Developing a competence framework for nurses in pharmaceutical care: A Delphi study

Background: Nurses play an important role in pharmaceutical care. They are involved in: detecting clinical change; communicating/discussing pharmacotherapy with patients, their advocates, and other healthcare professionals; proposing and implementing medication-related interventions; and ensuring follow-up of patients and medication regimens. To date, a framework of nurses' competences on knowledge, skills, and attitudes as to interprofessional pharmaceutical care tasks is missing. Objectives: To reach agreement with experts about nurses' competences for tasks in interprofessional pharmaceutical care. Methods: A two-phase study starting with a scoping review followed by five Delphi rounds was performed. Competences extracted from the literature were assessed by an expert panel on relevance by using the RAND/UCLA method. The experts (n = 22) involved were healthcare professionals, nurse researchers, and educators from 14 European countries with a specific interest in nurses' roles in interprofessional pharmaceutical care. Descriptive statistics supported the data analysis. Results: The expert panel reached consensus on the relevance of 60 competences for 22 nursing tasks. 41 competences were related to 15 generic nursing tasks and 33 competences were related to seven specific nursing tasks. Conclusions: This study resulted in a competence framework for competency-based nurse education. Future research should focus on imbedding these competences in nurse education. A structured instrument should be developed to assess students' readiness to achieve competence in interprofessional pharmaceutical care in clinical practice.The research was supported by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union (grant number 2018–1-BE02-KA203–046861) and MDMJ accountants, an accountancy service in Belgium that financially supported the Belgian authors, without any conflicts of interest

Nurse students’ competences in interprofessional pharmaceutical care in Europe: cross-sectional evaluation

Background: Safe pharmaceutical care requires competent nurses with specific knowledge, skills and attitudes. It is unclear whether nursing students are adequately prepared to perform pharmaceutical care in practice. Mapping their pharmaceutical care competences can lead to a better understanding of the extent to which curricula fit expectations of the labour market. Objectives: To assess pharmaceutical care competences of final-year nursing students of different educational levels. Design: A cross-sectional survey design. Settings: In 14 European countries, nursing schools who offer curricula for level 4 to 7 students, were approached. Participants: Through convenience sampling 1741 final-year student nurses of level 4 to 7 were included. Sampling strategies were country-specific. Methods: A web-platform was developed with an assessment of the level in which students mastered pharmaceutical care competences. Knowledge questions, case studies (basic/advanced level), self-reported practical skills and attitudes were evaluated. Results: Mean scores for knowledge questions differed significantly (p<0.001) between level 5 (56/100), level 6 (68/100) and level 7 students (72/100). For basic cases level 5 students reached lower scores (64/100) compared with level 6 (71/100) and level 7 (72/100) students (p=0.002 and p=0.005). For more advanced cases no difference between levels was observed (overall mean 61/100). Most students (63-90%) considered themselves skilled to perform pharmaceutical care and had positive attitudes towards their participation in pharmaceutical care (65-97%). Conclusions: Relatively low knowledge scores were calculated for final-year student nurses. In some domains, lower levels of students might be insufficiently prepared to take up responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Our assessment can be used as a tool for educators to evaluate how prepared nursing students are for pharmaceutical care. Its further implementation for students of different educational levels will allow benchmarking between the levels, both within and between countries.This work was supported by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union [grant number 2018-1-BE02-KA203-046861] and Consensus accountants, an accountancy service in Belgium that financially supported the Belgian authors, without any conflicts of interest

Interessenkonflikte mit der Industrie - eine Befragung von Pflegenden im Bereich der Wundversorgung in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz.

Hintergrund: Pflegende werden zunehmend von der Industrie umworben. Ziel: Erfassung der Einstellungen und des Verhaltens von pflegerischen Wundexpert(inn)en gegenüber der Industrie. Methode: Auf Basis bestehender Instrumente wurde ein standardisierter Fragebogen (39 Items; 5-stufige Likert-Skala) entwickelt, der elektronisch und postalisch an alle pflegerischen Mitglieder der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für vaskuläre Pflege (ÖGvP), der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Wundheilung und Wundbehandlung e. V. (DGfW e. V.) und der Swiss Association for Wound Care (SAfW) versandt wurde. Ergebnisse: Die Stichprobe umfasste 178 Pflegende (75 % Frauen; Alter 27 – 70 Jahre [Median 45]; 0 – 40 Jahre [Median 9] tätig im Wundbereich). Nur etwa jeder vierte der Befragten (23,0 %) hat im vergangenen Jahr nicht am Pharmamarketing teilgenommen. Allgemein wurden kleine Geschenke häufiger angenommen als teure Geschenke. Mehrheitlich werden preiswerte Geschenke, Geschenke zu Ausbildungszwecken und solche, die den Patienten nutzen können, als positiv bewertet. Die Befragten betrachten sich, im Vergleich zu Ärzt(inn)en, mehrheitlich als eher weniger beeinflussbar in ihrem Entscheidungsvermögen. Schlussfolgerungen: Das Verhalten und die Einstellung der Pflegenden sind ambivalent. Das Auftreten von Interessenkonflikten wird teilweise mit dem Wohl der Patient(inn)en begründet. Mangelhafte Kenntnisse über diese Thematik und soziale Erwünschtheit könnten die Ursache für eine unkritische Haltung sein. Für einen kritischeren Umgang mit der Industrie sind Bildungsmaßnahmen und berufsethische Standards notwendig

Environmental and behavioural modifications for improving food and fluid intake in people with dementia.

BACKGROUND: Weight loss, malnutrition and dehydration are common problems for people with dementia. Environmental modifications such as, change of routine, context or ambience at mealtimes, or behavioural modifications, such as education or training of people with dementia or caregivers, may be considered to try to improve food and fluid intake and nutritional status of people with dementia. OBJECTIVES: Primary: To assess the effects of environmental or behavioural modifications on food and fluid intake and nutritional status in people with dementia. Secondary: To assess the effects of environmental or behavioural modifications in connection with nutrition on mealtime behaviour, cognitive and functional outcomes and quality of life, in specific settings (i.e. home care, residential care and nursing home care) for different stages of dementia. To assess the adverse consequences or effects of the included interventions. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Specialized Register of Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement (ALOIS), MEDLINE, Eembase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) portal/ICTRP on 17 January 2018. We scanned reference lists of other reviews and of included articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating interventions designed to modify the mealtime environment of people with dementia, to modify the mealtime behaviour of people with dementia or their caregivers, or both, with the intention of improving food and fluid intake. We included people with any common dementia subtype. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included trials. We assessed the quality of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included nine studies, investigating 1502 people. Three studies explicitly investigated participants with Alzheimer's disease; six did not specify the type of dementia. Five studies provided clear measures to identify the severity of dementia at baseline, and overall very mild to severe stages were covered. The interventions and outcome measures were diverse. The overall quality of evidence was mainly low to very low.One study implemented environmental as well as behavioural modifications by providing additional food items between meals and personal encouragement to consume them. The control group received no intervention. Differences between groups were very small and the quality of the evidence from this study was very low, so we are very uncertain of any effect of this intervention.The remaining eight studies implemented behavioural modifications.Three studies provided nutritional education and nutrition promotion programmes. Control groups did not receive these programmes. After 12 months, the intervention group showed slightly higher protein intake per day (mean difference (MD) 0.11 g/kg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.01 to 0.23; n = 78, 1 study; low-quality evidence), but there was no clear evidence of a difference in nutritional status assessed with body mass index (BMI) (MD -0.26 kg/m² favouring control, 95% CI -0.70 to 0.19; n = 734, 2 studies; moderate-quality evidence), body weight (MD -1.60 kg favouring control, 95% CI -3.47 to 0.27; n = 656, 1 study; moderate-quality evidence), or score on Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) (MD -0.10 favouring control, 95% CI -0.67 to 0.47; n = 656, 1 study; low-quality evidence). After six months, the intervention group in one study had slightly lower BMI (MD -1.79 kg/m² favouring control, 95% CI -1.28 to -2.30; n = 52, 1 study; moderate-quality evidence) and body weight (MD -8.11 kg favouring control, 95% CI -2.06 to -12.56; n = 52, 1 study; moderate-quality evidence). This type of intervention may have a small positive effect on food intake, but little or no effect, or a negative effect, on nutritional status.Two studies compared self-feeding skills training programmes. In one study, the control group received no training and in the other study the control group received a different self-feeding skills training programme. For both comparisons the quality of the evidence was very low and we are very uncertain whether these interventions have any effect.One study investigated general training of nurses to impart knowledge on how to feed people with dementia and improve attitudes towards people with dementia. Again, the quality of the evidence was very low so that we cannot be certain of any effect.Two studies investigated vocal or tactile positive feedback provided by caregivers while feeding participants. After three weeks, the intervention group showed an increase in calories consumed per meal (MD 200 kcal, 95% CI 119.81 to 280.19; n = 42, 1 study; low-quality evidence) and protein consumed per meal (MD 15g, 95% CI 7.74 to 22.26; n = 42, 1 study; low-quality evidence). This intervention may increase the intake of food and liquids slightly; nutritional status was not assessed. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Due to the quantity and quality of the evidence currently available, we cannot identify any specific environmental or behavioural modifications for improving food and fluid intake in people with dementia

Snoezelen, structured reminiscence therapy and 10-minutes activation in long term care residents with dementia (WISDE): study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background People with dementia are often inapproachable due to symptoms of their illness. Therefore nurses should establish relationships with dementia patients via their remaining resources and facilitate communication. In order to achieve this, different targeted non-pharmacological interventions are recommended and practiced. However there is no sufficient evidence about the efficacy of most of these interventions. A number of publications highlight the urgent need for methodological sound studies so that more robust conclusions may be drawn. Methods/Design The trial is designed as a cluster randomized controlled trial with 20 nursing homes in Saxony and Saxony-Anhalt (Germany) as the units of randomization. Nursing homes will be randomly allocated into 4 study groups consisting of 5 clusters and 90 residents: snoezelen, structured reminiscence therapy, 10-minutes activation or unstructured verbal communication (control group). The purpose is to determine whether the interventions are effective to reduce apathy in long-term care residents with dementia (N = 360) as the main outcome measure. Assessments will be done at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after beginning of the interventions. Discussion This trial will particularly contribute to the evidence on efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions in dementia care. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00653731</p

Evaluation der Effizienzsteigerung der Pflegedokumentation SV16-9002 (EVASIS). Abschlussbericht: Projektträger: GKV-Spitzenverband

Im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit wurden im Jahr 2013 Empfehlungen zur Effizienzsteigerung der Pflegedokumentation entwickelt, die in ein Strukturmodell mündeten, welches 2014 einem ersten Praxistest unterzogen wurde. Seit dem 01. Januar 2015 startete auf Initiative des Beauftragten der Bundesregierung für die Belange von Patientinnen und Patienten sowie Bevollmächtigen für Pflege das Projekt zur flächendeckenden Einführung der neuen Pflegedokumentation Strukturmodell. Bis Anfang Juni 2016 registrierten sich bundesweit knapp 10.000 Pflegedienste und stationäre Pflegeeinrichtungen für die Einführung des neuen Dokumentationssystems. Die Implementierung begleitend soll die Zielerreichung der neuen Pflegedokumentation auf der Grundlage der integrierten Strukturierten Informationssammlung SIS – auch im Hinblick auf die Dokumentationsqualität – wissenschaftlich evaluiert werden