9 research outputs found

    Photometric observations of Southern Abell Cluster Redshifts Survey Clusters: Structure of galaxies in the inner region of clusters of galaxies

    Full text link
    We analyze photometric properties of 1384 cluster galaxies as a function of the normalized distance to cluster center. These galaxies were selected in the central region (r/r200r/r_{200} \leq 0.8) of 14 southern Abell clusters chosen from the Southern Abell Cluster Redshifts Survey (SARS). For 507 of these galaxies we also obtained their luminosity profiles. We have studied the morphology-clustercentric distance relation on the basis of the shape parameter nn of the S\'ersic's law. We also have analyzed the presence of a possible segregation in magnitude for both, the galaxy total luminosity and that of their components (i.e. the bulge and the disk). Results show a marginal (2σ2\sigma level) decrease of the total luminosity as a function of normalized radius. However, when bulges are analyzed separately, a significant luminosity segregation is found (3σ3\sigma and 2σ2\sigma for galaxies in projection and member galaxies respectively). The fraction of bulges brighter than MB22M_B \leq -22 is three times larger in the core of clusters than in the outer region. Our analysis of the disk component suggests that disks are, on average, less luminous in the cluster core than at r/r2000.8r/r_{200} \sim 0.8. In addition, we found that the magnitude-size relation as a function of r/r200r/r_{200} indicates (at 2σ2\sigma level) that disks are smaller and centrally brighter in the core of clusters. However, the Kormendy relation (the bulge magnitude-size relation) appears to be independent of environment.Comment: To appear in the A

    Triplets of Quasars at high redshift I: Photometric data

    Full text link
    We have conducted an optical and infrared imaging in the neighbourhoods of 4 triplets of quasars. R, z', J and Ks images were obtained with MOSAIC II and ISPI at Cerro Tololo Interamerican Observatory. Accurate relative photometry and astrometry were obtained from these images for subsequent use in deriving photometric redshifts. We analyzed the homogeneity and depth of the photometric catalog by comparing with results coming from the literature. The good agreement shows that our magnitudes are reliable to study large scale structure reaching limiting magnitudes of R = 24.5, z' = 22.5, J = 20.5 and Ks = 19.0. With this catalog we can study the neighbourhoods of the triplets of quasars searching for galaxy overdensities such as groups and galaxy clusters.Comment: The paper contains 12 figures and 3 table

    Accurate dark matter halo elongation from weak-lensing stacking analysis

    Full text link
    Halo shape estimates that describe their anisotropic mass distribution are valuable parameters that provide useful information on their assembly process and evolution. Measurements of the mean shape estimates for a sample of cluster-size halos, can be used to test halo formation scenarios as well as improving the modelling of potential biases in constraining cosmological parameters using these systems. In this work we test the recovery of halo cluster shapes and masses applying weak lensing stacking techniques, using lensing shear and a new dark matter halo catalogues, derived from the light-cone output of the cosmological simulation MICE-GC. We perform this study by combining the lensing signals obtained for several samples of halos selected according to their mass and redshift, considering the main directions of the dark-matter distributions. In the analysis we test the impact of several potential introduced systematics, such as the adopted modelling, the contribution of the neighbouring mass distribution, miscentering and misalignment effects. Our results show that, when some considerations regarding the halo relaxation state are taken into account, the lensing semi-axis ratio estimates are in agreement within a 5%5\% with the mean shapes of the projected dark-matter particle distribution of the stacked halos. The presented methodology provides a useful tool to derive reliable shapes of galaxy clusters and to contrast them with those expected from numerical simulations. Furthermore, our proposed modelling, that takes into account the contribution of neighbouring halos, allows to constraint the elongation of the surrounding mass distribution.Comment: 15 pages, 8 figures, submitted to MNRA

    The PAU survey: close galaxy pairs identification and analysis

    Get PDF
    Galaxy pairs constitute the initial building blocks of galaxy evolution, which is driven through merger events and interactions. Thus, the analysis of these systems can be valuable in understanding galaxy evolution and studying structure formation. In this work, we present a new publicly available catalogue of close galaxy pairs identified using photometric redshifts provided by the Physics of the Accelerating Universe Survey (PAUS). To efficiently detect them, we take advantage of the high-precision photo−z (σ68 < 0.02) and apply an identification algorithm previously tested using simulated data. This algorithm considers the projected distance between the galaxies (rp < 50 kpc), the projected velocity difference (ΔV < 3500 km s−1) and an isolation criterion to obtain the pair sample. We applied this technique to the total sample of galaxies provided by PAUS and to a subset with high-quality redshift estimates. Finally, the most relevant result we achieved was determining the mean mass for several subsets of galaxy pairs selected according to their total luminosity, colour, and redshift, using galaxy–galaxy lensing estimates. For pairs selected from the total sample of PAUS with a mean r-band luminosity 1010.6 h−2 L⊙, we obtain a mean mass of M200 = 1012.2 h−1 M⊙, compatible with the mass–luminosity ratio derived for elliptical galaxies. We also study the mass-to-light ratio M/L as a function of the luminosity L and find a lower M/L (or steeper slope with L) for pairs than the one extrapolated from the measurements in groups and galaxy clusters.The PAU Survey is partially supported by MINECO under grants CSD2007-00060, AYA2015-71825, ESP2017-89838, PGC2018-094773, PGC2018-102021, PID2019-111317GB, SEV-2016-0588, SEV-2016-0597,MDM-2015-0509 and Juan de la Cierva fellowship and LACEGAL and EWC Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant numbers 734374 and 776247 with ERDF funds from the EU Horizon 2020 Programme, some of which include ERDF funds from the European Union. IEEC and IFAE are partially funded by the CERCA and Beatriu de Pinos program of the Generalitat de Catalunya. Funding for PAUS has also been provided by Durham University (via the ERC StG DEGAS-259586), ETH Zurich, Leiden University (via ERC StG ADULT-279396 and Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) Vici grant 639.043.512), University College London and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the grant agreement number 776247 EWC. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement number 734374. This work was also partially supported by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET, Argentina) and the Secretaría de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (SeCyT-UNC, Argentina). This work has been also partially supported by the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange (Bekker grant BPN/BEK/2021/1/00298/DEC/1), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement (number 754510). H. Hildebrandt is supported by a Heisenberg grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Hi 1495/5-1) as well as an ERC consolidator grant (number 770935). A. Wittje is supported by the DFG (SFB 1491).Peer reviewe

    New catalogue of dark-matter halo properties identified in MICE-GC -- I. Analysis of density profile distributions

    Full text link
    Constraints on dark matter halo masses from weak gravitational lensing can be improved significantly by using additional information about the morphology of their density distribution, leading to tighter cosmological constraints derived from the halo mass function. This work is the first of two in which we investigate the accuracy of halo morphology and mass measurements in 2D and 3D. To this end, we determine several halo physical properties in the MICE-Grand Challenge dark matter only simulation. We present a public catalogue of these properties that includes density profiles and shape parameters measured in 2D and 3D, the halo centre at the peak of the 3D density distribution as well as the gravitational and kinetic energies and angular momentum vectors. The density profiles are computed using spherical and ellipsoidal radial bins, taking into account the halo shapes. We also provide halo concentrations and masses derived from fits to 2D and 3D density profiles using NFW and Einasto models for halos with more than 10001000 particles (3×1013h1M\gtrsim 3 \times 10^{13} h^{-1} M_{\odot}). We find that the Einasto model provides better fits compared to NFW, regardless of the halo relaxation state and shape. The mass and concentration parameters of the 3D density profiles derived from fits to the 2D profiles are in general biased. Similar biases are obtained when constraining mass and concentrations using a weak-lensing stacking analysis. We show that these biases depend on the radial range and density profile model adopted in the fitting procedure, but not on the halo shape.Comment: 15 pages, 16 Figures, submitted to MNRA

    Observations of the First Electromagnetic Counterpart to a Gravitational-wave Source by the TOROS Collaboration

    Get PDF
    We present the results of prompt optical follow-up of the electromagnetic counterpart of the gravitational-wave event GW170817 by the Transient Optical Robotic Observatory of the South Collaboration. We detected highly significant dimming in the light curves of the counterpart (Δg = 0.17 ± 0.03 mag, Δr = 0.14 ± 0.02 mag, Δi = 0.10 ± 0.03 mag) over the course of only 80 minutes of observations obtained ∼35 hr after the trigger with the T80-South telescope. A second epoch of observations, obtained ∼59 hr after the event with the EABA 1.5 m telescope, confirms the fast fading nature of the transient. The observed colors of the counterpart suggest that this event was a "blue kilonova" relatively free of lanthanides.Fil: Díaz, Mario Claudio. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Macri, Lucas M.. Texas A&M University; Estados UnidosFil: Garcia Lambas, Diego Rodolfo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Mendes de Oliveira, C.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; BrasilFil: Nilo Castellon, Jose Luis Emilio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; Argentina. Universidad de La Serena; ChileFil: Ribeiro, T.. Universidade Federal de Sergipe; BrasilFil: Sánchez, Bruno Orlando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Schoenell, W.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; BrasilFil: Abramo, L. R.. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Brasil. Universidade de Sao Paulo; BrasilFil: Akras, S.. Ministério de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacao. Observatorio Nacional; BrasilFil: Alcaniz, J. S.. Ministério de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacao. Observatorio Nacional; BrasilFil: Artola, R.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Beroiz, Martin Isidro Ramon. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Bonoli, S.. Centro de Estudios de Física del Cosmos de Aragón; EspañaFil: Cabral, Juan Bautista. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Camuccio, R.. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Castillo, M.. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Chavushyan, Vahram. Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica; MéxicoFil: Coelho, P.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; BrasilFil: Colazo, Juan Cruz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Costa Duarte, M. V.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; BrasilFil: Cuevas Larenas, H.. Universidad de La Serena; ChileFil: DePoy, D. L.. Texas A&M University; Estados UnidosFil: Dominguez Romero, Mariano Javier de Leon. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Dultzin, Debora. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. Instituto de Astronomia; MéxicoFil: Fernández, D.. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; ChileFil: García, J.. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Girardini, C.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Goncalves Gama, Diana Renata. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; BrasilFil: Gonçalves, T. S.. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; BrasilFil: Gurovich, Sebastian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Jiménez Teja, Y.. Ministério de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacao. Observatorio Nacional; BrasilFil: Kanaan, A.. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; BrasilFil: Lares, M.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Lopes de Oliveira, R.. Universidade Federal de Sergipe; Brasil. National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Estados UnidosFil: López Cruz, Omar. Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica; MéxicoFil: Marshall, J. L.. Texas A&M University; Estados UnidosFil: Melia, R.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Molino, A.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; BrasilFil: Padilla, Nelson. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; ChileFil: Peñuela, T.. University of Texas; Estados Unidos. Ludwig Maximilian Universität Munich; AlemaniaFil: Placco, V. M.. University of Notre Dame; Estados Unidos. Center for the Evolution of the Elements. Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics; Estados UnidosFil: Quiñones, Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Rivera, A. Ramírez. Universidad de La Serena; ChileFil: Renzi, Victor Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Riguccini, L.. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; BrasilFil: Ríos López, Emmanuel. Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica; MéxicoFil: Rodriguez, Horacio Oscar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Sampedro, L.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; BrasilFil: Schneiter, Ernesto Matías. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Sodré, Laerte. Universidade de Sao Paulo; BrasilFil: Starck Cuffini, Manuel Darío. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Torres Flores, S.. Universidad de La Serena; ChileFil: Tornatore, M.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Zadrożny, A.. University of Texas; Estados Unido
    corecore