174 research outputs found

    What is Quality and Does it Matter?

    Get PDF

    Thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy debate: the pro argument

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Controversy persists about the role of VATS lobectomy for patients with lung cancer. This is particularly true in Europe, where VATS (video assisted thoracic surgery) lobectomy is performed for lung cancer less often than in the USA or Japan. This article reviews existing data comparing the results of VATS vs. open lobectomy for the treatment of lung cancer in order to provide a scientific basis for a rational assessment of this issue

    Evaluation and Treatment of Stage I and II Thymoma

    Get PDF
    Abstract:Thymomas are relatively uncommon. Nevertheless, an accumulation of studies (mostly retrospective, single-institution series) have made it important to approach this disease in a knowledgeable, evidence-based fashion. This begins with the approach to evaluation of a patient with an anterior mediastinal mass, in whom a reliable clinical diagnosis is usually possible in experienced centers. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment, and every effort must be made to achieve a complete resection

    Sublobar Resection of Ground Glass Opacity—Great Data, but can I have More?

    Get PDF

    Anatomy, Biology and Concepts, Pertaining to Lung Cancer Stage Classification

    Get PDF
    AbstractThe proposed lung cancer stage classification system remains grounded in anatomic characteristics, although the large patient database contributing to this revision has dramatically expanded our body of knowledge. Predictably this has led to increased complexity due to the identification of an increasing number of subpopulations of patients. Patterns of clinical presentation characterizing these subgroups may provide clues about the propensity of tumors within a subgroup toward a particular pattern of biologic behavior. This article explores concepts regarding tumor biology that can be applied to the anatomically based new staging system

    Thoroughness of Mediastinal Staging in Stage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

    Get PDF
    IntroductionGuidelines recommend that patients with clinical stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergo histologic confirmation of pathologic lymph nodes. Studies have suggested that invasive mediastinal staging is underutilized, although practice patterns have not been rigorously evaluated.MethodsWe used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database to identify patients with stage IIIA NSCLC diagnosed from 1998 through 2005. Invasive staging and use of positron emission tomography (PET) scanning were assessed using Medicare claims. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics associated with use of invasive staging.ResultsOf 7583 stage IIIA NSCLC patients, 1678 (22%) underwent invasive staging. Patients who received curative intent cancer treatment were more likely to undergo invasive staging than patients who did not receive cancer-specific therapy (30% versus 9.8%, adjusted odds ratio, 3.31; 95% confidence interval, 2.78–3.95). The oldest patients (age, 85–94 years) were less likely to receive invasive staging than the youngest (age, 67–69 years; 27.6% versus 11.9%; odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.34–0.61). Sex, marital status, income, and race were not associated with the use of the invasive staging. The use of invasive staging was stable throughout the study period, despite an increase in the use of PET scanning from less than 10% of patients before 2000 to almost 70% in 2005.ConclusionNearly 80% of Medicare beneficiaries with stage IIIA NSCLC do not receive guideline adherent mediastinal staging; this failure cannot be entirely explained by patient factors or a reliance on PET imaging. Incentives to encourage use of invasive staging may improve care

    Paraneoplastic Syndromes and Thymic Malignancies: An Examination of the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group Retrospective Database

    Get PDF
    Introduction Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are associated with paraneoplastic autoimmune (PN/AI) syndromes. Myasthenia gravis is the most common PN/AI syndrome associated with TETs. Methods The International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) retrospective database was examined to determine (i) baseline and treatment characteristics associated with PN/AI syndromes and (ii) the prognostic role of PN/AI syndromes for patients with TETs. The competing risks model was used to estimate cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS). A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis. Results 6670 patients with known PN/AI syndrome status were identified from 1951-2012. PN/AI syndromes were associated with younger age, female sex, type B1 thymoma, earlier stage, and an increased rate of total thymectomy and complete resection status. There was a statistically significant lower CIR in the PN/AI (+) group compared to the PN/AI (-) group (10-year 17.3% vs. 21.2%, respectively, p=0.0003). The OS was improved in the PN/AI (+) group compared to the PN/AI (-) group (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.74, P<0.0001, median OS 21.6 years versus 17.0 years, respectively). However, in the multivariate model for recurrence-free survival and OS, PN/AI syndrome was not an independent prognostic factor. Discussion Previously, there has been mixed data regarding the prognostic role of PN/AI syndromes for patients with TETs. Here, using the largest dataset in the world for TETs, PN/AI syndromes were associated with favorable features (i.e. earlier stage, complete resection status) but were not an independent prognostic factor for TETs

    ESTS guidelines for intraoperative lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer

    Get PDF
    The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) organized a workshop dealing with lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer. The objective of this workshop was to develop guidelines for definitions and the surgical procedures of intraoperative lymph node staging, and the pathologic evaluation of resected lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Relevant peer-reviewed publications on the subjects, the experience of the participants, and the opinion of the ESTS members contributing on line, were used to reach a consensus. Systematic nodal dissection is recommended in all cases to ensure complete resection. Lobe-specific systematic nodal dissection is acceptable for peripheral squamous T1 tumors, if hilar and interlobar nodes are negative on frozen section studies; it implies removal of, at least, three hilar and interlobar nodes and three mediastinal nodes from three stations in which the subcarinal is always included. Selected lymph node biopsies and sampling are justified to prove nodal involvement when resection is not possible. Pathologic evaluation includes all lymph nodes resected separately and those remaining in the lung specimen. Sections are done at the site of gross abnormalities. If macroscopic inspection does not detect any abnormal site, 2-mm slices of the nodes in the longitudinal plane are recommended. Routine search for micrometastases or isolated tumor cells in hematoxylin-eosin negative nodes would be desirable. Randomized controlled trials to evaluate adjuvant therapies for patients with these conditions are recommended. The adherence to these guidelines will standardize the intraoperative lymph node staging and pathologic evaluation, and improve pathologic staging, which will help decide on the best adjuvant therap
    • …
    corecore