Ursodeoxycholic acid in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

Background Ursodeoxycholic acid is commonly used to treat intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, yet its largest trial detected minimal benefit for a composite outcome (stillbirth, preterm birth, and neonatal unit admission). We aimed to examine whether ursodeoxycholic acid affects specific adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods In this systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Global Health, MIDIRS, and Cochrane without language restrictions for relevant articles published between database inception, and Jan 1, 2020, using search terms referencing intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, ursodeoxycholic acid, and perinatal outcomes. Eligible studies had 30 or more study participants and reported on at least one individual with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and bile acid concentrations of 40 μmol/L or more. We also included two unpublished cohort studies. Individual participant data were collected from the authors of selected studies. The primary outcome was the prevalence of stillbirth, for which we anticipated there would be insufficient data to achieve statistical power. Therefore, we included a composite of stillbirth and preterm birth as a main secondary outcome. A mixed-effects meta-analysis was done using multi-level modelling and adjusting for bile acid concentration, parity, and multifetal pregnancy. Individual participant data analyses were done for all studies and in different subgroups, which were produced by limiting analyses to randomised controlled trials only, singleton pregnancies only, or two-arm studies only. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019131495. Findings The authors of the 85 studies fulfilling our inclusion criteria were contacted. Individual participant data from 6974 women in 34 studies were included in the meta-analysis, of whom 4726 (67·8%) took ursodeoxycholic acid. Stillbirth occurred in 35 (0·7%) of 5097 fetuses among women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy treated with ursodeoxycholic acid and in 12 (0·6%) of 2038 fetuses among women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy not treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1·04, 95% CI 0·35–3·07; p=0·95). Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment also had no effect on the prevalence of stillbirth when considering only randomised controlled trials (aOR 0·29, 95% CI 0·04–2·42; p=0·25). Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment had no effect on the prevalence of the composite outcome in all studies (aOR 1·28, 95% CI 0·86–1·91; p=0·22), but was associated with a reduced composite outcome when considering only randomised controlled trials (0·60, 0·39–0·91; p=0·016). Interpretation Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment had no significant effect on the prevalence of stillbirth in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, but our analysis was probably limited by the low overall event rate. However, when considering only randomised controlled trials, ursodeoxycholic acid was associated with a reduction in stillbirth in combination with preterm birth, providing evidence for the clinical benefit of antenatal ursodeoxycholic acid treatment.Caroline Ovadia, Jenna Sajous, Paul T Seed, Kajol Patel, Nicholas J Williamson, George Attilakos, Francesco Azzaroli, Yannick Bacq, Linoy Batsry, Kelsey Broom, Romana Brun-Furrer, Laura Bull, Jenny Chambers, Yue Cui, Min Ding, Peter H Dixon, Maria C Estiú, Fergus W Gardiner, Victoria Geenes, Monika Grymowicz, Berrin Günaydin, William M Hague, Christian Haslinger, Yayi Hu, Ugo Indraccolo, Alexander Juusela, Stefan C Kane, Ayse Kebapcilar, Levent Kebapcilar, Katherine Kohari, Jūratė Kondrackienė, Maria P H Koster, Richard H Lee, Xiaohua Liu, Anna Locatelli, Rocio I R Macias, Riza Madazli, Agata Majewska, Kasia Maksym, Jessica A Marathe, Adam Morton, Martijn A Oudijk, Deniz Öztekin, Michael J Peek, Andrew H Shennan, Rachel M Tribe, Valeria Tripodi, Naciye Türk Özterlemez, Tharni Vasavan, L F Audris Wong, Yoav Yinon, Qianwen Zhang, Keren Zloto, Hanns-Ulrich Marschall, Jim Thornton, Lucy C Chappell, Catherine Williamso

Use of SMS texts for facilitating access to online alcohol interventions: a feasibility study

A41 Use of SMS texts for facilitating access to online alcohol interventions: a feasibility study In: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 2017, 12(Suppl 1): A4

Holocene tectonic histories for five islands in the south-central Lau group, south Pacific

Low-level (<30 m) evidence for emergence is reported for five islands along the south-central Lau Ridge, which has a well-documented history of late Cenozoic uplift. Most of the evidence is erosional, some of the lowest is emerged reef and beachrock: all can be linked to higher relative sea levels. Correlations are established between islands and most of the series of emerged shorelines found to exhibit characteristics of coseismically uplifted series elsewhere. Dates for various shorelines allow ages and recurrence intervals of coseismic-uplift events to be tentatively established for all islands. By reconciling this with contemporary sealevel changes, magnitudes of coseismic uplift are obtained for the middle and late Holocene. The islands of Moce and Oneata have experienced fewest coseismic-uplift events with small uplift magnitudes. Four coseismic-uplift events are identified for Lakeba with an average magnitude of 2.63 m and an assumed recurrence interval of 1045 years: no uplift has apparently occurred since 3800 BP. Five coseismic-uplift events are identified for Namuka-i-Lau with an average magnitude of 2.08 m and an assumed recurrence interval of 1045 years: no uplift has apparently occurred since 2360 BP. Three coseismic-uplift events occurred on Nayau, averaging 1.53 m in magnitude and recurring every 1045 years: no uplift has occurred since 2240 BP. The approach used here has implications not only for understanding tectonic history but may eventually prove a useful tool for isolating Holocene sealevel history in tectonically active areas. © 1995, Sage Publications. All rights reserved