Whole exome sequencing identifies a mutation in thrombomodulin as the genetic cause of a suspected platelet disorder in a family with normal platelet function

Here, we describe a mother and son with a lifelong bleeding tendency and posttraumatic bleeding who were recruited to the UK Genotyping and Phenotyping of Platelets (GAPP) study with a suspected platelet function disorder. However, despite a clinically significant bleeding score, both had normal platelet counts and normal platelet function. The patients’ blood was analyzed by light transmission aggregometry and genotyping by whole exome sequencing, as outlined by the GAPP study. Approximately 25 000 genetic variants were found for each patient as a result of sequencing and were filtered using a specialized bioinformatics pipeline. A heterozygous variant displaying autosomal dominant inheritance (c.1611 C>A) was found in the gene THBD which encodes the glycoprotein thrombomodulin. This sequence change results in a stop codon (p.Cys537Stop) and truncation of the protein and has been previously described in two other families with bleeding events which suggests it may be a recurrent mutation. In summary, this study shows that patients with a suspected platelet disorder but who present with a normal pattern of platelet aggregation should be investigated for defects in nonplatelet genes

Hemophilia treatment in 2021: choosing the”optimal” treatment using an integrative, patient-oriented approach to shared decision-making between patients and clinicians

The mainstay of hemophilia treatment is to prevent bleeding through regular long-term prophylaxis and to control acute breakthrough bleeds. Various treatment options are currently available for prophylaxis, and treatment decision-making is a challenging and multifaceted process of identifying the most appropriate option for each patient. A multidisciplinary expert panel convened to develop a practical, patient-oriented algorithm to facilitate shared treatment decision-making between clinicians and patients. Key variables were identified, and an algorithm proposed based on five variables: bleeding phenotype, musculoskeletal status, treatment adherence, venous access, and lifestyle. A complementary, patient-focused preference tool was also hypothesized, with the aim of exploring individual patients' priorities, preferences, and goals. It is hoped that the proposed algorithm and the hypothesized patient preference tool will assist in selecting a treatment for each patient that is as efficient as possible in preventing bleeds while also accounting for the patient's expectations and prioritiesFunded by a grant from Novo Nordis

Factor IX Expression within the Normal Range Prevents Spontaneous Bleeds Requiring Treatment Following FLT180a Gene Therapy in Patients with Severe Hemophilia B: Long-Term Follow- up Study of the B-Amaze Program

Introduction: FLT180a (verbrinacogene setparvovec) is an investigational, liver-directed AAV gene therapy for the treatment of patients with hemophilia B (HB). FLT180a consists of a novel, potent, engineered capsid (AAVS3) containing an expression cassette encoding a Factor IX (FIX) gain-of-function protein variant ('Padua'; FIX-R338L). The B-AMAZE study was designed to identify a dose of FLT180a that maintains FIX activity within the normal range (50-150%) and thereby protect patients with severe HB from spontaneous and traumatic bleeds. Methods: B-AMAZE was a multicentre, open-label Phase 1/2 clinical trial (NCT03369444; sponsored by UCL) that evaluated FLT180a dose levels using an escalating/descending adaptive design in patients with severe (FIX activity <1%) or moderately severe (FIX activity 1-2%) HB who were negative for AAVS3 neutralizing antibodies. A novel regimen of prophylactic corticosteroids with/without tacrolimus was implemented to mitigate the impact of vector-related transaminitis on FIX expression. Patients who completed the 26-week B-AMAZE study were eligible for the ongoing long-term follow-up study (NCT03641703; sponsored by Freeline). Results: Ten HB patients received a single dose of FLT180a. Four FLT180a doses ranging from 3.84e11 vg/kg to 1.28e12 vg/kg were assessed. As of the data cut-off date, all patients have been followed for ≥16 months. FLT180a demonstrated a favorable safety profile, without evidence of inhibitors against FIX, infusion-related or allergic reactions. The most common treatment-related adverse event was transient elevation in alanine aminotransferase. An event of AV fistula thrombosis occurred in a 67-year-old patient who received the highest dose of 1.28e12 vg/kg (total dose of 1.15e14 vg) and had supranormal FIX levels; this patient was treated with anticoagulants. While these FIX levels demonstrate the potency of our proprietary AAVS3 capsid, this dose will not be used in future hemophilia studies. At Week 26 after FLT180a administration, a dose-response relationship was observed with mean FIX activity of 45.0%, 35.5%, 141.5%, and 175.5% for 3.84e11, 6.4e11, 8.32e11, and 1.28e12 vg/kg doses, respectively (Table); FIX activity levels ≥50% were achieved in 7 of 8 patients treated with the three highest doses. One patient (Patient 4) who received 6.4e11 vg/kg lost transgene expression early due to transaminitis and resumed routine factor prophylaxis. The 8.32e11 vg/kg cohort received an extended immune management regimen (9-18 weeks) with prophylactic tacrolimus in addition to prednisolone to prevent breakthrough vector-related transaminitis. However, after cessation of the immune management regimen, transaminitis with concomitant reductions in FIX activity was observed in all patients in the 8.32e11 vg/kg cohort. The combination of prophylactic tacrolimus and prednisolone appeared to have suppressed immune-mediated transaminitis while administered, but recurrence of transaminitis developed soon after cessation. This unique and previously unreported observation suggests that the longer-duration prophylactic immune management regimen may have prevented tolerization to the vector because this was not observed in earlier cohorts where a brief course of tacrolimus was given reactively for breakthrough transaminitis. All patients (including the 8.32e11 vg/kg cohort) have achieved steady state. Patients in the earliest cohort who received the lowest dose (3.84e11 vg/kg) have shown stable FIX activity for >3 years. There were no spontaneous bleeds that required FIX supplementation in patients who maintained FIX activity above 50%; Patient 4 in the 6.4e11 vg/kg cohort experienced two bleeds (cause unknown) after he lost transgene expression, which were treated with exogenous FIX. One patient received exogenous FIX for treatment of a traumatic bleed, but his FIX activity level was 57% at the time of the event. Additional efficacy and safety results with >3.5 years of follow-up will be presented. Conclusions: B-AMAZE is the first HB gene therapy study to achieve normal levels of FIX activity using relatively low vector doses. Results suggest that a dose of 7.7e11 vg/kg, coupled with a short course of prophylactic immune management, has the potential to achieve durable FIX activity in the normal range (50-150%) and thereby prevent spontaneous bleeds and normalize hemostasis in the event of traumatic bleeds

Economic evaluation of complete revascularization for patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of complete revascularisation at index admission compared to infarct-related artery (IRA) treatment only, in patients with multi-vessel disease undergoing Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI) for ST-segment elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI). Methods: Economic evaluation of a multi-centre randomised trial comparing complete revascularisation at index admission to IRA-only P-PCI in patients with multi-vessel disease (12 month follow-up). Overall hospital costs (costs for P-PCI procedure(s), hospital stay and any subsequent readmissions) were estimated. Outcomes were major adverse cardiac events (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, heart failure, and ischemia-driven revascularisation) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the EQ-5D-3L. Multiple imputation was undertaken. The mean incremental cost and effects, with associated 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) were estimated. Results: Based on 296 patients, the mean incremental overall hospital cost for complete revascularisation was estimated to be –£215.96 (–£1,390.20 to £958.29), compared to IRA-only, with a per-patient mean reduction in MACE events of 0.170 (0.044 to 0.296) and a QALY gain of 0.011 (-0.019 to 0.041). According to the CEAC, the probability of complete revascularisation being cost-effective was estimated to be 72.0% at willingness to pay of £20,000 per QALY. Conclusions: Complete revascularisation at index admission was estimated to be more effective (in terms of MACE and QALYs) and cost-effective (overall costs were estimated to be lower and complete revascularisation thereby dominated IRA-only). There was, however, some uncertainty associated with this decision

European retrospective study of real-life haemophilia treatment

IntroductionHaemophilia treatment varies significantly between individuals, countries and regions and details of bleed rates, factor consumption and injection frequency are often not available.AimTo provide an overview of the FVIII/FIX treatment practice and outcome for patients with haemophilia A (HA) or haemophilia B (HB) across Europe.MethodsNon‐interventional, 12‐month retrospective study where anonymized data were retrieved from haemophilia centres/registers in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Male patients (all ages) receiving coagulation factor treatment 24 months prior to the study, with basal FVIII/FIX levels ≤5 IU dL−1, without inhibitors, were included. Data were summarized descriptively.ResultsIn total, 1346 patients with HA and 312 with HB were included in the analysis; 75% and 57% had severe disease (FVIII/FIX < 1 IU dL−1) respectively. Prophylaxis was most common for severe haemophilia, especially for children, whereas on‐demand treatment was more common for moderate haemophilia in most countries. The mean (SD) prescribed prophylactic treatment ranged from 67.9 (30.4) to 108.4 (78.1) (HA) and 32.3 (10.2) to 97.7 (32.1) (HB) IU kg−1 per week, across countries. Most patients on prophylaxis were treated ≥3 times/week (HA) or two times/week (HB). The median annual bleeding rate (ABR) for patients on prophylaxis ranged from 1.0 to 4.0 for severe HA, and from 1.0 to 6.0 for severe HB, while those with moderate haemophilia generally had slightly higher ABRs. Median ABRs for on‐demand‐treated severe HA ranged from 4.5 to 18.0, and for HB, 1.5 to 14.0.ConclusionTreatment practice varied greatly between centres and countries and patients treated on‐demand and prophylactically both experienced bleeds, emphasizing the need for further optimization of care

Global Emerging HEmophilia Panel (GEHEP): A Multinational Collaboration for Advancing Hemophilia Research and Treatment

GEHEP, established in 2009, is an independent, multi-institutional, international consortium of early career hematology specialists in the field of hemophilia and other inherited bleeding disorders. The main objective of the group, whose members practice at institutions in North America, Europe, and South Africa, is to advance hemophilia care by providing a forum for mentored collaborative research, developing programs for improving clinical care, and promoting academic career development of junior faculty. GEHEP members collect and document anonymized data on intra- and interinstitutional differences in patient populations, diagnosis, and treatment in the field of hemophilia and other bleeding disorders. To facilitate sharing of aggregated data among GEHEP members, a global protocol was developed and approved by most members’ local institutional review board. Current GEHEP research initiatives are varied, encompassing work in pediatric and adult patients. GEHEP members have presented research at international meetings on the initiation of prophylaxis in children, use of immune tolerance induction in adults, and prevalence of acute coronary syndromes in older patients with hemophilia. The main goal of the continuing work of GEHEP is to advance the care of patients with hemophilia worldwide

Cost-effectiveness of pregabalin versus venlafaxine in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: findings from a Spanish perspective

The objective of the present study was to describe a new model of the cost-effectiveness of treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and its application to a comparison of pregabalin versus venlafaxine extended-release (XR) from a Spanish healthcare perspective. Microsimulation techniques, including Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) score, number of weeks with minimal or no anxiety (HAM-A ≤ 9), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), were used to predict treatment outcomes for patients with moderate-to-severe GAD who would be treated with pregabalin vs venlafaxine XR. Expected levels of healthcare utilization and unit cost of care are derived from Spanish published sources. We express cost-effectiveness alternatively in terms of incremental cost per additional week with minimal or no anxiety, and incremental cost per QALY gained [in 2007 Euros (€)]. Considering costs of drug treatment only, the incremental cost [mean (95% confidence interval)] of pregabalin (vs venlafaxine XR) would be €96 (€86, €107) per additional week with minimal or no anxiety, and €32,832 (€29,656, €36,308) per QALY gained. When other medical care costs are considered, cost-effectiveness ratios decline to €70 (€61, €80) per additional week with no or minimal anxiety, and €23,909 (€20,820, €27,006) per QALY gained. We conclude that, using a new microsimulation model of the treatment of GAD, pregabalin appears to be cost-effective vs venlafaxine XR in a Spanish healthcare setting

Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: Health-related quality of life outcomes, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness analysis

BackgroundThe Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial showed that survival in patients with severe lower limb ischemia (rest pain, tissue loss) who survived postintervention for >2 years after initial randomization to bypass surgery (BSX) vs balloon angioplasty (BAP) was associated with an improvement in subsequent amputation-free and overall survival of about 6 and 7 months, respectively. We now compare the effect on hospital costs and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of the BSX-first and BAP-first revascularization strategies using a within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis.MethodsWe measured HRQOL using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol), the Short Form 36 (SF-36), and the EuroQol (EQ-5D) health outcome measure up to 3 years from randomization. Hospital use was measured and valued using United Kingdom National Health Service hospital costs over 3 years. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated for cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Uncertainty was assessed using nonparametric bootstrapping of incremental costs and incremental effects.ResultsNo significant differences in HRQOL emerged when the two treatment strategies were compared. During the first year from randomization, the mean cost of inpatient hospital treatment in patients allocated to BSX ($34,378) was estimated to be about$8469 (95% confidence interval, $2,417-$14,522) greater than that of patients allocated to BAP ($25,909). Owing to increased costs subsequently incurred by the BAP patients, this difference decreased at the end of follow-up to$5521 ($45,322 for BSX vs$39,801 for BAP) and was no longer significant. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of a BSX-first strategy was $184,492 per QALY gained. The probability that BSX was more cost-effective than BAP was relatively low given the similar distributions in HRQOL, survival, and hospital costs.ConclusionsAdopting a BSX-first strategy for patients with severe limb ischemia does result in a modest increase in hospital costs, with a small positive but insignificant gain in disease-specific and generic HRQOL. However, the real-world choice between BSX-first and BAP-first revascularization strategies for severe limb ischemia due to infrainguinal disease cannot depend on costs alone and will require a more comprehensive consideration of individual patient preferences conditioned by expectations of survival and other health outcomes

Pharmacokinetics in routine haemophilia clinical practice: rationale and modalities-a practical review.

Prophylactic therapy with exogenous clotting factor concentrates in haemophilia A and B aims to achieve levels of circulating FVIII or FIX that are adequate for the prevention or reduction of spontaneous joint bleeding. Historically, a minimum trough level of at least 1% of the normal levels of circulating clotting factor has been targeted using standardised protocols. However, clearance of clotting factor varies between products and patients, and other pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters such as the frequency and magnitude of peaks may be important for ensuring optimal coverage. Thus, it is increasingly recognised that an individualised, PK-based approach to prophylaxis is necessary to achieve optimal protection. This review focuses on the clinical implications of using PK-guided, individualised prophylaxis in haemophilia to improve patient outcomes and considers practical methods of establishing patients' PK parameters. The most useful PK parameters will depend on the aim of the specific treatment (e.g. preventing activity-related and traumatic bleeds or addressing subclinical bleeding). In clinical practice, lengthy and frequent post-infusion sampling for PK analysis is costly and a significant burden for patients. However, a Bayesian analysis allows for the estimation of different PK parameters (e.g. half-life, factor concentrations over time, etc.) with only a minimum number of samples (e.g. 4, 24 and 48 h for haemophilia A), by using the patient's data to adjust a relevant population PK value towards the actual value. Numerous tools are available to aid in the practical use of Bayesian PK-guided dosing in the clinic, including the Web-based Application for the Population Pharmacokinetic Service hosted by McMaster University, Canada. The PK data can be used to determine the appropriate prophylaxis regimen for the individual patient, which can be monitored by assessment of the trough level at each clinic visit. Collection of PK data and subsequent PK-guided dosing should become standard practice when determining treatment strategies for people with haemophilia

Clinical management of older persons with haemophilia

Life expectancy for people with haemophilia (PWH) has improved and is now approaching that of the general population. The growing population of elderly PWH will therefore increasingly face the age-related morbidities such as cardiovascular diseases, malignant disease, liver disease, and bone and joint related diseases, as well as the lifestyle and psychosocial factors that accompany many of these conditions. For many PWH, frequent contact with haemophilia specialists within the comprehensive care centres supplants the relationship that individuals in the general population have with their general practitioners. As a result, there is a risk that elderly PWH may miss the chronic disease screening opportunities offered to the general population. This review focuses on the screening tests and examinations recommended for age-related comorbidities in the general population that may be applicable to the growing population of older people with haemophilia. © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd