de los programas de monitoreo de pesquerías para comprender mejor y escalar este tipo de fenómenos, no solo para las tortugas marinas sino también en relación con otros grupos de fauna

Spatio-temporal distribution and target species of longline fish eries off Southeastern/Southern Brazil between 2000 and 2011

In the presente study, cluster analysis was performed to classify 1080 interviews with captains of national pelagic longline fleet (2000 to 2011), and 38 trips of the chartered fleet (2003 to 2008), in relation to the composition of species landed. For the national fleet 4 groups were identified: 1 - Albacores, 2 - Blue shark, 3 - Swordfish, and 4 - Dolphinfish. For the chartered fleet 3 groups were identified: 1 - Swordfish, 2 - Blue shark, and 3 - Albacores. The results indicated that part of the national fleet change their strategies according to the availability of the target species and market demand (internal and external). A part of the fleet from Espírito Santo state operates in the region between December and March, exclusively to capture dolphinfish. The chartered fleet differed from the national one as regards the fishing areas of each target species, mainly as regards swordfish and blue shark. Despite the great difference in the data sets, it is evident that both the national and the chartered fleets operated in accordance with their peculiarities and technological development, adopting strategies that optimize catches and net profits per trip.No presente estudo, uma análise de agrupamento foi realizada para classificar 1080 entrevistas com mestres da frota nacional de espinhel pelágico (2000 à 2011), e 38 embarques da frota estrangeira arrendada (2003 a 2008), em relação à composição das espécies desembarcadas. Para a frota nacional, foram identificados 4 grupos: 1 - Albacoras; 2 - Tubarãoazul; 3 - Meca; e 4 - Dourado. Para a frota estrangeira arrendada foram identificados 3 grupos: 1 - Meca; 2 - Tubarão-azul; e 3 - Albacoras. Os resultados indicam que parte da frota nacional altera suas estratégias de pesca de acordo com a disponibilidade da espéciealvo e pela demanda do mercado (interno e externo). Uma parcela da frota oriunda do Espírito Santo opera na região durante alguns meses de verão (dezembro a março), exclusivamente na captura do dourado. Para a frota estrangeira arrendada, ocorrem diferenças principalmente nas áreas de pesca para cada uma das espécies, sendo a frota direcionada principalmente para a captura da meca e tubarão-azul. Apesar da grande diferença no conjunto de dados, fica evidente que a frota nacional e estrangeira operam de acordo com suas particularidades e desenvolvimento tecnológico, adotando estratégias que otimizem as capturas e os lucros líquidos por viagem

Pan-Atlantic analysis of the overlap of a highly migratory species, the leatherback turtle, with pelagic longline fisheries

This is the final version of the article. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.Large oceanic migrants play important roles in ecosystems, yet many species are of conservation concern as a result of anthropogenic threats, of which incidental capture by fisheries is frequently identified. The last large populations of the leatherback turtle, Dermochelys coriacea, occur in the Atlantic Ocean, but interactions with industrial fisheries could jeopardize recent positive population trends, making bycatch mitigation a priority. Here, we perform the first pan-Atlantic analysis of spatio-temporal distribution of the leatherback turtle and ascertain overlap with longline fishing effort. Data suggest that the Atlantic probably consists of two regional management units: northern and southern (the latter including turtles breeding in South Africa). Although turtles and fisheries show highly diverse distributions, we highlight nine areas of high susceptibility to potential bycatch (four in the northern Atlantic and five in the southern/equatorial Atlantic) that are worthy of further targeted investigation and mitigation. These are reinforced by reports of leatherback bycatch at eight of these sites. International collaborative efforts are needed, especially from nations hosting regions where susceptibility to bycatch is likely to be high within their exclusive economic zone (northern Atlantic: Cape Verde, Gambia, Guinea Bissau, Mauritania, Senegal, Spain, USA and Western Sahara; southern Atlantic: Angola, Brazil, Namibia and UK) and from nations fishing in these high-susceptibility areas, including those located in international waters.Work in Gabon was financially supported by the Large Pelagics Research Center through National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency award no. NA04NMF4550391, the UK Defra Darwin Initiative, the Shellshock Campaign (European Association for Zoos and Aquaria) and the UK Natural Environment Research Council. Sea turtle monitoring programmes in Gabon were financially supported by the Wildlife Conservation Society and by the Gabon Sea Turtle Partnership with funding from the Marine Turtle Conservation Fund (United States Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of the Interior). Four of the satellite tags were deployed in Canadian waters by M. James (Dalhousie University) and the Canadian Sea Turtle Network, with the funding support of Canadian Sea Turtle Network leatherback field research provided by R. A. Myers, the Canadian Wildlife Federation, Environment Canada and WWF-Canada. Work in French Guiana was financially supported by CNES, DEAL and the European Union.This study results from the collaborative effort of 10 data providers, which have satellite-tracked leatherback turtles in the Atlantic Ocean since 1995, through their voluntary participation in the Trans-Atlantic Leatherback Conservation Initiative (TALCIN), a WWF-led initiative. We thank C. Drews (WWF-International) and Jean-Yves Georges (IPHC-CNRS) for having initiated this project. Significant contributions were made by A. Fonseca and M. L. Felix and the WWF Guianas office in fostering this project to secure its continuation. We thank those involved in the sea turtle restoration plan in French Guiana (DEAL, ONCFS, Kulalasi NGO, Kwata, the Reserve Naturelle de l'Amana, Chiefs of Awala and Yalimapo), Yvon Le Maho (IPHC-CNRS) for having initiated the leatherback tracking programme in French Guiana, colleagues from the Regional Program for Sea Turtles Research and Conservation of Argentina–PRICTMA, Aquamarina and Fundación Mundo Marino, the onboard scientific observers from PNOFA-DINARA, the crew and owner of the F/V Torres del Paine, the artisanal fishermen from Kiyú, San José, Uruguay, D. del Bene (PROFAUMA), Z. Di Rienzo and colleagues from Karumbé, the University of Pisa for initiating the satellite tagging programmes in South Africa, and the South African Department of Environmental Affairs for continuing the work in cooperation with Dr Nel from the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth and Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife. We thank M. L. Felix for her efforts in the deployment of satellite tags in Suriname and the Nature Conservation Division Suriname for facilitating these research efforts. P.M. thanks C. Palma for his help in dealing with ICCAT's database, C. Ere, as well as the GIS training and support received from SCGIS and the ESRI Conservation Program, which allowed processing of fishing-effort data. We thank J. Parezo for her careful reading of the manuscript. All authors designed the study and contributed data; S.F, M.S.C., P.M. and M.J.W. compiled the data; S.F., M.A.N. and A.L. coordinated and supervised the project; S.F., M.J.W., P.M. and B.J.G. led the data analysis and interpretation with contributions from all authors; the manuscript was developed by S.F. and M.J.W. as lead authors, with contributions from all authors

Pan-Atlantic analysis of the overlap of a highly migratory species, the leatherback turtle, with pelagic longline fisheries

Large oceanic migrants play important roles in ecosystems, yet many species are of conservation concern as a result of anthropogenic threats, of which incidental capture by fisheries is frequently identified. The last large populations of the leatherback turtle, Dermochelys coriacea, occur in the Atlantic Ocean, but interactions with industrial fisheries could jeopardize recent positive population trends, making bycatch mitigation a priority. Here, we perform the first pan-Atlantic analysis of spatio-temporal distribution of the leatherback turtle and ascertain overlap with longline fishing effort. Data suggest that the Atlantic probably consists of two regional management units: northern and southern (the latter including turtles breeding in South Africa). Although turtles and fisheries show highly diverse distributions, we highlight nine areas of high susceptibility to potential bycatch (four in the northern Atlantic and five in the southern/equatorial Atlantic) that are worthy of further targeted investigation and mitigation. These are reinforced by reports of leatherback bycatch at eight of these sites. International collaborative efforts are needed, especially from nations hosting regions where susceptibility to bycatch is likely to be high within their exclusive economic zone (northern Atlantic: Cape Verde, Gambia, Guinea Bissau, Mauritania, Senegal, Spain, USA and Western Sahara; southern Atlantic: Angola, Brazil, Namibia and UK) and from nations fishing in these high-susceptibility areas, including those located in international waters

Pan-atlantic analysis of the overlap of a highly migratory species, the leatherback turtle, with pelagic longline fisheries

Large oceanic migrants play important roles in ecosystems, yet many species are of conservation concern as a result of anthropogenic threats, of which incidental capture by fisheries is frequently identified. The last large populations of the leatherback turtle, Dermochelys coriacea, occur in the Atlantic Ocean, but interactions with industrial fisheries could jeopardize recent positive population trends, making bycatch mitigation a priority. Here, we perform the first pan-Atlantic analysis of spatio-temporal distribution of the leatherback turtle and ascertain overlap with longline fishing effort. Data suggest that the Atlantic probably consists of two regional management units: northern and southern (the latter including turtles breeding in South Africa). Although turtles and fisheries show highly diverse distributions, we highlight nine areas of high susceptibility to potential bycatch (four in the northern Atlantic and five in the southern/equatorial Atlantic) that are worthy of further targeted investigation and mitigation. These are reinforced by reports of leatherback bycatch at eight of these sites. International collaborative efforts are needed, especially from nations hosting regions where susceptibility to bycatch is likely to be high within their exclusive economic zone (northern Atlantic: Cape Verde, Gambia, Guinea Bissau, Mauritania, Senegal, Spain, USA and Western Sahara; southern Atlantic: Angola, Brazil, Namibia and UK) and from nations fishing in these high-susceptibility areas, including those located in international waters