18 research outputs found

    EFFECTS OF THE BENCH SHIRT ON SAGITTAL BAR PATH

    Get PDF
    Powerlifting, like many sports, uses performance-enhancing equipment. The purpose of this study was to explore whether wearing a bench shirt would alter the natural mechanics of the bench press. Participants (n=5) completed two bench press tests; the first was raw (no shirt), while the second utilized the bench shirt. Vertical bar path ranges were significantly smaller in the shirted condition compared to the raw condition. Significant differences were found between the optimal and observed values while benching during the raw condition, but no significant differences were found in the shirted condition. Assuming a straight line bar path is optimal, findings suggest the bench shirt may provide a more efficient bar path, improving load capability and decreasing the forces that act on the shoulder and thus the likelihood of injury

    When here becomes there: attentional distribution modulates foveal bias in peripheral localization

    Get PDF
    Much research concerning attention has focused on changes in the perceptual qualities of objects while attentional states were varied. Here, we address a complementary question—namely, how perceived location can be altered by the distribution of sustained attention over the visual field. We also present a new way to assess the effects of distributing spatial attention across the visual field. We measured magnitude judgments relative to an aperture edge to test perceived location across a large range of eccentricities (30°), and manipulated spatial uncertainty in target locations to examine perceived location under three different distributions of spatial attention. Across three experiments, the results showed that changing the distribution of sustained attention significantly alters known foveal biases in peripheral localization

    Comparison of Back Squat Kinematics Between Barefoot and Shoe Conditions

    No full text
    The purpose of the study was to compare the kinematics of the barbell back squat between two footwear conditions and to evaluate the results with respect to recommendations put forth in the National Strength and Conditioning Association position statement for proper squat technique. Twenty-five subjects with 5 - 7 years of resistance training experience participated. Selected kinematics were measured during a 60% of 1RM barbell back squat in both barefoot and athletic shoe conditions. Paired-samples T tests were performed to compare the two footwear conditions. Significant differences were found in trunk (50.72±8.27 vs. 46.97±9.87), thigh (20.94±10.19 vs. 24.42±11.11), and shank segment angles (59.47±5.54 vs. 62.75±6.17), and knee joint angles (81.33±13.70 vs. 88.32±15.45) at the peak descent position. Based on the kinematic analysis of the barefoot squat, two kinematic advantages are countered by two disadvantages. Coaches and instructors should acknowledge these results with respect to a performer\u27s capability, and be aware the advantages and disadvantages of barefoot squat from a kinematic perspective
    corecore