Procedure-specific peripheral nerve blocks

Cork University Hospital, Ireland, Congresul II Internaţional al Societăţii Anesteziologie Reanimatologie din Republica Moldova 27-30 august 2009Peripheral nerve blockade [PNB] is an anaesthetic technique, which renders specific body parts insensate to surgical stimuli while permitting the patient to remain conscious. Peripheral nerve blockade may be used as a sole anaesthetic technique or as an additional component of general anaesthesia. Significant benefits have been associated with the use of peripheral nerve block for both patients and the healthcare institutions. Nonetheless, for a variety of reasons, nerve block techniques are under-utilised in current anaesthetic practice. The Department of Anaesthesia at Cork University Hospital Ireland has, as part of an international consortium (including Bulgarian an Greek partners), been awarded EU funding under the Leonardo da Vinci Lifelong Learning Programme. to develop an integrated web-based platform providing real time, remote interactive training in perioperative care of patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. As part of the project, we performed needs analyses of clinicians in this area, and we are going to apply the e-learning system to training in procedures such as Peripheral Nerve Blockade. The system will be pilot tested at Cork University Hospital and other UCC affiliated hospitals. The project is of two years duration ending in November 2010 (http://onlineortho. ath.cx/). This internet-based performance support system is aimed at providing just-in-time, just enough and at the point of need support to learners in remote areas in order to deal with complex authentic tasks in the context of problem-based learning

The effect of simulation-based training on initial performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in a clinical setting – a pilot study

BACKGROUND: In preparing novice anesthesiologists to perform their first ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade, we hypothesized that virtual reality simulation-based training offers an additional learning benefit over standard training. We carried out pilot testing of this hypothesis using a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: We planned to recruit 20 anesthesiologists who had no experience of performing ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Initial standardized training, reflecting current best available practice was provided to all participating trainees. Trainees were randomized into one of two groups; (i) to undertake additional simulation-based training or (ii) no further training. On completion of their assigned training, trainees attempted their first ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade. Two experts, blinded to the trainees’ group allocation, assessed the performance of trainees using validated tools. RESULTS: This study was discontinued following a planned interim analysis, having recruited 10 trainees. This occurred because it became clear that the functionality of the available simulator was insufficient to meet our training requirements. There were no statistically significant difference in clinical performance, as assessed using the sum of a Global Rating Score and a checklist score, between simulation-based training [mean 32.9 (standard deviation 11.1)] and control trainees [31.5 (4.2)] (p = 0.885). CONCLUSIONS: We have described a methodology for assessing the effectiveness of a simulator, during its development, by means of a randomized controlled trial. We believe that the learning acquired will be useful if performing future trials on learning efficacy associated with simulation based training in procedural skills. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01965314. Registered October 17th 2013

A cross-sectional survey of anaesthesia-related expectations amongst patients awaiting upper limb trauma surgery

Background and aims: Little is known regarding patients’ anaesthesia-related expectations when presenting for upper limb trauma surgery. Methods: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional survey exploring prior anaesthetic experience, anaesthesia-related knowledge, anaesthesia expectations, the preoperative visit and factors likely to influence anaesthesia choice. The survey was completed by 192 patients. Results: Anaesthetists were identified as doctors by 52%; 53% were unaware of their planned anaesthesia; 58% indicated likely acceptance of regional anaesthesia. Information regarding anaesthesia originated mostly from surgeons (65%); 93% had not seen an anaesthetist at the time of the survey. Most believed anaesthesia involved ‘going to sleep’ (82%) and 71% expected to receive general anaesthesia. The preoperative anaesthesia visit was rated as important by 65% of patients. 78% indicated that provision of information would increase the likelihood of accepting regional anaesthesia. Reducing postoperative pain and nausea would influence 80% in choosing a regional technique. Conclusion: A knowledge deficit exists regarding anaesthesia modalities for upper limb trauma surgery

Microstream capnography during conscious sedation with midazolam for oral surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

Objectives/Aims: There has been no dentistry-specific published data supporting the use of monitoring with capnography for dental sedation. Our aim was to determine if adding capnography to standard monitoring during conscious sedation with midazolam would decrease the incidence of hypoxaemia. Materials and Methods: A randomised controlled trial was conducted in which all patients (ASA I and II) received standard monitoring and capnography, but were randomised to whether staff could view the capnography (intervention) or were blinded to it (control). The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxaemia (SpO2⩽94%). Results: We enrolled 190 patients, mean age 31 years (range, 14–62 years). There were 93 patients in the capnography group and 97 in the control group. The mean cumulative dose of midazolam titrated was 6.94 mg (s.d., 2.31; range, 3–20 mg). Six (3%) patients, three in each group, required temporary supplemental oxygen. There was no statistically significant difference between the capnography and control groups for the incidence of hypoxaemia: 34.4 vs 39.2% (P=0.4962, OR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.45–1.47). Conclusions: We were unable to confirm an additive role for capnography to prevent hypoxaemia during conscious sedation with midazolam for patients not routinely administered supplemental oxygen

A comparison of three techniques (local anesthetic deposited circumferential to vs. above vs. below the nerve) for ultrasound guided femoral nerve block

Background: Fractured neck of femur generally requires operative fixation and is a common cause of admission to hospital. The combination of femoral nerve block and spinal anesthesia is a common anesthetic technique used to facilitate the surgical procedure. The optimal disposition of local anesthetic (LA) relative the femoral nerve (FN) has not been defined. Our hypothesis was: that the deposition of LA relative to the FN influences the quality of analgesia for positioning of the patient for performance of spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was verbal rating (VRS) pain scores 0–10 assessed immediately after positioning the patient to perform spinal anesthesia. Methods: With Institutional ethical approval and having obtained written informed consent from each, 52 patients were studied. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01527812). Patients were randomly allocated to undergo to one of three groups namely: intention to deposit lidocaine 2% (15 ml) i. above (Group A), ii. below (Group B), iii. circumferential (Group C) to the FN. A blinded observer assessed i. the sensory nerve block (cold) in the areas of the terminal branches of the FN and ii. VRS pain scores on passive movement from block completion at 5 minutes intervals for 30 minutes. Immediately after positioning the patient for spinal anesthesia, VRS pain scores were recorded. Results: Pain VRS scores during positioning were similar in the three groups [Above group/Below group/Circumferential group: 2(0–9)/0(0–10)/3(0–10), median(range), p:0.32]. The block was deemed to have failed in 20%, 47% and 12% in the Above group, Below group and Circumferential group respectively. The median number of needle passes was greater in the Circumferential group compared with the Above group (p:0.009). Patient satisfaction was greatest in the Circumferential group [mean satisfaction scores were 83.5(19.8)/88.1(20.5)/93.8(12.3), [mean(SD), p=0.04] in the Above, Below and Circumferential groups respectively. Conclusions: We conclude that there is no clinical advantage to attempting to deposit LA circumferential to the femoral nerve (relative to depositing LA either above or below the nerve), during femoral nerve block in this setting

A year in review in Minerva Anestesiologica 2014

Year in revie

Pain after upper limb surgery under peripheral nerve block is associated with gut microbiome composition and diversity

peer-reviewedGut microbiota play a role in certain pain states. Hence, these microbiota also influence somatic pain. We aimed to determine if there was an association between gut microbiota (composition and diversity) and postoperative pain. Patients (n = 20) undergoing surgical fixation of distal radius fracture under axillary brachial plexus block were studied. Gut microbiota diversity and abundance were analysed for association with: (i) a verbal pain rating scale of < 4/10 throughout the first 24 h after surgery (ii) a level of pain deemed “acceptable” by the patient during the first 24 h following surgery (iii) a maximum self-reported pain score during the first 24 h postoperatively and (iv) analgesic consumption during the first postoperative week. Analgesic consumption was inversely correlated with the Shannon index of alpha diversity. There were also significant differences, at the genus level (including Lachnospira), with respect to pain being “not acceptable” at 24 h postoperatively. Porphyromonas was more abundant in the group reporting an acceptable pain level at 24 h. An inverse correlation was noted between abundance of Collinsella and maximum self-reported pain score with movement. We have demonstrated for the first time that postoperative pain is associated with gut microbiota composition and diversity. Further work on the relationship between the gut microbiome and somatic pain may offer new therapeutic targets

Recommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia: an expert panel Delphi consensus project

Background and objectives: Documentation is important for quality improvement, education, and research. There is currently a lack of recommendations regarding key aspects of documentation in regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to establish recommendations for documentation in regional anesthesia. Methods: Following the formation of the executive committee and a directed literature review, a long list of potential documentation components was created. A modified Delphi process was then employed to achieve consensus amongst a group of international experts in regional anesthesia. This consisted of 2 rounds of anonymous electronic voting and a final virtual round table discussion with live polling on items not yet excluded or accepted from previous rounds. Progression or exclusion of potential components through the rounds was based on the achievement of strong consensus. Strong consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement and weak consensus as 50%-74% agreement. Results: Seventy-seven collaborators participated in both rounds 1 and 2, while 50 collaborators took part in round 3. In total, experts voted on 83 items and achieved a strong consensus on 51 items, weak consensus on 3 and rejected 29. Conclusion: By means of a modified Delphi process, we have established expert consensus on documentation in regional anesthesia