81 research outputs found
Large Kinetic Isotope Effects for the Protonolysis of Metal–Methyl Complexes Are Not Reliable Mechanistic Indicators
Bis(4′-(4-pyridyl)-2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine)ruthenium(II) complexes and their N-alkylated derivatives in catalytic light-driven water oxidation
Hydrogen sulfate salts of [Ru(1)2]2+ where 1 = 4′-(4-pyridyl)-2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine and four N-alkylated derivatives [Ru(L)2]4+ were used as photosensitizers (λmax ∼510 nm) for water oxidation in light driven reactions with peroxydisulfate as a sacrificial electron acceptor and Na10[Co4(H2O)2(α-PW9O34)2] (Co4POM) as the catalyst in sodium borate buffers at pH 8.0 and 9.0. The N-substituents investigated were benzyl (L+ = 2+), ethyl (L+ = 3+), allyl (L+ = 4+) and 4-cyanobenzyl (L+ = 5+). The O2 yield in the presence of [Ru(L)2]4+ (L+ = 2+–4+) was comparable to that obtained in the presence [Ru(bpy)3]2+ (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) using light sources with λmax ≈ 490 nm. The ruthenium(III) complexes [Ru(1)2]3+ and [Ru(L)2]5+ (L+ = 2+–5+) are rather unstable in acidic conditions and could not be isolated. The most efficient photosensitizers [Ru(L)2]5+ (L+ = 2+ and 4+) were the least stable under weakly basic conditions (pH 9.0) with a half-life τ1/2 ∼ 10 ms. The stability of the complexes under photocatalytic turnover conditions is probably controlled by the rate at which ligand L+ is oxidized by Co4POM in its highest oxidation state
Water Oxidation at a Tetraruthenate Core Stabilized by Polyoxometalate Ligands: Experimental and Computational Evidence To Trace the Competent Intermediates
Terminal gold-oxo complexes
In contradiction to current bonding paradigms, two terminal Au-oxo molecular complexes have been synthesized by reaction of AuCl3 with metal oxide-cluster ligands that model redox-active metal oxide surfaces. Use of K10[alpha2-P2W17O61].20H2O and K2WO4 (forming the [A-PW9O34]9- ligand in situ) produces K15H2[Au(O)(OH2)P2W18O68].25H2O (1); use of K10[P2W20O70(OH2)2].22H2O (3) produces K7H2[Au(O)(OH2)P2W20O70(OH2)2].27H2O (2). Complex 1 crystallizes in orthorhombic Fddd, with a=28.594(4) A, b=31.866(4) A, c=38.241(5) A, V=34844(7) A3, Z=16 (final R=0.0540), and complex 2 crystallizes in hexagonal P6(3)/mmc, with a=16.1730(9) A, b=16.1730(9) A, c=19.7659(15) A, V=4477.4(5) A3, Z=2 (final R=0.0634). The polyanion unit in 1 is disorder-free. Very short (approximately 1.76 A) Au-oxo distances are established by both X-ray and 30 K neutron diffraction studies, and the latter confirms oxo and trans aqua (H2O) ligands on Au. Seven findings clarify that Au and not W is present in the Au-oxo position in 1 and 2. Five lines of evidence are consistent with the presence of d8 Au(III) centers that are stabilized by the flanking polytungstate ligands in both 1 and 2: redox titrations, electrochemical measurements, 17 K optical spectra, Au L2 edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and Au-oxo bond distances. Variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility data for crystalline 1 and 2 establish that both solids are diamagnetic, and 31P and 17O NMR spectroscopy confirm that both remain diamagnetic in solution. Both complexes have been further characterized by FT-IR, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and other techniques
Surface Immobilization of a Tetra-Ruthenium Substituted Polyoxometalate Water Oxidation Catalyst Through the Employment of Conducting Polypyrrole and the Layer-by-Layer (LBL) Technique
- …