10 research outputs found

    DĂ©veloppement et Ă©valuation d'une intervention infirmiĂšre virtuelle sur mesure visant Ă  faciliter l'autogestion de la douleur aprĂšs une chirurgie cardiaque

    Get PDF
    Plusieurs Ă©tudes ont dĂ©montrĂ© que prĂ©s de deux tiers des patients subissant une chirurgie cardiaque souffrent de douleur d’intensitĂ© modĂ©rĂ©e Ă  sĂ©vĂšre. Ces niveaux de douleur semblent ĂȘtre partiellement expliquĂ©s par la prĂ©sence de barriĂšres individuelles face au soulagement de la douleur. Le savoir acquis sur les cognitions associĂ©es Ă  la douleur ne semble pas avoir Ă©tĂ© traduit dans de nouvelles approches Ă©ducatives face Ă  la douleur aiguĂ«. Le but du projet doctoral Ă©tait 1) de dĂ©velopper une intervention visant Ă  faciliter l’autogestion de la douleur postopĂ©ratoire aprĂšs une chirurgie cardiaque et, 2) d’en Ă©valuer l’acceptabilitĂ© et la faisabilitĂ©, ainsi que le potentiel d’efficacitĂ© sur le soulagement de la douleur de patients subissant une chirurgie cardiaque. Le dĂ©veloppement de l’iintervention SOULAGE-TAVIE a inclus quatre Ă©tapes fondĂ©es sur les savoirs clinique, empirique et thĂ©orique et inspirĂ©es de plusieurs Ă©crits mĂ©thodologiques. SOULAGE-TAVIE consiste en une session prĂ©opĂ©ratoire Ă©ducative sur la gestion de la douleur post-chirurgie cardiaque d’approximativement 30 minutes sur un ordinateur, dispensĂ©e sur mesure en fonction d’un algorithme. Deux renforcements cliniques en personne sont aussi offerts en phase postopĂ©ratoire. L’évaluation de l’intervention consistait en un essai clinique pilote Ă  rĂ©partition alĂ©atoire incluant 60 participants rĂ©partis entre le groupe expĂ©rimental (GE : SOULAGE-TAVIE) et le groupe contrĂŽle (GC : soins usuels incluant un feuillet d’information). Les donnĂ©es Ă©taient recueillies au moment de l’admission et dans les sept jours postopĂ©ratoires. SOULAGE-TAVIE a Ă©tĂ© jugĂ©e comme acceptable et faisable. De plus, les participants du GE n’ont pas expĂ©rimentĂ© une douleur de plus faible intensitĂ© mais ils ont rapportĂ© significativement moins d’interfĂ©rence de la douleur avec la toux et la respiration profonde, ont dĂ©montrĂ© moins de barriĂšres face Ă  la gestion de la douleur et ont consommĂ© plus d’opiacĂ©s. Cette Ă©tude pilote procure des rĂ©sultats prometteurs sur les bĂ©nĂ©fices potentiels de cette nouvelle approche sur mesure utilisant les technologies de l’information et de la communication (TIC). L’autonomisation des personnes est cruciale et complĂ©mentaire pour soutenir le soulagement de la douleur dans le contexte actuel de soins.Several studies have shown that many patients undergoing a cardiac surgery suffer from moderate to severe pain. These levels of pain may be explained by individual barriers toward pain relief. Knowledge acquired on pain-related cognitions has not been translated into new approaches. The aim of the doctoral project was 1) to develop an intervention to facilitate the self-management of postoperative pain after cardiac surgery and, 2) to assess its the acceptability and feasibility and to investigate its efficacy potential on pain relief in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The development of SOULAGE-TAVIE included four steps based on clinical, empirical and theoretical knowledge and inspired by diverse methodological considerations. SOULAGE-TAVIE consists in a 30-minute computer-tailored preoperative educational session about postoperative pain management, tailored according to an algorithm. Two short reinforcements are provided in person. The evaluation of SOULAGE-TAVIE consisted in a pilot randomized controlled trial including 60 participants assigned to the experimental group (EG: SOULAGE-TAVIE) and the control group (CG: usual care including educational pamphlet). Data were collected at the time of admission and across Day 1 to 7 after surgery. The results provide preliminary support for the acceptability and feasibility of a tailored and virtual intervention. The results revealed that patients of the EG did not experience less intense pain but they reported significantly less pain interference when breathing/coughing, exhibited fewer pain-related barriers, and consumed more opioid medication. This pilot study provides promising results to support the potential benefits of this new web-tailored approach. Patient empowerment is complementary yet crucial in the current context of care and may contribute to improve pain relief

    The effect of psychological interventions on the prevention of chronic pain in adults: a systematic review protocol

    No full text
    Abstract Background Numerous psychological risk and protective factors have been identified as contributing to or preventing the development of the prevalent issue of chronic pain. Systematic reviews of studies on psychological interventions that tackle these factors have shown limited effects on chronic pain. Therefore, implementing psychological interventions before pain becomes chronic has been put forward. However, the efficacy of such interventions in preventing the transition from acute to chronic pain has not yet been systematically assessed. Methods The aims of this systematic review are to assess the effects of psychological interventions applied in the acute pain phase on pain severity as well as on physical, psychological, and social functions at 3 months and beyond. Randomized controlled trials including psychological intervention as a treatment of primary interest and participants with pain of less than 3 months duration will be considered. The following comparisons will be undertaken: psychological interventions with (1) standard treatment, (2) information, (3) waiting-list, and (4) active treatment. The primary outcome will be pain severity using indicators such the presence or absence of pain and self-report measures such as the numeric pain intensity rating scale. Secondary outcomes will include pain-related disability, mood, coping with pain, quality of life, health care utilization, and work capability. A systematic review of English and French articles in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be conducted without date restriction. Extracted data will include demographics and clinical characteristics, sample size, intervention and control group types, assessment tools used, time interval of measurement, fidelity of the intervention, and attrition rate. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) will be used to assess treatment effects. Discussion This systematic review is the first in examining the effects of psychological interventions implemented in the acute pain phase with the objective of preventing chronic pain. Results of this systematic review could provide information on psychological intervention characteristics that are most helpful for individuals with pain and guidance as to when such interventions should be applied in the continuum of care. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD4201604931

    Additional file 1: of The effect of tailored Web-based interventions on pain in adults: a systematic review protocol

    No full text
    PRISMA-P 2015 checklist. The PRISMA framework will be used to ensure the transparent reporting of this systematic review including the flow diagram. (DOCX 35.5 kb

    My pain coach ::a mobile system with tangible interface for pain assessment

    No full text
    Pain assessment is an essential first step in planning for and providing pain management. Access to effective pain management programs is often limited, due to scarcity of services. Other barriers to treatment include physical symptoms that limit mobility, distance from a clinic, transportation requirements and cost constraints. In response to these barriers to service delivery, the demand for online health resources is growing. However, current solutions present a number of shortcomings, in particular when referring to usability and accessibility. This paper presents the vision of the My Pain Coach system and the first prototype generated as the result of the first iteration of the development process. This prototype is based on a smartphone app and presents two different interfaces: a force-sensitive touchscreen, and a tangible interface based on a textile mat. A preliminary usability evaluation has been conducted and the results show that these interfaces are perceived as excellent from a usability point of view. Nevertheless, further development and testing are still required for the tangible interface
    corecore