13 research outputs found

    Besoins et ressentis des aidants en oncogériatrie, utilité d’un serious game

    No full text
    International audienceFaced with an ageing population, carers are real allies and partners who are essential to the smooth running of the care of elderly patients. The objective of this study was to analyse their needs in oncogeriatrics, in order to verify the relevance of developing a serious game to support them. Although the need for better support for carers in oncogeriatrics was recognized, they especially value the need for human exchanges

    A Two-Step Frailty Assessment Strategy in Older Patients With Solid Tumors: A Decision Curve Analysis

    Get PDF
    International audiencePURPOSE: The intended clinical value of frailty screening is to identify unfit patients needing geriatric assessment (GA) and to prevent unnecessary GA in fit patients. These hypotheses rely on the sensitivity and specificity of screening tests, but they have not been verified. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of outpatients age >/= 70 years with prostate, breast, colorectal, or lung cancer included in the ELCAPA cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02884375) between February 2007 and December 2019. The diagnostic accuracy of the G8 Geriatric Screening Tool (G8) and modified G8 scores for identifying unfit patients was determined on the basis of GA results. We used decision curve analysis to calculate the benefit of frailty screening for detecting unfit patients and avoiding unnecessary GA in fit patients across different threshold probabilities. RESULTS: We included 1,648 patients (median age, 81 years), and 1,428 (87%) were unfit. The sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 85% (95% CI, 84 to 87) and 59% (95% CI, 57 to 61) for G8, and 86% (95% CI, 84 to 87) and 60% (95% CI, 58 to 63) for the modified G8 score. For decision curve analysis, the net benefit (NB) for identifying unfit patients were 0.72 for G8, 0.72 for the modified G8, and 0.82 for GA at a threshold probability of 0.25. At a threshold probability of 0.33, the NBs were 0.71, 0.72, and 0.80, respectively. At a threshold probability of 0.5, the NBs were 0.68, 0.69, and 0.73, respectively. No screening tool reduced unnecessary GA in fit patients at predefined threshold probabilities. CONCLUSION: Although frailty screening tests showed good diagnostic accuracy, screening showed no clinical benefits over the GA-for-all strategy. NB approaches, in addition to diagnostic accuracy, are necessary to assess the clinical value of tests

    Treatment of systemic necrotizing vasculitides in patients aged sixty-five years or older: results of a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial of corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide-based induction therapy

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate a new therapeutic strategy, with rapid corticosteroid dose tapering and limited cyclophosphamide (CYC) exposure, for older patients with systemic necrotizing vasculitides (SNVs; polyarteritis nodosa [PAN], granulomatosis with polyangiitis [Wegnener's] [GPA], microscopic polyangiitis [MPA], or eosinophilic GPA [Churg-Strauss] [EGPA]). METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial comprising patients ≥65 years old and newly diagnosed as having SNV was conducted. The experimental treatment consisted of corticosteroids for ∼9 months and a maximum of six 500-mg fixed-dose intravenous (IV) CYC pulses, every 2-3 weeks, then maintenance azathioprine or methotrexate. The control treatment included ∼26 months of corticosteroids for all patients, combined with 500 mg/m(2) IV CYC pulses, every 2-3 weeks until remission, then maintenance for all patients with GPA or MPA and for those with EGPA or PAN with a Five-Factors Score (FFS) of ≥1. Randomization used a 1:1 ratio computer-generated list and was performed centrally with sealed opaque envelopes. The primary outcome measure was ≥1 serious adverse event (SAE) occurring within 3 years of followup. Secondary outcome measures included remission and relapse rates. RESULTS: Among the 108 patients randomized, 4 were excluded (early consent withdrawal or protocol violation). Mean ± SD age at diagnosis was 75.2 ± 6.3 years. Analysis at 3 years included 53 patients (21 GPA, 21 MPA, 8 EGPA, and 3 PAN) in the experimental arm and 51 patients (15 GPA, 23 MPA, 6 EGPA, and 7 PAN) in the conventional arm. In total, 32 (60%) versus 40 (78%) had ≥1 SAE (P = 0.04), most frequently infections; 6 (11%) versus 7 (14%) failed to achieve remission (P = 0.71); 9 (17%) versus 12 (24%) died (P = 0.41); and 20 (44%) of 45 versus 12 (29%) of 41 survivors in remission experienced a relapse (P = 0.15). CONCLUSION: For older SNV patients, an induction regimen limiting corticosteroid exposure and with fixed low-dose IV CYC pulses reduces SAEs in comparison to conventional therapy, and does not affect the remission rate. Three-year relapse rates remain high for both arms.status: publishe
    corecore